基于文献计量学的社会—生态系统恢复力研究进展

doi:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2019.07.0765

地球科学进展 ›› 2019, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 765 -777. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2019.07.0765

研究简报上一篇

基于文献计量学的社会—生态系统恢复力研究进展

刘小茜 ^1, ²(

),裴韬 ²(

),舒华 ²,高锡章 ²

1. 北京联合大学应用文理学院城市科学系，北京 100191
2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所资源与环境信息系统国家重点实验室，北京 100101

收稿日期:2019-03-26 修回日期:2019-05-27 出版日期:2019-07-10
通讯作者: 裴韬 E-mail:liuxq@lreis.ac.cn;peit@lreis.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“特大城市群地区城镇化与生态环境交互耦合决策支持系统研发”(41590845);对策优化模型”(41877523)

A Bibliometric Investigation of Research on Social-Ecological System Resilience

Xiaoqian Liu ^1, ²( ),Tao Pei ²( ),Hua Shu ²,Xizhang Gao ²

1. College of Arts and Science of Beijing Union University, Beijing 100191, China
2. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

Received:2019-03-26 Revised:2019-05-27 Online:2019-07-10 Published:2019-07-29
Contact: Tao Pei E-mail:liuxq@lreis.ac.cn;peit@lreis.ac.cn
About author:Liu Xiaoqian(1984-)， female， Chifeng City， Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region， Lecturer. Research areas include system dynamic modeling and landscape ecology. E-mail： liuxq@lreis.ac.cn
Supported by:
ect supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China “Decision support system of interactive coupled effects between urbanization and eco-environment in mega-urban agglomerations” (No.41590845) and “Research of regulation framework and optimization strategy for integrated risk management based on the system resilience perspective”(41877523)

全文 ( 29 ) 下载PDF ( 1105 )

采用文献计量学方法，运用CiteSpace和TDA等引文分析及可视化工具，对国内外“社会—生态系统恢复力”相关研究论文进行分析。构建检索式，得到1900—2017年WOS(Web of Science)期刊论文共10 315篇，对研究态势及热点进行梳理和分析。结果发现，系统恢复力研究可归纳为5个基本理论问题，即内涵、变化诱因、空间尺度、研究对象及响应措施。自1973年提出，该理论发展了近45年，借助知识图谱分析发现，形成了三大研究主题领域：内涵与理论、诱因与方法、适应与管理。分析研究热点时序演化发现，近20年来，以气候变化为诱因、以生态系统为对象的研究形成了最为完备的理论和方法体系；近10年来，社区和城市尺度的研究发展迅速成为热点；近5年来，社会学习和知识传播等适应对策得到关注。深化对同质社会经济单元的研究，开展案例研究与实地观测、实验和建模方法的融合是未来研究的重点。

关键词: 恢复力, 社会—生态系统, 文献计量学, 适应性管理, 共现关系分析

The notion of Resilience of Social-Ecological Systems (ReSES) in balancing and sustaining development are increasingly breeding more multidisciplinary attentions from world scientists and government managers. However, with the tremendous growing in theoretical system, certain problems hinder the integration of theory and practice, such as the low degree of research recognition, lacking of unified paradigm, unevenly development of research topics, etc. Thus, it is an urgent need to sort out the construction, source and development in theory, and its gaps with practices. To identify the hotspot in current research, including the fundamental theories and methods, current focus and future trends, a bibliometric analysis integrating Citespace and TDA tools were made. Using searching queries on “system resilience”, 10 315 articles in Web of Science database were retrieved. Then, a series of contents were examined on these publications, including: $①$ topics division on co-occurrence network of keywords; $②$ journal and co-citation analysis of highly cited papers; $③$ trends by keyword burst analysis; $④$ changing of high-frequency categories and keywords. Several findings were achieved through scientometric analysis. Firstly, research on system resilience were summarized into five basic theoretical issues, namely, research objects, changes incentives, spatial and temporal scale, and adaptive measures. Secondly, by analyzing the knowledge atlas, it is found that the theory has developed for nearly 45 years since 1973. In the past 20 years, ecosystem resilience driven by climate changes has been one of the earliest and consistent research topics, and formed a well-developed theoretical framework. Over the past ten years, research on the system resilience on community and urban scale has rapidly become a hot topic. In the past five years, adaptation strategies such as social learning and knowledge dissemination have attracted increasing attentions. Overall, improving system simulation and scenario based adaptive management analysis can build the bridge of theoretical research and adaptive management practice.

Key words: Resilience, Social-ecological system, Bibliometric study, Adaptive management, Co-occurrence analysis.

