地球科学进展 ›› 2005, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (1): 24 -028. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2005.01.0024

所属专题: “沙尘天气追因、影响及治理”虚拟专刊

研究论文 上一篇    下一篇

内蒙古中西部地区土壤水分对沙尘暴的贡献
李彰俊 1,2,李宁 3,4,顾卫 4,5,吴学宏 1,2   
  1. 1. 南京信息工程大学,江苏南京210044;
    2.内蒙古自治区气象台,内蒙古呼和浩特010051;
    3.北京师范大学资源学院灾害与公共安全研究所,北京100875;
    4. 北京师范大学资源学院资源技
    术与工程研究所,北京100875;
    5.北京师范大学环境演变与自然灾害教育部重点实验室,北京100875
  • 收稿日期:2003-11-14 修回日期:2004-05-01 出版日期:2005-01-25
  • 通讯作者: 李宁(1958-),女,江苏镇江人,副教授,主要从事应用气候和自然灾害研究 E-mail:ningli@irs.bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    内蒙古自治区科委科研项目“内蒙古中西部沙尘源地的下垫面特征研究”(编号:20020703);北京师范大学青年科学基金项目“不同下垫面气候特征的观测研究”(编号:107190) 资助

The Contribution of Soil Moisture to Dust Storm in Western and Central Inner Mongolia, China

LI Zhangjun 1,2,LI Ning 3,4,GU Wei 4,5,WU Xuehong 1,2   

  1. 1. Nanjing Information Engineering University, Jiangsu  Nanjing 210044, China;
    2. Weather Station of Autonomous Region of Inner Mongolia, Inner Mongolia, Huhhot 010051, China;
    3. Institute of Disaster and Public Security,College of Resources Sciences and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875,China; 
    4.Resources Technology and Engineering, College of ResourcesSciences and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875,China;
    5.Key Laboratory of Environmental Changes and Natural Disaster of Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
  • Received:2003-11-14 Revised:2004-05-01 Online:2005-01-25 Published:2005-01-25

以2001年4月至2002年 6月内蒙中部地区逐时观测的土壤水分资料为基础,论证了该区日土壤水分和日平均风速的变化规律,统计分析了日平均风速与土壤水分对沙尘暴的成生综合贡献。得出的主要结论是:①该地区沙尘暴发生时日平均风速的最小值是 3.5 m/s。如果日平均风速大于 8.0 m/s,预示着有沙尘暴的发生。②在平均风速大于 3.5 m/s的条件下,观测样本中 18.4%日数发生沙尘暴,而81.6%日数没有发生。说明大风的天气条件不应当被视其为沙尘暴的唯一重要的因子。③在同一地点、同样的风力条件下,在沙尘暴发生时,日平均风速与日平均土壤水分呈明显的反相关变化;而它们的反相关关系不明显时,沙尘暴就很少发生。

To recuperate the shortage of soil moisture, based on hourly soil moisture date observed from April 2001 to June 2003 in western and central Inner Mongolia of China, the change regulation of daily mean soil moisture and daily mean wind speed and their integrative contributions are analyzed in the paper. Then rationality of the statistic result is discussed, from which some interesting results can be drawn as follows: (1)The minimum value of daily mean wind speed for dust storm emission is 3.5m/s, and dust storm will occur when the wind speed over 8m/s in this area. (2)There are 18.4% of dust storms that occurred and 81.6% of non-dust storms that occurred in the total data collected when the wind speed was more than 3.5m/s. It indicated that dynamical factor with daily mean wind speed is not a most important one in the factors of dust storm emission. (3)If only soil moisture and wind speed are consider, when there is a inverse relation between daily mean soil moisture and daily mean wind speed, dust storm would occurred (r= 0.674). Otherwise, if their relation were not shown as this inverse, dust storm would not occur. The formation and development of dust storm is an integrative result of soil moisture and wind speed. Continuous data of soil moisture would be an avail index to study dust storm for showing the humid status of soil directly and for scaling the status of vegetation cover indirectly.

