1 |
GALLORINI A, LOIZEAU J L. Mercury methylation in oxic aquatic macro-environments: a review[J]. Journal of Limnology, 2021, 80(2). DOI:10.4081/jlimnol.2021.2007 .
|
2 |
LIU C T, LIU J L, ZHOU C Y, et al. Redox potential and C/N ratio predict the structural shift of mercury methylating microbe communities in a subalpine sphagnum peatland[J]. Geoderma, 2021, 403. DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115375 .
|
3 |
O’CONNOR D, HOU D Y, OK Y S, et al. Mercury speciation, transformation, and transportation in soils, atmospheric flux, and implications for risk management: a critical review[J]. Environment International, 2019, 126: 747-761.
|
4 |
LOUX N T. An assessment of thermodynamic reaction constants for simulating aqueous environmental monomethylmercury speciation[J]. Chemical Speciation & Bioavailability, 2007, 19(4): 183-196.
|
5 |
DRISCOLL C T, MASON R P, CHAN H M, et al. Mercury as a global pollutant: sources, pathways, and effects[J].Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(10): 4 967-4 983.
|
6 |
HOGGARTH C G J, HALL B D, MITCHELL C P J. Mercury methylation in high and low-sulphate impacted wetland ponds within the prairie pothole region of North America[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2015, 205: 269-277.
|
7 |
ZHANG Z S, LI M, LI Z, et al. Unexpected high methylmercury contents related to soil organic carbon and its molecular composition in wetland soils of the Yarlung Tsangbo River, Tibet[J]. Geoderma, 2020, 377. DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114607 .
|
8 |
DIEZ E G, LOIZEAU J L, COSIO C, et al. Role of settling particles on mercury methylation in the oxic water column of freshwater systems[J].Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 5 021: 11 672-11 679.
|
9 |
ECKLEY C S, HINTELMANN H. Determination of mercury methylation potentials in the water column of lakes across Canada[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2006, 368(1): 111-125.
|
10 |
MONPERRUS M, TESSIER E, AMOUROUX D, et al. Mercury methylation, demethylation and reduction rates in coastal and marine surface waters of the mediterranean sea[J]. Marine Chemistry, 2007, 107(1): 49-63.
|
11 |
HAMELIN S, PLANAS D, AMYOT M. Mercury methylation and demethylation by periphyton biofilms and their host in a fluvial wetland of the St. Lawrence River (QC, Canada)[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2015, 512/513: 464-471.
|
12 |
AYANLADE A, PROSKE U. Assessing wetland degradation and loss of ecosystem services in the Niger Delta, Nigeria[J].Marine and Freshwater Research, 2016, 67: 828-836.
|
13 |
SCHAEFER J K, KRONBERG R M, BJORN E, et al. Anaerobic guilds responsible for mercury methylation in boreal wetlands of varied trophic status serving as either a methylmercury source or sink[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2020, 22(9): 3 685-3 699.
|
14 |
St. LOUIS V L, RUDD J W M, KELLY C A,et al. Importance of wetlands as sources of methyl mercury to boreal forest ecosystems[J]. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1994, 51(5): 1 065-1 076.
|
15 |
WEBER J H. Review of possible paths for abiotic methylation of Mercury(II) in the aquatic environment[J]. Chemosphere, 1993, 26(11): 2 063-2 077.
|
16 |
YU R Q, BARKAY T. Microbial mercury transformations: molecules, functions and organisms[J]. Advances in Applied Microbiology, 2022, 118: 31-90.
|
17 |
PARKS J M, JOHS A, PODAR M, et al. The genetic basis for bacterial mercury methylation[J]. Science, 2013, 339(6 125): 1 332-1 335.
|
18 |
GORDON J, QUINTON W, BRANFIREUN B A, et al. Mercury and methylmercury biogeochemistry in a thawing permafrost wetland complex, northwest territories, Canada[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2016, 30(20): 3 627-3 638.
|
19 |
MA M, DU H X, WANG D Y. Mercury methylation by anaerobic microorganisms: a review[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2019, 49(20): 1 893-1 936.
|
20 |
XU J Y, LIEM-NGUYEN V, BUCK M, et al. Mercury methylating microbial community structure in boreal wetlands explained by local physicochemical conditions[J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2021, 8. DOI:10.3389/fenvs.2020.518662 .
|
21 |
COMPEAU G C, BARTHA R. Sulfate-reducing bacteria:principal methylators of mercury in anoxic estuarine sediment[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1985, 50(2): 498-502.
|
22 |
FLEMING E J, MACK E E, GREEN P G, et al. Mercury methylation from unexpected sources: molybdate-inhibited freshwater sediments and an iron-reducing bacterium[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2006, 72(1): 457-464.
|
23 |
GILMOUR C C, PODAR M, BULLOCK A L, et al. Mercury methylation by novel microorganisms from new environments[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(20): 11 810-11 820.
|
24 |
EKSTROM E B, MOREL F M M, BENOIT J M. Mercury methylation independent of the acetyl-coenzyme A pathway in sulfate-reducing bacteria[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2003, 69(9): 5 414-5 422.
|
25 |
CHOI S C, CHASE T, BARTHA R. Metabolic pathways leading to mercury methylation in Desulfovibrio desulfuricans LS[J]. Applied And Environmental Microbiology, 1994, 60(11): 4 072-4 077.
