雅鲁藏布植被类型及与侵蚀类型的关系

doi:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2011.11.1208

地球科学进展 ›› 2011, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (11): 1208 -1216. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2011.11.1208

雅鲁藏布植被类型及与侵蚀类型的关系

王兆印 ¹,巩同梁 ²,施文婧 ¹

1.清华大学水沙科学与水利水电工程国家重点实验室，北京100084；2.西藏水利厅，西藏拉萨850000

收稿日期:2011-08-08 修回日期:2011-10-07 出版日期:2011-11-10
通讯作者: 王兆印（1951-），男，山东济南人，教授，主要从事泥沙理论、植被—侵蚀动力学、河流生态研究. E-mail:zywang@tisnghua.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“尼克点在雅鲁藏布地貌演变和生态平衡中的作用”(编号：41071001);清华重点实验室项目(编号：2009-zy-2)资助.

Typical Types of Vegetation and Erosion in the Yalutsangpo Basin

Wang Zhaoyin ¹, Gong Tongliang ², Shi Wenjing ¹

1.State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing100084, China;
2. Water Resources Department of Tibet Autonomous Region, Lasa850000, China

Received:2011-08-08 Revised:2011-10-07 Online:2011-11-10 Published:2011-11-10

下载PDF ( 1502 )

雅鲁藏布流域发育高山垫状植被、干旱河谷植被、沙洲植被、亚热带植被和高山冰川植被等多种类型的植被，与各种侵蚀类型相互克制又相互适应。通过2年的野外调查和采样分析研究植被分布规律和与各种侵蚀的相互关系。峡谷亚热带植被的物种多样性、覆盖度和植被厚度都很高，水力和风力侵蚀完全被克制，但是重力侵蚀和泥石流侵蚀发育。高山垫状植被由几十种耐寒草本和苔藓物种组成，植被仅1~3 cm厚，但是却有半米多厚的密集根系，侵蚀率极低。干旱河谷植被覆盖度仅1%~10%，由阳生草本和地衣苔藓组成，承受各种水力侵蚀。雅鲁藏布和拉萨河河谷有很多风沙沙丘，风力侵蚀率极高，只有极少不怕风沙的物种构成极稀疏的沙丘植被。植被平均厚度随高程降低而增加，在5 000 m高山只有2 cm，到2 000 m的大峡谷增加到3 m。物种多样性和覆盖度在干旱河谷最低，到5 000 m高山和低于2 000 m大峡谷都增加到最大值。

关键词: 雅鲁藏布, 植被, 物种多样性, 侵蚀, 干热河谷

Various types of vegetation and erosion occur in the Yalutsangpo (Brahmaputra) River Basin. Field investigation was carried out in 2009 and 2010 studying the relation between the typical types of vegetation and erosion and the distributions of vegetation and erosion along the elevation. An alpine mat vegetation develops on the mountains with altitude over 4 000 m, with a coverage over 90% but a vegetation thickness of only 1~3 cm. The river valleys in the west part of the Yalutsangpo and the Lhasa River are very dry with low precipitation and high evaporation. Poor vegetation develops in the dry valleys and water erosion and aeolian erosion occur. In the great Yalutsaangpo Canyon subtropical vegetation with coverage of almost 100% and highest vegetation thickness controls all forms of water erosion and aeolian erosion. Nevertheless, riverbed incision causes very intensive gravitational erosion, with main forms of avalanches and landslides. Sclerophyllous forest grows in glacial gullies and moraine fans. The vegetation thickness increases from 2 cm in mountains of elevation of 5 200 m to 350 cm in the grand canyon of elevation of less than 2 000 m. The taxa richness, or the number of species, and the vegetation coverage is extremely low in the dry valleys at elevation of 3 000~3 500 m, and increase with both increasing and decreasing elevation. The richness and coverage reach the highest for the subtropical vegetation and for the alpine mat vegetation.