中图分类号: 

[1]Gu Wei, Cai Xuepeng, Xie Feng,et al. Study on relationship between vegetation cover and distribution of days of sandstorm—Taking central and western Inner Mongolia for example[J].Advances in Earth Science,2002,17(2): 273-277.[顾卫,蔡雪鹏,谢峰,等,植被覆盖与沙尘暴日数分布关系的探讨——以内蒙古中西部地区为例[J]. 地球科学进展,2002,17(2): 273-277.]
[2]Shao Y P. Physics and Modeling of Wind Erosion[M].The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers,2000:135-136.
[3]Bai Jingyu, Shi Xiaoying, Yu Shuqiu. Preliminary research on soil moisture in eastern part of Northwest China[J].Meteorological Science and Technology,2003, 31(4): 226-230.[柏晶瑜,施小英,于淑秋.西北地区东部春季土壤水分变化的初步研究[J].气象科技,2003,31(4): 226-230.]
[4]Fan Yida, Shi Peijun, Wang Xiushan,et al.The analysis of typical dust storm in Northern China by remote sensing[J].Advances in Earth Science,2002,17(2): 289-294.[范一大,史培军,王秀山,等.中国北方典型沙尘暴的遥感分析[J].地球科学进展,2002,17(2):289-294.]
[5]Pan Yaozhong, Fan Yida,Shi Peijun,et al.Spatial variation and seasonal distribution of dust-storm in China in resent 50 years: A preliminary study[J].Journal of Natural Disaster,2003,12(1): 1-8.[潘耀忠,范一大,史培军,等.近50年来中国沙尘暴空间分异格局及季相分布——初步研究[J].自然灾害学报,2003,12(1):1-8.]
[6]Nilgun K, Slobodan N. An illustration of the transport and deposition of mineral dust onto the eastern Mediterranean[J].Atmospheric Environment,2000,34: 1 293-1 303.
[7]Shi Peijun,Zhang Hong, Wang Ping,et al.The regional patterns for combating sandification in sandy disaster affected area in China[J].Journal of Natural Disasters,2000, 9(3):1-7.[史培军,张宏,王平.我国沙区防沙治沙的区域模式[J].自然灾害学报,2000,9(3):1-7.]

[1] 康文敏,蔡芫镔,郑慧祯. 福州城市地表温度时空变化与贡献度研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(1): 88-100.
[2] 柳本立,牛百成,屈建军. 多组复合指纹示踪法及其应用[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(10): 1092-1098.
[3] 赵文智, 周宏, 刘鹄. 干旱区包气带土壤水分运移及其对地下水补给研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(9): 908-918.
[4] 邵明安, 贾小旭, 王云强, 朱元骏. 黄土高原土壤干层研究进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(1): 14-22.
[5] 高江波, 吴绍洪, 戴尔阜, 侯文娟. 西南喀斯特地区地表水热过程研究进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(6): 647-653.
[6] 曾静静, 曲建升, 裴惠娟, 董利苹, 廖琴, 刘燕飞, 张志强. 国际气候变化会议回顾与近期热点问题分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(11): 1210-1217.
[7] 李大治, 晋锐, 车涛, 高莹, 耶楠, 王树果. 联合机载PLMR微波辐射计和MODIS产品反演黑河中游张掖绿洲土壤水分研究 *[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(2): 295-305.
[8] 李宁,顾孝天,刘雪琴. 沙尘暴灾害致灾因子三维联合分布与重现期探索[J]. 地球科学进展, 2013, 28(4): 490-496.
[9] 朱忠礼,林柳莺,徐同仁. 海河流域不同下垫面土壤水分动态模拟研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2012, 27(7): 778-787.
[10] 张添,黄春林,沈焕锋. 土壤水分对土壤参数的敏感性及其参数优化方法研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2012, 27(6): 678-685.
[11] 陈书林,刘元波,温作民. 卫星遥感反演土壤水分研究综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2012, 27(11): 1192-1203.
[12] 李耀辉,孙国武,张良,段海霞. 我国北方沙尘暴年代际变化与北大西洋海气系统年代际变率的联系[J]. 地球科学进展, 2011, 26(6): 624-630.
[13] 朱好,张宏升. 沙尘天气过程临界起沙因子的研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2011, 26(1): 30-38.
[14] 赵天杰,张立新,蒋玲梅,陈权,张志玉,张勇攀. 利用主被动微波数据联合反演土壤水分[J]. 地球科学进展, 2009, 24(7): 769-775.
[15] 冉有华,李新,王维真,晋 锐. 黑河流域临泽盐碱化草地网格尺度多层土壤水分时空稳定性分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2009, 24(7): 817-824.
阅读次数
全文


摘要