地球科学进展 ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 692 -699. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2026.047   cstr: 32269.14.adearth.CN62-1091/P.2026.047.

综述与评述 上一篇    下一篇

DGT-汞同位素视角下稻田生态系统甲基汞来源与转化机制研究
尹宏倩1(), 姚珩1(), 冯新斌1,2   
  1. 1.中国科学院地球化学研究所 喀斯特环境演变与生态安全实验室,贵州 贵阳 550081
    2.中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2026-05-16 修回日期:2026-06-24 出版日期:2026-07-10
  • 通讯作者: 姚珩 E-mail:yinhongqian@mail.gyig.ac.cn;yaoheng@mail.gyig.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(C类)(42507356);贵州省农业社发领域科技支撑项目(编号:黔科合支撑[2026]一般326)资助

Sources and Transformation of Methylmercury in Paddy Ecosystems: Insights from DGT and Mercury Isotopes

Hongqian Yin1(), Heng Yao1(), Xinbin Feng1,2   

  1. 1.Laboratory of Karst Environmental Evolution and Ecological Security, Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang 550081, China
    2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2026-05-16 Revised:2026-06-24 Online:2026-07-10 Published:2026-09-23
  • Contact: Heng Yao E-mail:yinhongqian@mail.gyig.ac.cn;yaoheng@mail.gyig.ac.cn
  • About author:Yin Hongqian, research area includes mercury biogeochemical cycle. E-mail: yinhongqian@mail.gyig.ac.cn
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China(42507356);Science and Technology Support Project in the Field of Agriculture and Social Development of Guizhou Province (Grant No. QKHZC[2026]YIBAN326)

稻田生态系统特有的淹水厌氧环境,为甲基汞的生成提供了有利条件,且该物质易于在水稻中富集,并经由食物链传递,最终对人体健康构成威胁。然而,目前关于水稻植株体内甲基汞的来源归属、稻田水体中汞形态转化的主导机制等关键科学问题的认识仍有待深化。近年来,汞稳定同位素技术,特别是奇数汞同位素非质量分馏(odd-MIF),为解决上述问题提供了独特的研究视角。整合了目前报道的稻田土壤、水稻各组织以及梯度扩散薄膜技术所表征的水体甲基汞同位素端元数据,基于混合模型定量解析了水稻植株中甲基汞的来源贡献。结果表明,水稻组织中的甲基汞主要来源于土壤—孔隙水系统,其贡献比例为72%~97%,而上覆水的贡献仅为3%~28%。进一步地,基于梯度扩散薄膜技术获取稻田水体甲基汞的Δ199Hg/Δ201Hg斜率,并结合汞的光化学转化理论参数[甲基汞光降解过程中Δ199Hg/Δ201Hg斜率约为1.36,Hg(II)光还原过程中约为1.00],定量计算得出:光还原对光化学反应的贡献约为75%,光降解的贡献约为25%。这表明光还原是稻田水体汞转化的主导机制。梯度扩散薄膜技术与汞同位素技术联用为理解稻田生态系统中甲基汞的生成、迁移与转化提供了新视角。在未来的工作中,需要进一步探索水体中超痕量甲基汞的预富集方法与同位素测试技术,以便更直接地研究水生生态系统中甲基汞的来源与迁移转化机制。

Paddy ecosystems are recognized as critical hotspots for the generation of methylmercury (MeHg), a potent neurotoxin that poses substantial health risks to humans through dietary exposure via contaminated rice grains. Unlike aquatic food chains, where fish consumption is the primary route of MeHg intake, rice-based diets represent a major but often overlooked pathway in many regions, particularly in Hg-contaminated areas in China. Despite decades of research, several key scientific questions persist, notably the precise provenance of MeHg in rice plants and the prevailing mechanisms that govern Hg transformation within paddy water columns. In recent years, Hg stable isotope techniques, particularly odd-Mass Independent Fractionation (odd-MIF), have provided a unique research perspective for addressing the aforementioned issues. In this study, we compiled a comprehensive database of previously reported MeHg isotope end-member values derived from paddy soil, various rice tissues (roots, stems, leaves, and grains), and paddy water samples collected using the Diffusive Gradients in Thin films (DGT) technique, which provides time-integrated in situ pre-concentration of soluble MeHg. Using a mixing model, we then quantitatively constrained the source contributions of MeHg from different end-members to rice plants. Our modeling results unequivocally demonstrate that MeHg in rice plants originates predominantly from the soil-porewater system, contributing from 72% to 97% of the total MeHg burden, whereas the overlying water plays only a minor role, accounting for merely from 3% to 28%. This finding highlights the critical importance of managing soil biogeochemical conditions to mitigate MeHg transfer into rice plants. Furthermore, according to the Δ199Hg/Δ201Hg slope of MeHg in paddy water captured by DGT and the theoretical parameters of Hg photochemical transformation (the slope is approximately 1.36 for MeHg photodegradation and approximately 1.00 for Hg(II) photoreduction), we quantitatively estimated that photoreduction accounts for about 75% of the photochemical reactions, while photodegradation accounts for about 25%. This indicates that photoreduction is the dominant process driving Hg transformation in paddy water. Overall, this study couples the DGT technique with Hg stable isotopes, providing a novel methodological paradigm and offering new perspectives for a deeper understanding of the formation, transport, and fate of MeHg in aquatic ecosystems. Finally, we emphasize that future efforts should be directed toward developing robust pre-concentration methods and isotopic analytical techniques for ultra-trace MeHg in aquatic systems, thereby enabling a more direct elucidation of its sources, transport, and transformation dynamics within aquatic ecosystems.

