地球科学进展 ›› 2025, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 525 -539. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2025.034

研究论文 上一篇    下一篇

页岩粉碎及热处理的流体核磁响应及其原位含油性启示
白龙辉1(), 柳波1(), 刘明博1, 苏勇2, 王柳1, 霍迎冬2, 徐鹏程1, 付晓飞1   
  1. 1.多资源协同陆相页岩油绿色开采全国重点实验室 东北石油大学,黑龙江 大庆 163318
    2.大庆油田勘探开发研究院,黑龙江 大庆 163375
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-10 修回日期:2025-04-20 出版日期:2025-05-10
  • 通讯作者: 柳波 E-mail:bailonghui0302@163.com;liubo@nepu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目区域创新联合基金项目(U22A20574);黑龙江省重点研发计划项目(GA23A906)

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Characteristics and in situ Oil Content Analysis of Shale Crushing and Heat Treatment

Longhui BAI1(), Bo LIU1(), Mingbo LIU1, Yong SU2, Liu WANG1, Yingdong HUO2, Pengcheng XU1, Xiaofei FU1   

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Continental Shale Oil, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing Heilongjiang 163318, China
    2.Exploration and Development Research Institute of Daqing Oilfield, Daqing Heilongjiang 163375, China
  • Received:2025-02-10 Revised:2025-04-20 Online:2025-05-10 Published:2025-07-10
  • Contact: Bo LIU E-mail:bailonghui0302@163.com;liubo@nepu.edu.cn
  • About author:BAI Longhui, research areas include shale oil reservoir characterization. E-mail: bailonghui0302@163.com
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China Regional Innovation Joint Fund Project(U22A20574);The Heilongjiang Provincial Key R & D Program(GA23A906)

处于开放环境的页岩样品,一方面由于压力释放导致轻烃发生大量散失,另一方面由于温度降低导致滞留烃黏度增大、赋存状态改变,从而使常温下核磁检测无法准确定量原位温压条件下的页岩含油性。以松辽盆地白垩系青山口组页岩为例,选取处于低成熟和高成熟阶段的典型页岩样品。对不同粉碎程度的高成熟页岩,以及不同温度条件下的低成熟、高成熟页岩样品进行核磁共振序列检测,定量页岩样品粉碎过程和加热过程中的流体散失和赋存状态转化,确定页岩温度作用下的含油性特征。结果表明,页岩从标准柱塞粉碎到0.04 cm的过程中,其T2谱的形态、T1-T2谱总信号量和各含氢组分的信号量基本没有发生变化。因此,久置页岩样品在粉碎过程中不会导致残留流体进一步散失。随着页岩样品温度的升高,低成熟页岩中轻质油信号增加、水信号减少,高成熟页岩中油和水信号均减少。同时页岩含羟基化合物信号减少,待恢复室温后其信号量重新恢复。由此可见,随着温度升高,自由水持续挥发;低成熟页岩常温黏度较大的油前沥青由类固态转变为液态轻质油,100 ℃后核磁轻质油绝对量增加达107%;高成熟页岩油常温即为轻质油,升温使其挥发散失。含羟基化合物随着温度升降的减增,反映了温度对于黏土吸附水的控制作用。因此利用核磁共振评价低成熟页岩含油性时,要注意室温条件下油前沥青在温度作用下的赋存状态转化,避免页岩油含量的低估。

Shale samples exposed to open environments experience major loss of light hydrocarbons due to pressure release, while simultaneously, the viscosity of retained hydrocarbons increases due to temperature reduction. These changes alter the state of hydrocarbons, making it difficult to accurately quantify shale oil content under in situ temperature and pressure conditions using Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) at room temperature. This study examines shale from the Qingshankou Formation (Cretaceous) in the Songliao Basin. Representative shale samples at both low and high maturity stages were selected. NMR measurements were performed on high-maturity shale samples with varying degrees of pulverization, as well as on low- and high-maturity shale samples under different temperature conditions, to quantify fluid loss and state transformation during pulverization and heating and to determine oil content characteristics under the influence of temperature. Results showed that during shale crushing from standard plunger size to ~0.04 cm particles, the morphology of the T2 spectrum, the total T1-T2 signal, and the signal strength of each hydrogen-containing component remained largely unchanged. Therefore, prolonged exposure during crushing does not lead to significant residual fluid loss. With increasing temperature, light oil signals increased while water signals decreased in low-maturity shale; in high-maturity shale, both oil and water signals decreased. Additionally, the signal from hydroxyl compounds declined with heating but recovered upon returning to room temperature. These findings indicate that rising temperature leads to continuous free water evaporation. In low-maturity shale, pre-oil bitumen, which has high viscosity at room temperature, transforms from a solid-like state into liquid light oil. After heating to 100  °C, the absolute amount of NMR-detected light oil increased by 107%. In contrast, high-maturity shale oil bitumen already exists as light oil at room temperature and evaporates upon heating. The reversible change in hydroxyl-containing compounds with temperature rise and fall reflects the temperature-dependent water adsorption capacity of clay. Thus, when using NMR to evaluate oil content in low-maturity shale, the transformation of pre-oil bitumen under elevated temperatures must be considered to avoid underestimating shale oil content.

