地球科学进展

地球科学进展 ›› 2018, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 435 -444. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2018.04.0435

研究简报 上一篇    

社会生态系统研究态势:文献计量分析视角
马学成( ), 巩杰 *( ), 柳冬青, 张金茜   
  1. 兰州大学 资源环境学院 西部环境教育部重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-30 修回日期:2018-02-09 出版日期:2018-04-20
  • 通讯作者: 巩杰 E-mail:maxch2016@lzu.edu.cn;jgong@lzu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目“黄土宽梁缓坡丘陵区生态格局优化与特色粮草产业技术及示范”之子课题“基于社会—生态复合系统综合效应分析的生态格局优化模式研究”(编号:2016YFC0501701-01);国家自然科学基金项目“面向社会—生态脆弱性适应的易灾型流域生态系统服务权衡与管控研究”(编号:41771196)资助.

Review of Social Ecological System Research: An Analysis Based on Bibliometrics

Xuecheng Ma( ), Jie Gong *( ), Dongqing Liu, Jinxi Zhang   

  1. Key Laboratory of Western China’s Environmental Systems (Ministry of Education), College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2017-10-30 Revised:2018-02-09 Online:2018-04-20 Published:2018-05-24
  • Contact: Jie Gong E-mail:maxch2016@lzu.edu.cn;jgong@lzu.edu.cn
  • About author:

    First author:Ma Xuecheng (1993-), male, Haidong City, Qinghai Province, Master student. Research areas include social ecological system and ecosystem services.E-mail:maxch2016@lzu.edu.cn

  • Supported by:
    Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China “Research and demonstration on ecological pattern optimization and typical crops and grasses industrialization technology in hilly loessal area” sub project “Research of ecological pattern optimization based on comprehensive analysis of social ecological systems”(No.2016YFC0501701-01);The National Natural Science Foundation of China “Research on ecosystem services trade-off and its management for the adaptation to the social-ecological system vulnerability in a disaster-prone watershed” (No.41771196).
全文 ( 4 ) 下载PDF ( 871 )

社会生态系统是当前可持续性和全球变化研究的热点与核心议题。通过SCI-E和CNKI数据库,运用文献计量法对1980—2017年社会生态系统研究进展及热点进行分析。结果表明:①社会生态系统研究发展态势良好;发达国家的贡献较大,瑞典和美国占据领先地位,斯德哥尔摩大学是发文量最多的机构;国家(地区)与机构间的合作正在不断加强。②中国是最早开展社会生态系统研究的国家之一,但发展速度较慢,国际合作相对较弱,文献被引频次相对较低,国际影响力有待进一步提升。③重点研究主要表现在社会生态系统整体性与社会发展需求之间的协同性、社会生态系统复杂性与不确定性、社会系统与内外部环境的交互作用及演化机制等方面;此外,受人类活动和全球气候变化的胁迫,社会生态系统的响应与反馈机制及政策与决策研究尤为突出。

关键词: 社会生态系统, 文献计量, 脆弱性, 复杂性, 可持续性

Social Ecological System (SES) is the core and highlight of the global change research and sustainability science. Based on Science Citation Index Expanded Database and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the situation of social ecological system research was analyzed via bibliometrics from 1980 to 2017. The results indicated that: ①The scientific outcomes of social ecological system research are increasing gradually. The developed countries have greatly contributed to it, such as, Sweden and the USA, the leading countries in this field, and Stockholm University is the dominant institution on publication of SES. Cooperation between countries (regions) and institutions is strengthening gradually. ② China is one of the frontier countries in the social ecological system research with a lower increasing speed, its international cooperation and the citation frequency of publications are relatively low, and its international influence should be strengthened in the future. ③ The research highlights are listed as follows: The synergy between social ecological system integrity and social development needs, the complexity and uncertainty of SES, the mechanism between social system and its environmental factors, etc. In addition, under the stress of human activity and global climate change, the research of response and feedback mechanism of SES and policy decision-making are one of the important topics of SES.

Key words: Social ecological system, Bibliometrics, Vulnerability, Complexity, Sustainability.