中图分类号: 

表1 水稻植株各组织中甲基汞(MeHg)的同位素组成特征 (‰)
Table 1 Characteristics of methylmercuryMeHgisotopic composition in rice plant tissues
图1 稻田生态系统不同环境介质样品中甲基汞(MeHg)的汞同位素组成特征
水稻根、茎、叶及土壤中MeHg的同位素数据引自参考文献[18];籽粒的相应数据引自参考文献[1018];孔隙水与上覆水中MeHg的同位素数据引自参考文献[26]。
Fig. 1 Mercury isotopic composition characteristics of methylmercuryMeHgin different environmental media samples in paddy field ecosystems
MeHg isotope data for rice roots, stalks, leaves, and soil are cited from reference [18]; for rice grains from references [10, 18]; and for porewater and overlying water from reference [26].
图2 稻田水体中汞转化途径示意图
Fig. 2 Schematic diagram of Hg transformation pathways in paddy water
图3 梯度扩散薄膜(DGT)技术捕获的稻田水体中甲基汞(MeHg)的Δ199Hg/Δ201Hg斜率
孔隙水与上覆水中MeHg的同位素组成数据来自参考文献[26],图例中DGT下标数字表示水稻的不同生长时期。
Fig. 3 The Δ199Hg/Δ201Hg slope of methylmercuryMeHgin paddy water captured by Diffusive Gradients in Thin filmsDGT
MeHg isotope data for porewater and overlying water from reference [26]. The subscript numbers of DGT in the legend denote the different growth stages of rice.
[1] Wang Z W, Sun T, Driscoll C T, et al. Dimethylmercury in floodwaters of mercury contaminated rice paddies[J]. Environmental Science & Technology201953(16): 9 453-9 461.
[2] Zhong H, Zhou H Y, Li Y B, et al. Methylmercury photodegradation in paddy water: an overlooked process mitigating methylmercury risks[J]. Water Research2024253: 121332.
[3] Liu J, Chen J, Poulain A J, et al. Mercury and sulfur redox cycling affect methylmercury levels in rice paddy soils across a contamination gradient[J]. Environmental Science & Technology202357(21): 8 149-8 160.
[4] Man Y, Wang B, Wang J X, et al. New insights into MeHg accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.): evidence from cysteine[J]. Environmental Science & Technology202458(13): 5 942-5 951.
[5] Wu Q Q, Hu H Y, Meng B, et al. Methanogenesis is an important process in controlling MeHg concentration in rice paddy soils affected by mining activities[J]. Environmental Science & Technology202054(21): 13 517-13 526.
[6] Zhang H, Feng X B, Larssen T, et al. In inland China, rice, rather than fish, is the major pathway for methylmercury exposure[J]. Environmental Health Perspectives2010118(9): 1183-1188.
[7] Qiu G L, Feng X B, Li P, et al. Methylmercury accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown at abandoned mercury mines in Guizhou, China[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry200856(7): 2 465-2 468.
[8] Qiu G L, Feng X B, Wang S F, et al. Mercury and methylmercury in riparian soil, sediments, mine-waste calcines, and moss from abandoned Hg mines in east Guizhou Province, southwestern China[J]. Applied Geochemistry200520(3): 627-638.
[9] Hao Y Y, Zhu Y J, Yan R Q, et al. Important roles of thiols in methylmercury uptake and translocation by rice plants[J]. Environmental Science & Technology202256(10): 6 765-6 773.
[10] Li P, Du B Y, Maurice L, et al. Mercury isotope signatures of methylmercury in rice samples from the Wanshan mercury mining area, China: environmental implications[J]. Environmental Science & Technology201751(21): 12 321-12 328.
[11] Li P, Feng X B, Shang L H, et al. Human co-exposure to mercury vapor and methylmercury in artisanal mercury mining areas, Guizhou, China[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety201174(3): 473-479.
[12] Yang S C, Wang B, Qin C Y, et al. Compound-specific stable isotope analysis provides new insights for tracking human monomethylmercury exposure sources[J]. Environmental Science & Technology202155(18): 12 493-12 503.
[13] Blum J D, Sherman L S, Johnson M W. Mercury isotopes in earth and environmental sciences[J]. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences201442: 249-269.
[14] Yin R S, Feng X B, Foucher D, et al. High precision determination of mercury isotope ratios using online mercury vapor generation system coupled with multicollector inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer[J]. Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry201038(7): 929-934.
