地球科学进展 doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2026.043   cstr: 32269.14.adearth.CN62-1091/P.2026.043

   

水资源深部地质贮存地质环境效应研究框架
隋旺华1,2,高亮3,林沛元4,陈歌1,2*,张莉1,2,徐智敏1,2,梁晋熙1,2   
  1. (1. 中国矿业大学 资源与地球科学学院,江苏 徐州 221116;2. 矿山水害防治技术基础研究国家级专业中心实验室,江苏 徐州 221116;3. 澳门大学 智慧城市物联网国家重点实验室,澳门 999078;4. 中山大学 土木工程学院,广东 珠海 519082)
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金国际(地区)合作与交流项目 (内地-澳门)(编号:42561160092)资助.

Research Framework of Geo-environmental Effects of Deep Geological Storage of Water Resources

Sui Wanghua1, 2, Gao Liang3, Lin Peiyuan4, Chen Ge1, 2*, Zhang Li1, 2,Xu Zhimin1, 2, Liang Jinxi1, 2   

  1. (1. School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou Jiangsu 221116, China; 2. Fundamental Research Laboratory for Mine Water Hazards Prevention and Controlling Technology, Xuzhou Jiangsu 221006, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Internet of Things for Smart City, University of Macau, Macau 999078, China; 4. School of Civil Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Zhuhai Guangdong 519082, China)
  • About author:Sui Wanghua, research areas include hydrogeology and engineering geology, mine safety geology, engineering geological hazards and geological environment. E-mail: suiwanghua@cumt.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Chinese Mainland-Macao) (Grant No.42561160092).
水安全问题是关系中华民族永续发展的战略问题。城市雨洪、矿井水等既是灾害又是难得的非常规水资源,对其进行深部地质贮存,兼具水资源战略储备和减灾防灾的双重效益。然而,深贮过程中目标层选择尚不规范、应力场—渗流场—水化学场—微生物场等多场耦合机理不明导致增渗扩容不可控、深贮后目标层地下水环境演变规律不清、地质环境效应评估方法缺失,这制约了水资源深部地质贮存技术的规模化应用。围绕水资源深部地质贮存的地质环境效应核心科学问题,构建了涵盖水文地质精细评价、目标层智能优选、地质环境演化、致裂扩容增储、微生物调控及多场耦合的完整科学构想框架。以内地矿井水和粤港澳大湾区城市雨洪深贮为典型对象,通过定量评价深部砂岩、石灰岩等目标层的水文地质结构和赋存地质环境,融合机器学习与多源地质数据,建立环境友好型深贮目标层的智能优选方法;开展水—岩—微生物耦合模拟和野外深贮试验等,构建基于AI 高解析模型与数字孪生的温度场—应力场—渗流场—水化学场—微生物场耦合数值模型,揭示水资源深贮水岩作用机理、微生物群落对渗流通道开闭作用的机理和赋存地质环境演变规律,构建深贮地质环境效应评价方法与差异化风险识别、预警与防控对策。预期成果将为破解水资源地质贮存的技术瓶颈、推动非常规水资源安全高效利用提供科学依据。
Abstract:Water security is a strategic issue for the sustainable development of the Chinese nation. Urban stormwater and mine water serve not only as hazards but also as valuable unconventional water resources. Their deep geological storage presents dual benefits of strategic water resource reserves and disaster mitigation. Nevertheless, the large-scale application of this technology is hindered by the absence of standardized criteria for target layer selection, unclear coupling mechanisms of the stress-seepage-hydrochemical-microbial fields leading to uncontrollable permeability enhancement and capacity expansion, ambiguous evolutionary patterns of groundwater environments in target layers following storage, and a lack of methodologies for assessing geoenvironmental effects. This study addresses the core scientific issue of geo-environmental effects of deep geological water storage by constructing a comprehensive scientific framework that encompasses refined hydrogeological evaluation, intelligent target layer optimization, geological environment evolution, fracturinginduced capacity expansion, microbial regulation, and multi-field coupling. Focusing on mine water from inland mining areas and urban stormwater in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, the framework quantitatively evaluates the hydrogeological structure and host geological environment of deep target layers such as sandstone and limestone. By integrating machine learning with multi-source geological data, it establishes an environmentally friendly intelligent optimization method for selecting deep storage target layers. Through waterrock- microbe coupling simulations and field deep storage experiments, a coupled numerical model of the thermalstress- seepage-hydrochemical-microbial fields is developed using AI high-resolution modeling and digital twin technologies. This model reveals the mechanisms of water–rock interactions during deep water storage, elucidates the role of microbial communities in regulating seepage channel opening and closure, and delineates the evolutionary patterns of the host geological environment. Furthermore, an assessment method for geoenvironmental effects of deep storage is established, accompanied by differentiated risk identification, early warning, and prevention and control strategies. The expected results will provide a scientific basis for resolving technical bottlenecks in geological water storage and advancing the safe and efficient utilization of unconventional water resources.

