地球科学进展 ›› 2021, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 317 -324. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2021.008

青藏高原综合科学考察研究 上一篇    下一篇

“可持续社会指数”的研究综述与展望
王翔宇 1 , 2( ), 王元慧 1, 高培超 2, 宋长青 1( ), 程昌秀 1 , 3, 沈石 2   
  1. 1.北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室,北京 100875
    2.北京师范大学地理科学学部,北京 100875
    3.国家青藏高原科学数据中心,北京 100101
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-20 修回日期:2021-01-24 出版日期:2021-04-30
  • 通讯作者: 宋长青 E-mail:201831051025@mail.bnu.edu.cn;songcq@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    第二次青藏高原综合考察研究专题“人类活动影响与生存环境安全评估”(2019QZKK0608)

Review and Prospect of "Sustainable Society Index"

Xiangyu WANG 1 , 2( ), Yuanhui WANG 1, Peichao GAO 2, Changqing SONG 1( ), Changxiu CHENG 1 , 3, Shi SHEN 2   

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China
    2.Faculty of Geographical Science,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China
    3.National Tibetan Plateau Data Center,Beijing 100101,China
  • Received:2020-11-20 Revised:2021-01-24 Online:2021-04-30 Published:2021-04-30
  • Contact: Changqing SONG E-mail:201831051025@mail.bnu.edu.cn;songcq@bnu.edu.cn
  • About author:WANG Xiangyu (1992-), male, Zibo City, Shandong Province, Ph.D student. Research areas include sustainable development. E-mail: 201831051025@mail.bnu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP) “Human activities and assessment of living environment”(2019QZKK0608)

正确评价和监测区域可持续发展水平,是实现2030年可持续发展目标的关键参考。随着观测手段和计算机技术的蓬勃发展,以指标观测和指数表达为基础的“指标时代”的到来为研究区域可持续发展水平提供了一个思路。“可持续社会指数”是全要素的综合评价,可以综合衡量国家尺度的可持续发展程度,并长期监测。从理论研究、指标框架和方法论的角度详细介绍了“可持续社会指数”,从对“可持续社会指数”的指标选取和指数计算方面的局限和改进两个方面,对其相关研究进行综合梳理。最后,提出了未来可能应用的研究方向。

It is important to assess and monitor the level of regional sustainable development. With the development of observation and computer technology, scholars and stakeholders have realized that constructing an index is a critical step in evaluating the level of regional sustainable development. This paper introduced the "Sustainable Society Index" (SSI) from three perspectives, namely, theory, indicators framework, and methodology. This paper reviewed the literatures about the SSI based on two views, that is, limitation and improvement. There are three conclusions. First, the scholars and stakeholders widely thought SSI was a comprehensive method for assessing and monitoring the level of national sustainable development. Second, the limitations of SSI were mainly about the selection and aggregation of indicators. Third, the improvements of SSI were mainly about the aggregation methods. Finally, this paper also suggested possible research directions in the future.

中图分类号: 

