地球科学进展 ›› 2005, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (2): 173 -179. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2005.02.0173

综述与评述 上一篇    下一篇

从区域安全建设到风险管理体系的形成——从第一届世界风险大会看灾害与风险研究的现状与发展趋向
史培军,邹 铭,李保俊,周俊华,王 瑛   
  1. 北京师范大学资源学院,环境演变与自然灾害教育部重点实验室,北京 100875
  • 收稿日期:2004-02-05 修回日期:2004-06-04 出版日期:2005-02-25
  • 通讯作者: 史培军 E-mail:spj@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展规划项目“草地与农牧交错带生态系统重建机理及优化生态—生产范式”(编号:G2000018604);民政部国家减灾中心研究项目“中国自然灾害及救区划”资助.

REGIONAL SAFETY CONSTRUCTION AND RISK MANAGEMENT SYSTEM—The Actuality and Trend of the Study of Disaster and Risk Based on the World Congress on Risk

SHI Peijun; ZOU Ming; LI Baojun; ZHOU Junhua; WANG Ying   

  1. College of Resources Science & Technology, Key Laboratory of Environmental Change and Natural Disaster Ministry of Education of China, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
  • Received:2004-02-05 Revised:2004-06-04 Online:2005-02-25 Published:2005-02-25

综述了第一届世界风险大会关于灾害与风险科学研究的进展,分析了其发展趋势,并对我国加强这一领域的研究提出了对策。灾害与风险研究的目标正在趋向一致,都集中在为可持续发展模式提供科学依据;基于灾害研究的区域安全建设正在向基于风险研究的区域风险管理体系转变,由此认为可持续发展模式就是接受一定风险水平条件下的区域发展模式,一定风险水平依赖于由区域经济水平与社会文化体系相关联的区域安全建设水平;加强我国灾害与风险科学研究的学科建设、国家实验室建设、重大项目的组织与实施已势在必行;重点开展灾害脆弱性评价体系与评价模型、风险评价体系与风险评价模型、典型区域灾害与风险管理范式、灾害与风险应急控制预案(情景分析)、灾害与风险区划等方面的研究。为此把灾害科学和风险科学,与全球变化科学和可持续发展科学统一纳入到地球系统科学体系之中,以加强与完善我国在这些领域的综合多学科交叉研究能力。

The paper reviewed the advances in the study of disaster and risk sciences on the World Congress on Risk held in Brussels, Belgium on June 22-25,2003, and analyzed their tendencies, then the countermeasures on strengthen studies in this field are presented. The aims of disaster study and risk study are tent to unanimousness, both will offer the theoretical basis for sustainable development models. Regional safety construction based on disaster study is converting into regional risk management system based on risk study. So the authors consider that sustainable development model is the regional development model under a certain risk level, and the risk level relies on the regional safety construction level that integrates the regional economic level and social cultural system. Strengthening subject construction of disaster and risk study in China, national laboratory construction, and organization and practice of key items are imperative. And we should put the study emphasis on the vulnerability assessment system and models, risk assessment system and models, disaster and risk management mode of typical region, disaster and risk emergency control scenario (scene analysis), disaster and risk regions. So the authors suggest that disaster science and risk science should be put into the earth system science system with global change science and sustainable development science, in order to strengthen and prefect the study abilities in these fields.

中图分类号: 

[1]SRA. Risk and Governance, Program of World Congress on Risk[C]. Brussels: Belgium, 2003.
[2]Shi Peijun. Study on theory of disaster research and its practice[J]. Journal of Nanjing University (Natural Sciences), 1991, Special of Natural Disaster Research:37-41.[史培军.灾害研究的理论与实践[J].南京大学学报(自然科学版),1991,自然灾害研究专辑:37-41. ]
[3]Shi Peijun. Theory and practice of disaster study[J]. Journal of Natural Disaster, 1996, 5(4): 6-17.[史培军.再论灾害研究的理论与实践[J].自然灾害学报, 1996, 5(4): 6-17.]
[4]Shi Peijun. Theory on disaster science and disaster dynamics[J]. Journal of Natural Disaster, 2002, 11(3): 1-9.[史培军.三论灾害研究的理论与实践[J].自然灾害学报, 2002, 11(3): 1-9.]
[5]Whipple C. Trends of the intersection of risk assessment and policy[A]. In: Risk and Governance, Program of World Congress on Risk[C]. Brussels: Belgium, 2003.
[6]Fraland W. Assessing risks: Yesterday, today and tomorrow[A]. In: Risk and Governance, Program of World Congress on Risk[C]. Brussels: Belgium, 2003.
[7]Bernard D. Goldstein, SRA President's Message[J]. SRA Risk Newsletter,2003, 23(2):2.
[8]Ikeda S. Some lessons from Japan in early detection, precaution, and informed choice in the risk divided society [A]. In: Risk and Governance, Program of World Congress on Risk[C]. Brussels: Belgium, 2003.
[9]Bhandari P.Risk of global climate change: Developing country perspectives[A]. In: Risk and Governance, Program of World Congress on Risk[C]. Brussels: Belgium, 2003.
[10]Remy U G. Transboundary risks: How governmental and non-governmental agencies work together [A]. In: Risk and Governance, Program of World Congress on Risk[C]. Brussels: Belgium, 2003.
[11]Kleiber C. Risk governance: A new approach[A]. In: Risk and Governance, Program of World Congress on Risk[C]. Brussels: Belgium, 2003.
[12]Wiedeman P. Risk as a model for sustainability[A]. In: Risk and Governance, Program of World Congress on Risk[C]. Brussels: Belgium, 2003.
[13]Umana A. Governance and capability development for risk management in developing countries[A]. In: Risk and Governance, Program of World Congress on Risk[C]. Brussels: Belgium, 2003.
[14]Slovic D. The Sociopolitics of risk: Challenges to sustainable development [A]. In: Risk and Governance, Program of World Congress on Risk[C]. Brussels: Belgium, 2003.
[15]Shi Peijun,Song Changqing, Jing Guifei. Strengthening the study of land use/cover change and its impact on eco-environmental security: The trend of the study of the dynamics of human-nature system based on “Global Change Open Science Conference 2001” in Amsterdam, Netherlands[J]. Advances  in Earth Sciences, 2002, 17(2): 161-168.[史培军,宋长青,景贵飞.加强我国土地利用/覆盖变化及其对生态环境安全影响的研究——从荷兰“全球变化开放科学会议”看人地系统动力学研究的发展趋势[J].地球科学进展, 2002, 17(2): 161-168.]

[1] 曾庆存,林朝晖. 地球系统动力学模式和模拟研究的进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(1): 1-6.
[2] 史培军,李 宁,叶谦,董文杰,韩国义,方伟华. 全球环境变化与综合灾害风险防范研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2009, 24(4): 428-435.
[3] 毛汉英,余丹林. 区域承载力定量研究方法探讨[J]. 地球科学进展, 2001, 16(4): 549-555.
阅读次数
全文


摘要