地球科学进展

地球科学进展 ›› 2020, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 804 -815. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2020.069

综述与评述 上一篇    下一篇

生态系统服务研究进展与展望
于德永 1, 2( ),郝蕊芳 3   
  1. 1.北京师范大学地理科学学部，地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室人与环境可持续性研究中心，北京 100875
    2.青海省人民政府—北京师范大学高原科学与可持续发展研究院，青海 西宁 810008
    3.北京林业大学水土保持学院，北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-09 修回日期:2020-07-15 出版日期:2020-08-10
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目“气候变化背景下内蒙古中西部地区土地利用与生态系统服务的定量关系研究”(41971269);青海省重大科技专项项目“青海省生态价值总量和时空差异的量化”(2019SFA12-A010204)

Research Progress and Prospect of Ecosystem Services

Deyong Yu 1, 2( ),Ruifang Hao 3   

  1. 1.Center for Human-Environment System Sustainability (CHESS), State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology (ESPRE), College of Resources Science & Technology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    2.Academy of Plateau Science and Sustainability, People's Goverment of Qinghai Province & Beijing Normal University, Xining 810008, China
    3.School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2020-05-09 Revised:2020-07-15 Online:2020-08-10 Published:2020-09-15
  • About author:Yu Deyong （1973-）， male， Chaoyang City， Liaoning Province， Professor. Research areas include landscape ecology and land system planning, urban ecology and urban planning. E-mail： ydy@bnu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China “Quantifying the relationship between land use and ecosystem services under climate change in the central and western regions of Inner Mongolia”(41971269);The Key Project of Science and Technology Department of Qinghai Province “Quantification of total ecological value and temporal and spatial differences in Qinghai Province”(2019SFA12-A010204)
全文 ( 138 ) 下载PDF ( 2632 )

生态系统服务是指人类从自然生态系统中获得的惠益。加强气候变化背景下景观格局与生态系统服务的定量关系研究，在此基础上优化区域土地系统，是提高区域/景观提供生态系统服务能力的重要途径。评述了生态系统服务测量、相互关系和优化管理研究进展和存在的问题。强调生态系统服务物质量准确测量是价值化的基础，约束线方法在刻画生态系统服务相互关系的非线性特征和阈值方面具有较大潜力，应从人与环境耦合系统整体性出发，研发新一代的地球系统模式，在区域尺度上优化生态系统服务，这是实现区域可持续发展的景观可持续科学途径。

关键词: 区域可持续发展, 人与环境耦合系统, 地球系统模式, 约束作用, 土地系统设计

Ecosystem services refer to the benefits that humans obtain from natural ecosystems. Landscape pattern is closely related to ecosystem processes/functions. Understanding the quantitative relationship between landscape pattern and ecosystem services in the context of climate change is an important way to improve the ability of a region/landscape to provide ecosystem services. This article reviewed the progress and existing problems in the research field of ecosystem service measurement, mutual relationship and optimal management. This article emphasized that the accurate measurement of the amount of ecosystem services is the basis of valuing it, and the constraint line approach has great potential in portraying the nonlinear relationship and threshold characteristics of ecosystem services. It is necessary to start from the integrity of human-environment coupling system to develop a new generation of earth system models and optimize regional ecosystem services on this basis, which is a landscape sustainability science approach to achieve the goal of regional sustainable development.

Key words: Regional sustainable development, Human-environment coupling system, Earth system modeling, Constraint effect, Land system planning

中图分类号: 

图1 生态系统服务的驱动机制及与人类福祉的耦合关系
Fig.1 Driving mechanism of ecosystem services and the coupling relationship with human well-being
表1 生态系统服务主要研究领域及存在的问题
Table 1 Main fields and existing problems of ecosystem service studies
研究领域 研究方法 优点 存在问题

生态系统

服务测量

 生态过程模型 生态学机理清楚 参数化复杂、验证困难
遥感反演模型 能够全覆盖表征生态系统质量异质性 高精度遥感影像较难获取
土地利用/覆盖替代 简单易行 难以表征生态系统异质性
野外调查采样 精度高 不适用于大尺度