中图分类号: 

图1 社会生态系统研究论文年度变化趋势(1980—2017年)
1980—1990年SCI-E数据库无社会生态系统研究文献收录,国内仅有35篇相关中文文献,故 图1 横坐标从1990年开始
Fig.1 Annual change trend of social ecological system research papers from 1980 to 2017
The start year of the figure is 1990 due to there are no papers on social ecological system included in the SCI-E database and there are only 35 Chinese literatures from 1980 to 1990
图1 社会生态系统研究论文年度变化趋势(1980—2017年)
1980—1990年SCI-E数据库无社会生态系统研究文献收录,国内仅有35篇相关中文文献,故 图1 横坐标从1990年开始
Fig.1 Annual change trend of social ecological system research papers from 1980 to 2017
The start year of the figure is 1990 due to there are no papers on social ecological system included in the SCI-E database and there are only 35 Chinese literatures from 1980 to 1990
表1 发文量前10位国家的论文量及其被引用情况(1980—2017年)
Table 1 Papers numbers and its citation of the top-10 countries from 1980 to 2017
国家 发文量
/篇		 总被引频次
/次		 篇均被引频
次/(次/篇)		 H指数
美国 1 220 31 230 25.60 83
澳大利亚 427 11 293 26.45 47
英国 370 11 599 31.35 50
加拿大 306 8 132 26.58 42
德国 296 6 180 20.88 38
瑞典 280 11 460 40.93 47
中国 237 2 102 8.87 23
荷兰 199 5 328 26.77 36
西班牙 173 3 169 18.32 32
法国 144 2 536 17.61 24
表1 发文量前10位国家的论文量及其被引用情况(1980—2017年)
Table 1 Papers numbers and its citation of the top-10 countries from 1980 to 2017
国家 发文量
/篇		 总被引频次
/次		 篇均被引频
次/(次/篇)		 H指数
美国 1 220 31 230 25.60 83
澳大利亚 427 11 293 26.45 47
英国 370 11 599 31.35 50
加拿大 306 8 132 26.58 42
德国 296 6 180 20.88 38
瑞典 280 11 460 40.93 47
中国 237 2 102 8.87 23
荷兰 199 5 328 26.77 36
西班牙 173 3 169 18.32 32
法国 144 2 536 17.61 24
图2 国际前7位主要国家历年发文情况(1980—2017年)
1980—1990年SCI-E数据库无社会生态系统研究文献收录,国内仅有35篇相关中文文献,故 图2 横坐标从1990年开始
Fig.2 Annual paper numbers of the top-7 countries from 1980 to 2017
The start year of the figure is 1990 due to there are no papers on social ecological system included in the SCI-E database and there are only 35 Chinese literatures from 1980 to 1990
图2 国际前7位主要国家历年发文情况(1980—2017年)
1980—1990年SCI-E数据库无社会生态系统研究文献收录,国内仅有35篇相关中文文献,故 图2 横坐标从1990年开始
Fig.2 Annual paper numbers of the top-7 countries from 1980 to 2017
The start year of the figure is 1990 due to there are no papers on social ecological system included in the SCI-E database and there are only 35 Chinese literatures from 1980 to 1990
表2 国际前10和国内前5研究机构的发文情况及研究主题(1980—2017年)
Table 2 Paper number and research topics of the top-10 international institutions and top-5 domestic institutions from 1980 to 2017
机构 发文量
/篇		 篇均被引频次
/(次/篇)		 研究主题
Stockholm University 180 54.76 社会生态系统, 恢复力,政策与决策,生态系统服务,生物多样性,可持续性,系统论,气候变化,生态系统,适应性
Arizona State University 114 57.5 社会生态系统,恢复力,政策与决策,概念框架,气候变化,生态系统服务,可持续性,脆弱性,适应性,系统论
Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) 110 46.47 社会生态系统,政策与决策,气候变化,恢复力,生态系统服务,可持续性,生物多样性,适应性,脆弱性,系统论
University of California System 108 26.56 恢复力,社会生态系统,政策,可持续性,气候变化,生态系统,生物多样性,生态系统服务,系统论,景观
James Cook University 89 25.37 恢复力,社会生态系统,政策,气候变化,生物多样性,生态系统服务,渔业,适应性,脆弱性,资源管理
Wageningen University Research Center 82 32.88 社会生态系统,政策与决策,恢复力,生态系统服务,可持续性,气候变化,生物多样性,适应性,景观,土地利用
Chinese Academy of Sciences 80 13.1 系统论,生态系统,政策,土地变化,生态系统服务,城市,脆弱性,社会生态系统,可持续性,自然生态
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 70 26.96 资源管理,社会生态系统,生态系统服务,系统论,恢复力,可持续性,生态系统,生态恢复,政策与决策,生物多样性
State University System of Florida (SUSF) 63 61.38 气候变化,社会生态系统,资源管理,生态系统服务,生态恢复,影响因素,可持续性,土地利用,生态系统,恢复力
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) 59 18.73 生物多样性,可持续性,生态系统服务,系统论,资源管理,生态系统,土地利用,气候变化,影响因素,景观
中国科学院 189 23.48 土壤养分及水分,复合生态系统,生态系统服务,流域生态,脆弱性,可持续性,政策管理,土地利用,驱动因素,扩散模型
北京师范大学 32 25.81 指标体系,自然资源管理,恢复力,复杂性,稳定性,生物多样性,城市,生态整合,农林业复合系统,农村生态系统健康
北京大学 28 8.56 可持续性,生物多样性,适应性,生态系统服务,政策管理,景观生态风险,景观格局—过程,城市,生态风险评价,气候变化
北京林业大学 23 18.78 水土资源,生态系统,水土保持,复合生态系统,生态补偿,生态建设,生态位理论,指标体系,不确定性,林草复合生态工程
华东师范大学 17 20.29 影响因素,系统动力学,生态绿地系统规划,生态流,生态系统服务,生态安全,环境变化,温度,流域生态,水资源
表2 国际前10和国内前5研究机构的发文情况及研究主题(1980—2017年)
Table 2 Paper number and research topics of the top-10 international institutions and top-5 domestic institutions from 1980 to 2017
