渤海湾风暴潮倒灌对沿岸农田土壤盐分的影响

doi:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2006.02.0157

地球科学进展 ›› 2006, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2): 157 -160. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2006.02.0157

“土地利用/覆盖变化与综合减灾”专辑上一篇下一篇

渤海湾风暴潮倒灌对沿岸农田土壤盐分的影响

张国明 ^1,2,顾卫 ^1,2,吴之正 ³,史培军 ^1,2

1.北京师范大学资源学院灾害与公共安全研究所，北京 100875； 2.北京师范大学环境演变与自然灾害教育部重点实验室，北京 100875；3.北京师范大学地理学与遥感科学学院，北京 100875

收稿日期:2005-12-20 修回日期:2006-01-16 出版日期:2006-02-15
通讯作者: 史培军(1959-)，男，陕西靖边人，教授，主要从事环境演变与自然灾害研究. E-mail:spj@bnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家863计划重大专项资助项目“渤海海冰资源开发与农业综合利用技术研究”（编号：2004AA2Z4020）；国家自然科学基金重点项目“渤海海冰作为淡水资源的储量测算”（编号：40335048）资助.

The Effect of Storm Surge on Soil Salt Content of the Farmlands along the Bohai Bay in China

Zhang Guoming ^1,2,Gu Wei ^1,2,Wu Zhizheng ³,Shi Peijun ^1,2

1.Institute of Disaster and Public Security, College of Resources Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;2.Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disasters,Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China;3. College of Geography and Remote Sensing Science, Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875, China

Received:2005-12-20 Revised:2006-01-16 Online:2006-02-15 Published:2006-02-15

下载PDF ( 1344 )

2003年10月11日渤海湾沧州范围内发生特大温带风暴潮，其摧毁沿岸养殖场后涌向沿海农田区域，海水倒灌农田浸泡持续时间达10~15 d不等。2004年5月3日，对浸泡农田土壤采样进行盐分分析，结果表明，经海水浸泡后农田全部盐碱化，且盐分主要聚集在土壤表层；46%的土地出现碱斑，0~90 cm土体内土壤含盐量较浸泡前普遍增加，0~10 cm表层含盐量高达1.134%；浸泡后0~25 cm土体内含盐离子组成较之浸泡前有显著变化，Cl^－含量增加了33.3%，Na⁺+K⁺含量增加了39.4%；降雨淋溶可以使土壤盐分含量明显下降，且为主要影响因素；经过一年后，土壤盐分含量降低到0.308%，而两年后，受灾土壤盐分含量降低到0.265%左右，可以种植耐盐性较强的作物。

关键词: 风暴潮, 土壤盐分, 影响, 农田

On October 11, 2003, a huge storm surge attacked the Changzhou region in the Bohai bay of China. The surge smashed the shrimp breeding fields and flooded the coastal farms. These farms were inundated for a period from 10 days to 15 days. On May 3, 2004, a salinity analysis was carried out for the soil samples from the seawatersoaked farms. Result shows that these farms had all been salinized: 46% of the lands had alkali pots; the content of salts in the soil (0~90cm) had increased evidently while the salts mainly concentrated at the surface layer (0~10cm), where the salt content was as high as 1.134%; constitutes of saline ions at the 0~25cm layer also changed greatly: the Cl^－increased for 33.3%, while the Na⁺ and K⁺altogether increased for 39.4%. It is found that rainfall is an effective and also primary way to desalinize these soils. Two years after the storm surge, salt content of the affected soils had dropped to around 0.265%, at which level some salt-enduring crops can be grown.

Key words: Storm surge, Salt content, Effect, Farmlands.

中图分类号:

S153

[1] Yang Guishan. Historical change and future trends of storm surge disaster in China’s coastal area[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters,2000,9(3):23-30. [杨桂山. 中国沿海风暴潮灾害的历史变化及未来趋向[J].自然灾害学报,2000,9(3):23-30.]

[2] Hu Xin, Jing Hua, Wang Fuxia, et al. Analysis of synoptic system and wind-field structure of a storm surge in Bohai Sea[J]. Meteorological Science and Technology, 2005,33(3):235-239.[胡欣,景华,王福侠,等.渤海湾风暴潮天气系统及风场结构个例分析[J].气象科技,2005,33(3):235-239.]