中图分类号: 

[1] 鲁重生, 曹文庚, 庄海艳, 丛日辉, 仝艳龙, 任宇, 李祥志, 宋乐, 卢瑶, 郭记菊. 奈曼旗农牧交错带地下水水化学形成机制与背景值研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2025, 40(12): 1363-1379.
[2] 曹文庚, 鲁重生, 庄海艳, 丛日辉, 仝艳龙, 任宇, 李祥志, 卢瑶, 王妍妍. 奈曼旗南部山区富锶—偏硅酸地下水形成机制与开发潜力[J]. 地球科学进展, 2025, 40(12): 1283-1296.
[3] 张勇勇, 康文蓉, 赵文智. 地下水依赖植被适应机制与稳态转换研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2025, 40(3): 243-254.
[4] 杜静雯, 童晨晨, 黄璟胜. 基于新基质水流控制方程的形状因子推导[J]. 地球科学进展, 2024, 39(12): 1311-1323.
[5] 蒯沐钦, 黄璟胜, 童晨晨, 王晨, 肖烨熙. 避免异参同效的抽水井表皮层溶质运移方程推导[J]. 地球科学进展, 2024, 39(3): 292-303.
[6] 徐秋娥, 角媛梅, 张兆年, 丁银平, 张洪森, 陶妍. 地下水年龄的概念及其测定方法研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2023, 38(6): 594-609.
[7] 毛绪美, 查希茜. 50~1 000 a地下水定年新方法:放射性成因 32P[J]. 地球科学进展, 2023, 38(6): 610-618.
[8] 张开鑫, 黄璟胜, 王晨, 童晨晨, 王子成. 基于负表皮层影响的径向溶质运移模型构建与新求解方法[J]. 地球科学进展, 2023, 38(4): 429-440.
[9] 涂梦昭,刘志锋,何春阳,任强,卢文路. 基于GRACE卫星数据的中国地下水储量监测进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(6): 643-656.
[10] 黄婉彬,鄢春华,张晓楠,邱国玉. 城市化对地下水水量、水质与水热变化的影响及其对策分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(5): 497-512.
[11] 李昂,王化锋,宁立波,胡闯,朱晛亭. 边坡裂隙岩体内凝结水形成区域的分布特征[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(2): 189-197.
[12] 覃荣高,邱仁敏,黎明,曹广祝,王金生,仵彦卿. 包气带—含水层地下水污染风险评估研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(2): 111-123.
[13] 曹天正, 韩冬梅, 宋献方, 刘伟, 杜荻. 滨海地区地表水—地下水相互作用研究进展的文献计量分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(2): 154-166.
[14] 杨建,刘基,黄浩,梁向阳. 鄂尔多斯盆地北部深埋区“地貌—沉积”控水关键要素研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(5): 523-530.
[15] 王思佳,刘鹄,赵文智,李中恺. 干旱、半干旱区地下水可持续性研究评述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(2): 210-223.
阅读次数
全文


摘要