中图分类号: 

图1 松辽盆地构造单元划分和地层分布情况(据参考文献[23]修改)
(a)松辽盆地一级构造单元;(b)中央坳陷区二级构造单元及取心井位置;(c)地层发育柱状图
Fig. 1 Tectonic units and stratigraphy of the Songliao Basinmodified after reference23])
(a) First-order tectonic units of the Songliao Basin; (b) Second-order tectonic units of the Central Depression and sampling well’s location; (c)General lithologic stratigraphy
表1 页岩样品有机地化及全岩矿物组成数据
Table 1 Organic geochemistry and whole-rock minerals for shale samples
图2 页岩样品有机地化特征及矿物组成
(a)Tmax与生烃潜力指数交会图;(b)S2与总有机碳交会图;(c)矿物组成三角图
Fig. 2 Plots showing the geochemical data and mineralogical compositions of the shale samples
(a) Crossplot of Tmax and Hydrogen Index (HI); (b) Crossplot of S2 and Total Organic Carbon (TOC); (c) Ternary plot of the mineral composition
图3 页岩样品中固体沥青光学及电成像特征
(a)C1样品,油浸反射光,藻类体演化形成的油前沥青,具备藻类体的形状;(b)图(a)样品同一视域下油浸荧光,油前沥青在荧光下呈黑色;(c)B2样品,油浸反射光,生油阶段晚期的油后沥青,相比油前沥青,反射强度增强;(d)B2样品,油浸反射光,生油阶段晚期的油后沥青,相比油前沥青,反射强度增强;(e)C1样品,油前沥青具有流动构造特征;(f)B2样品,油后沥青具有填充孔隙特征,其上发育海绵状孔隙
Fig. 3 Opitcal and Scanning Electron MicroscopeSEMcharacteristics of solid bitumen in shale samples
(a) C1 sample, oil immersed in reflected light, algae evolved into pre-oil pitch, with algal shape; (b)C1 sample, fluorescently immersed in oil under the same field of view, and the pre-oil bitumen is black under fluorescence; (c) B2 sample, oil immersed reflected light, the late oil generation stage of the post-oil bitumen, compared to the pre-oil bitumen, the reflection intensity is enhanced; (d) B2 sample, oil immersion reflects light, and the reflection intensity of post-oil bitumen in the late oil generation stage is enhanced compared with pre-oil bitumen; (e) C1 sample, the pre-oil bitumen has the characteristics of flow structure; (f) B2 sample, the post-oil bitumen has the characteristics of filling pores, and spongy pores are developed on it
图4 不同粉碎状态下页岩核磁二维谱图
A为类固体有机质信号区;B为含羟基化合物信号区;C为油信号区;D为水信号区
Fig. 4 2D NMR maps of shale samples in different crushing states
A is the signal region of solid-like organic matter; B is the signal region of hydroxyl compounds; C is the oil signal region; D is the water signal region
图5 不同粉碎粒径页岩核磁T2 谱图
Fig. 5 T2 spectra of shale with different crushing particle sizes
图6 不同粉碎粒径下页岩含 1H组分信号量
(a)不同粉碎粒径下A1和B1总信号量;(b)不同粉碎粒径下B2含1H各组分信号量;(c)不同粉碎粒径下A1含1H各组分信号量
Fig. 6 1H component signal intensity of the shale sample at different crushing particle sizes
(a) Total signal intensity for A1 and B1 at different particle sizes;(b)Signal intensity of 1H components for B2 at different particle sizes; (c)Signal intensity of 1H components for A1 at different particle sizes
图7 不同温度下页岩核磁T2 spectra和信号量变化对比图
(a)C1样品核磁T2图;(b)C1样品T2<0.1 ms信号量统计直方图;(c) C1样品T2>0.1 ms信号量统计直方图;(d) B1样品核磁T2图;(e)B1样品T2<0.1 ms信号量统计直方图;(f) B1样品T2>0.1 ms信号量统计直方图
Fig. 7 Comparison of shale NMR T2 spectra and signal amplitude variations under different temperatures
(a) T2 spectrum of sample C1; (b) Histogram of signal amplitudes with T2 < 0.1 ms for sample C1; (c) Histogram of signal amplitudes with T2> 0.1 ms for sample C1; (d) T2 spectrum of sample B1; (e) Histogram of signal amplitudes with T2 < 0.1 ms for sample B1; (f) Histogram of signal amplitudes with T2 > 0.1 ms for sample B1