中图分类号:

P963
Q149

图1 分时段高频英文关键词时序变化图（1991—2015年）

Fig.1 Changes of top fifteen high frequency keyword every five years in 1991-2015

图2 热点主题关键词时序变化对比图

Fig.2 Comparative diagram of prominent keywords groups in SCI articles

图 3 具有爆发性出现特征的热点关键词

Fig. 3 Burst detection of keywords

图 4 不同时空框架下的ReSES研究关键词分类图

Fig 4 Keywords map of research on ReSES at different spatial and temporal scales

图 5 SCI期刊论文中关键词共现关系图

Fig. 5 Co-occurrence network of keywords in SCI articles

1	HollingC S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems [J]. Annual Review of Ecological Systems, 1973, 4: 1-23.
2	HollingC S. Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience[C]//Schulze P C, ed. Engineering within Ecological Constraints. Washington WA, USA: National Academic Press, 1996:31-32.
3	KleinR J T, NichollsR J， ThomallaF. Resilience to natural hazards: How useful is this concept?[J].Environmental Hazards, 2003, 5(1): 35-45.
4	FolkeC, CarpenterS, WalkerB, et al. Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability [J]. Ecology and Society, 2010, 15(4): 9.
5	NavehZ. What is holistic landscape ecology? A conceptual introduction [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2000, 50(1/3): 7-26.
6	GundersonL H. Adaptive dancing: Interactions between social resilience and ecological crises[C]//BerkesF, FolkeC, ColdingJ, eds. Navigating Social-ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 33-52.
7	LiuXiaoqian, WangYanglin, PengJian. Progress in vulnerability analysis of coupled human-environment system [J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2009, 24(8): 917-927.
	刘小茜, 王仰麟, 彭建.人地耦合系统脆弱性研究进展[J].地球科学进展, 2009,24(8): 917-927.
8	LiuYanxu, WangYanglin, PengJian, et al. Urban landscape ecological risk assessment based on the 3D framework of adaptive cycle [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(7): 1 052-1 067.
	刘焱序, 王仰麟, 彭建, 等. 基于生态适应性循环三维框架的城市景观生态风险评价[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(7): 1 052-1 067.
9	WalkerB, SaltD. Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World [M]. Peng Shaolin,et al, translated. Beijing: High Education Press, 2010.
	WalkerB, SaltD.弹性思维——不断变化的世界中社会—生态系统的可持续性[M]. 彭少麟等译.北京:高等教育出版社, 2010.
10	MeerowS, NewellJ P, StultsM. Defining urban resilience: A review [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2016, 147: 38-49.
11	AsadzadehA, K?tterT, SalehiP, et al. Operationalizing a concept: The systematic review of composite indicator building for measuring community disaster resilience [J]. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 2017, 25: 147-162.
12	RighiA W, SaurinT A, WachsP. A systematic literature review of resilience engineering: Research areas and a research agenda proposal [J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2015, 141: 142-152.
13	SharifiA. A critical review of selected tools for assessing community resilience [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 69: 629-647.
14	CummingG S. Spatial resilience: Integrating landscape ecology, resilience, and sustainability [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2011, (7): 899-909.
15	YanHaiming, ZhanJinyan, ZhangTao. Review of ecosystem resilience research progress [J]. Progress in Geography, 2012,31(3): 303-314.
	闫海明, 战金艳, 张韬. 生态系统恢复力研究进展综述[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31(3): 303-314.
16	TurnerII B J. Vulnerability and resilience: Coalescing or paralleling approaches for sustainability science?[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2010, 20: 570-576.
17	CaponS J, LynchA J J, BondN, et al. Regime shifts, thresholds and multiple stable states in freshwater ecosystems: A critical appraisal of the evidence [J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2015, 534: 122-130.
18	RobertK W, ParrisT M, LeiserowitzA A. What is sustainable development? goals, indicators, values, and practice[J]. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 2005, 47(3): 8-21.
19	SunJing, WangJun, YangXinjun. An overview on the resilience of social-ecological systems [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27(12): 5 371-5 381.
	孙晶, 王俊, 杨新军. 社会—生态系统恢复力研究综述[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(12): 5 371- 5 381.
20	CroweP R, FoleyK， CollierM J. Operationalizing urban resilience through a framework for adaptive co-management and design: Five experiments in urban planning practice and policy[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2016, 62: 112-119.
21	ZhongSaixiang, QuBo, SuXiangyan, et al. Progress in Chinese geography research reflected from Acta Geographica Sinica during 1934-2013: A bibliometrics analysis [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2014, 69(8): 1 077-1 092.
