地球科学进展 doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2024.081.

   

沉积源汇系统数值模拟研究进展:多模型比较与应用
何锦秋1,李海鹏2,3*,侯明才1,4   
  1. (1. 成都理工大学 沉积地质研究院,四川 成都 610059;2. 苏州深时数字地球研究中心, 江苏 昆山 215347;3. 浙江深时数字地球国际研究中心,浙江 杭州 3111214; 4. 深时地理环境重建与应用自然资源部重点实验室,四川 成都 610059)
  • 出版日期:2024-10-18
  • 通讯作者: 李海鹏,主要从事沉积源汇系统与古地理重建研究. E-mail:haipeng.geo@gmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(编号:42302133);江苏省重大科技开放合作平台建设项目(编号:BZ2022057)资助.

Advances in Numerical Simulation Research of Source-to-Sink Systems: Comparison and Application of Multiple Models

HE Jinqiu1, LI Haipeng2, 3*, HOU Mingcai1, 4   

  1. (1. Institute of Sedimentary Geology, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China; 2. Suzhou Deep-time Digital Earth Research Center, Kunshan Jiangsu 215347, China; 3. Deep-time Digital Earth Research Center of Excellence, Zhejiang, Hangzhou 3111214;4. Key Laboratory of Deep-time Geography and Environment Reconstruction and Applications of Ministry of Natural Resources, Chengdu 610059, China)
  • Online:2024-10-18 Published:2024-10-18
  • Contact: Corresponding author: LI Haipeng, research areas include sediment source-to-sink systems and paleogeographic reconstruction.E-mail: li.haipeng@ddeworld.org
  • About author:First author: HE Jinqiu, research area includes sedimentology. E-mail: 2022050768@stu.cdut.edu.cn
沉积源汇系统研究通过分析物质从源到汇的全过程,旨在揭示地表动态变化、物质循环机 制及其对环境变化的响应,有助于我们全面了解沉积物从母岩风化、剥蚀、搬运至最终沉积的复杂 过程。传统的源汇研究多依赖于野外地质观测和实验室分析,这些方法受限于数据的可获取性较 差、时空分辨率低和多解性,难以捕捉过程的动态变化和长期、大尺度的系统演化。随着计算机软 硬件的飞速发展,数值模拟已成为源汇研究的重要工具。数值模拟能够弥补传统方法的不足,定 量分析沉积物在不同环境条件下的侵蚀、搬运和沉积过程,从而提供更全面、更动态的源汇系统演 化视图。重点介绍5 种主流的源汇系统数值模拟工具:Dionisos、SEDSIM、Landlab、goSPL 和 Delft3D。这些工具各具特点,适用于不同的研究场景。Dionisos 擅长模拟大尺度、长时间跨度的 沉积盆地充填过程,但结果趋于平均化,不擅长小尺度的动态变化模拟;SEDSIM基于水动力方程 精准模拟沉积过程,结果更符合实际情况,但模拟速度较慢,更多集中于碎屑岩沉积模拟;Landlab 提供高度自定义和多过程耦合的模拟能力,适合多种研究需求,但需要用户有较强的编程能力; goSPL能够进行全球尺度的高分辨率源汇过程模拟,但处理局部地质现象时存在局限,同时对计算 资源要求较高;而Delft3D在小尺度精细模拟方面表现优越,广泛应用于海岸、河流和湖泊环境模 拟,但对于大尺度模拟存在一定的局限性。未来,随着算力的进一步增强和算法模型的优化,预计 将出现更多高精度、多过程耦合的模拟工具。同时,大数据和人工智能技术在源汇研究中的应用 将成为重要趋势,也将更好地助力源汇模拟,推动该领域的多学科融合和智能化发展。
Abstract:The study of source-to-sink systems is an important field of research focused on understanding the entire process of material transport from source areas, such as mountain ranges or other landforms, to sink areas like river basins, lakes, or the ocean. This process involves the weathering of parent rock, the erosion of materials, their transport via various agents (such as wind, water, or ice), and their eventual deposition at sink locations. Analyzing this system helps reveal dynamic surface changes, material cycling mechanisms, and how these processes respond to environmental shifts over time. Understanding these complex processes is crucial for a variety of scientific fields, including geomorphology, environmental science, and natural resource management. Traditional methods used to study these systems, such as field observations and laboratory analyses, often face several limitations. Data availability, low spatial-temporal resolution, and ambiguity in interpretation make it difficult to capture the rapid and dynamic changes occurring in natural systems. Furthermore, these methods are not well-suited for analyzing long-term evolutionary processes or large-scale systems. As a result, numerical modeling has become a critical tool in the study of source-to-sink systems, addressing these traditional limitations by simulating complex processes over varying spatial and temporal scales. These models provide more quantitative insights into the dynamics of erosion, transport, and deposition under different environmental conditions.This paper highlights five key numerical tools commonly used in source-to-sink research: Dionisos, SEDSIM, Landlab, goSPL, and Delft3D. Each tool has specific advantages that make them suitable for different research needs. Dionisos, for instance, is particularly effective for modeling large-scale, long-term basin filling processes, but it may not be as effective for simulating small-scale, dynamic changes. SEDSIM, which is based on hydrodynamic equations, offers highly accurate results, especially in clastic sedimentary processes, though it tends to be slower and more focused on specific types of sediments. Landlab is highly customizable and capable of multi-process simulations, but it requires advanced programming skills for its effective use. goSPL excels at handling global-scale, high-resolution simulations, though it struggles with localized phenomena and demands significant computational resources. Delft3D, meanwhile, is ideal for small-scale, fine-detail simulations, particularly in coastal, riverine, and lacustrine environments, although it faces challenges in large-scale applications.As computational power continues to grow and algorithms improve, future advancements in sourceto- sink modeling are expected. The integration of big data and AI will likely play a key role in driving further developments, enabling more accurate predictions, facilitating multidisciplinary integration, and fostering the intelligent evolution of the field.