[15] Meng B, Feng X B, Qiu G L, et al. Localization and speciation of mercury in brown rice with implications for pan-Asian public health[J]. Environmental Science & Technology201448(14): 7 974-7 981.
[16] Meng B, Feng X B, Qiu G L, et al. Distribution patterns of inorganic mercury and methylmercury in tissues of rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants and possible bioaccumulation pathways[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry201058(8): 4 951-4 958.
[17] Meng B, Feng X B, Qiu G L, et al. Inorganic mercury accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry201231(9): 2 093-2 098.
[18] Qin C Y, Du B Y, Yin R S, et al. Isotopic fractionation and source appointment of methylmercury and inorganic mercury in a paddy ecosystem[J]. Environmental Science & Technology202054(22): 14 334-14 342.
[19] Yin R S, Feng X B, Meng B. Stable mercury isotope variation in rice plants (Oryza sativa L.) from the Wanshan mercury mining district, SW China[J]. Environmental Science & Technology201347(5): 2 238-2 245.
[20] Rosera T J, Janssen S E, Tate M T, et al. Methylmercury stable isotopes: new insights on assessing aquatic food web bioaccumulation in legacy impacted regions[J]. ACS ES&T Water20222(5): 701-709.
[21] Zhao L, Anderson C W N, Qiu G L, et al. Mercury methylation in paddy soil: source and distribution of mercury species at a Hg mining area, Guizhou Province, China[J]. Biogeosciences201613(8): 2 429-2 440.
[22] Pi K F, Liu J W, Van Cappellen P. Direct measurement of aqueous mercury(II): combining DNA-based sensing with diffusive gradients in thin films[J]. Environmental Science & Technology202054(21): 13 680-13 689.
[23] Wagner S, Santner J, Irrgeher J, et al. Selective Diffusive Gradients in Thin films (DGT) for the simultaneous assessment of labile Sr and Pb concentrations and isotope ratios in soils[J]. Analytical Chemistry202294(16): 6 338-6 346.
[24] Davison W, Zhang H. In situ speciation measurements of trace components in natural waters using thin-film gels[J]. Nature1994367(6 463): 546-548.
[25] Wang R M, Biles E, Li Y Y, et al. In situ catchment scale sampling of emerging contaminants using Diffusive Gradients in Thin films (DGT) and traditional grab sampling: a case study of the River Thames, UK[J]. Environmental Science & Technology202054(18): 11 155-11 164.
[26] Yin H Q, Yao H, Meng H, et al. Sources and transformation of methylmercury in paddy water: insights from mercury isotopes collected by diffusive gradients in thin films[J]. Analytical Chemistry202597(17): 9 183-9 191.
[27] Blum J D, Bergquist B A. Reporting of variations in the natural isotopic composition of mercury[J]. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry2007388(2): 353-359.
[28] Estrade N, Carignan J, Sonke J E, et al. Mercury isotope fractionation during liquid-vapor evaporation experiments[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta200973(10): 2 693-2 711.
[29] Ghosh S, Schauble E A, Lacrampe Couloume G, et al. Estimation of nuclear volume dependent fractionation of mercury isotopes in equilibrium liquid-vapor evaporation experiments[J]. Chemical Geology2013336: 5-12.
[30] Jiskra M, Wiederhold J G, Bourdon B, et al. Solution speciation controls mercury isotope fractionation of Hg(II) sorption to goethite[J]. Environmental Science & Technology201246(12): 6 654-6 662.
[31] Koster van Groos P G, Esser B K, Williams R W, et al. Isotope effect of mercury diffusion in air[J]. Environmental Science & Technology201448(1): 227-233.
[32] Bergquist B A, Blum J D. Mass-dependent and-independent fractionation of Hg isotopes by photoreduction in aquatic systems[J]. Science2007318(5 849): 417-420.