机构 发文量
/篇		 篇均被引频次
/(次/篇)		 研究主题
Stockholm University 180 54.76 社会生态系统, 恢复力,政策与决策,生态系统服务,生物多样性,可持续性,系统论,气候变化,生态系统,适应性
Arizona State University 114 57.5 社会生态系统,恢复力,政策与决策,概念框架,气候变化,生态系统服务,可持续性,脆弱性,适应性,系统论
Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) 110 46.47 社会生态系统,政策与决策,气候变化,恢复力,生态系统服务,可持续性,生物多样性,适应性,脆弱性,系统论
University of California System 108 26.56 恢复力,社会生态系统,政策,可持续性,气候变化,生态系统,生物多样性,生态系统服务,系统论,景观
James Cook University 89 25.37 恢复力,社会生态系统,政策,气候变化,生物多样性,生态系统服务,渔业,适应性,脆弱性,资源管理
Wageningen University Research Center 82 32.88 社会生态系统,政策与决策,恢复力,生态系统服务,可持续性,气候变化,生物多样性,适应性,景观,土地利用
Chinese Academy of Sciences 80 13.1 系统论,生态系统,政策,土地变化,生态系统服务,城市,脆弱性,社会生态系统,可持续性,自然生态
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 70 26.96 资源管理,社会生态系统,生态系统服务,系统论,恢复力,可持续性,生态系统,生态恢复,政策与决策,生物多样性
State University System of Florida (SUSF) 63 61.38 气候变化,社会生态系统,资源管理,生态系统服务,生态恢复,影响因素,可持续性,土地利用,生态系统,恢复力
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) 59 18.73 生物多样性,可持续性,生态系统服务,系统论,资源管理,生态系统,土地利用,气候变化,影响因素,景观
中国科学院 189 23.48 土壤养分及水分,复合生态系统,生态系统服务,流域生态,脆弱性,可持续性,政策管理,土地利用,驱动因素,扩散模型
北京师范大学 32 25.81 指标体系,自然资源管理,恢复力,复杂性,稳定性,生物多样性,城市,生态整合,农林业复合系统,农村生态系统健康
北京大学 28 8.56 可持续性,生物多样性,适应性,生态系统服务,政策管理,景观生态风险,景观格局—过程,城市,生态风险评价,气候变化
北京林业大学 23 18.78 水土资源,生态系统,水土保持,复合生态系统,生态补偿,生态建设,生态位理论,指标体系,不确定性,林草复合生态工程
华东师范大学 17 20.29 影响因素,系统动力学,生态绿地系统规划,生态流,生态系统服务,生态安全,环境变化,温度,流域生态,水资源
图3 社会生态系统研究国际合作情况
Fig.3 International cooperation in the field of social ecological system
图3 社会生态系统研究国际合作情况
Fig.3 International cooperation in the field of social ecological system
表3 社会生态系统领域研究热点
Table 3 Hottest keywords in the field of social ecological system
热点主题 代表性关键词 词频合计/次
政策与决策 conservation, ecosystem management, biodiversity conservation, adaptive governance, comanagement, policy, decision making, perspective 3 102
恢复力与脆弱性 resilience, vulnerability, framework, model, dynamics, pattern, restoration, threshold, stability, climate change, environmental change 2 024
复杂性与不确定性 complexity, uncertainty, system, ecological system, social system,
ecology, forest, mating system, agriculture, landscape ecology		 1 472
可持续性 sustainability, sustainable development, indicator, ecological economics, evolution, biodiversity, population, community 1 272
表3 社会生态系统领域研究热点
Table 3 Hottest keywords in the field of social ecological system
热点主题 代表性关键词 词频合计/次
政策与决策 conservation, ecosystem management, biodiversity conservation, adaptive governance, comanagement, policy, decision making, perspective 3 102
恢复力与脆弱性 resilience, vulnerability, framework, model, dynamics, pattern, restoration, threshold, stability, climate change, environmental change 2 024
复杂性与不确定性 complexity, uncertainty, system, ecological system, social system,
ecology, forest, mating system, agriculture, landscape ecology		 1 472
可持续性 sustainability, sustainable development, indicator, ecological economics, evolution, biodiversity, population, community 1 272
[1] Turner B L II, Kasperson R E, Matson P A,et al. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003, 100(14): 8 074-8 079.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1231335100     URL     pmid: 12792023
[2] Resilience Alliance. Assessing Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems: Workbook for Practitioners. Version 2.0[EB/OL].2010[2018-01-11].
URL    
[3] Ostrom E.A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems[J]. Science, 2009, 325(5 939): 419-422.
doi: 10.1126/science.1172133     URL    
[4] Walker B, Salt D.Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World[M]. Washington DC: Island Press, 2006: 21-22.
[5] Folke C, Biggs R, Norström A V,et al. Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science[J]. Ecology and Society, 2016, 21(3): 41.
doi: 10.5751/ES-08748-210341     URL    
[6] Takeuchi K, Elmqvist T, Hatakeyama M,et al. Using sustainability science to analyse social-ecological restoration in NE Japan after the great earthquake and tsunami of 2011[J]. Sustainability Science, 2014, 9(4): 513-526.