图8 C1不同温度下页岩核磁二维谱图
A为类固体有机质信号区;B为含羟基化合物信号区;C为油信号区;D为水信号区
Fig. 8 2D NMR maps of C1 shale samples at different temperatures
A is the signal region of solid-like organic matter;B is the signal region of hydroxyl compounds; C is the oil signal region; D is the water signal region
图9 B1不同温度下页岩核磁二维谱图
A为类固体有机质信号区;B为含羟基化合物信号区;C为油信号区;D为水信号区
Fig. 9 2D NMR maps of B1 shale samples at different temperatures
A is the signal region of solid-like organic matter; B is the signal region of hydroxyl compounds; C is the oil signal region; D is the water signal region
图10 页岩样品总信号量随温度变化图
Fig. 10 Plots showing total signal quantity of shale samples with increasing temperature
图11 核磁轻质油和类固体有机质含量随温度变化图
(a) C1样品核磁轻质油含量;(b)B1样品核磁轻质油含量;(c) C1样品核磁类固体有机质含量;(d)B1样品核磁类固体有机质含量
Fig. 11 Plots showing signal quantity of NMR light oil and organic matter with increasing temperature
(a) C1 sample nuclear magnetic resonance light oil content; (b) B1 sample nuclear magnetic resonance light oil content; (c) C1 sample nuclear magnetic resonance solid-like organic matter content; (d) B1 sample nuclear magnetic resonance solid-like organic matter content
图12 不同含 1H组分lnT2 )随温度变化图
(a)C1样品轻质油;(b) C1样品类固体有机质和轻质油;(c) B1样品轻质油;(d)B1样品类固体有机质和轻质油
Fig. 12 Plots showing lnT2of heterogeneous 1H compounds with increasing temperature
(a) C1 sample light oil; (b)C1 solid-like organic matter and light oil; (c) B1 sample light oil; (d) B1 sample solid-like organic matter and light oil
图13 核磁水和含羟基化合物含量随温度变化图量
(a)C1样品核磁水含量;(b) B1样品核磁水含量;(c) C1样品核磁含羟基化合物含量;(d)B1样品核磁含羟基化合物含量
Fig. 13 Plots showing signal quantity of water and hydroxyl containing compounds with increasing temperature
(a) C1 sample nuclear magnetic resonance water content; (b) B1 sample nuclear magnetic resonance water content; (c) Content of nuclear magnetic resonance hydroxyl compounds in C1 sample; (d) Content of nuclear magnetic resonance hydroxyl compounds in B1 sample
[1] GUO Xusheng, SHEN Baojian, LI Zhiming, et al. Discussion on the uniformity of shale oil and gas in China[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment202446(5): 889-905.
郭旭升, 申宝剑, 李志明, 等. 论我国页岩油气的统一性[J]. 石油实验地质202446(5): 889-905.
[2] ZOU Caineng, YANG Zhi, CUI Jingwei, et al. Formation mechanism, geological characteristics and development strategy of nonmarine shale oil in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development201340(1): 14-26.
邹才能, 杨智, 崔景伟, 等. 页岩油形成机制、地质特征及发展对策[J]. 石油勘探与开发201340(1): 14-26.
[3] BAI L H, LIU B, FU X F, et al. A new method for evaluating the oil mobility based on the relationship between pore structure and state of oil[J]. Geoscience Frontiers202314(6). DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101684 .
[4] ABRAMS M A, GONG C R, GARNIER C, et al. A new thermal extraction protocol to evaluate liquid rich unconventional oil in place and in situ fluid chemistry[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology201788: 659-675.