生态系统

服务作用关系

 权衡与协同 简单易行 静态、二元化
制图叠加 简单易行 无法得到定量关系
情景模拟 有针对性 目标较为单一
统计方法 简单易行 统计学基础往往难以满足

生态系统

服务管理

 驱动机制 明晰生态系统服务变化的机制 缺乏多类因子综合分析
情景分析 服务于政策制定 较多假设与现实有偏离
土地利用优化 生态系统服务优化目标明确 往往局地或局部优化
图2 气候系统—土地系统—人类系统相互作用构成人与环境耦合系统
Fig.2 Climate system, land system and human system interact with each other and constitute a coupling human-environment system
图3 可持续性景观建研究框架
Fig.3 Research framework of sustainable landscape architecture
1 Helliwell D. Valuation of wildlife resources[J]. Regional Studies, 1969, 3：41-47.
2 Westman W E. How much are nature's services worth?[J]. Science, 1997, 197(4 307): 960-964.
3 Ehrlich P, Ehrlich A. Extinction: The causes and consequences of the disappearance of species[J]. Bioscience， 1982, 53(4): 254-255.
4 Daily G. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems[M]. Washington DC: Island Press, 1997: 1-10.
5 Nations United. Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015 General Assembly[Z]. 2015: 1-35.
6 Nations United. World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision, Volume I-Comprehensive Tables[R]. New York:United Nations, 2012：1-3.
7 Hoff H. Understanding the Nexus. Background Paper for the Bonn 2011 Conference: The Water, Energy and Food Security Nexus[R]. Stockholm：Stockholm Environment Institute, 2011：4-11.
8 Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, et al. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2014, 26: 152-158.
9 Millennium Ecosystem Assessment.Ecosystems and Human Well-being[M]. Washington DC: Island Press, 2005：27-28.
10 Cumming G S, Olsson P, Chapin F, et al. Resilience, experimentation, and scale mismatches in social-ecological landscapes[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2013, 28: 1 139-1 150.
11 Fu B, Wang S, Su C, et al. Linking ecosystem processes and ecosystem services[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2017, 5: 4-10.
12 Peng S. Water resources strategy and agricultural development in China[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2011, 62: 1 709-1 713.
13 Bryan B A, Gao L, Ye Y, et al. China’s response to a national land-system sustainability emergency[J]. Nature, 2018, 559:193-204.
14 Costanza R, De Groot R, Farber S, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Ecological Economics, 1998, 25: 3-15.
15 Wu J. Landscape sustainability science: Ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2013, 28: 999-1 023.
16 Nowak A, Grunewald K. Landscape sustainability in terms of landscape services in rural areas: Exemplified with a case study area in Poland[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 94: 12-22.
17 Opdam P, Luque S, Nassauer J, et al. How can landscape ecology contribute to sustainability science?[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2018, 33: 1-7.
18 Wu Jianguo, Guo Xiaochuan, Yang Jieqian, et al. What is sustainability science?[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology，2014，25(1): 1-11.
邬建国,郭晓川,杨稢钱,等.什么是可持续科学?[J].应用生态学报，2014, 25(1)：1-11.
19 Costanza R, d'Arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Nature, 1997, 387: 253-260.
20 Ouyang Zhiyun, Wang Xiaoke, Miao Hong.A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological-economic values[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999,19(5): 607-613.
欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿.中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J].生态学报, 1999, 19(5):607-613.
21 Xie Gaodi, Zhang Caixia, Zhang Changshun, et al. The value of ecosystem services in China [J]. Resources Science, 2015, 37(9):1 740-1 746.
谢高地, 张彩霞, 张昌顺, 等.中国生态系统服务的价值[J].资源科学, 2015, 37(9):1 740-1 746.
22 Xu Z, Wei H, Fan W, et al. Energy modeling simulation of changes in ecosystem services before and after the implementation of a Grain-for-Green program on the Loess Plateau—A case study of the Zhifanggou valley in Ansai County, Shaanxi Province, China[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018, 31: 32-43.
23 Villa F, Bagstad K, Johnson G. Scientific instruments for climate change adaptation: Estimating and optimizing the efficiency of ecosystem service provision[J]. Ecomnomia Agrariay Recursos Naturales, 2011, 11(1): 83-98.