doi: 10.1007/s11625-014-0257-5     URL    
[7] Bodin Ö, Tengö M.Disentangling intangible social-ecological systems[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2012, 22(2): 430-439.
doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.005     URL    
[8] Adger W N, Hughes T P, Folke C,et al. Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters[J]. Science, 2005, 309(5 737): 1 036-1 039.
doi: 10.1126/science.1112122     URL    
[9] Moen J, Keskitalo E C H. Interlocking panarchies in mufti-use boreal forests in Sweden[J]. Ecology and Society, 2010, 15(3): 17.
[10] Cohen P J, Lawless S, Dyer M,et al. Understanding adaptive capacity and capacity to innovate in social-ecological systems: Applying a gender lens[J]. Ambio, 2016, 45(S3): 309-321.
doi: 10.1007/s13280-016-0831-4     URL     pmid: 27878535
[11] Palmer M, Bernhardt E, Chornesky E, et al. Ecology for a crowded planet[J]. Science, 2004, 304(5 675): 1 251-1 252.
doi: 10.1126/science.1095780     URL     pmid: 15166349
[12] Yu Guirui.Scientific Frontier on Human Activities and Ecosystem Changes[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2009: 11-13.
[于贵瑞. 人类活动与生态系统变化的前沿科学问题[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2009: 11-13.]
[13] Nederhof A J.Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review[J]. Scientometrics, 2006, 66(1): 81-100.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0007-2     URL    
[14] Tancoigne E, Barbier M, Cointet J P, et al. The place of agricultural sciences in the literature on ecosystem services[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2014, 10: 35-48.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.07.004     URL    
[15] Wang Xuemei, Zhang Zhiqiang.Tendency analysis of socio-hydrology researches based on bibliometrics[J].Advances in Earth Science, 2016, 31(11): 1 205-1 212.
[王雪梅, 张志强. 基于文献计量的社会水文学发展态势分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(11): 1 205-1 212.]
doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2016.11.1205     URL    
[16] Wang S, Fu B, Wei Y, et al. Ecosystem services management: An integrated approach[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013, 5(1): 11-15.
doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.01.003     URL    
[17] Maes J, Egoh B, Willemen L,et al. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2012, 1(1): 31-39.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004     URL    
[18] Kanyuuru C K, Mburu J, Njoka J.Adaptation of institutional arrangements to management of Northern Rangelands of Kenya[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2017, 19(1): 67-82.
doi: 10.1007/s10668-015-9718-y     URL    
[19] von Haaren C, Albert C, Barkmann J,et al. From explanation to application: Introducing a Practice-oriented Ecosystem Services Evaluation (PRESET) model adapted to the context of landscape planning and management[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2014, 29(8): 1 335-1 346.
doi: 10.1007/s10980-014-0084-1     URL    
[20] Santana S E, Barroso G F.Integrated ecosystem management of river basins and the coastal zone in Brazil[J].Water Resources Management, 2014, 28(14): 4 927-4 942.
doi: 10.1007/s11269-014-0754-4     URL    
[21] Fan Mingming, Li Wenjun.Research progress and debate on the theory of payment for ecosystem services[J].China Population, Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(3): 130-137.
[范明明, 李文军. 生态补偿理论研究进展及争论[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(3): 130-137.]
[22] Braat L C, de Groot R. The ecosystem services agenda: Bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy[J].Ecosystem Services, 2012, 1(1): 4-15.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.011     URL    
