地球科学进展 ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (7): 742 -749. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2020.061

可持续发展研究 上一篇    下一篇

生态问题的社会经济检视
蔡运龙( )   
  1. 国家发展研究院瑞意高等研究所 北京大学城市与环境学院,北京 100871
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-02 修回日期:2020-03-12 出版日期:2020-07-10

Socio-Economic Perspectives on Ecological Problems

Yunlong Cai( )   

  1. Raissun Institute for Advanced Studies in National School of Development, School of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
  • Received:2020-01-02 Revised:2020-03-12 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-08-21
  • About author:Cai Yunlong (1948-), male, Guiyang City, Guizhou Province, Professor. Research areas include integrated physical geography, land change, geography thought. E-mail: caiyl@urban.pku.edu.cn

人类社会经济活动是造成生态问题的主要和根本原因,生态问题又反过来冲击社会经济,因此必须从社会经济的视角来检视生态问题。国际学术界对“人类世”概念的认同,以及“国际全球环境变化人文因素计划”和“未来地球计划”的执行,都表明对当代生态问题进行社会经济透视的重要性。生态问题本质上是社会经济问题,需要从社会、经济、政治的角度去认识,于是产生了政治生态学、“公地的悲剧”以及社会—生态系统分析等理论。以社会经济的视角检视生态问题的制度因素和退化生态系统治理,表明需要加强从社会经济方面寻求根本解决途径的研究,以助力社会经济的发展并使退化生态系统走上“以自然恢复为主”的轨道。为此,生态问题研究要在体制与政策变革、发展模式转型以及科学技术创新3个层面上寻求解决之道。

Human activities are the main and root cause of ecological problems, while human activity is socio-economic activity. Therefore, ecological problems must be examined from the perspective of socio-economy. The identification of the Anthropocene concept in the international academic community and the implementation of IHDP and the Future Earth show the importance of socio-economic perspective on contemporary ecological problems. Ecological problem is essentially socio-economic issue, and it needs understanding from a socio-economic and political point of view. As a result, political ecology, theories of the tragedy of the commons and socio-ecosystem analysis have emerged. Examining the institutional factors of ecological problems and the reconstruction of degraded ecosystems from a socio-economic perspective indicate that the research on the socio-economic aspects needs to be strengthened so as to obtain the fundamental solutions. In this way, the development of social economy will be promoted and the degraded ecosystems can go on the right track of natural recovery. For these purposes, the study of ecological problems should seek solutions at three levels: institutional and political reform, development model transformation and scientific and technological innovation.

中图分类号: 