表1 “可持续社会指数”的指标框架( 2018版)
Table 1 The indicators framework of “Sustainable Society Index”(2018)
表1 “可持续社会指数”的指标框架( 2018版)
Table 1 The indicators framework of “Sustainable Society Index”(2018)
表2 可持续发展目标与可持续社会指数的维度层对比
Table 2 Compare with dimensions of the SDGs and SSI
表2 可持续发展目标与可持续社会指数的维度层对比
Table 2 Compare with dimensions of the SDGs and SSI
1 DONG Liang, ZHANG Haibin. Environmental objectives in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and its implications on the world and China in environmental governance[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2016, 26(1): 8-15.
DONG Liang, ZHANG Haibin. Environmental objectives in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and its implications on the world and China in environmental governance[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2016, 26(1): 8-15.
董亮,张海滨. 2030年可持续发展议程对全球及中国环境治理的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(1):8-15.
董亮,张海滨. 2030年可持续发展议程对全球及中国环境治理的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(1):8-15.
2 FOLEY J A, DEFRIES R S, ASNER G P, et al. Global consequences of land use[J]. Science, 2005, 309(5 734): 570-574.
FOLEY J A, DEFRIES R S, ASNER G P, et al. Global consequences of land use[J]. Science, 2005, 309(5 734): 570-574.
3 QIN Dahe. Climate change science and sustainable development[J]. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(7): 874-883.
QIN Dahe. Climate change science and sustainable development[J]. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(7): 874-883.
秦大河.气候变化科学与人类可持续发展[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(7):874-883.
秦大河.气候变化科学与人类可持续发展[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(7):874-883.
4 ZHOU Hongjian. Hot-topics and prospects of global platform for disaster risk reduction: Based on 2017 Global Plat for Disaster Risk Reduction in Cancun, Mexico[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2017, 32(7): 688-695.
ZHOU Hongjian. Hot-topics and prospects of global platform for disaster risk reduction: Based on 2017 Global Plat for Disaster Risk Reduction in Cancun, Mexico[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2017, 32(7): 688-695.
周洪建.当前全球减轻灾害风险平台的前沿话题与展望——基于2017年全球减灾平台大会的综述与思考[J].地球科学进展,2017,32(7):688-695.
周洪建.当前全球减轻灾害风险平台的前沿话题与展望——基于2017年全球减灾平台大会的综述与思考[J].地球科学进展,2017,32(7):688-695.
5 SUN Xinzhang. China's strategy to participating in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2016, 26(1): 1-7.
SUN Xinzhang. China's strategy to participating in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2016, 26(1): 1-7.
孙新章.中国参与2030年可持续发展议程的战略思考[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(1):1-7.
孙新章.中国参与2030年可持续发展议程的战略思考[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(1):1-7.
6 WANG Guanghui, LIU Yijun, WANG Hongbing. Succession of Sustainable Development Goals in past 30 years[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2015,30(5):586-592.
WANG Guanghui, LIU Yijun, WANG Hongbing. Succession of Sustainable Development Goals in past 30 years[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2015,30(5):586-592.
王光辉,刘怡君,王红兵.过去30年世界可持续发展目标的演替[J].中国科学院院刊,2015,30(5):586-592.
王光辉,刘怡君,王红兵.过去30年世界可持续发展目标的演替[J].中国科学院院刊,2015,30(5):586-592.
7 GAO P, WANG X, WANG H, et al. Viewpoint: A correction to the entropy weight coefficient method by Shen,et al. for accessing urban sustainability [Cities 42 (2015) 186-194][J]. Cities, 2020, 103: 102 742-102 744.
GAO P, WANG X, WANG H, et al. Viewpoint: A correction to the entropy weight coefficient method by Shen,et al. for accessing urban sustainability [Cities 42 (2015) 186-194][J]. Cities, 2020, 103: 102 742-102 744.
8 MONZON M, LOPEZMESA B. Buildings performance indicators to prioritise multi-family housing renovations[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2018, 38: 109-122.
MONZON M, LOPEZMESA B. Buildings performance indicators to prioritise multi-family housing renovations[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2018, 38: 109-122.
9 LIU Z, DING M, HE C, et al. The impairment of environmental sustainability due to rapid urbanization in the dryland region of northern China[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2019, 187: 165-180.
LIU Z, DING M, HE C, et al. The impairment of environmental sustainability due to rapid urbanization in the dryland region of northern China[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2019, 187: 165-180.