[23] Martone R G, Bodini A, Micheli F.Identifying potential consequences of natural perturbations and management decisions on a coastal fishery social-ecological system using qualitative loop analysis[J]. Ecology and Society, 2017, 22(1): 34.
doi: 10.5751/ES-08825-220134     URL    
[24] Holling C S.Resilience andstability of ecological systems[J]. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics, 1973, 4(4): 1-23.
doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245     URL    
[25] Walker B, Holling C S, Carpenter S R,et al. Resilience, adaptability and transform ability in social-ecological systems[J]. Ecology and Society, 2004, 9(2): 5-12.
doi: 10.1890/04-0463     URL    
[26] Sun Jing, Wang Jun, Yang Xinjun.An overview on the resilience of social-ecological systems[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27(12): 5 371-5 381.
[孙晶, 王俊, 杨新军. 社会—生态系统恢复力研究综述[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(12):5 371-5 381.]
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.12.050     URL    
[27] Wang Qun, Lu Lin, Yang Xingzhu.Study on measurement and impact mechanism of social-ecological system resilience in Qiandao Lake[J].Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(5): 779-795.
[王群, 陆林, 杨兴柱. 千岛湖社会—生态系统恢复力测度与影响机理[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(5): 779-795.]
[28] Lacitignola D, Petrosillo I, Zurlini G.Time-dependent regimes of a tourism-based social-ecological system: Period-doubling route to chaos[J]. Ecological Complexity, 2010, 7(1): 44-54.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.03.009     URL    
[29] Marín V H, Rodríguez L C, Niemeyer H M.A socio-ecological model of the Opuntia scrublands in the Peruvian Andes[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2012, 227(1): 136-146.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.12.010     URL    
[30] Lu Daming, Shi Yuzhong, Li Wenlong,et al. Spatiotemporal change of vulnerability in counties of northwest China[J]. Progress in Geography, 2017, 36(4): 404-415.
[鲁大铭, 石育中, 李文龙, 等. 西北地区县域脆弱性时空格局演变[J]. 地理科学进展, 2017, 36(4): 404-415.]
URL    
[31] Birkmann J.Risk and vulnerability indicators at different scales: Applicability, usefulness and policy implications[J].Environmental Hazards, 2007, 7(1): 20-31.
doi: 10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.04.002     URL    
[32] Johnson J E, Welch D J, Maynard J A,et al. Assessing and reducing vulnerability to climate change: Moving from theory to practical decision-support[J]. Marine Policy, 2016, 74: 220-229.
doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.09.024     URL    
[33] Frazier T G, Thompson C M, Dezzani R J.A framework for the development of the SERV model: A spatially explicit resilience-Vulnerability model[J]. Applied Geography, 2014, 51: 158-172.
doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.04.004     URL    
[34] Liu H, Willems P, Bao A,et al. Effect of climate change on the vulnerability of a socio-ecological system in an arid area[J]. Global and Planetary Change, 2016, 137: 1-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2015.12.014     URL    
[35] Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T,et al. Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations[J]. Ambio, 2002, 31(5): 437-440.
doi: 10.1579/0044-7447-31.5.437     URL     pmid: 12374053
[36] Chapman A, Darby S.Evaluating sustainable adaptation strategies for vulnerable mega-deltas using system dynamics modelling: Rice agriculture in the Mekong Delta’s An Giang Province, Vietnam[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 559(2): 326-338.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.162     URL     pmid: 27082648
[37] Holling C S.Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems[J]. Ecosystems, 2001, 4(5): 390-405.
doi: 10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5     URL    