[5] SUN Longde, ZHAO Wenzhi, LIU He, et al. Concept and application of “sweet spot” in shale oil[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica202344(1): 1-13.
孙龙德, 赵文智, 刘合, 等. 页岩油“甜点” 概念及其应用讨论[J]. 石油学报202344(1): 1-13.
[6] ZHANG J Y, WANG M, LI J B, et al. Research on loss rules of oil and gas in preserved shale cores after open air exposure[J]. Frontiers in Earth Science2024, 12. DOI: 10.3389/feart.2024.1375590 .
[7] JARVIE D M. Shale resource systems for oil and gas: part 1-shale oil resource systems[J]. AAPG Memoir201297: 1-19.
[8] CHEN Z H, JIANG C Q. An integrated mass balance approach for assessing hydrocarbon resources in a liquid-rich shale resource play: an example from upper Devonian duvernay formation, western Canada sedimentary basin[J]. Journal of Earth Science202031(6): 1 259-1 272.
[9] FENG Zihui, ZHANG Juhe, SHAO Hongmei, et al. Experimental techniques and their application for high clay content continental shale[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing202443(3): 75-87.
冯子辉, 张居和, 邵红梅, 等. 高黏土陆相页岩实验技术及其应用[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发202443(3): 75-87.
[10] LIU B, BAI L H, CHI Y A, et al. Geochemical characterization and quantitative evaluation of shale oil reservoir by two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance and quantitative grain fluorescence on extract: a case study from the Qingshankou Formation in southern Songliao Basin, northeast China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology2019109: 561-573.
[11] ZHAN H M, LI X Z, HU Z M, et al. Influence of particle size on the low-temperature nitrogen adsorption of deep shale in southern Sichuan, China[J]. Minerals202212(3). DOI: 10.3390/min12030302 .
[12] SHI J, MA Y, LI S Y, et al. Characteristics of thermal bitumen structure as the pyrolysis intermediate of Longkou oil shale[J]. Energy & Fuels201731(10): 10 535-10 544.
[13] MASTALERZ M, DROBNIAK A, STANKIEWICZ A B. Origin, properties, and implications of solid bitumen in source-rock reservoirs: a review[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology2018195: 14-36.
[14] CURIALE J A. Origin of solid bitumens, with emphasis on biological marker results[J]. Organic Geochemistry198610(1/2/3): 559-580.
[15] LIU Bo, WANG Liu, FU Xiaofei, et al. Identification, evolution and geological indications of solid bitumen in shales: a case study of the first member of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development202350(6): 1 173-1 184.
柳波, 王柳, 付晓飞, 等. 页岩中固体沥青的识别、演化路径及地质意义: 以松辽盆地白垩系青山口组一段为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发202350(6): 1 173-1 184.
[16] LIU X P, JIN Z J, LAI J, et al. Fractal behaviors of NMR saturated and centrifugal T2 spectra in oil shale reservoirs: the Paleogene Funing formation in Subei basin, China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology2021, 129. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.105069 .
[17] LIN Z Z, LI J Q, LU S F, et al. The occurrence characteristics of oil in shales matrix from organic geochemical screening data and pore structure properties: an experimental study[J]. Petroleum Science202421(1): 1-13.
[18] CAO Y, JIN Z J, ZHU R K, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of the organic-rich saline lacustrine shale in the Lucaogou Formation, Jimusar sag, Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Energy2024, 294. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2024.130786 .
[19] ZHANG P F, LU S F, WANG J J, et al. Microscopic occurrence and distribution of oil and water in situ shale: evidence from nuclear magnetic resonance[J]. Petroleum Science202421(6): 3 675-3 691.
[20] LIU B, JIANG X W, BAI L H, et al. Investigation of oil and water migrations in lacustrine oil shales using 20 MHz 2D NMR relaxometry techniques[J]. Petroleum Science202219(3): 1 007-1 018.
[21] LI J B, JIANG C Q, WANG M, et al. Adsorbed and free hydrocarbons in unconventional shale reservoir: a new insight from NMR T1-T2 maps[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology2020, 116. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104311 .
[22] DOU Z Y, YANG Z M, DONG C C, et al. Rock physical evolution and microscopic flow mechanism of massive energy replenishment in tight oil reservoirs[J]. Advances in Geo-Energy Research202414(1): 49-63.
[23] LIU B, LIU L B, FU J, et al. The Songliao super basin in northeastern China[J]. AAPG Bulletin2023107(8): 1 257-1 297.
