地球科学进展 ›› 2009, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 436 -443. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2009.04.0436

全球变化研究 上一篇    下一篇

国际温室气体减排情景方案比较分析
曾静静,曲建升,张志强   
  1. 中国科学院国家科学图书馆兰州分馆/中国科学院资源环境科学信息中心,甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2009-02-15 修回日期:2009-02-20 出版日期:2009-04-10
  • 通讯作者: 曾静静 E-mail:zengjj@llas.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:

    中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目“中国参与国际CO2减排的国家方案设计”(编号:KZCX2-YW-Q1-10);国家自然科学基金项目“我国欠发达地区人口温室气体排放行为与排放需求研究”(编号:40801232)资助.

Review of the International Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Scenario Programs

Zeng Jingjing, Qu Jiansheng, Zhang Zhiqiang   

  1. Lanzhou Branch of National Science Library,Scientific Information Center for Resources and Environment, CAS, Lanzhou 730000,China
  • Received:2009-02-15 Revised:2009-02-20 Online:2009-04-10 Published:2009-04-10

     在整理、介绍主要国际组织、国家、研究机构和一些学者所提出的温室气体减排情景方案、减排目标和设想的基础上,对当前国际上主要的温室气体减排情景方案的温室气体减排目标、大气温室气体浓度目标和温度控制目标进行了归纳、比较和综合分析。研究结果表明:①国际组织和主要国家对温度升高的控制目标总体以2℃为主,即到21世纪末,将大气温度控制在不高于工业革命前2℃的范围内;②国际组织和主要国家的温室气体减排方案一般都倾向于在2050年将大气温室气体浓度控制在450×10-6~550×10-6CO2e(二氧化碳当量)的范围内,但各个方案中有关具体的减排责任分配、减排措施和减排量分歧仍然较大;③在确定温室气体减排目标和减排配额时,国际组织和主要国家一般都按照“共同但有区别”的原则,倾向于为发达国家制定减排目标,但也有个别方案认为发展中国家也应承担量化的减排义务。

      On the basis of sorting out and introducing the greenhouse gas emission reduction program, targets and assumptions that were put forward by the major international organizations, countries, research institutions and some scholars, the paper summarized, compared and comprehensively analyzed the main GHG emission reduction targets, atmospheric concentrations targets of GHG, and temperature control targets of the current international GHG mitigation program. The results revealed that: ①the general control goal of temperature increment proposed by international organizations and major countries was 2 ℃, that is, by the end of the 21st century, the air temperature will be controlled at no higher than 2℃ at the level of preindustrial revolution; ② the GHG mitigation program proposed by international organizations and major countries generally tended to control the atmospheric concentrations of GHG at 450×10-6~550×10-6 CO2e, and there were still large differences in the specific allocation of responsibilities, mitigation measures and emission reductions among each mitigation program; ③when determining the GHG emission reduction targets and allowances, the international organizations and major countries were generally in accordance with the “common but differentiated” principle, tending to set emission reduction targets for developed countries. However however, individual programs considered it necessary for developing countries to take quantified emission reduction commitment obligations.

中图分类号: 