中图分类号: 

[1] 郭颖, 冯文杰, 李少华, 闫淑红. 砂质辫状河中河边滩和河心滩沉积构型:基于沉积演化过程的精细解析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2024, 39(4): 405-418.
[2] 何锦秋, 李海鹏, 侯明才. 沉积源—汇系统数值模拟研究进展:多模型比较与应用[J]. 地球科学进展, 2024, 39(11): 1136-1155.
[3] 魏思华, 田军. 晚中新世低大气 pCO2 背景下暖室气候的成因机制[J]. 地球科学进展, 2022, 37(4): 417-428.
[4] 李虎, 潘小多. 青藏高原水汽输送过程及水汽源地研究方法综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2022, 37(10): 1025-1036.
[5] 李欣泽, 金会军, 吴青柏, 魏彦京, 温智. 北极多年冻土区埋地输气管道周边温度场数值分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(1): 69-82.
[6] 董治宝, 吕萍, 李超. 火星风沙地貌研究方法[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(8): 771-788.
[7] 李琼,王姣姣,潘保田. 构造和降水对祁连山北麓冲积扇演化影响的数值模拟研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(6): 607-617.
[8] 王蓉, 张强, 岳平, 黄倩. 大气边界层数值模拟研究与未来展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(4): 331-349.
[9] 李亚龙, 刘先贵, 胡志明, 端祥刚, 张杰, 詹鸿铭. 页岩气水平井产能预测数值模型综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(4): 350-362.
[10] 王冰笛, 李清泉, 沈新勇, 董李丽, 汪方, 王涛, 梁信忠. 区域气候模式CWRF对东亚冬季风气候特征的模拟[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(3): 319-330.
[11] 王坚红,张萌,任淑媛,王兴,苗春生. 太行山脉地形坡度对下山锋面气旋暴雨影响模拟研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(7): 717-730.
[12] 张晨,王清,赵建民. 海洋微塑料输运的数值模拟研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(1): 72-83.
[13] 王世红, 赵一丁, 尹训强, 乔方利. 全球海洋再分析产品的研究现状[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(8): 794-807.
[14] 李正泉, 宋丽莉, 马浩, 冯涛, 王阔. 海上风能资源观测与评估研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(8): 800-810.
[15] 陆雯茜, 吴涧. 气溶胶影响印度夏季风和东亚夏季风的研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(3): 248-257.
阅读次数
全文


摘要