Key words: Yalutsangpo, Vegetation, Bio-diversity, Erosion, Dry valleys

中图分类号:

[1]Sun Ming, Shen Weishou, Li Haidong, et al. Traits and dynamic changes of the Aeolian sandy land in the source region of the Yarlung Zangbo River in Tibet[J].Journal of Natural Resources,2010,25(7):1 163-1 171.[孙明, 沈渭寿, 李海东,等. 雅鲁藏布江源区风沙化土地演变趋势[J].自然资源学报,2010, 25(7): 1 163-1 171.]
[2]Lu Haihua. Research on Land Use/Cover Change and It s Environment Impact in Naidong County, Tibet[D]. Beijing: Capital Normal University, 2008.[芦海花. 西藏乃东县土地利用/土地覆被变化及其环境效应研究[D].北京：首都师范大学, 2008.]
[3]Hou Fang, Wang Liang.The wild orchidaceae resources in Motuo County and the resource exploitation[J].Forest by Product and Speciality in China,2009,(5):77-80.[侯方, 王亮. 墨脱县野生兰科植物资源及开发利用[J]. 中国林副特产,2009,(5): 77-80.]
[4]He Ping, Guo Ke, Gao Jixi, et al. Vegetation types and their geographic distribution in the source area of the Yarlung Zangbo[J].Journal of Mountain Research,2005,(3):267-273.[何萍, 郭柯, 高吉喜, 等. 雅鲁藏布江源头区的植被及其地理分布特征[J]. 山地学报,2005, (3): 267-273.]
[5]Zhang Jian, Tan Jiali, Deng Lilan, et al. Investigation and assessment of the terrestrial vegetation in the middle reaches of the Yarlung Zangbo River in Tibet[J].Forest Resources Management,2008,(4):118-123.[张剑, 覃家理, 邓莉兰, 等. 西藏雅鲁藏布江中游陆生植被调查与评价[J]. 林业资源管理,2008, (4): 118-123.]
[6]Zheng Weilie. Analyses of the floristic features on the families, genera of pteridophyta from the big bend begion at Yalu Tsangpo (River), Xizang (Tibet), China[J].Acta Botanica Yunnanica,1999,21(1):43-50.[郑维列. 雅鲁藏布江大拐弯地区蕨类植物科属区系特征分析[J]. 云南植物研究,1999, 21 (1): 43-50.]
[7]Wen Anbang, Liu Shuzhen, Fan Jianrong, et al. Soil erosion rate using ~(137)Cs technique in the middle Yalungtsangpo[J].Journal of Soil Water Conservation,2000,(4):47-50.[文安邦, 刘淑珍, 范建容, 等. 雅鲁藏布江中游地区土壤侵蚀的~(137)Cs示踪法研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2000, (4): 47-50.]
[8]Wang Z Y, Huang G H, Wang G Q J G. Modeling of vegetation-erosion dynamics in watershed systems[J]. Journal of Environment Engineering，2004, 130 (7): 792-800.
[9]Chang C P, Zou X Y, Zhang C L, et al.The characteristics and distribution of the source area of Aeolian sand in the valley Lhasa River′s lower reaches, Tibet, China[J]. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,2006,(1/8): 3 082-3 085.
[10]Wang Z, Wang G, Huang G. Modeling of state of vegetation and soil erosion over large areas[J].International Journal of Sediment Research,2008, 23(3): 181-196.
[11]Wang Zhaoyin, Cui Peng, Yu Guoan,et al.Stability of landslide dams and development of Knickpoints[J]. Environmental Earth Science,2010,doi:10.1007/S12665-010-0863-1.
[12]Zhao Jian,Li Rong. Soil erosion and subarea characteristics in Yarlung Tsangpo River Basin[J].Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute,2008,(3):42-45.[赵健, 李蓉. 雅鲁藏布江流域土壤侵蚀区域特征初步研究[J]. 长江科学院院报,2008, (3): 42-45.]
[13]Finnegan N J, Hallet B, Montgomery D R,et al.Coupling of rock uplift and river incision in the namche barwa-gyala peri massif, Tibet[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin,2008,120(1/2): 142-155.
[14]Miehe G, Miehe S, Schlutz F,et al.Palaeoecological and experimental evidence of former forests and woodlands in the treeless desert pastures of southern Tibet (Lhasa, Ar Xizang, China)[J].Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology,2006, 242(1/2): 54-67.
[15]Miehe G, Mlehe S, Kaiser K,et al.Status and dynamics of kobresia pygmaea ecosystem on the Tibetan Plateau[J].Ambio,2008, 37(4): 272-279.
[16]Lu Chunxia, Wang Ling, Xie Gaodi, et al. Altitude effect of precipitation and spatial distribution of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J].Journal of Mountain Science,2007,25(6):655-663.[鲁春霞, 王菱, 谢高地, 等. 青藏高原降水的梯度效应及其空间分布模拟[J]. 山地学报,2007, 25(6): 655-663.]
[17]Pu Zongchao, Zhang Shanqing, Li Jinglin, et al. Change characteristics of reference crop evapotranspiration in Urumqi River Basin[J].Desert and Oasis Meteorology,2008,2(1):41-45.[普宗朝, 张山清, 李景林, 等. 乌鲁木齐河流域参考作物蒸散量时空变化特征[J]. 沙漠与绿洲气象，2008, 2(1): 41-45.]
[18]Yang Yichou. Aeolian landform on the banks of river valley—Case study in Yalutsangpo river valley[J]. Journal of Desert Research,1984,4(3):12-16.[杨益畴. 雅鲁藏布江河谷风沙地貌的初步观察[J].中国沙漠,1984,4(3):12-16.]
[19]Zhu Pingyi, He Ziwen, Wang Yangchun. Typical Mountain Hazards along Sichuan-Tibet Highway[M]. Chengdu: Press of Chengdu University of Science and Technology, 1999: 54-102.[朱平一, 何子文, 汪阳春. 川藏公路典型山地灾害研究[M]. 成都: 成都科技大学出版社, 1999: 54-102.]
[20]Chen Xiaoqing. Mountain hazard induced by Wenchuan earthquake and its long-term development trends of Ganxi Gully, Beichuan[J]. Journal of Sichuan University(Engineering Science Edition),2010,41(Z1):22-32.[陈晓清. 汶川地震后北川干溪沟山地灾害及长期发展趋势初步分析[J].四川大学学报:工程科学版,2010,41(Z1): 22-32.]

