论变化环境下流域管理的知识创新

doi:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2012.01.0052

地球科学进展 ›› 2012, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (1): 52 -59. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2012.01.0052

论变化环境下流域管理的知识创新

Wei Yongping ¹，郑航 ^1,2， John Langford ¹，程国栋 ^3*

1.Australia China Centre on Water Resources Research, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia；2.清华大学水沙科学与水利水电工程国家重点实验室，北京100084；3.中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所，甘肃兰州730000

收稿日期:2011-09-15 修回日期:2011-09-26 出版日期:2012-01-10
通讯作者: 程国栋(1943-)，男，上海人，研究员，中国科学院院士，主要从事冻土、生态经济及水文水资源研究. E-mail:gdcheng@lzb.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金黑河流域生态—水文集成研究计划重点项目“流域文化变迁与生态演化相互作用对流域生态政策影响的机理研究——黑河与澳大利亚墨累—达令河流域对比研究”（编号：91125007）；澳大利亚自然科学基金项目“Systemic and adaptive water governance: Lessons for Australia from China and South Africa”（编号： LP100100546）资助.

A Knowledge Co-production System for River Basin Management under Changing Environment

Wei Yongping ¹, Zheng Hang ^1,2, John Langford ¹, Cheng Guodong ³

1.Australia China Centre on Water Resources Research, the University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia；
2.State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University，Beijing100084, China;
3.Cold and Arid Regions Environment and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences，Lanzhou730000，China

Received:2011-09-15 Revised:2011-09-26 Online:2012-01-10 Published:2012-01-10

下载PDF ( 1154 )

提出全球气候变化与世界社会经济动荡等变化环境下流域可持续发展的科学内涵、制约因素以及解决途径。以自然与社会协同进化的复杂系统作为变化环境下流域概念的抽象表征，以科研能力与管理能力作为流域可持续发展的重要影响因素，以流域管理中科学研究与管理实践的相互作用机理为出发点，分析当前流域管理中科学研究与管理实践的种种错位，提出适应变化环境的流域管理知识创新机制，为提高流域科研水平、充分发挥科学在流域可持续发展中的作用提供理论支撑。

关键词: 流域, 可持续, 变化环境, 科学政策错位, 社会学习

Technological innovations and social change have consistently had consequences for river environmental systems since the 19 th century. The river basin is no longer regarded as a natural object and should be conceptualized as a coupled co-evolutionary socio-ecological system. The increasing uncertainties due to climate change and fast changing socio-economic conditions further add challenges on future river basin management. Therefore, a systemic innovation in knowledge in the river basin management is required to adapt to this changing environment. A knowledge co-production system based on social learning is proposed for realizing the systemic innovation, preceded by the identification of mismatches between the current science and management. This knowledge co-production system provides an innovative idea to improve the application of scientific achievement in river basin management and is also useful for framing the scientific research closely related to the management practices.

Key words: River basin, Sustainability of river basin, Changing environment, Mismatch between science and management, Social learning.

中图分类号:

[1]United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Water in Changing World, the United Nations World Water Development Report 3
[R/OL]. http:∥www.unesco.org/water/wwap/wwdr/wwdr3/tableofcontents.shtml, 2009.

[2]Wei Y P, Langford J, Willett I, et al. Is irrigated agriculture in the Murray-Darling Basin well prepared to deal with reductions in water availability?
[J]. Global Environmental Change,2011,21(3): 906-916.

[3]Newson M. Land Water and Development: Sustainable Management of River Basin Systems(2 nd)
[M].USA, New York: Routledge, 1997: 423.

[4]CHES (Chinese Hydraulic Engineering Society), CNCID (Chinese National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage). A Concise History of Irrigation in China
[M]. Beijing: CHES, 1991.

[5]Molle F. River-basin planning and management: The social life of a concept
[J]. Geoforum, 2009, 40(3):484-494.

[6]McCully P. Silenced Rivers: The Ecology and Politics of Large Dams
[M]. London/New York: Zed Books/St. Martin′s Press, 2001.

[7]Biswas A K. Integrated water resources management: A reassessment
[J]. Water International, 2004, 29(2): 248-256.

[8]Barraqué B. Integrated and Participative River Basin management: A social sciences perspective
[C]∥River Basins: From Hydrological Science to Water Management. Paris:UNESCO, 2008.

[9]McGinnis M V. Bioregionalism
[M]∥Taylor B ed. The Encyclopaedia of Religion and Nature. New York: Continuum International, 2009.