	钟赛香, 曲波, 苏香燕,等.从《地理学报》看中国地理学研究的特点与趋势——基于文献计量方法[J]. 地理学报, 2014, 69(8): 1 077-1 092.
22	LengShuying. The Geographical Sciences During 1986-2015: From the Classics to the Frontiers[M]. Beijing: The Commercial Press, 2016: 1-16.
	冷疏影. 地理科学三十年: 从经典到前沿[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2016: 1-16.
23	WangShuqiang, XiulingQing, WangJing, et al. Analysis of competitiveness of international geographic institutes based on bibliometrics [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(9):1 702-1 716.
	王淑强, 青秀玲, 王晶,等. 基于文献计量方法的国际地理科学研究机构竞争力分析[J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(9):1 702-1 716.
24	ChenYue, ChenChaomei, HuZhigang,et al. Principles and Applications of Analyzing a Citation Space [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2014.
	陈悦, 陈超美, 胡志刚,等. 引文空间分析原理与应用CiteSpace实用指南[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2014.
25	KleinbergJ. Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams [J]. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2003, 7(4): 373-397.
26	LeeS, ParkY, YoonW C. Burst analysis for automatic concept map creation with a single document [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42(22): 8 817-8 829.
27	GundersonL H, HollingC S. Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems [J]. Biological Conservation, 2003,114 (2):488-491.
28	SchefferM, CarpenterS, FoleyJ A, et al. Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems [J]. Nature, 2001, 413(6 856): 591-596.
29	CarpenterS, WalkerB, AnderiesM J, et al. From metaphor to measurement: Resilience of what to what?[J]. Ecosystems, 2001, 4(8): 765-781.
30	FolkeC. Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses [J]. Global Environmental Change, 2006, 16: 253-267.
31	WalkerB, HollingC S, CarpenterS, et al. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems [J]. Ecology and Society, 2004, 9(2): 9.
32	BerkesF, ColdingJ, FolkeC. Navigating Social-ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
33	FolkeC, CarpenterS, WalkerB, et al. Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management [J]. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 2004, 35: 557-581.
34	BerkesF, FolkeC. Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability [C]//Berkes F, Folke C, eds. Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
35	FolkeC, HahnT, OlssonP, et al. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems[J]. Annual Review of Environment & Resources, 2005, 15(30): 441-473.
36	HollingC S， GundersonL H. Resilience and adaptive cycles[C]// Gunderson L H, Holling C S, eds. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington: Island Press, 2002:25-62.
37	WalkerB, CarpenterS, AnderiesJ, et al. Resilience management in social-ecological systems: A working hypothesis for a participatory approach[J]. Conservation Ecology, 2002, 6(1): 17.
38	MastenA S, HubbardJ J, GestS D A, et al. Competence in the context of adversity: Pathways to resilience and maladaptation from childhood to late adolescence [J]. Development and Psychopathology, 1999, 11(1): 143-169.
39	MansfieldC F, BeltmanS, BroadleyT, et al. Building resilience in teacher education: An evidenced informed framework [J]. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2016, 54: 77-87.
40	MumbyP J, HastingsA， EdwardsH J. Thresholds and the resilience of Caribbean coral reefs[J]. Nature， 2007, 450(7 166): 98-101.
41	GuoYongrui, ZhangJie. Research progress and themes of geography on community resilience[J]. Progress in Geography, 2015，34(1): 100-109.
	郭永锐, 张捷. 社区恢复力研究进展及其地理学研究议题[J]. 地理科学进展, 2015,34(1): 100-109.
42	AllianceResilience. Assessing Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems: Workbook for Practitioners, Version 2.0 [N/OL]. 2010.[2018-12-28].. URL
	恢复力联盟.社会生态系统恢复力评价：工作手册(2.0版) [N/OL]. 2010. [2018-12-28].. URL
43	WangQun, LuLin, YangXingzhu. Research progress and enlightenment of tourism socio-ecological system resilience in foreign countries [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2014, 29(5): 894-908.
	王群, 陆林, 杨兴柱. 国外旅游地社会—生态系统恢复力研究进展与启示[J]. 自然资源学报, 2014, 29(5): 894-908.

[1]	周洪建. 当前全球减轻灾害风险平台的前沿话题与展望——基于2017年全球减灾平台大会的综述与思考[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(7): 688-695.
[2]	李强. 基于文献计量学分析2016年度岩溶学研究热点[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(5): 535-545.
[3]	王雪梅, 张志强, 肖仙桃. 中科院资源环境科学领域发展态势文献计量分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(11): 1287-1293.
[4]	王雪梅,李新,马明国,张志强. 青藏高原科研文献地理信息空间分析研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2012, 27(11): 1288-1294.
[5]	刘婧,史培军,葛怡,王静爱,吕红峰. 灾害恢复力研究进展综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(2): 211-218.
[6]	赵波;张志强;郑军卫. 从科学文献计量看中国国际地球科学研究队伍现状与科研影响力[J]. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(12): 1371-1375.

阅读次数

全文

摘要