陆面过程研究的现状与发展趋势

doi:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.1997.01.0020

地球科学进展 ›› 1997, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1): 20 -25. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.1997.01.0020

陆面过程研究的现状与发展趋势

牛国跃，洪钟祥，孙菽芬

中国科学院大气物理研究所北京 100029

收稿日期:1996-05-06 修回日期:1996-06-19 出版日期:1997-02-01
通讯作者: 牛国跃,男,1966年4月出生,主要研究方向为边界层气象学及陆面过程。

STATUS AND DEVELOPMENTAL TRENDS OF LAND SURFACE PROCESSES STUDY

NIU Guoyao, HONG Zhongxiang, SUN Shufen

Institute of Atmospheric Physics,CAS,Beijing 100029

Received:1996-05-06 Revised:1996-06-19 Online:1997-02-01 Published:1997-02-01

下载PDF ( 832 )

对目前陆面过程研究的现状及存在的问题进行了总结,并且提出了与边界层研究有关的几个前沿方向:①非均匀下垫面地表湍流通量的参数化及中尺度通量的参数化方法;②边界层理论在复杂地形条件下的应用,以及次网格地形对通量输送的影响;③进一步改进GCM中冠层地表水文参数化;④边界层的层云和层积云的参数化。

关键词: 陆面过程, 边界层过程, 参数化, 发展趋势, 环境特征, 氮磷含量, 紫色土丘陵区典型小流域

This paper is a brief review on the study of land surface processes relevant to atmospheric boundary layer(ABL) processes. The authors think that the priority of land surface processes includes:(1)The parameterization scheme of surface turbulence fluxes and mesoscale fluxes over heterogeneous land surface.(2)The parameterization scheme of the influence of subgrid topography on the trnsport of momentum,heat and water fluxes.(3)Further parameterization of subgrid canopy and surface hydrology.(4)The parameterization of ABL clouds.

Key words: Land surface processes, ABL processes, Parameterization scheme, Research priority.

中图分类号:

P437/P435

1 胡隐樵,高由禧.黑河实验(HEIFE)——对干旱地区陆面过程的一些新认识.气象学报, 1994,52(3):285-296.
2 孙菽芬.土壤—植被—大气统一体内水份循环和能量交换——SPAC模型.力学进展,1984,14(1):1-10.
3 Avissar R, Chen F. Development and analysis of prognostic equations for mesoscale kinetic energy and mesoscale (subgrid scale) fluxes for large-scale atmospheric model. J Atmos Sci,1993,50:3751-3774.
4 Blyth E M, Dolman A J, Wood N. Effective resistence to Sensible and latent heat flux in heteorogeneous Terrain. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc, 1993,119:423-442.
5 Chen F, Avissar. The impact of land-surface wetness heterogeneity on mesoscale heat fluxes. J Appl Meteor,1994,33:1323-1340.
6 Dalu G A, Pielke R A. Vertical heat fluxes generated by mesoscale atmospheric flow induced by thermal inhomogeneities in the PBL. J Atmos Sci, 1993,50:919-926.
7 Deardorff J W. Efficient prediction of ground surface temperatureand moisture, with inclusion of a layer of vegetation. J Geophys Res,1978,83(4):1889-903.
8 Dickinson R E. Changes in landuse. In: Climate System Modeling. In:Trenberth K E ed. Cambridge University Press, 1993.689-701.
9 Dolman A J. A note on areally-averaged evaporation and the value of the effective surface conductance. J Hydrol,1992,138:583-589.
10 Ji J J, Hu Y. A simple land surface process model for use in climate study. Acta Meteor Sinica, 1989,3:344-353.
11 Lynn B H, Abramopoulos F, Avissar R. Using similarity therory to parameterize mesoscale heat fluxes generated by subgrid-scale landscape discontinuities in GCMS. J Climate, 1995,8:932-951.
12 Mahrt L, Grid-areraged surface fluxes. Mon Wea Rev, 1987,115:1550-1560.
13 Mason P J. The formation of area-averaged roughness lengths. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc, 1988,114:399-420.
14 Mintz Y. The sensitivity of numerically simulated climates to land surface conditions. In: Houghton J T ed. Global Climate. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1984.79-105
15 Noihan J, Lacarrere P. GCM grid-scale evaporation from Mesoscale modeling. J Climate, 1995,8:206-223.
16 Pielke R A, Zeng X, Lee T J, Dalu G A. Mesoscale fluxes over heterogeneous flat landscape for use in larger scale models. J Hydrol,1995.
17 Segal M, Arritt R W. Nonclassical mesoscale circulations caused by surface sensible heat flux gradients. Bull Amer Moteor Soc, 1992,73:1593-1604.
18 Sellers P J, Hall F G, Asrar G, et al. An overview of the First Intesnational Satallite Land Surface Climatology Project (ISLSCP) Field Experiment (FIFE). J Geophys Res,1992,97(D17):18345-18371.
19 Sellers P J, Hall F G. FIFE in 1992: Results, scientific gains, and future research directions. J Geopby Res, 1992,97(D17):19091-19109.
20 Sellers A H, Pitman J A. Land-Surface schemes for future climate models: Specification, aggregation and heterogeneity. J. Geophys Res, 1992,97(D3):2687-2696.
21 Sellers A H, Pitman A J, Irannejad P,et al. The project for intercomparison of land surface parameterization schemes (PILPS): Phases 2 and 3. Bull Amer Meteor Soc,1995,76(4):489-503.
22 Shuttleworth W J. Macrohydrology: The new challange for process hydrology. J Hydrol, 1988,100:31-56.
23 Shuttleworth W J. The modellion concept. Rev Geophy, 1991,29(4):585-606.
24 Yeh T C, We therald R T, Manabe S. The effect of soil moisture on short term climate and hydrology change-A numerical experiment. Monthly Weather Review, 1984,112:474-490.
25 Zeng X, Pielke R A. Landscape-induced atmospheric flow and its parameterization in large-scale numerical models. J of Climate, 1995,8:1156-1177.

