地球科学进展 ›› 2006, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (7): 687 -694. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2006.07.0687

学术论文 上一篇    下一篇

中国城市空间分布的双侧对称性
陈彦光 1,余斌 2   
  1. 1.北京大学环境学院城市与区域规划系,北京 100871;2.华中师范大学城市与环境学院,湖北 武汉 430079
  • 收稿日期:2006-01-18 修回日期:2006-05-11 出版日期:2006-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 陈彦光 E-mail:chenyg@pku.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金重点项目“中国的城市变化及其自组织空间动力学”(编号:40335051)资助.

Bilateral Symmetry of Spatial Distribution of Cities in China

Chen Yanguang 1, Yu Bin 2   

  1. 1.Department of Geography, Peking University, Beijing 100871,China;2.Department of Geography, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079,China
  • Received:2006-01-18 Revised:2006-05-11 Online:2006-07-15 Published:2006-07-15

借助尺度归并和笛卡儿变换思想考察中国城市的宏观分布规律,发现中国城市在一定的空间和规模尺度上具有双重对称性:以秦岭—淮河为界,南方城市与北方城市呈现双侧对称特征;以呼和浩特—太原—郑州—武汉—广州沿线为轴,东部城市与西部城市形成双侧对称局势。中国城市的宏观对称性与地球公转和自转的方式有关,海陆差异、地表形态和水系构成是影响城市对称格局的重要因素。城市的对称分布属于广义的形态发育问题,对称形成的内在机制可能在于人类空间行为的自组织演化。

This paper is devoted to the research of bilateral symmetry distribution of cities in China at the global level, based on Ye Danian (2000)'s precursory work. Using the idea from Cartesian transform in mathematics and Zhou Yixing's notion of urban economic regions in geography, the authors make two models with bilaterality for spatial distributions of China's cities. Taking Qin Mountain-Huai river as an axis of symmetry, we can find that the cities in northern China corresponds to those in southern China; while taking a line along the cities of Hohehot, Taiyuan, Zhengzhou, Wuhan, and Guangzhou as another axis of symmetry, we can find that the cities in eastern China seems to be a mirror image of those in western China. Symmetry research is significant to the theory construction of urban geography because it associates with universality. On the other hand, symmetry implies beauty, perfect, and order. Therefore studies of symmetry of cities are of help to developing urban spatial optimization methods.

中图分类号: 

[1] Woldenberg M J, Berry B J L. Rivers and central places: Analogous systems? [J]. Journal of Regional Science, 1967, 7: 129-139.

[2] Chen Yanguang. Spatial structure of central-place systems: Fractal and scaling laws[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2004, 40(4): 626-634.[陈彦光.中心地体系空间结构的标度定律与分形模型——Christarller中心地模型的数学抽象与理论推广[J].北京大学学报:自然科学版,2004,40(4):626-634.]

[3] Chen Yanguang, Liu Jisheng. Fractals and fractal dimensions of structure of river systems [J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2001, 16(2):178-183.[陈彦光,刘继生.水系结构的分形和分维——Horton水系定律的模型重建及其参数分析[J].地球科学进展,2001,16(2):179-183.]

[4] Christaller W. Central Places in Southern Germany [M]. Baskin C W translated. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1966.

[5] Prigogine I, Stengers I. Order Out of Chaos: Man's New Dialogue with Nature [M]. New York: Bantam Book, Inc, 1984.

[6] Ye Danian. Geography and Symmetry[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Education Press, 2000.[叶大年.地理与对称[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社,2000.]

[7] Ye Danian, He Wei, Xu Wendong, et al. Symmetry distribution of cities in China [J]. Science in China (Series D), 2001, 44(8): 716-725.[叶大年,赫伟,徐文东,.中国城市的对称分布[J].中国科学:D,2001,31(7):608-616.]

[8] Chen Yanguang, Liu Jisheng. Studies of analogies of fractal structure between river networks and systems of central places[J]. Progress in Geography, 2001, 20(1): 81-88.[陈彦光,刘继生.中心地体系与水系分形结构的相似性分析——关于人地对称关系的一个理论探讨[J].地理科学进展,2001,20(1):81-88.]

[9] Niu Wenyuan. Theoretical Geography[M]. Beijing: Commercial Press, 1992.[牛文元.理论地理学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1992.]