10 TAO Y, LI F, CRITTENDEN J C, et al. Measuring urban environmental sustainability performance in China: A multi-scale comparison among different cities, urban clusters, and geographic regions[J]. Cities, 2019, 94: 200-210.
TAO Y, LI F, CRITTENDEN J C, et al. Measuring urban environmental sustainability performance in China: A multi-scale comparison among different cities, urban clusters, and geographic regions[J]. Cities, 2019, 94: 200-210.
11 SILVA L DA, MARQUES PRIETTO P D, PAVAN KORF E. Sustainability indicators for urban solid waste management in large and medium-sized worldwide cities[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 237:117 802-117 811.
SILVA L DA, MARQUES PRIETTO P D, PAVAN KORF E. Sustainability indicators for urban solid waste management in large and medium-sized worldwide cities[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 237:117 802-117 811.
12 WU Jianguo, GUO Xiaochuan, YANG Yu, et al. What is sustainability science?[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(1): 1-11.
WU Jianguo, GUO Xiaochuan, YANG Yu, et al. What is sustainability science?[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(1): 1-11.
邬建国,郭晓川,杨稢,等.什么是可持续性科学[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(1):1-11.
邬建国,郭晓川,杨稢,等.什么是可持续性科学[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(1):1-11.
13 JIANG Tong, WANG Yanjun, SU Buda, et al. Perspectives of human activities in global climate change: Evolution of socio-economic scenarios[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 1(1): 68-80.
JIANG Tong, WANG Yanjun, SU Buda, et al. Perspectives of human activities in global climate change: Evolution of socio-economic scenarios[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 1(1): 68-80.
姜彤,王艳君,苏布达,等.全球气候变化中的人类活动视角:社会经济情景的演变[J].南京信息工程大学学报:自然科学版,2020,1(1):68-80.
姜彤,王艳君,苏布达,等.全球气候变化中的人类活动视角:社会经济情景的演变[J].南京信息工程大学学报:自然科学版,2020,1(1):68-80.
14 HUANG L, WU J, YAN L, et al. Defining and measuring urban sustainability: A review of indicators[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2015, 30(7): 1 175-1 193.
HUANG L, WU J, YAN L, et al. Defining and measuring urban sustainability: A review of indicators[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2015, 30(7): 1 175-1 193.
15 SIRONEN S, SEPPALA J, LESKINEN P, et al. Towards more non-compensatory sustainable society index[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2015, 17(3): 587-621.
SIRONEN S, SEPPALA J, LESKINEN P, et al. Towards more non-compensatory sustainable society index[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2015, 17(3): 587-621.
16 World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). Our common future[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.
World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). Our common future[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.
17 DE KERK G VAN, MANUEL A R. Sustainable society index-SSI 2012[R]. The Netherlands: Sustainable Society Foundation, 2012.
DE KERK G VAN, MANUEL A R. Sustainable society index-SSI 2012[R]. The Netherlands: Sustainable Society Foundation, 2012.
18 WU S, FU Y, SHEN H, et al. Using ranked weights and Shannon entropy to modify regional sustainable society index[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2018, 41: 443-448.
WU S, FU Y, SHEN H, et al. Using ranked weights and Shannon entropy to modify regional sustainable society index[J]. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2018, 41: 443-448.
19 SCHLOSSAREK M, SYROVATKA M, VENCALEK O, et al. The importance of variables in composite indices: A contribution to the methodology and application to development indices[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2019, 145(3): 1 125-1 160.
SCHLOSSAREK M, SYROVATKA M, VENCALEK O, et al. The importance of variables in composite indices: A contribution to the methodology and application to development indices[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2019, 145(3): 1 125-1 160.
20 SMITH L M, CASE J L, SMITH H M, et al. Relating ecosystem services to domains of human well-being: Foundation for a U.S. index[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2013, 28: 79-90.
SMITH L M, CASE J L, SMITH H M, et al. Relating ecosystem services to domains of human well-being: Foundation for a U.S. index[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2013, 28: 79-90.