[10]Milly P, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M, et al. Stationarity is dead: Whither water management?
[J].Science, 2008, 319(5 863): 573-574.

[11]Wang Hao, Wang Jianhua, Qin Dayong, et al. Theory and methodology of water resources assessment based on dualistic water cycle model
[J].Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2006, 37(12):1 496-1 502.
[王浩, 王建华, 秦大庸, 等. 基于二元水循环模式的水资源评价理论方法
[J]. 水利学报, 2006, 37(12):1 496-1 502.]

[12]Von Storch H. Climate research and policy advice: Scientific and cultural constructions of knowledge
[J].Environmental Science and Policy,2009, 12: 741-747.

[13]Ison R. Systems Practice: How to Act in a Climate-Change World
[M]. London: Springer, 2010.

[14]Norgaard R B. Development Betrayed: The End of Progress and A Coevolutionary Revisioning of the Future
[M]. London and New York: Routledge Press, 1994.

[15]Norgaard R B, Baer P. Collectively seeing complex systems: The nature of the problem
[J].BioScience, 2005, 55(11):953-960.

[16]Viviroli D, Archer D R, Buytaert W, et al. Climate change and mountain water resources: Overview and recommendations for research, management and policy
[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2011, 15 (2):471-504, doi:10.5194/hess-15-471-2011.

[17]Lansing J S. Complex adaptive systems
[J]. Annual Review of Anthropology,2003, 32: 183-204.

[18]Alberts B. A scientific approach to policy
[J].Science,2008, 322(5 907): 1 435.

[19]Pullin A S, Knight T M, Watkinson A R. Linking reductionist science and holistic policy using systematic reviews: Unpacking environmental policy questions to construct an evidence based framework
[J].Journal of Applied Ecology, 2009, 46: 970-975.

[20]Cheng Guodong, Zhao Chuanyan. An integrated study of ecological and hydrological processes in the inland river basin of the arid regions, China
[J]. Advances in Earth Science,2008, 23(10):1 005-1 012.
[程国栋, 赵传燕. 干旱区内陆河流域生态水文综合集成研究
[J]. 地球科学进展, 2008, 23(10):1 005-1 012.]

[21]Bracken L J, Oughton E A. Interdisciplinarity within and beyond geography: Introduction to special section
[J].Area, 2009, 1(4): 371-373.

[22]Hooper B. River basin organization performance indicators: Application to the Delaware River basin commission
[J]. Water Policy, 2010, 12: 461-478.

[23]Pahl-Wostl C, Tàbarab D, Bouwen R, et al. The importance of social learning and culture for sustainable water management
[J]. Ecological Economics,2008, 63(3): 484-495.

[24]Koetz T, Bridgewater P, van den Hove S, et al. The role of the subsidiary body on scientific, technical and technological advice to the convention on biological diversity as science-policy interface
[J].Environmental Science & Policy, 2008, 11(6): 505-516.

[25]Cash D W, Clark W C, Alcock F, et al. Knowledge systems for sustainable development
[J]. PNAS, 2003,100 (14): 8 086-8 091.

[26]Pohl C. From science to policy through transdisciplinary research
[J]. Environmental Science and Policy, 2008, 11 (1): 46-53.

[27]Miller C. Hybrid management: Boundary organizations, science policy, and environmental governance in the climate regime
[J]. Science Technology, Human Values, 2001, 26: 478-500.

[28]Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M. Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty
[M]. UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2001.

[29]Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern P C. The struggle to govern the commons
[J].Science, 2003, 302: 1 907-1 912.

[30]Likens G E. The role of science in decision making: Does evidence-based science drive environmental policy?
[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2010, 8(6): e1-e9.

[31]Acreman M. Linking science and decision-making: Features and experience from environmental river flow setting environmental
[J]. Modelling & Software, 2005, 20: 99-109.

[32]Weichselgartner J, Kasperson R. Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: Toward acknowledge-action-system in global environmental change research
[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2010, 20: 266-277.

[33]Totlandsdal A I, Dybing E, Schwarze P E. From science to policy—When are scientific results certain enough?
[J].Toxicological Sciences,2006, 94(2): 256-260.

[34]Slob A F L, Rijnveld M, Chapman A S, et al. Challenges of linking scientific knowledge to river basin management policy: AquaTerra as a case study
[J].Environmental Pollution,2007, 148: 867-874.

[35]Montpetit E. Scientific credibility, disagreement, and error costs in 17 biotechnology policy subsystems
[J].The Policy Studies Journal, 2011, 39: 3.