[24] LIU B, SHI J X, FU X F, et al. Petrological characteristics and shale oil enrichment of lacustrine fine-grained sedimentary system: a case study of organic-rich shale in first member of Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Gulong Sag, Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development201845(5): 884-894.
[25] BACCIARELLI M, ROMERO R P A, ELKINGTON P A S. Focused nuclear magnetic resonance[C]// Transactions of the SPWLA fifty ninth annual logging symposium: SPWLA 59th annual logging symposium, 2018.
[26] BLOEMBERGEN N, PURCELL E M, POUND R V. Relaxation effects in nuclear magnetic resonance absorption[J]. Physical Review194873(7): 679-712.
[27] LI J L, WANG M, WANG M, et al. Shale primary porosimetry based on 2D nuclear magnetic resonance of T1-T2[J]. Energy Geoscience20245(3). DOI: 10.1016/j.engeos.2023.100270 .
[28] FAN R Q, LIAO G Z, MAO R, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance response characteristics and quantitative evaluation method of fluid saturation of lacustrine shale oil[J]. Frontiers in Earth Science2023, 11. DOI: 10.3389/feart.2023.1117193 .
[29] KHATIBI S, OSTADHASSAN M, XIE Z H, et al. NMR relaxometry a new approach to detect geochemical properties of organic matter in tight shales[J]. Fuel2019235: 167-177.
[30] BAI Longhui, LIU Bo, CHI Yaao, et al. 2D NMR studies of fluids in organic-rich shale from the Qingshankou Formation, Songliao Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology202142(6): 1 389-1 400.
白龙辉, 柳波, 迟亚奥, 等. 二维核磁共振技术表征页岩所含流体特征的应用: 以松辽盆地青山口组富有机质页岩为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质202142(6): 1 389-1 400.
[31] FENG Zihui, HUO Qiuli, ZENG Huasen, et al. Organic matter compositions and organic pore evolution in Gulong shale of Songliao Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing202140(5): 40-55.
冯子辉, 霍秋立, 曾花森, 等. 松辽盆地古龙页岩有机质组成与有机质孔形成演化[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发202140(5): 40-55.
[32] QIAN Menhui, LI Maowen, JIANG Qigui, et al. Evaluation of evaporative loss of hydrocarbon in shale samples and its geological implications[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment202244(3): 497-504, 514.
钱门辉, 黎茂稳, 蒋启贵, 等. 页岩岩心样品烃类散失特征与地质意义[J]. 石油实验地质202244(3): 497-504, 514.
[33] SUN Ying. Review of the application of nuclear magnetic resonance in the evaluation of shale reservoir parameters[J]. Progress in Geophysics202338(1): 254-270.
孙颖. 核磁共振在页岩储层参数评价中的应用综述[J]. 地球物理学进展202338(1): 254-270.
[34] GODEFROY S, KORB J P, FLEURY M, et al. Surface nuclear magnetic relaxation and dynamics of water and oil in macroporous media[J]. Physical Review E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics2001, 64(2 Pt 1). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.64.021605 .
[35] MUSIN K, ABDULLIN T, SHIPUNOV T, et al. Estimation viscosity and its heterogeneity by NMR logging tool in reservoir conditions in oilfield with heavy oil: practical results[C]//SPE russian petroleum technology conference and exhibition. Moscow, Russia: SPE, 2016. DOI: 10.2118/182066-MS .
[36] SERVE O, CHOBLET H, LIVADARIS V, et al. Probing hydrocarbon dynamics at asphaltene/maltene interfaces for the global characterization of bitumen[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science2021593: 21-31.
[37] GODEFROY S, FLEURY M, DEFLANDRE F, et al. Temperature effect on NMR surface relaxation in rocks for well logging applications[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B2002106(43): 11 183-11 190.
[38] XIE Z H, GAN Z. Investigation of physical properties of hydrocarbons in unconventional mudstonesusing two-dimensional nmr relaxometry[C]// SPWLA 60th annual logging symposium transactions. Society of Petrophysicists and Well Log Analysts, 2019: 1-10.
[39] SUCHÝ V, SÝKOROVÁ I, ZACHARIÁŠ J, et al. Solid bitumen as an indicator of petroleum migration, thermal maturity, and contact metamorphism: a case study in the Barrandian Basin (Silurian-Devonian), Czech Republic[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology2024, 286. DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2024.104493 .