[10] Weyl H. Symmetry [M]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989.

[11] Lee T D. Symmetries, Asymmetries, and the World of Particles [M]. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 1988.

[12] Batty M, Longley P A. Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function [M]. London: Academic Press, 1994.

[13] Zhou Yixing, Zhang Li. China’s urban economic region in the open context [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2003, 58(2): 271-284.[周一星,张莉. 改革开放条件下的中国城市经济区[J].地理学报,2003,58(2):271-284.]

[14] Takayasu H. Fractals in the Physical Sciences [M]. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1990.

[15] Chen Yanguang. Urbanization as phase transition and self-organized critical process [J]. Geographical Research, 2004, 23(3): 301-311.[陈彦光.城市化:相变与自组织临界性[J].地理研究,2004,23(3):301-311.]

[16] Thompson D W. On Growth and Form[M].An abridged, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966.

[17] Chen Yanguang, Liu Jisheng. Main tasks and methods of geography [J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2004, 24(3): 257-263.[陈彦光,刘继生.地理学的主要任务与研究方法 [J].地理科学,2004,24(3):257-263.]

[18] Liu Jisheng, Chen Yanguang. Multifractal measures based on man-land relationships of the spatial structure of the urban system in Henan[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2003, 23(6): 713-720.[刘继生,陈彦光.河南省城镇体系空间结构的多分形特征及其与水系分布的关系探讨[J].地理科学,2003,23(6):713-720.]

[19] Haken H. A synergetic approach to the self-organization of cities and settlements[J]. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 1995, 22(1): 35-46.

[20] Allen P M. Cities and Regions as Self-Organizing Systems: Models of Complexity [M]. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, 1997.

[21] Portugali J. Self-Organization and the City [M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2000.

[1] 贺缠生, 田杰, 张宝庆, 张兰慧. 土壤水文属性及其对水文过程影响研究的进展、挑战与机遇[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(2): 113-124.
[2] 庞姗姗, 王喜冬, 刘海龙, 邵彩霞. 热带海洋盐度障碍层多尺度变异机理及其对海气相互作用的影响研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(2): 139-153.
[3] 王飞, 陶宇, 欧维新. 景观格局变化的水质净化服务响应关系研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(1): 17-28.
[4] 王大伟,孙悦,司少文,吴时国. 海底周期阶坎研究进展与挑战[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(9): 890-901.
[5] 张永垂, 王宁, 周林, 刘科峰, 汪浩笛. 海洋中尺度涡旋表面特征和三维结构研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(6): 568-580.
[6] 张宏文,续昱,高艳红. 19822005年青藏高原降水再循环率的模拟研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(3): 297-307.
[7] 郝志新,吴茂炜,张学珍,刘洋,郑景云. 过去千年中国年代和百年尺度冷暖阶段的干湿格局变化研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(1): 18-25.
[8] 康文敏,蔡芫镔,郑慧祯. 福州城市地表温度时空变化与贡献度研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(1): 88-100.
[9] 孙义博,苏德,全占军,商豪律,耿冰,林兴稳,荆平平,包扬,赵艳华,杨巍. 无人机涡动相关通量观测技术研究综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(8): 842-854.
[10] 谢鑫昌,杨云川,田忆,廖丽萍,韦钧培,周津羽,陈立华. 广西降水非均匀性多尺度特征与综合评价[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(11): 1152-1164.
[11] 黄强,陈子燊,唐常源,李绍峰. 珠江流域重大干旱事件时空发展过程反演研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(10): 1050-1059.
[12] 王萌,张艳伟,刘志飞,吴家望. 南海北部中尺度涡的时空分布特征:基于卫星高度计资料的统计分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(10): 1069-1080.
[13] 栾海军, 田庆久, 章欣欣, 聂芹, 朱晓玲. 定量遥感地表参数尺度转换研究趋势探讨[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(5): 483-492.
[14] 易雪, 李得勤, 赵春雨, 沈历都, 敖雪, 刘鸣彦. 分析Nudging对辽宁地区降尺度的影响[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(5): 517-531.
[15] 李爱农, 边金虎, 尹高飞, 靳华安, 赵伟, 张正健, 南希, 雷光斌. 山地典型生态参量遥感反演建模及其时空表征能力研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(2): 141-151.
阅读次数
全文


摘要