[36]Costanza R, d′Arge R, de Groot R. et al. The value of the world′s ecosystem services and natural capital
[J].Nature, 1997, 387:253-260.

[37]Doering O. What science can and cannot provide policy makers in managing agricultural landscapes for environmental quality
[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 63:181A-182A.

[38]Weiss C. The many meanings of research utilization
[M]∥Bulmer M ed. Social Science and Social Policy. London: Allen & Unwin, 1986:31-40.

[39]Hood P. Perspectives on Knowledge Utilization in Education
[Z]. San Francisco: West Ed, 2002.

[40]Landry R, Amara N, Lamari M. Utilization of social science research knowledge in Canada
[J]. Research Policy, 2001, 30: 333-349.

[41]Schenkel R. The challenge of feeding scientific advice into policy-making
[J]. Science,2010, 330:1 749-1 751, doi: 10.1126/science.1197503.

[42]Wei Y P, Ison R L, Colvin L, et al. Reframing water governance:A multi-perspective of an over-engineered catchment in China
[J].Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2011, doi:10.1080/09640568.2011.597589.

[43]Briggs S V, Knight A T. Science-policy interface: Scientific input limited
[J]. Science, 2011, 331(6 021):1 139-1 140.

[44]Colvin J, Mead B. Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation Programme
[R]. Unpublished Tender Document, Coventry: Harewelle International and the Open University, 2010.

[45]Garmendia E, Sigrid Stagl S. Public participation for sustainability and social learning: Concepts and lessons from three case studies in Europe
[J]. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69: 1 712-1 722.

[46]Gottschick M. Participatory sustainability impact assessment: Scientific policy advice as a social learning process
[J].Systemic Practice and Action Research,2008, 21:479-495.

[47]Ison R, Rölling N, Watson D. Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: Investigating the role of social learning
[J].Environmental Science & Policy, 2007, 10: 499-511.

[48]Jiggins J, van Slobbe E, Rölling N. The organisation of social learning in response to perceptions of crisis in the water sector of the Netherlands
[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2007, 10 (6): 526-536.

[49]Mostert E. Hydrological assessment and integrated water resources management with special focus on developing countries
[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth,2008, 33:22-27.

[1]	王奕佳,刘焱序,宋爽,傅伯杰. 水—粮食—能源—生态系统关联研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(7): 684-693.
[2]	王翔宇, 王元慧, 高培超, 宋长青, 程昌秀, 沈石. “可持续社会指数”的研究综述与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(3): 317-324.
[3]	于德永,郝蕊芳. 生态系统服务研究进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(8): 804-815.
[4]	赖正,苏妮,吴舟扬,连尔刚,杨承帆,李芳亮,杨守业. 流域风化过程稳定锶同位素的分馏与示踪[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(7): 691-703.
[5]	涂梦昭,刘志锋,何春阳,任强,卢文路. 基于 GRACE卫星数据的中国地下水储量监测进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(6): 643-656.
[6]	刘元波, 吴桂平, 赵晓松, 范兴旺, 潘鑫, 甘国靖, 刘永伟, 郭瑞芳, 周晗, 王颖, 王若男, 崔逸凡. 流域水文遥感的科学问题与挑战[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(5): 488-496.
[7]	黄婉彬,鄢春华,张晓楠,邱国玉. 城市化对地下水水量、水质与水热变化的影响及其对策分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(5): 497-512.
[8]	陈明星,周园,郭莎莎,黄莘绒. 新型城镇化研究的意义、目标与任务[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(9): 974-983.
[9]	刘鸣彦,孙凤华,侯依玲,赵春雨,周晓宇. 基于 HBV模型的太子河流域径流变化情景预估[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(6): 650-659.
[10]	王雪梅,尉永平,马明国,张志强. 基于文献计量学的黑河流域研究进展分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(3): 316-323.
[11]	王思佳,刘鹄,赵文智,李中恺. 干旱、半干旱区地下水可持续性研究评述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(2): 210-223.
[12]	黄强,陈子燊,唐常源,李绍峰. 珠江流域重大干旱事件时空发展过程反演研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(10): 1050-1059.
[13]	常海钦,付亚龙,林鑫,张苗苗,孟刚刚. 流域盆地化学风化强度空间分布及控制因素研究：以长江和珠江为例[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(1): 93-102.
[14]	张宸嘉, 方一平, 陈秀娟. 基于文献计量的国内可持续生计研究进展分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(9): 969-982.
[15]	马忠, 苏守娟, 龙爱华, 张晓霞. 塔里木河流域社会经济系统水循环分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(8): 833-841.

阅读次数

全文

摘要