[38] Adger W N, Brown K, Nelson D R, et al. Resilience implications of policy responses to climate change[J]. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change, 2011, 2(5): 757-766.
doi: 10.1002/wcc.133     URL    
[39] Azizuh M F, Knight-Lenihan S, van Roon M. Sense shaping place: Repositioning the role of sense of place in social-ecological systems from a bioregional planning viewpoint[J]. IAFOR Journal of Sustainability, Energy and the Environment, 2016, 3(1): 3-22.
doi: 10.22492/ijsee.3.1.02     URL    
[40] Pennisi E.Tracing life’s circuitry[J]. Science, 2003, 302(5 651): 1 646-1 649.
doi: 10.1126/science.302.5651.1646     URL     pmid: 14657470
[41] Fu Lihua.Correction in the community based on the society ecosystem theory[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2009, 19(4):125-128.
[付立华. 社会生态系统理论视角下的社区矫正与和谐社区建设[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2009, 19(4): 125-128.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2104.2009.04.023     URL    
[42] Eakin H, York A, Aggarwal R, et al. Cognitive and institutional influences on farmers’ adaptive capacity: Insights into barriers and opportunities for transformative change in central Arizona[J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2016, 16(3): 801-814.
doi: 10.1007/s10113-015-0789-y     URL    
[43] Walters J P, Archer D W, Sassenrath G F,et al. Exploring agricultural production systems and their fundamental components with system dynamics modelling[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2016, 333: 51-65.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.04.015     URL    
[44] Dai Erfu, Wang Xiaoli, Zhu Jianjia, et al. Progress and perspective on ecosystem services trade-offs[J].Advances in Earth Science, 2015, 30(11): 1 250-1 259.
[戴尔阜, 王晓莉, 朱建佳, 等. 生态系统服务权衡/协同研究进展与趋势展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(11): 1 250-1 259.]
doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2015.11.1250     URL    
[45] Urgenson L S, Hagmann R K, Henck A C, et al. Social-ecological resilience of a Nuosu community-linked watershed, southwest Sichuan, China[J]. Ecology and Society, 2010, 15(4): 2.
doi: 10.1890/08-2244.1     URL    
[46] Finkbeiner E M.The role of diversification in dynamic small-scale fisheries: Lessons from Baja California Sur, Mexico[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2015, 32: 139-152.
doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.009     URL    
[47] Norberg J, Cumming G S.Complexity Theory for A Sustainable Future[M]. New York: Columbia University Press, 2008.
[48] Wu Jianguo, Guo Xiaochuan, Yang Jie,et al. What is sustainability science?[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(1): 1-11.
[邬建国, 郭晓川, 杨劼, 等. 什么是可持续性科学?[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(1):1-11.]
[49] Wang Qiyan.Review of the research on social-ecological systems conceptual framework[J].China Population, Resources and Environment, 2011, 21(3): 440-443.
[王琦妍. 社会—生态系统概念性框架研究综述[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(3): 440-443.]
URL    
[50] Estoque R C, Murayama Y.A worldwide country-based assessment of social-ecological status (c.2010) using the social-ecological status index[J].Ecological Indicators, 2017, 72: 605-614.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.08.047     URL    
[51] Rasch S, Heckelei T, Oomen R J.Reorganizing resource use in a communal livestock production socio-ecological system in South Africa[J].Land Use Policy, 2016, 52: 221-231.
doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.026     URL    
[52] Sharma D, Holmes I, Vergara-Asenjo G,et al. A comparison of influences on the landscape of two social-ecological systems[J]. Land Use Policy, 2016, 57: 499-513.
doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.018     URL    
[53] Li Tianxing.Research progress in sustainable development indicator systems both at home and abroad[J].Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2013, 22(6): 1 085-1 092.