21 DE KERK G VAN, MANUEL A R. Sustainable society index-SSI 2010[R]. The Netherlands: Sustainable Society Foundation, 2010.
DE KERK G VAN, MANUEL A R. Sustainable society index-SSI 2010[R]. The Netherlands: Sustainable Society Foundation, 2010.
22 LUZZATI T, GUCCIARDI G. A non-simplistic approach to composite indicators and rankings: An illustration by comparing the sustainability of the EU countries[J]. Ecological Economics, 2015, 113(113): 25-38.
LUZZATI T, GUCCIARDI G. A non-simplistic approach to composite indicators and rankings: An illustration by comparing the sustainability of the EU countries[J]. Ecological Economics, 2015, 113(113): 25-38.
23 HUANG L, YAN L, WU J, et al. Assessing urban sustainability of Chinese megacities: 35 years after the economic reform and open-door policy[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2016, 145: 57-70.
HUANG L, YAN L, WU J, et al. Assessing urban sustainability of Chinese megacities: 35 years after the economic reform and open-door policy[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2016, 145: 57-70.
24 DE KERK G VAN, MANUEL A R. Sustainable society index-SSI 2016[R]. The Netherlands: Sustainable Society Foundation, 2016.
DE KERK G VAN, MANUEL A R. Sustainable society index-SSI 2016[R]. The Netherlands: Sustainable Society Foundation, 2016.
25 SAISANA M, PHILIPPAS D. Sustainable Society Index (SSI): Taking societies' pulse along social, environmental and economic issues[C]. Italy: The Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, 2012.
SAISANA M, PHILIPPAS D. Sustainable Society Index (SSI): Taking societies' pulse along social, environmental and economic issues[C]. Italy: The Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, 2012.
26 DE KERK G VAN, MANUEL A R. A comprehensive index for a sustainable society: The SSI—The Sustainable Society Index[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 66(2): 228-242.
DE KERK G VAN, MANUEL A R. A comprehensive index for a sustainable society: The SSI—The Sustainable Society Index[J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 66(2): 228-242.
27 WITULSKI N, DIAS J. The Sustainable Society Index: Its reliability and validity[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 114: 106 190-106 120.
WITULSKI N, DIAS J. The Sustainable Society Index: Its reliability and validity[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 114: 106 190-106 120.
28 KAIVO-OJA J, PANULA-ONTTO J, VEHMAS J, et al. Relationships of the dimensions of sustainability as measured by the sustainable society index framework[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 2014, 21(1): 39-45.
KAIVO-OJA J, PANULA-ONTTO J, VEHMAS J, et al. Relationships of the dimensions of sustainability as measured by the sustainable society index framework[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 2014, 21(1): 39-45.
29 DING Y, FU Y, LAI K K, et al. Using ranked weights and acceptability analysis to construct composite indicators: A case study of regional Sustainable Society Index [J]. Social Indicators Research, 2018, 139(3): 871-885.
DING Y, FU Y, LAI K K, et al. Using ranked weights and acceptability analysis to construct composite indicators: A case study of regional Sustainable Society Index [J]. Social Indicators Research, 2018, 139(3): 871-885.
30 SEPPÄLÄ J, LESKINEN P, MYLLYVIITA T, et al. Expert panel weighting and aggregation of the Sustainable Society Index (SSI) 2010—A decision analysis approach [J]. Sustainable Development, 2017, 25(4): 322-335.
SEPP?L? J, LESKINEN P, MYLLYVIITA T, et al. Expert panel weighting and aggregation of the Sustainable Society Index (SSI) 2010—A decision analysis approach [J]. Sustainable Development, 2017, 25(4): 322-335.
31 GONZALEZ-CABEZAS D, ZAROR C, HERRERA M A, et al. Comparative assessment of sustainable development in South American countries on the basis of the Sustainable Society Index[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 2019, 26(1): 90-98.
GONZALEZ-CABEZAS D, ZAROR C, HERRERA M A, et al. Comparative assessment of sustainable development in South American countries on the basis of the Sustainable Society Index[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 2019, 26(1): 90-98.
