地球科学进展 doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2025.008.

   

祁连山水系演化研究进展与展望
武佳坤1,2,胡小飞2,潘保田2,曹喜林3,温振玲4, 孙强1,李梦昊1,2,赵启明2   
  1. (1. 西安科技大学 地质与环境学院,陕西 西安 710054;2. 兰州大学 资源环境学院,甘肃 兰州 730000; 3. 南京师范大学 地理科学学院,江苏 南京 210023;4. 兰州财经大学 公共管理学院, 甘肃 兰州 730101)
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(编号:41730637)资助.

Research Progress and Prospects on Drainage Evolution in the Qilian Shan

WU Jiakun1, 2, HU Xiaofei2, PAN Baotian2, CAO Xilin3, WEN Zhenling4, SUN Qiang1, LI Menghao1, 2, ZHAO Qiming2   

  1. (1. College of Geology and Environment, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China; 2. College of Resources and Environment, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; 3. School of Geography, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China; 4. School of Public Administration, Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics, Lanzhou 730101, China)
  • About author:WU Jiakun , research areas include sedimentary evolution, fluvial geomorphology, and tectonic geomorphology. E-mail: jiakunwu992@gmail.com
  • Supported by:
    Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41730637).
祁连山是青藏高原向北扩展形成的最年轻山体,其抬升扩展对于理解高原的扩展过程和 隆升机制以及造山带演化等科学问题具有重要意义。水系演化能够比较快速地响应山地的抬升 扩展,在祁连山地区开展水系的发育演化研究是探讨山体抬升扩展过程的重要手段。基于对剥蚀 面、河流阶地、风口和古河道等地貌记录以及新生代沉积地层开展的年代学与物源研究,当前祁连 山地区水系演化研究取得如下成果与认识:①祁连山东部黄河上游干流的形成演化是在构造抬升 或者气候变化的驱动下,河流向上游发生溯源侵蚀和袭夺的水系重组过程;②祁连山北部石羊河 与黑河流域、祁连山东部兰州盆地开展的河流阶地研究显示,气候变化与构造抬升分别控制着河 流的下切时间(冰期向间冰期过渡期、间冰期)和下切幅度,全新世以来阶地的形成主要受到气候 变化的控制(暖湿期河流下切);③河流阶地可靠地记录了祁连山东部黄河重要支流湟水河(流向 反转)与大通河(河流袭夺)的演化过程;④祁连山北部榆木山地区与南部乌兰、查查盆地开展的新 生代沉积物年代学、物源与古水文研究,较可靠地重建了区域水系演化历史,显示出沉积地层在重 建可靠、详细的水系演化过程中潜力巨大。同时,还存在诸多亟需解决的问题,开展深入的地貌面 与沉积物定年研究,多物源方法融合的物源分析,持续的地貌特征研究,以及数值模拟与仿真模拟 研究,将成为今后研究的重点与趋势。
Abstract:The Qilian Shan, the youngest mountain range formed by the northward expansion of the Tibetan Plateau, plays a crucial role in understanding the plateau’s expansion processes, uplift mechanisms, and the evolution of orogenic belts. Drainage system evolution responds rapidly to mountain uplift, making the study of drainage development and evolution a critical approach for investigating the uplift and expansion of the Qilian Shan. Based on chronological and provenance studies of geomorphic records, including erosion surfaces, river terraces, wind gaps and ancient river channels, and Cenozoic sedimentary strata, the current research on drainage system evolution in the Qilian Shan has yielded the following findings and insights: ① The formation and evolution of the upper reaches of the Yellow River in the eastern Qilian Shan involve a process of drainage reorganization driven by tectonic uplift or climate change, characterized by headward erosion and river capture; ② Research on river terraces in the Shiyang River and Heihe River basins of the northern Qilian Shan, as well as in the Lanzhou Basin of the eastern Qilian Shan, indicates climate change and tectonic uplift independently govern the timing (transitions between glacial and interglacial periods, and interglacial periods) and extent of river incision; Since the Holocene, terrace formation has been primarily driven by climate change, with river incision occurred during warm and humid periods; ③ River terraces reliably record the evolution processes of major tributaries of the Yellow River in the eastern Qilian Shan, including the Huangshui River (flow reversal) and the Datong River (river capture); ④ Study of chronology, provenance, and paleohydrology of Cenozoic sedimentary strata in the Yumu Shan of the northern Qilian Shan, as well as the Wulan and Chacha basins of the southern Qilian Shan, has reliably reconstructed the regional drainage evolution history, highlighting the significant potential of sedimentary strata for reconstructing reliable and detailed record of drainage evolution. Simultaneously, numerous critical issues remain unresolved, necessitating further investigation. Future research is expected to prioritize and emphasize in-depth studies on geomorphic surface and sediments dating, the integration of multi-source methods for provenance analysis, continuous exploration of geomorphic features, as well as advancements in numerical simulations and simulation modeling studies.

中图分类号: 

[1] 武佳坤, 胡小飞, 潘保田, 曹喜林, 温振玲, 孙强, 李梦昊, 赵启明. 祁连山水系演化研究进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2025, 40(2): 169-192.
[2] 任珩, 赵文智, 王小鹏, 罗维成, 周涛. 祁连山甘肃片区生命共同体的系统认知、实践历程与关键挑战[J]. 地球科学进展, 2024, 39(9): 957-967.
[3] 孟宪萌, 黄檬, 黄杰, 赵琦, 刘登峰. 流域地貌与河网结构影响机制及其演化模型的研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2023, 38(8): 780-789.
[4] 李旭明,李来峰,王浩贤,王野,陈旸. 土壤中次生与碎屑组分的差异性剥蚀[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(8): 826-838.
[5] 李琼,王姣姣,潘保田. 构造和降水对祁连山北麓冲积扇演化影响的数值模拟研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(6): 607-617.
[6] 魏传义, 刘春茹, 李长安, 尹功明, 李文朋, 赵举兴, 张增杰, 张岱, 孙习林, 李亚伟. 石英ESR法物源示踪:认识与进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(10): 1062-1071.
[7] 陈京华, 贾文雄*, 赵珍, 张禹舜, 刘亚荣. 1982—2006年祁连山植被覆盖的时空变化特征研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(7): 834-845.
[8] 胡凯, 方小敏, 赵志军. 宇宙成因核素10Be揭示的北祁连山侵蚀速率特征*[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(2): 268-275.
[9] 范代读,王扬扬,吴伊婧. 长江沉积物源示踪研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2012, 27(5): 515-528.
[10] 由伟丰,张海清,校培喜,曹宣铎,胡云绪,谢从瑞. 北祁连山—阿拉善地区寒武纪构造—岩相古地理[J]. 地球科学进展, 2011, 26(10): 1092-1100.
[11] 郑国光,陈跃,陈添宇,陈乾,朱君鉴,李照荣. 祁连山夏季地形云综合探测试验[J]. 地球科学进展, 2011, 26(10): 1057-1070.
[12] 余吉远,李向民,马中平,孙吉明,王建强. 青海省祁连县清水沟-白柳沟矿田含矿火山岩系年代学研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(1): 55-60.
[13] 武震,刘时银,张世强. 祁连山老虎沟12号冰川冰下形态特征分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2009, 24(10): 1149-1158.
[14] 王宝鉴,黄玉霞,王劲松,陶健红. 祁连山云和空中水汽资源的季节分布与演变[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(9): 948-955.
[15] 白云来;范育新;汤中立;江荣伏. 关于中国西部龙首山、祁连山成矿区(带)进一步找矿问题的思考[J]. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(1): 36-041.
阅读次数
全文


摘要