[1] Zhang Zhiqiang,Qu Jiansheng,Zeng Jingjing. A quantitative comparison and analysis on the assessment indicators of greenhouse gases emission[J].Journal of Geographical Sciences,2008,63(7): 693-702.[张志强,曲建升,曾静静.温室气体排放评价指标及其定量分析[J].地理学报,2008,63(7): 693-702.]
[2] IPCC. 气候变化2007年:综合报告[R/OL]. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_cn.pdf. 2007.
[3] OECD. Environmental Outlook to 2030[R/OL]. http://oberon.sourceoecd.org/,2008-03.
[4] Council of the European Union. Brussels European Council presidency conclusions[R/OL]. http://register.consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/07/st07/st07224-re01.en07.pdf,2007.
[5] UNDP. 2007/2008人类发展报告[R/OL]. http://www.un.org/chinese/esa/hdr2007-2008/hdr_20072008_ch_complete.pdf.2007.
[6] The Committee on Climate Change. Government advised to reduce Greenhouse gas emissions by at least 80% in 2050[EB/OL]. http://www.theccc.org.uk/downloads/CCC%202050 TargetPRESSRELEASE07.10.08.pdf,2008-10-06.
[7] HM Government. Draft Climate Change Bill[R/OL]. http://www.defra.gov.uk/,2007-03.
[8] Department of Environment,Food,and Rural Affairs. Climate Change Act 2008[R/OL]. http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/climatechange/uk/legislation/docs.htm,2007-11-27.
[9] US Department of State. Global Climate Change Initiative[R/OL]. http://www.state.gov/g/oes/rls/fs/2002/12956.htm,2002.[ZK)]
[10] Qu Jiansheng,Sun Chengquan. Political contents of the global change studies: Taking the policies on climate of US as an example[J].World SCI-TECH R&D,2004,26(2): 78-83.[曲建升,孙成权. 全球变化研究中的科学政治化倾向——以美国气候政策为例[J].世界科技研究与发展,2004,26(2): 78-83.]
[11] Pew Center on Global Climate Change. A look at emission targets[EB/OL]. http://www.pewclimate.org/what_s_being_done/targets,2008.
[12] Department of Climate Change. Carbon pollution reduction scheme green paper[R/OL]. http://www.climatechange.gov.au/greenpaper/report/pubs/greenpaper.pdf,2008-07.
[13] Ministry of Ecology and Sustainable Development. Climate plan 2004[R/OL]. http://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/PLANCLIMATANGLAIS.pdf,2004.
[14] Government of Japan. Submission on sectoral approach[R/OL]. http://unfccc.int/files/kyoto_protocol/application/pdf/japan_sectoralapproach_rev.pdf,2008-05.
[15] Garnaut R. The Garnaut Climate Change Review[R/OL]. http://www.garnautreview.org.au/,2008-09.
[16] Government of India. National Action Plan on Climate Change[R/OL]. http://pmindia.nic.in/Pg01-52.pdf,2008-06.
[17] WWF. A vision for leadership by industrialized nations-climate change at the G8 Summit 2008 in Japan[R/OL]. http://assets.panda.org/downloads/wwf_g8_position_paper_final_250608.pdf,2008.
[18] WWF. Climate change: Faster, stronger, sooner[R/OL]. http://assets.panda.org/downloads/wwf_science_paper_october_2008.pdf,2008.
[19] CAN. A Viable Framework for Preventing Dangerous Climate Change-CAN Discussion Paper[R/OL]. http://assets.panda.org/downloads/candpframework.pdf. 2003.
[20] Baer P,Athanasiou T,Kartha S. The right to development in a climate constrained world: The greenhouse development rights framework[R/OL]. http://www.boell.de/downloads/gdr_klein_en.pdf,2007-11.
[21] The Climate Group. Breaking the Climate Deadlock: A Global Deal for Our Low-Carbon Future[R/OL]. http://www.theclimategroup.org/assets/resources/June 2008 BTCDReportChinese.pdf,2008-06-27.
[22] The Basic Peoject. The Sao Paulo proposal for an agreement on future climate policy[R/OL]. http://www.basic-project.net/data/final/Paper17Sao%20Paulo%20Agreement%20on%20Future%20International%20Climate%85.pdf, 2006-08.
[24] HM Treasury. Stern review: the economics of climate change[R/OL]. http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/6520.htm. 2006.
[23] Chen Yin. The Sao Paulo proposal's key elements[J].Advances in Climate Research,2007,3(3): 177-182.[陈迎. 圣保罗案文的基本要点[J]. 气候变化研究动态,2007,3(3): 177-182.]
[25] Meinshausen M,Hare B,Wigley T M L,et al. Multi-gas emission pathways to meet climate targets[J].Climatic Change, 2006(75): 151-194.
[26] Stern N. Key Elements of a Global Deal on Climate Change[R/OL]. http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/granthamInstitute/publications/KeyElementsOfAGlobalDeal_30Apr08.pdf, 2008-04.
[27] McKibbin W J,Wilcoxen P J. Building on Kyoto: Towards a realistic climate change agreement[R/OL]. http://www.msgpl.com.au/download/mckibbinwilcoxenfinalANU.pdf, 2008-06.
[28] Bent Sørensen. Pathways to climate stabilization[J].Energy Policy,2008,36(9) :3 505-3 509.
[29] Qu Jiansheng, Zeng Jingjing, Zhang Zhiqiang. Review of the international main greenhouse gases emission datebases[J].Advances in Earth Science,2008,23(1):47-54.[曲建升,曾静静,张志强.国际主要温室气体排放数据集比较分析研究[J].地球科学进展,2008,23(1):47-54.]

[1] 单薪蒙, 温家洪, 王军, 胡恒智. 深度不确定性下的灾害风险稳健决策方法评述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(9): 911-921.
[2] 段伟利, 邹珊, 陈亚宁, 李稚, 方功焕. 18792015年巴尔喀什湖水位变化及其主要影响因素分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(9): 950-961.
[3] 王澄海, 张晟宁, 张飞民, 李课臣, 杨凯. 论全球变暖背景下中国西北地区降水增加问题[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(9): 980-989.
[4] 王慧,张璐,石兴东,李栋梁. 2000年后青藏高原区域气候的一些新变化[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(8): 785-796.
[5] 田凤云,吴成来,张贺,林朝晖. 基于 CAS-ESM2的青藏高原蒸散发的模拟与预估[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(8): 797-809.
[6] 张子洋, 闫明, MULVANEY Robert, 季峻峰, 效存德, 刘雷保, 安春雷. 东南极 LGB69冰芯 17122001年气温变化记录的初步研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(2): 172-184.
[7] 崔林丽, 史军, 杜华强. 植被物候的遥感提取及其影响因素研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(1): 9-16.
[8] 龙上敏,刘秦玉,郑小童,程旭华,白学志,高臻. 南大洋海温长期变化研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(9): 962-977.
[9] 蔡运龙. 生态问题的社会经济检视[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(7): 742-749.
[10] 萧凌波. 17361911年华北饥荒的时空分布及其与气候、灾害、收成的关系[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(5): 478-487.
[11] 熊建国, 李有利, 张培震. 夷平面研究新进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(4): 378-388.
[12] 武登云, 任治坤, 吕红华, 刘金瑞, 哈广浩, 张弛, 朱孟浩. 冲积扇形态与沉积特征及其动力学控制因素:进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(4): 389-403.
[13] 胡利民,石学法,叶君,张钰莹. 北极东西伯利亚陆架沉积有机碳的源汇过程研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(10): 1073-1086.
[14] 王亚锋,芦晓明,朱海峰,梁尔源. 高山树线的调查与研究方法[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(1): 38-51.
[15] 罗鑫玥,陈明星. 城镇化对气候变化影响的研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(9): 984-997.
阅读次数
全文


摘要