[3] Zhang Xueying, Shao Rongmin, Gao Mengchuan. Research on the cause of formation of the coastal sea storm in Tianjin and its prevention and reduction measure[J]. Journal of Tianjin University of Technology, 2005,21(2):60-63.[张雪莹,邵荣敏,高孟川. 天津沿海风暴潮的成因与防灾减灾措施研究[J].天津理工大学学报,2005,21(2):60-63.]

[4] Zhang Zhiyue. Analysis of Cangzhou sea border 10.11 huge storm surge cause of formation[J]. Marine Forecasts, 2004, 21(2):74-77.[张志悦. 沧州沿海“10.11”特大温带风暴潮灾情成因分析[J].海洋预报,2004, 21(2):74-77.]

[5] Cui Jianyun,Xu Wenzheng,Gao Xiaomei,et al. Analysis of storm tide and rainstorm of Shandong on 2003 Oct.11-12[J]. Journal of Shandong Meteorology, 2005,(2):19-21.[崔建云,徐文正,高晓梅,等.2003年10月11/12日山东暴雨及风暴潮分析[J].山东气象,2005,(2):19-21.]

[6] Ye Xujun,Wang Zhaoqian,Wang Chenghong,et al. Impacts of typhoon storm on farmland ecological environments in the eastern coastal area of Zhejiang Province and their countermeasures [J]. Eco-Agriculture Research,1999, 7(4):38-40.[叶旭君,王兆骞,汪成宏,等.台风暴潮对浙东沿海农田生态环境的影响及其对策[J].生态农业研究,1999,7(4):38-40.]

[1]	韦进, 申重阳, 胡敏章, 江颖, 张晓彤, 刘子维. 连续重力观测站测定的中国大陆潮汐因子空间分布特征[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(5): 490-499.
[2]	李耀辉, 孟宪红, 张宏升, 李忆平, 王闪闪, 沙莎, 莫绍青. 青藏高原—沙漠的陆—气耦合及对干旱影响的进展及其关键科学问题[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(3): 265-275.
[3]	崔林丽, 史军, 杜华强. 植被物候的遥感提取及其影响因素研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(1): 9-16.
[4]	苗毅, 刘海猛, 宋金平, 戴特奇. 青藏高原交通设施建设及影响评价研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(3): 308-318.
[5]	谢彦君, 任福民, 李国平, 王铭杨, 杨慧. 影响中国双台风活动气候特征研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(1): 101-108.
[6]	罗鑫玥,陈明星. 城镇化对气候变化影响的研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(9): 984-997.
[7]	王坚红,张萌,任淑媛,王兴,苗春生. 太行山脉地形坡度对下山锋面气旋暴雨影响模拟研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(7): 717-730.
[8]	杨慧,任福民,杨明仁. 不同强度热带气旋对中国降水变化的影响[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(7): 747-756.
[9]	孟宪萌,张鹏举,周宏,刘登峰. 水系结构分形特征的研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(1): 48-56.
[10]	王宇航, 朱园园, 黄建东, 宋虎跃, 杜勇, 李哲. 海相碳酸盐岩稀土元素在古环境研究中的应用[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(9): 922-932.
[11]	王芳慧, 陈莹, 王波, 李好文, 周升钱. 海洋微生物气溶胶的丰度、群落结构及影响机制[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(8): 783-793.
[12]	李宁, 刘丽, 张正涛, 冯介玲, 陈曦, 白扣. 气候变化经济影响研究热点的足迹可视化:整合被引文献和突现词[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(8): 865-873.
[13]	宋世雄, 刘志锋, 何春阳, 赵瑞, 任强. 城市扩展过程对自然生境影响评价的研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(10): 1094-1104.
[14]	王坚红, 丁晓敏, 薛峰, 苗春生. 气温增暖与趋冷变化阶段江淮汛期气旋气候特征对比研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(2): 160-173.
[15]	方修琦, 张頔旸. 气候变化影响区域文明发展演化的主要表现方式[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(11): 1218-1225.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

The Effect of Storm Surge on Soil Salt Content of the Farmlands along the Bohai Bay in China

模态框（Modal）标题

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容

The Effect of Storm Surge on Soil Salt Content of the Farmlands along the Bohai Bay in China