|
26 |
GU Chunhao, XU Huaifeng, QIU Guangle. The progress in research on mechanism of microbial mercury methylation and de-methylation[J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2013, 32(6): 926-936.
|
|
谷春豪, 许怀凤, 仇广乐.汞的微生物甲基化与去甲基化机理研究进展[J].环境化学, 2013, 32(6): 926-936.
|
27 |
REGNELL O, WATRAS C J. Microbial mercury methylation in aquatic environments: a critical review of published field and laboratory studies[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(1): 4-19.
|
28 |
DATE S S, PARKS J M, RUSH K W, et al. Kinetics of enzymatic mercury methylation at nanomolar concentrations catalyzed by hgcAB [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2019, 85(13). DOI:10.1128/AEM.00438-19 .
|
29 |
QIAN C, CHEN H M, JOHS A, et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of biological processes and responses of the bacterium Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132 upon deletion of its mercury methylation genes[J]. Proteomics, 2018, 18(17). DOI:10.1002/pmic.201700479 .
|
30 |
GILMOUR C C, ELIAS D A, KUCKEN A M, et al. Sulfate-reducing bacterium desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132 as a model for understanding bacterial mercury methylation[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2011, 77(12): 3 938-3 951.
|
31 |
BARKAY T, WAGNER-DOBLER I. Microbial transformations of mercury: potentials, challenges, and achievements in controlling mercury toxicity in the environment[J]. Advances in Applied Microbiology, 2005, 57. DOI:10.1016/S0065-2164(05)57001-1 .
|
32 |
SELLERS P, KELLY C A, RUDD J W M, et al. Photodegradation of methylmercury in lakes[J]. Nature, 1996, 380(6 576): 694-697.
|
33 |
LI Y B, MAO Y X, LIU G L, et al. Degradation of methylmercury and its effects on mercury distribution and cycling in the Florida Everglades[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(17): 6 661-6 666.
|
34 |
TAI C, LI Y B, YIN Y G, et al. Methylmercury photodegradation in surface water of the Florida Everglades: importance of dissolved organic matter-methylmercury complexation[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(13): 7 333-7 340.
|
35 |
BLACK F J, POULIN B A, FLEGAL A R. Factors controlling the abiotic photo-degradation of monomethylmercury in surface waters[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2012, 84: 492-507.
|
36 |
HAMMERSCHMIDT C R, FITZGERALD W F. Iron-mediated photochemical decomposition of methylmercury in an Arctic Alaskan Lake[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(16): 6 138-6 143.
|
37 |
ZHANG T, HSU-KIM H. Photolytic degradation of methylmercury enhanced by binding to natural organic ligands[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2010, 3(7): 473-476.
|
38 |
FERNANDEZ-GOMEZ C, DROTT A, BJORN E, et al. Towards universal wavelength-specific photodegradation rate constants for methyl mercury in humic waters, exemplified by a boreal lake-wetland gradient[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(12): 6 279-6 287.
|
39 |
BOYD E S, KING S, TOMBERLIN J K, et al. Methylmercury enters an aquatic food web through acidophilic microbial mats in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming[J]. Environmental Microbiology, 2009, 11(4): 950-959.
|
40 |
QIAN Y, YIN X P, LIN H, et al. Why dissolved organic matter enhances photodegradation of methylmercury[J]. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 2014, 1(10): 426-431.
|
41 |
BARKAY T, GU B H. Demethylation─the other side of the mercury methylation coin: a critical review[J]. ACS Environmental Au, 2022, 2(2): 77-97.
|
42 |
KHAN M A K, WANG F Y. Chemical demethylation of methylmercury by selenoamino acids[J]. Chemical Research in Toxicology, 2010, 23(7): 1 202-1 206.
|
43 |
ASADUZZAMAN A M, SCHRECKENBACH G. Degradation mechanism of methyl mercury selenoamino acid complexes: a computational study[J]. Inorganic Chemistry, 2011, 50(6): 2 366-2 372.
|
44 |
WEST J, GRAHAM A M, LIEM-NGUYEN V, et al. Dimethylmercury degradation by dissolved sulfide and mackinawite[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020, 54(21): 13 731-13 738.
|
45 |
DU H X, MA M, IGARASHI Y, et al. Biotic and abiotic degradation of methylmercury in aquatic ecosystems: a review[J]. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2019, 102(5): 605-611.
|
46 |
BOYD E S, BARKAY T. The mercury resistance operon: from an origin in a geothermal environment to an efficient detoxification machine[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2012, 3. DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2012.00349 .
|
47 |
CHRISTAKIS C A, BARKAY T, BOYD E S. Expanded diversity and phylogeny of mer genes broadens mercury resistance paradigms and reveals an origin for MerA among thermophilic Archaea[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2021, 12. DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2021.682605 .
|
48 |
SCHAEFER J K, LETOWSKI J, BARKAY T. Mer-mediated resistance and volatilization of Hg(II) under anaerobic conditions[J]. Geomicrobiology Journal, 2002, 19(1): 87-102.
|
49 |
BROWN N L, MISRA T K, WINNIE J N, et al. The nucleotide-sequence of the mercuric resistance operons of plasmid R100 and transposon Tn501: further evidence for mer genes which enhance the activity of the mercuric ion detoxification system[J]. