地球科学进展 ›› 2006, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 605 -609. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2006.06.0605

学术论文 上一篇    下一篇

条件价值法在澳门固体废弃物管理经济价值评估中的比较研究
金建君,王志石   
  1. 澳门大学科技学院,澳门
  • 收稿日期:2005-07-06 修回日期:2006-02-10 出版日期:2006-06-15
  • 通讯作者: 金建君 E-mail:ya27402@umac.mo

A Comparative Study of Economic Valuation of Solid Waste Management in Macao Using CVM

Jin Jianjun,Wang Zhishi   

  1. Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Macau Macao, China
  • Received:2005-07-06 Revised:2006-02-10 Online:2006-06-15 Published:2006-06-15

单边界和双边界是二分式条件价值法(CVM)的2种主要问题格式。针对澳门固体废弃物管理存在的问题,应用单边界和双边界二分式条件价值法,比较研究了澳门固体废弃物管理方案改善的支付意愿及其总经济价值;结果表明,80.56%的居民对新的固体废弃物管理方案存在支付意愿。单边界二分式CVM的分析结果表明澳门居民的平均支付意愿为每人每月14.87~24.12澳门元。双边界二分式CVM的结果表明澳门居民的平均支付意愿为每人每月14.43~17.94澳门元。单边界和双边界二分式CVM的评估结果相差不大,双边界二分式CVM的评估结果较为精确。按2003年澳门总人口44.85万计算,新的固体废弃物管理方案的年总经济价值约为7.02×107澳门元。

This paper presents results from a single-bounded and double-bounded Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) study that aimed to examine Macao residents’ willingness to Pay (WTP) to support an improved solid waste management program. A random sample survey of 260 respondents in Macao was conducted face-to-face during the summer in 2004. About 80.56% stated that they would be willing to pay for this improved solid waste management program. The mean WTP of Macao public for this improved solid waste management program derived from single-bounded CVM was between 14.87MOP and 24.12MOP. The double-bounded CVM revealed that the mean WTP was about 16.82 MOP per person per month, which was between 14.43~17.94MOP. The study results show that the double-bounded CVM can decrease the variance of the WTP estimate. Based on the estimation results of double-bounded CVM, the annual aggregate value of this improved solid waste management program was about  7.02×107 MOP. The survey results revealed that the determinants of the WTP of Macao public for this improved solid waste management program were people's awareness on solid waste management, education level and total household income. These results provide support for the hypothesis that CVM can be successfully used in Macao.

中图分类号: 

[1] Kwabena A Anaman, Rashidah M Jair. Contingent valuation of solid waste collection services for rural households in Brunei Darussalam[J]. The Singapore Economic Review, 2000, 45(2): 223-240.

[2] Zhang Zhiqiang, Xu Zhongmin, Cheng Guodong, et al. Contingent valuation of the economic benefits of restoring ecosystem services of Zhangye prefecture of Heihe river basin [J]. Acta Ecologic Sinica, 2002, 22(6): 885-893. [张志强,徐中民,程国栋,. 黑河流域张掖地区生态系统服务恢复的条件价值评估[J]. 生态学报,2002, 22(6): 885-893.]

[3] Mitchell R C, Carson R T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method[M]. Washington DC: Resources for the Future,1989.

[4] Zhang Zhiqiang, Xu Zhongmin, Cheng Guodong. The updated development and application of Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) [J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2003, 18(3): 454-463. [张志强,徐中民,程国栋. 条件价值评估法的发展与应用[J]. 地球科学进展,2003, 18(3): 454-463.]

[5] Xu Zhongmin, Zhang Zhiqiang, Long Aihua, et al. Comparison and application of different contingent valuation methods in measuring total economic value of restoring Ejina Banner’s ecosystem service [J]. Acta Ecologic Sinica, 2003,23(9):1 841-1 850.[徐中民,张志强,龙爱华,.额济纳旗生态系统服务恢复价值评估方法的比较与应用[J]. 生态学报,2003,23(9):1 841-1 850.]

[6] Xu Zhongmin, Zhang Zhiqiang, Cheng Guodong, et al. Measuring the total economic value of restoring Ejina Banner’s ecosystem services [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2002, 57(1): 107-116. [徐中民,张志强,程国栋,.额济纳旗生态系统恢复的总经济价值评估 [J]. 地理学报,2002, 57(1): 107-116.]

[7] Chen Dongjing, Xu Zhongmin, Cheng Guodong, et al. Willingness to pay for the restoration of the ecosystem in Ejina Qi, Inner Mongolia, China [J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 2003, 39(3): 69-72. [陈东景,徐中民,程国栋,.恢复额济纳旗生态环境的支付意愿研究[J]. 兰州大学学报:自然科学版,2003, 39(3): 69-72.]

[8] Zhang Zhiqiang, Xu Zhongmin, Long Aihua, et al. Measuring the economic value of restoring ecosystem services in Zhangye city of Heihe river basin—Comparison and application of continuous and discrete contingent valuation survey [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2004, 19(2): 230-238. [张志强,徐中民,龙爱华,.黑河流域张掖市生态系统服务恢复价值评估研究——连续型和离散型条件价值评估方法的比较应用[J]. 自然资源学报,2004,19(2): 230-238.]

[9] Li Ying, Bai Mo, Yang Kaizhong, et al. Study on residents’ willingness to pay for improving air quality in Beijing [J]. Urban Environment & Urban Ecology, 2001, 14(5): 6-8. [李莹,白墨,杨开忠,.居民为改善北京市大气环境质量的支付意愿研究[J]. 城市环境与城市生态,2001,14(5): 6-8.]

[10] Hanemann W M, Loomis J, Kanninen B. Statistical efficency of double bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation [J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1991,73:1 255-1 263.

[1] 魏梦美,符素华,刘宝元. 青藏高原水力侵蚀定量研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(7): 740-752.
[2] 范成新, 刘敏, 王圣瑞, 方红卫, 夏星辉, 曹文志, 丁士明, 侯立军, 王沛芳, 陈敬安, 游静, 王菊英, 盛彦清, 朱伟. 20年来我国沉积物环境与污染控制研究进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(4): 346-374.
[3] 吴佳梅,彭秋志,黄义忠,黄亮. 中国植被覆盖变化研究遥感数据源及研究区域时空热度分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(9): 978-989.
[4] 李侠祥, 刘昌新, 王芳, 郝志新. 中国投资对“一带一路”地区经济增长和碳排放强度的影响[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(6): 618-631.
[5] 刘凯,聂格格,张森. 中国 19512018年气温和降水的时空演变特征研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(11): 1113-1126.
[6] 谢彦君, 任福民, 李国平, 王铭杨, 杨慧. 影响中国双台风活动气候特征研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(1): 101-108.
[7] 郝志新,吴茂炜,张学珍,刘洋,郑景云. 过去千年中国年代和百年尺度冷暖阶段的干湿格局变化研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(1): 18-25.
[8] 蒋诗威,周鑫. 中国东南地区中世纪暖期和小冰期夏季风降水研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(7): 697-705.
[9] 高峰,赵雪雁,宋晓谕,王宝,王鹏龙,牛艺博,王伟军,黄春林. 面向 SDGs的美丽中国内涵与评价指标体系[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(3): 295-305.
[10] 张宸嘉, 方一平, 陈秀娟. 基于文献计量的国内可持续生计研究进展分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(9): 969-982.
[11] 陈亮, 段建平, 马柱国. 大气环流形势客观分型及其与中国降水的联系[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(4): 396-403.
[12] 王建, 车涛, 李震, 李弘毅, 郝晓华, 郑照军, 肖鹏峰, 李晓峰, 黄晓东, 钟歆玥, 戴礼云, 李红星, 柯长青, 李兰海. 中国积雪特性及分布调查[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(1): 12-15.
[13] 吴绍洪, 高江波, 戴尔阜, 赵东升, 尹云鹤, 杨琳, 郑景云, 潘韬, 杨勤业. 中国陆地表层自然地域系统动态研究:思路与方案[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(6): 569-576.
[14] 陈晓龙, 周天军. 使用订正的“空间型标度”法预估1.5 ℃温升阈值下地表气温变化[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(4): 435-445.
[15] 汪品先. 未雨绸缪——迎接大洋钻探学术新计划的制定[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(12): 1229-1235.
阅读次数
全文


摘要