24 Sherrouse B C, Semmens D J. Social Values for Ecosystem Services, Version 3.0 (SolVES 3.0): Documentation and User Manual[R]. Reston, Virginia：U.S. Geological Survey, 2015.
25 Sharp R, Tallis H T, Ricketts T, et al. InVEST +VERSION+ User’s Guide[R]. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund, 2016.
26 Bennett E M, Peterson G D, Gordon L J. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services[J]. Ecology Letters, 2009, 12: 1 394-1 404.
27 Li Shuangcheng, Zhang Caiyu, Liu Jinlong, et al.The tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services:Research progress, development trend, and themes of geography[J]. Geographical Research, 2013, 32(8): 1 379-1 390.
李双成, 张才玉, 刘金龙, 等.生态系统服务权衡与协同研究进展及地理学研究议题[J].地理研究, 2013, 32(8): 1 379-1 390.
28 de Groot, R, Fisher B, Christie M, et al. chapter TEEB1: Integrating the ecological and economic dimensions in biodiversity and ecosystem service valuation[M]//The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: The Ecological and Economic Foundations, 2010: 3-12.
29 Rodríguez J P, Beard Jr T D, Bennett E M, et al. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services[J]. Ecology and Society, 2006, 11(1): 28.
30 Bai Y, Zhuang C, Ouyang Z, et al. Spatial characteristics between biodiversity and ecosystem services in a human-dominated watershed[J]. Ecological Complexity, 2011, 8: 177-183.
31 Qiu J, Carpenter S R, Booth E G, et al. Scenarios reveal pathways to sustain future ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape[J]. Ecological Applications, 2017, 28: 119-134.
32 Estoque R C, Murayama Y, Myint S W. Effects of landscape composition and pattern on land surface temperature: An urban heat island study in the megacities of Southeast Asia[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 577: 349-359.
33 Jopke C, Kreyling J, Maes J, et al. Interactions among ecosystem services across Europe: Bagplots and cumulative correlation coefficients reveal synergies, trade-offs, and regional patterns[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 49: 46-52.
34 Hao R, Yu D. Optimization schemes for grassland ecosystem services under climate change[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 85: 1 158-1 169.
35 Turner K G, Odgaard MV, B?cher P K, et al. Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: Trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2014, 125: 89-104.
36 Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, et al. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2009, 7: 4-11.
37 Holling C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973, 4: 1-23.
38 Hao Ruifang, Yu Deyong, Wu Jianguo, et al. Constraint line methods and the applications in ecology [J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2016, 40(10): 1 100-1 109.
郝蕊芳, 于德永, 邬建国,等. 约束线方法在生态学研究中的应用[J]. 植物生态学报， 2016, 40(10): 1 100-1 109.
39 Hao R, Yu D, Wu J. Relationship between paired ecosystem services in the grassland and agro-pastoral transitional zone of China using the constraint line method[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 2017, 240: 171-181.
40 Hao R, Yu D, Sun Y, et al. The features and influential factors of interactions among ecosystem services[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 101:770-779.
41 Albert C, Galler C, Hermes J, et al. Applying ecosystem services indicators in landscape planning and management: The es-in-planning framework [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 61: 100-113.
42 Porto M, Correia O, Beja P. Optimization of landscape services under uncoordinated management by multiple landowners [J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(1): e86001.
43 Keller A A, Fournier E, Fox J. Minimizing impacts of land use change on ecosystem services using multi-criteria heuristic analysis [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2015, 156: 23-30.
44 Fezzi C, Harwood A R, Lovett A A, et al. The environmental impact of climate change adaptation [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2015, 5(4): 385-385.
45 Mastrangelo M E, Weyland F, Villarino S H, et al. Concepts and methods for landscape multifunctionality and a unifying framework based on ecosystem services [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2014, 29：345-358.
