地球科学进展 ›› 1999, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (1): 51 -55. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.1999.01.0051

可持续发展研究 上一篇    下一篇

人地系统可持续发展评价体系与方法研究
温琰茂,柯雄侃,王 峰   
  1. 中山大学环境科学系 广州 510275
  • 收稿日期:1998-05-07 修回日期:1998-12-22 出版日期:1999-02-01
  • 通讯作者: 温琰茂,男,1942年1月出生,教授,主要从事区域环境与可持续发展、土壤污染控制研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目“粤中沿海经济高速发展区人地系统特征及调控机制研究”(项目编号:49371059)资助。

STUDY ON ASSESSMENT SYSTEM AND ASSESSMENT METHOD OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN-EARTH SYSTEM

WEN Yanmao,KE Xiongkan,WANG Feng   

  1. Department ofEnvironmental Sciences, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou 510275
  • Received:1998-05-07 Revised:1998-12-22 Online:1999-02-01 Published:1999-02-01

提出了人地系统可持续发展的评价体系和评价方法。评价体系的建立应遵循空间跨度和时间跨度相结合、简洁和区域分类的原则。人地系统的可持续性由社会经济的发展水平、资源环境的数量、质量状态及它们的协调度所决定。深圳和东莞人地系统可持续发展评价结果表明:深圳可持续性从1980年至1990年逐渐增强,但1991年开始下降;东莞可持续性从1980年以后逐渐增强;目前两市处于弱可持续阶段。

The assessment system and method of sustainable development of human-earth system and the sustainability of human-earth system in Shenzhen and Dongguan, the rapid economic area in Guangdong province were studied in this paper. The principles that combine the space and time , relative simple and regional classification should be in mind when the assessment system is formulated. The calculating fomulas for sustainability of human-earth system and coordinate coefficient between social-economic development and the state of environment , natural resources were put forward. 16 assessment factors of social , economic , natural resources and environment were sellected and the criteria of sustainability assessment was posed. The sustainability of human-earth system are dependent on not only the development level of society and economy, the state of resources and environment, but the coordination degree between two aspects. The assessment results show that the developmental sustainability was risen gradually from 1980 to 1990, but descended after 1990 in Shenzhen, and that was risen gradually from 1980 to update in Dongguan. Two regions are weak in the state of developmental sustainability recently, but that in Dongguan is slight better than in Shenzhen. The descent canse of sustainable development state of human-earth system in Shenzhen are that the environmental quality became worse and the consuming rate of natural resources was too fast. The countermeasures of rising the sustainability in Shenzhen are increasing the investment in environmental protection and increasing thd natural resources utilization efficiency.

中图分类号: 

1 叶文虎,唐剑武.可持续发展的衡量方法及衡量指标初探.见:北京大学中国持续发展研究中心编.可持续发展之路.北京:北京大学出版社, 1995.5761.
2 张志强.区域可持续发展的理论与方法.中国人口.资源与环境,1994, 4 (3): 1925.
3 郝晓辉.可持续发展指标体系初探.国土开发与整治, 1996, 6(3): 3339.

[1] 王奕佳,刘焱序,宋爽,傅伯杰. 水—粮食—能源—生态系统关联研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(7): 684-693.
[2] 王翔宇, 王元慧, 高培超, 宋长青, 程昌秀, 沈石. “可持续社会指数”的研究综述与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(3): 317-324.
[3] 于德永,郝蕊芳. 生态系统服务研究进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(8): 804-815.
[4] 童磊,郑珂,苏飞. 生计脆弱性概念、分析框架与评价方法[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(2): 209-217.
[5] 陈明星,周园,郭莎莎,黄莘绒. 新型城镇化研究的意义、目标与任务[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(9): 974-983.
[6] 谢鑫昌,杨云川,田忆,廖丽萍,韦钧培,周津羽,陈立华. 广西降水非均匀性多尺度特征与综合评价[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(11): 1152-1164.
[7] 张宸嘉, 方一平, 陈秀娟. 基于文献计量的国内可持续生计研究进展分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(9): 969-982.
[8] 林晓娟, 高姗, 仉天宇, 刘桂梅. 海水富营养化评价方法的研究进展与应用现状[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(4): 373-384.
[9] 宋晓谕, 高峻, 李新, 李巍岳, 张中浩, 王亮绪, 付晶, 黄春林, 高峰. 遥感与网络数据支撑的城市可持续性评价:进展与前瞻[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(10): 1075-1083.
[10] 魏彦强, 李新, 高峰, 黄春林, 宋晓谕, 王宝, 马瀚青, 王鹏龙. 联合国2030年可持续发展目标框架及中国应对策略[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(10): 1084-1093.
[11] 陆大道, 孙东琪. 关于经济增长支撑系统领域研究的进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(6): 555-559.
[12] 曾 超,贺 拿,宋国虎. 泥石流作用下建筑物易损性评价方法分析与评价[J]. 地球科学进展, 2012, 27(11): 1211-1220.
[13] 龚建华,周洁萍,张利辉. 虚拟地理环境研究进展与理论框架[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(9): 915-926.
[14] 曾庆存,林朝晖. 地球系统动力学模式和模拟研究的进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(1): 1-6.
[15] 史培军,李 宁,叶谦,董文杰,韩国义,方伟华. 全球环境变化与综合灾害风险防范研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2009, 24(4): 428-435.
阅读次数
全文


摘要