[李天星. 国内外可持续发展指标体系研究进展[J]. 生态环境学报, 2013, 22(6): 1 085-1 092.]
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2013.06.029     URL    
[54] Fu Bojie.Trends and priority areas in ecosystem research of China[J].Geographical Research, 2010, 29(3): 383-396.
[傅伯杰. 我国生态系统研究的发展趋势与优先领域[J]. 地理研究, 2010, 29(3):383-396.]
doi: 10.11821/yj2010030001     URL    
[55] Tan Jiangtao, Zhang Renjun, Wang Qun.Comment on the Ostrom’s general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems[J]. Science and Technology Progress and Policy, 2010, 27(22): 42-47.
[谭江涛, 章仁俊, 王群. 奥斯特罗姆的社会生态系统可持续发展总体分析框架述评[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2010, 27(22):42-47.]
[56] Bose P S.Vulnerabilities and displacements: Adaptation and mitigation to climate change as a new development mantra[J]. Area, 2016, 48(2): 168-175.
doi: 10.1111/area.12178     URL    
[57] Edenhofer O, Seyboth K.Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)[J]. Encyclopedia of Energy, Natural Resource, and Environmental Economics, 2013, 26(D14): 48-56.
doi: 10.1007/1-4020-3266-8_109     URL    
[58] Chaudhury A S, Ventresca M J, Thornton T F,et al. Emerging meta-organisations and adaptation to global climate change: Evidence from implementing adaptation in Nepal, Pakistan and Ghana[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2016, 38: 243-257.
doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.03.011     URL    
[59] Ma Shijun, Wang Rusong.The social-economic-natural complex ecosystem[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1984, 4(1): 1-9.
[马世俊, 王如松. 社会—经济—自然复合生态系统[J]. 生态学报, 1984, 4(1): 1-9.]
[60] Meng Weiqing, Hu Beibei, Liu Baiqiao,et al. Marine ecosystem-based management: Definition, principles, framework and practice[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2016, 31(5): 461-470.
[孟伟庆, 胡蓓蓓, 刘百桥, 等. 基于生态系统的海洋管理:概念、原则、框架与实践途径[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(5):461-470.]
doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2016.05.0461.    
[1] 房婷婷, 付广裕. 卫星重力与地球重力场的文献计量分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(5): 543-552.
[2] 吴佳梅,彭秋志,黄义忠,黄亮. 中国植被覆盖变化研究遥感数据源及研究区域时空热度分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(9): 978-989.
[3] 涂梦昭,刘志锋,何春阳,任强,卢文路. 基于 GRACE卫星数据的中国地下水储量监测进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(6): 643-656.
[4] 曹天正, 韩冬梅, 宋献方, 刘伟, 杜荻. 滨海地区地表水—地下水相互作用研究进展的文献计量分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(2): 154-166.
[5] 童磊,郑珂,苏飞. 生计脆弱性概念、分析框架与评价方法[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(2): 209-217.
[6] 艾鑫,马明国,王雪梅,匡鸿海. 全球地球科学研究的可视化分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(12): 1270-1280.
[7] 刘小茜,裴韬,舒华,高锡章. 基于文献计量学的社会—生态系统恢复力研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(7): 765-777.
[8] 王雪梅,尉永平,马明国,张志强. 基于文献计量学的黑河流域研究进展分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(3): 316-323.
[9] 高春东,吴秀平. 基于文献计量的水治理研究国际发展态势分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(3): 324-332.
[10] 王思佳,刘鹄,赵文智,李中恺. 干旱、半干旱区地下水可持续性研究评述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(2): 210-223.
[11] 张宸嘉, 方一平, 陈秀娟. 基于文献计量的国内可持续生计研究进展分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(9): 969-982.
[12] 王金平, 曲建升, 马金珠. 基于文献计量的国际虚拟水研究发展态势分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(6): 653-663.
[13] 曲建升, 肖仙桃, 曾静静. 国际气候变化科学百年研究态势分析 *[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(11): 1193-1202.
[14] 宋晓谕, 高峻, 李新, 李巍岳, 张中浩, 王亮绪, 付晶, 黄春林, 高峰. 遥感与网络数据支撑的城市可持续性评价:进展与前瞻[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(10): 1075-1083.
[15] 宋世雄, 刘志锋, 何春阳, 赵瑞, 任强. 城市扩展过程对自然生境影响评价的研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(10): 1094-1104.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 © 《地球科学进展》编辑部
地址：甘肃省兰州市天水中路8号
QQ：114723517
电话：0931-8762293　E-mail：adearth@lzb.ac.cn
陇ICP备2021001824号-5　 甘公网安备62010202000687