46 Lamarque P, Lavorel S, Mouchet M. Plant trait-based models identify direct and indirect effects of climate change on bundles of grassland ecosystem services [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 2014, 111: 13 751-13 756.
47 Lawler J J, Lewis D J, Nelson E, et al. Projected land-use change impacts on ecosystem services in the united states [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences f the United States, 2014, 111: 7 492-7 497.
48 Jones K B, Zurlini G, Kienast F, et al. Informing landscape planning and design for sustaining ecosystem services from existing spatial patterns and knowledge [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2012, 28: 1 175-1 192.
49 He Xiaojia, Wang Min, Feng Xiangzhao. Analysis on the feasibility and pathway of integrating ecosystem service into climate change governance solution [J].Advances in Earth Science, 2017, 32(5): 560-567.
何霄嘉, 王敏, 冯相昭.生态系统服务纳入应对气候变化的可行性与途径探讨[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(5): 560-567.
50 Yu D, Liu P, Shi P, et al. Projecting impacts of climate change on global terrestrial ecoregions [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 103:114-123.
51 Vitousek P M, Mooney H A, Lubchenco J, et al. Human domination of Earth's ecosystems[J]. Science,1997, 277(5 325): 494-499.
52 IPCC. Climate Change 2000:The Scientific Basis[M]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000：11-16.
53 Charney J G. Dynamics of deserts and droughts in the Sahel[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society,1975,101(428):193-202.
54 Cao Q, Wu J, Yu D, et al. The biophysical effects of the vegetation restoration program on regional climate metrics in the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2019, 268:169-180.
55 Cao Q, Yu D, Georgescu M, et al. Impacts of future urban expansion on summer climate and heat-related human health in eastern China[J]. Environment International, 2018, 112:134-146.
56 Cao Q, Yu D, Georgescu M, et al. Impacts of urbanization on summer climate in China—An assessment with coupled land-atmospheric modeling[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2016, 121(18): 10 505-10 521.
57 Cao Q, Yu D, Georgescu M, et al. Substantial impacts of landscape changes on summer climate with major regional differences: The case of China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 625: 416-427.
58 Rockstr?m J, Steffen W, Noone K, et al. A safe operating space for humanity[J]. Nature, 2009, 461:472-475.
59 Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockstr?m J, et al. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet[J]. Science, 2015, 347(6 223):1259855.
60 Anderies J M, Mathias J D，Janssen M A. Knowledge infrastructure and safe operating spaces in social-ecological systems[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018, 116(12): 5 277-5 284.
61 Ye Duzheng,Yan Zhongwei, Ma Zhuguo.Addressing climate change for sustainable development[J].Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2012, 27(3): 332-336.
叶笃正, 严中伟, 马柱国. 应对气候变化与可持续发展[J].中国科学院院刊, 2012, 27(3): 332-336.
62 Ye Duzheng, Fu Congbin, Ji Jinjun, et al. Orderly human activities and subsistence environment[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2001, 16(4): 453-460.
叶笃正，符淙斌，季劲钧，等.有序人类活动与生存环境[J].地球科学进展, 2001, 16(4): 453-460.
63 Verburg P H, Crossman N, Ellis E C, et al. Land system science and sustainable development of the Earth system: A global land project perspective[J]. Anthropocene, 2015, 12: 29-41.
[1] 田凤云,吴成来,张贺,林朝晖. 基于 CAS-ESM2的青藏高原蒸散发的模拟与预估[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(8): 797-809.
[2] 董文杰, 袁文平, 滕飞, 郝志新, 郑景云, 韦志刚, 丑洁明, 刘昌新, 齐天宇, 杨世莉, 阎东东, 张婧. 地球系统模式与综合评估模型的双向耦合及应用[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(12): 1215-1219.
[3] 张学珍, 于志博, 郑景云, 郝志新. 植物挥发性有机物的气候与环境效应研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(11): 1198-1209.
[4] 邬建国, 何春阳, 张庆云, 于德永, 黄甘霖, 黄庆旭. 全球变化与区域可持续发展耦合模型及调控对策[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(12): 1315-1324.
[5] 郑度，陈述彭. 地理学研究进展与前沿领域[J]. 地球科学进展, 2001, 16(5): 599-606.
[6] 周永章,郑洪汉. 开展21世纪区域可持续发展综合研究刍议[J]. 地球科学进展, 1995, 10(2): 202-204.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

网站版权所有 © 《地球科学进展》编辑部
地址：甘肃省兰州市天水中路8号
QQ：114723517
电话：0931-8762293　E-mail：adearth@lzb.ac.cn
陇ICP备2021001824号-5　 甘公网安备62010202000687