[1]	田静. 大气 CO₂浓度增加对中国区域植被蒸腾的影响[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(8): 826-835.
[2]	李芦頔,吴冰,李鑫璐,杨洁,林良国. 土壤侵蚀中的片蚀研究综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(7): 712-726.
[3]	魏梦美,符素华,刘宝元. 青藏高原水力侵蚀定量研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(7): 740-752.
[4]	高俊峰,苏强. 群落物种多度的分形模型和一般性分布规律的验证与探讨[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(6): 625-631.
[5]	董治宝, 李超, 吕萍, 胡光印. 侵蚀型沙丘：来自火星的启示[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(2): 125-138.
[6]	崔林丽, 史军, 杜华强. 植被物候的遥感提取及其影响因素研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(1): 9-16.
[7]	吴佳梅,彭秋志,黄义忠,黄亮. 中国植被覆盖变化研究遥感数据源及研究区域时空热度分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(9): 978-989.
[8]	杨军怀,夏敦胜,高福元,王树源,陈梓炫,贾佳,杨胜利,凌智永. 雅鲁藏布江流域风成沉积研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(8): 863-877.
[9]	雒聪文,马玉贞,王凯,李丹丹. 东亚地区 MIS 5时期孢粉记录的植被与气候研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(5): 540-551.
[10]	许海超,张建辉,戴佳栋,王勇. 耕作侵蚀研究回顾和展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(12): 1288-1300.
[11]	李天生, 夏军. 基于Budyko理论分析珠江流域中上游地区气候与植被变化对径流的影响 ^*[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(12): 1248-1258.
[12]	马芊红, 张科利. 西南喀斯特地区土壤侵蚀研究进展与展望 ^*[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(11): 1130-1141.
[13]	沈巍, 许清海, 李建勇, 李曼玥, 张攀攀, 卢静瑶. 山区小流域花粉植被土地利用的关系:定量检测人类活动对环境的影响[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(9): 972-982.
[14]	戴璐. 末次冰期时暴露的巽他大陆架可能被热带稀树草原覆盖吗?[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(11): 1147-1156.
[15]	徐永福. 高放废物地质处置库中膨润土的侵蚀机理和模型研究综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(10): 1050-1061.

阅读次数

全文

摘要