1 IPCC. Climate Change 1990:The IPCC Impacts Assessment[M]. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1990.
2 IPCC. Climate Change 1995:Impacts,Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change[M]. Cambridge, UK and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
3 IPCC. Climate Change 2001:Impacts,Adaptation,and Vulnerability[M]. Cambridge, UK and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
4 IPCC. Climate Change 2007:Impacts,Adaptation,and Vulnerability[M]. Cambridge, UK and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
5 IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Impact, Adaptation, and Vulnerability[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
6 IPBES. Summary for Policymakers of the Thematic Assessment Report on Land Degradation and Restoration of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services[R]. IPBES Secretariat, Bonn, Germany, 2018.
7 新华网. 联合国报告指出土地退化会加剧气候变化[EB/OL].[ 2019-08-09]. .
URL    
8 Marsh G P. Man and Nature: Or Physical Geography as Modified by Human Action[M]. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press, 1967.
9 Liu Tungsheng. Demand of Anthropocene study in the new stage of Geoscience: In honor of Late Geologist Huang Jiqing for his innovative spirit [J]. Quaternary Sciences, 2004, 24( 4): 369- 378.
刘东生. 开展“人类世”环境研究,做新时代地学的开拓者——纪念黄汲清先生的地学创新精神[J]. 第四纪研究, 2004, 24( 4): 369- 378.
10 Crutzen P J, Stoemler E F. The anthropocene[J]. IGBP Newsletter, 2000, 41: 17- 18.
11 Ehlers Eckart. From HDP to IHDP: Evolution of the International Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Programme (1996-2014)[M]. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2016.
12 Earth Future. Future Earth Initial Design: Report of the Transition Team[R]. Paris: International Council for Science (ICSU), 2013.
13 Hao Xinhong, Cai Zhong. IPCC and cobenhagen climate conference—China should strive for more discourse power of science [J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2011, 29( 1): 3- 8.
郝新鸿, 蔡仲. IPCC与哥本哈根气候大会——中国要争取科学话语权[J]. 科学学研究, 2011, 29( 1): 3- 8.
14 Wang Limao, Li Hongqiang, Gu Mengchen. Influence path and effect of climate change on geopolitical pattern[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67( 6): 853- 863.
王礼茂, 李红强, 顾梦琛. 气候变化对地缘政治格局的影响路径与效应[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67( 6): 853- 863.
15 Cai Yunlong, Meng Jijun. Ecological reconstruction of degraded land: A social approach[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 1999, 19( 3): 198- 204.
蔡运龙, 蒙吉军. 退化土地的生态重建: 社会工程途径[J]. 地理科学, 1999, 19( 3): 198- 204.
16 Dyson-Hudson R. Desertification as a social problem[J]. Science, 1983, 221: 1 365- 1 366.
17 Hayward J. The Meaning of political ecology[J]. World Philosophy, 1996( ): 98- 107.
海华德. 政治生态学的含义[J]. 世界哲学, 1996( ): 98- 107.
18 Xia Meiwu, Jin Taijun. Political ecology: Theoretical principles, value and practical significance[J]. Study & Exploretion, 2012( 2): 65- 69.
夏美武, 金太军. 政治生态学: 理论原则、价值与现实意义[J]. 学习与探索, 2012( 2): 65- 69.
19 Cai Yunlong, Ye Chao, Barnes Trevor, et al. Marxist geography and its development in China: Reflections on planning and practice[J]. Geographical Research, 2016, 35( 8): 1 399- 1 419. DOI: 10.11821/dlyj201608001.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201608001    
蔡运龙, 叶超, 特雷弗·巴恩斯, 等. 马克思主义地理学及其中国化:规划与实践反思[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35( 8): 1 399- 1 419.
doi: 10.11821/dlyj201608001    
20 Kitchin R, Tate N. Conducting Research in Human Geography: Theory, Methodology and Practice[M]. London: Prentice Hall, 2000.
21 Blaikie P. The Political Economy of Soil Erosion in Developing Countries[M]. New York: Longman, 1985.
22 Blaikie P, Brookfield H. Land Degradation and Society[M]. London and New York: Methuen, 1987.
23 Bryant R. Beyond the impasse: The power of political ecology in Third World environmental research[J]. Area, 1997, 29( 1): 5- 19.
24 Bryant R. Power, knowledge and political ecology in the third world: A review[J]. Progress in Physical Geography, 1998, 22( 1): 79.
25 Reynolds J, Smith D, Lambin E, et al. Global desertification: Building a science for dryland development[J]. Science, 2007, 316( 5 826): 847- 851.