32 RODRIGUEZ-ROSA M, GALLEGO-ALVAREZ I, VICENTE-GALINDO M P, et al. Are social, economic and environmental well-being equally important in all countries around the world?A study by income levels[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2017, 131(2): 543-565.
RODRIGUEZ-ROSA M, GALLEGO-ALVAREZ I, VICENTE-GALINDO M P, et al. Are social, economic and environmental well-being equally important in all countries around the world?A study by income levels[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2017, 131(2): 543-565.
33 GALLEGO-ALVAREZ I, GALINDO-VILLARDON M P, RODRIGUEZ-ROSA M, et al. Analysis of the Sustainable Society Index worldwide: A study from the biplot perspective[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2015, 120(1): 29-65.
GALLEGO-ALVAREZ I, GALINDO-VILLARDON M P, RODRIGUEZ-ROSA M, et al. Analysis of the Sustainable Society Index worldwide: A study from the biplot perspective[J]. Social Indicators Research, 2015, 120(1): 29-65.
34 GALLEGO-ALVAREZ I, GALINDO-VILLARDON M P, Rodriguez-Rosa M, et al. Evolution of sustainability indicator worldwide: A study from the economic perspective based on the X-STATICO method[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 58: 139-151.
GALLEGO-ALVAREZ I, GALINDO-VILLARDON M P, Rodriguez-Rosa M, et al. Evolution of sustainability indicator worldwide: A study from the economic perspective based on the X-STATICO method[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2015, 58: 139-151.
35 RODRIGUEZ-ROSA M, GALLEGO-ALVAREZ I, GALINDO-VILLARDON M P, et al. Spatio-temporal analysis of economic, social, and environmental issues in the framework of sustainable development in worldwide countries[J]. Sustainable Development, 2019, 27(3): 429-447.
RODRIGUEZ-ROSA M, GALLEGO-ALVAREZ I, GALINDO-VILLARDON M P, et al. Spatio-temporal analysis of economic, social, and environmental issues in the framework of sustainable development in worldwide countries[J]. Sustainable Development, 2019, 27(3): 429-447.
36 SONG Changqing, CHENG Changxiu, YANG Xiaofan, et al. Understanding geographic coupling and achieving geographic integration[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020,75(1):3-13.
SONG Changqing, CHENG Changxiu, YANG Xiaofan, et al. Understanding geographic coupling and achieving geographic integration[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2020,75(1):3-13.
宋长青,程昌秀,杨晓帆,等.理解地理“耦合”实现地理“集成”[J].地理学报,2020,75(1):3-13.
宋长青,程昌秀,杨晓帆,等.理解地理“耦合”实现地理“集成”[J].地理学报,2020,75(1):3-13.
37 XU Z, CHAU S N, CHEN X, et al. Assessing progress towards sustainable development over space and time[J]. Nature, 2020, 577(7 788): 74-78.
XU Z, CHAU S N, CHEN X, et al. Assessing progress towards sustainable development over space and time[J]. Nature, 2020, 577(7 788): 74-78.
[1] 王奕佳,刘焱序,宋爽,傅伯杰. 水—粮食—能源—生态系统关联研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(7): 684-693.
[2] 于德永,郝蕊芳. 生态系统服务研究进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(8): 804-815.
[3] 陈明星,周园,郭莎莎,黄莘绒. 新型城镇化研究的意义、目标与任务[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(9): 974-983.
[4] 张宸嘉, 方一平, 陈秀娟. 基于文献计量的国内可持续生计研究进展分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(9): 969-982.
[5] 宋晓谕, 高峻, 李新, 李巍岳, 张中浩, 王亮绪, 付晶, 黄春林, 高峰. 遥感与网络数据支撑的城市可持续性评价:进展与前瞻[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(10): 1075-1083.
[6] 魏彦强, 李新, 高峰, 黄春林, 宋晓谕, 王宝, 马瀚青, 王鹏龙. 联合国2030年可持续发展目标框架及中国应对策略[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(10): 1084-1093.
[7] 陆大道, 孙东琪. 关于经济增长支撑系统领域研究的进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(6): 555-559.
[8] 曾庆存,林朝晖. 地球系统动力学模式和模拟研究的进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(1): 1-6.
[9] 史培军,李 宁,叶谦,董文杰,韩国义,方伟华. 全球环境变化与综合灾害风险防范研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2009, 24(4): 428-435.
[10] 王雪梅,张志强,熊永兰. 国际生态足迹研究态势的文献计量分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2007, 22(8): 872-878.
[11] 李玉文,徐中民. 社会资本在可持续发展中的作用[J]. 地球科学进展, 2007, 22(6): 612-617.
[12] 王静爱,苏筠,商彦蕊,洪世奇,王志强,刘珍. 中国旱灾农业承灾体脆弱性诊断与评价[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(2): 161-169.
[13] 陈星;赵鸣;张洁. 南水北调对北方干旱化趋势可能影响的初步分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(8): 849-855.
[14] 袁朱. 我国煤炭城市实现可持续发展的思路与对策研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(6): 679-686.
[15] 史培军;邹铭;李保俊;周俊华;王瑛. 从区域安全建设到风险管理体系的形成——从第一届世界风险大会看灾害与风险研究的现状与发展趋向[J]. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(2): 173-179.
阅读次数
全文


摘要