[40] LI Zheng, BAO Youshu, ZHU Rifang, et al. Progress in experimental techniques and research methods for shale oil occurrence characteristics and mobility[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency202431(4): 84-95.
李政, 包友书, 朱日房, 等. 页岩油赋存特征、可动性实验技术及研究方法进展[J]. 油气地质与采收率202431(4): 84-95.
[41] BAI L H, UNIVERSITY N P, LIU B, et al. Liquid spontaneous imbibition and its time-resolved nuclear magnetic resonance within differently matured shale indications for shale pore structure and wettability[J]. Energy & Fuels202438(23): 22 804-22 819.
[42] LIANG T, ZHAN Z W, GAO Y, et al. Molecular structure and origin of solid bitumen from northern Sichuan Basin[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology2020, 122. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104654 .
[43] ZHANG P F, LU S F, LI J Q, et al. 1D and 2D Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) relaxation behaviors of protons in clay, kerogen and oil-bearing shale rocks[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology2020, 114. DOI: /10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2019.104210 .
[44] WANG L, LIU B, BAI L H, et al. Maceral evolution of lacustrine shale and its effects on the development of organic pores during low mature to high mature stage: a case study from the Qingshankou Formation in northern Songliao Basin, northeast China[J]. Petroleum Science202320(5): 2 709-2 725.
[45] LI J B, WANG M, JIA W L. A modified surface to volume (SVR) method to calculate Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) surface relaxivity: theory and a case study in shale reservoirs[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology2024, 170. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2024.107159 .
[1] 陈斐然, 刘珠江, 陆永潮, 魏富彬, 李飞, 郭金才, 苏泽昕. 川东北地区中—上二叠统层序地层格架内多重地质事件耦合的富有机质页岩成因模式[J]. 地球科学进展, 2024, 39(5): 519-531.
[2] 刘绍军, 刘勇, 赵圣贤, 张鉴, 邓乃尔, 邓虎成, 何建华, 徐浩, 曹埒焰, 何沅翰, 尹美璇. 泸州北区深层页岩现今地应力场分布特征及扰动规律[J]. 地球科学进展, 2023, 38(12): 1271-1284.
[3] 王青山, 常超, 吴来源, 张兴亮. 利用CiteSpace可视化分析中国黑色页岩研究现状[J]. 地球科学进展, 2023, 38(12): 1224-1242.
[4] 周龙政, 蔡进功, 李旭, 晁静, 李政. 泥页岩中水的赋存态研究进展及其意义[J]. 地球科学进展, 2022, 37(7): 709-725.
[5] 段美铃, 宋昊, 胡伟, 廖昕. 川北韩家店组页岩风化过程的矿物学与元素地球化学研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2022, 37(6): 641-659.
[6] 邓腾, 丁正鹏, 许德如. 浅论造山型金矿中碳质黑色页岩的来源及其在金成矿过程中的作用[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(10): 1077-1091.
[7] 陈愿愿, 杨晓, 邓小江, 王小兰, 何奇, 程莉莉, 陈科贵. 海鸥优化算法在四川盆地渝西区块 H井区页岩气储层最优化测井解释中的应用[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(7): 761-768.
[8] 李亚龙, 刘先贵, 胡志明, 端祥刚, 张杰, 詹鸿铭. 页岩气水平井产能预测数值模型综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(4): 350-362.
[9] 程超, 于文刚, 贾婉婷, 林海宇, 李莲庆. 岩石热物理性质的研究进展及发展趋势[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(10): 1072-1083.
[10] 琚宜文, 戚宇, 房立志, 朱洪建, 王国昌, 王桂梁. 中国页岩气的储层类型及其制约因素[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(8): 782-799.
[11] 孙寅森, 郭少斌. 基于图像分析技术的页岩微观孔隙特征定性及定量表征[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(7): 751-763.
[12] 张林晔, 李钜源, 李政, 张金功, 朱日房, 包友书. 北美页岩油气研究进展及对中国陆相页岩油气勘探的思考*[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(6): 700-711.
[13] 张林晔, 李钜源, 李政, 张金功, 朱日房, 包友书. 北美页岩油气研究进展及对中国陆相页岩油气勘探的思考*[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 2014(6): 700-711.
[14] 徐祖新, 郭少斌. 基于NMR和X-CT的页岩储层孔隙结构研究*[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(5): 624-631.
[15] 琚宜文, 卜红玲, 王国昌. 页岩气储层主要特征及其对储层改造的影响[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(4): 492-506.
阅读次数
全文


摘要