[1]	尤元红,黄春林,张莹,侯金亮. Noah-MP模型中积雪模拟对参数化方案的敏感性评估[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(4): 356-365.
[2]	周彦昭, 李新. 涡动相关能量闭合问题的研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(9): 898-913.
[3]	马雷鸣, 鲍旭炜. 数值天气预报模式物理过程参数化方案的研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(7): 679-687.
[4]	王昊亮, 刘玉宝, 赵天良, 郭凤霞, 冯双磊, 王勃. 基于数值天气模式及其模式输出的闪电预报研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(1): 44-55.
[5]	栾贻花, 俞永强, 郑伟鹏. 全球高分辨率气候系统模式研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(3): 258-268.
[6]	兰鑫宇, 郭子祺, 田野, 雷霞, 王婕. 土壤湿度遥感估算同化研究综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(6): 668-679.
[7]	汤秋鸿, 黄忠伟, 刘星才, 韩松俊, 冷国勇, 张学君, 穆梦斐. 人类用水活动对大尺度陆地水循环的影响[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(10): 1091-1099.
[8]	王连喜, 吴建生, 李琪, 顾嘉熠, 薛红喜. AquaCrop作物模型应用研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(10): 1100-1106.
[9]	王磊, 李秀萍, 周璟, 刘文彬, 阳坤. 青藏高原水文模拟的现状及未来[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(6): 674-682.
[10]	熊喆. 不同积云对流参数化方案对黑河流域降水模拟的影响[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(5): 590-597.
[11]	蔡福, 明惠青, 纪瑞鹏, 冯锐, 米娜, 赵先丽, 张玉书. 玉米冠层辐射传输参数优化对陆气通量模拟的影响[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(5): 598-607.
[12]	尹金方, 王东海, 翟国庆. 区域中尺度模式云微物理参数化方案特征及其在中国的适用性[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(2): 238-249.
[13]	任晓倩，孙菽芬，陈文，刘辉志. 湖泊数值模拟研究现状综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2013, 28(3): 347-356.
[14]	王晨稀. 边界层参数化影响“梅花”台风的敏感性试验[J]. 地球科学进展, 2013, 28(2): 197-208.
[15]	李得勤，段云霞，张述文. 土壤湿度观测、模拟和估算研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2012, 27(4): 424-434.

阅读次数

全文

摘要