26 Li Ying. Land degradation: Its social economical dimensions[J]. China Environmental Science, 1998, 18( ): 92- 97.
李颖. 土地退化的社会经济因素[J]. 中国环境科学, 1998, 18( ): 92- 97.
27 Hardin G. The tragedy of commons[J]. Science, 1968, 162: 1 243- 1 248.
28 Adam Y O, Eitayeb A M. Forestry decentralization and poverty alleviation: A review [J]. Forest Policy & Economics, 2016, 73: 300- 307.
29 Ostrom E. A general framework for analyzing the sustainability of social-ecological systems[J]. Science, 2009, 325( 5 939): 419- 422.
30 Ostrom E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action[M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
31 Hannegan. Environmental Sociology[M]. Hong Dayong, et al, translated. Beijing: Renmin University of China Press, 2009.
汉尼根. 环境社会学[M]. 洪大用等译. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2009.
32 Zhou Li’an. A study of promotion championship models for local officials in China[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2007( 7): 37- 51.
周黎安. 中国地方官员的晋升锦标赛模式研究[J]. 经济研究, 2007( 7): 37- 51.
33 Macias-Fauria M. Satellite images show China going green[J]. Nature, 2018, 553: 411- 413.
34 Tong X W, Brandt M, Yue Y M, et al. Increased vegetation growth and carbon stock in China karst via ecological engineering[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2018( 1): 44- 50.
35 The CPC Central Committee and State Council. The CPC Central Committee and State Council: Opinions on Speeding up the Construction of Ecological Civilization[Z]. Beijing, 2015.
中共中央国务院. 中共中央国务院关于加快推进生态文明建设的意见[Z]. 北京, 2015.
36 Carstena Nessh?ver, Timoe Assmuth, Irvine Katherine N, et al. The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 579: 1 215- 1 227.
37 Schenck C. Rewilding europe[M]// Wuerthner G, Crist E, Butler T. Protecting the Wild. Washington DC: Island Press, 2015.
38 Government of People's Republic of China, Government of the United States of America. China-US Joint Statement on Climate Change[Z]. Beijing, 2014.
中华人民共和国政府, 美利坚合众国政府. 中美气候变化联合声明[Z]. 北京, 2014.
39 Li Xiubin, Tan Minghong, Xin Liangjie. Is It Necessary to Restart the Conversion of Farmland to Forests[N]. China Science News, 2014-02-28( 7)
[ 李秀彬, 谈明洪, 辛良杰. 有必要重启退耕还林工程吗[N]. 中国科学报, 2014-02-28( 7).]
40 The Global Commission on the Economy and Climate. Better Growth, Better Climate: The New Climate Economy Report[R]. Washington DC: World Resources Institute, 2014.
41 Lu Dadao. The value of geographical science and the feelings of geographers[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70( 10): 1 539- 1 551.
陆大道. 地理科学的价值与地理学者的情怀[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70( 10): 1 539- 1 551.
[1] 陈小刚, 李凌, 杜金洲. 红树林和盐沼湿地间隙水交换过程及其碳汇潜力[J]. 地球科学进展, 2022, 37(9): 881-898.
[2] 陈亚宁, 李玉朋, 李稚, 刘永昌, 黄文静, 刘西刚, 冯梅青. 全球气候变化对干旱区影响分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2022, 37(2): 111-119.
[3] 柴磊, 王小萍. 青藏高原持久性有机污染物研究现状与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2022, 37(2): 187-201.
[4] 韩林生, 王祎. 全球海洋观测系统展望及对我国的启示[J]. 地球科学进展, 2022, 37(11): 1157-1164.
[5] 李稚, 李玉朋, 李鸿威, 刘永昌, 王川. 中亚地区干旱变化及其影响分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2022, 37(1): 37-50.
[6] 单薪蒙, 温家洪, 王军, 胡恒智. 深度不确定性下的灾害风险稳健决策方法评述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(9): 911-921.
[7] 段伟利, 邹珊, 陈亚宁, 李稚, 方功焕. 18792015年巴尔喀什湖水位变化及其主要影响因素分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(9): 950-961.
[8] 王澄海, 张晟宁, 张飞民, 李课臣, 杨凯. 论全球变暖背景下中国西北地区降水增加问题[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(9): 980-989.
[9] 王慧,张璐,石兴东,李栋梁. 2000年后青藏高原区域气候的一些新变化[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(8): 785-796.
[10] 田凤云,吴成来,张贺,林朝晖. 基于 CAS-ESM2的青藏高原蒸散发的模拟与预估[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(8): 797-809.
[11] 张子洋, 闫明, MULVANEY Robert, 季峻峰, 效存德, 刘雷保, 安春雷. 东南极 LGB69冰芯 17122001年气温变化记录的初步研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(2): 172-184.
[12] 崔林丽, 史军, 杜华强. 植被物候的遥感提取及其影响因素研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(1): 9-16.
[13] 龙上敏,刘秦玉,郑小童,程旭华,白学志,高臻. 南大洋海温长期变化研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(9): 962-977.
[14] 萧凌波. 17361911年华北饥荒的时空分布及其与气候、灾害、收成的关系[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(5): 478-487.
[15] 熊建国, 李有利, 张培震. 夷平面研究新进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(4): 378-388.
阅读次数
全文


摘要