[33] Rodríguez-González P, Epov V N, Bridou R, et al. Species-specific stable isotope fractionation of mercury during Hg(II) methylation by an anaerobic bacteria (Desulfobulbus propionicus) under dark conditions[J]. Environmental Science & Technology200943(24): 9 183-9 188.
[34] Zheng W, Demers J D, Lu X, et al. Mercury stable isotope fractionation during abiotic dark oxidation in the presence of thiols and natural organic matter[J]. Environmental Science & Technology201953(4): 1 853-1 862.
[35] Kritee K, Barkay T, Blum J D. Mass dependent stable isotope fractionation of mercury during mer mediated microbial degradation of monomethylmercury[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta200973(5): 1 285-1 296.
[36] Zhao H F, Meng B, Sun G Y, et al. Chemistry and isotope fractionation of divalent mercury during aqueous reduction mediated by selected oxygenated organic ligands[J]. Environmental Science & Technology202155(19): 13 376-13 386.
[37] Zheng W, Hintelmann H. Mercury isotope fractionation during photoreduction in natural water is controlled by its Hg/DOC ratio[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta200973(22): 6 704-6 715.
[38] Zhang H, Wang Z W, Zhang X S. Methylmercury concentrations and potential sources in atmospheric fine particles in Beijing, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment2019681: 183-190.
[39] Gehrke G E, Blum J D, Slotton D G, et al. Mercury isotopes link mercury in San Francisco Bay forage fish to surface sediments[J]. Environmental Science & Technology201145(4): 1 264-1 270.
[40] Laffont L, Sonke J E, Maurice L, et al. Anomalous mercury isotopic compositions of fish and human hair in the Bolivian Amazon[J]. Environmental Science & Technology200943(23): 8 985-8 990.
[41] Xia Yafei, Liu Yuhui, Gao Ting, et al. Advances in the application of metal stable isotopes for the identification of heavy metal sources in soil in mining-and smelting-affected areas[J]. Advances in Earth Science202338(4): 331-348.
夏亚飞, 刘宇晖, 高庭, 等. 基于金属稳定同位素的矿冶影响区土壤重金属污染源解析研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展202338(4): 331-348.
[42] Sonke J E. A global model of mass independent mercury stable isotope fractionation[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta201175(16): 4 577-4 590.
[1] 鄂正阳, 丁哲, 梅徽阳, 张伟超, 李海松, 梁建军, 李平, 范桥辉. 溶解性黑碳特征结构、环境行为与生态效应研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2025, 40(7): 725-736.
[2] 贾黎黎, 李婷婷, 朱鑫, 易隆科, 罗思亮. 基于改进随机森林模型的多要素层次插值技术在土壤硒元素空间分布上的运用[J]. 地球科学进展, 2023, 38(12): 1259-1270.
[3] 钟庆祥, 张豫, 陶贞, 贺一聪, 吴迪, 林培松. 土壤—植物系统硒的迁移转化机制研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2023, 38(1): 44-56.
[4] 雒恺, 马金龙. 花岗岩风化过程中稀土元素迁移富集机制研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2022, 37(7): 692-708.
[5] 段美铃, 宋昊, 胡伟, 廖昕. 川北韩家店组页岩风化过程的矿物学与元素地球化学研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2022, 37(6): 641-659.
[6] 闫雅妮, 张伟, 张俊文, 任亚雄, 赵志琦. 大陆硅酸盐岩石风化过程中镁同位素地球化学研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(3): 325-334.
[7] 储著银, 许继峰. 铼—锇同位素和铂族元素分析方法及地学应用进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(3): 245-264.
[8] 张为,周丽,唐红峰,李和平,王力. 水热体系中Na2SO4/K2SO4 溶解度的热力学计算[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(4): 414-423.
[9] 林祖苇,赵新福,熊乐,朱照先. 胶东三山岛金矿床黄铁矿原位微区微量元素特征及对矿床成因的指示[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(4): 399-413.
[10] 康健,陈列锰,宋谢炎,戴智慧,郑文勤. 金川超大型Ni-Cu-(PGE)矿床橄榄石微量元素特征及地质意义[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(4): 382-398.
[11] 张瑞刚, 高雪, 杨立强. 岩浆混合作用的识别:以义敦岛弧稻城岩体为例[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(10): 1058-1074.
[12] 唐志敏, 侯青叶, 游远航, 杨忠芳, 李括. 珠三角平原区第四系剖面重金属分布特征及其影响因素[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(8): 885-898.
[13] 王的, 冯海艳, 景慧敏. 北京市冬季、春季PM10和PM2.5中元素地球化学特征[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(8): 850-858.
[14] 穆延宗, 乜贞, 卜令忠, 王云生, 伍倩. 我国油(气)田水钾资源研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(2): 147-159.
[15] 董爱国, 朱祥坤. 表生环境中镁同位素的地球化学循环[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(1): 43-58.
阅读次数
全文


摘要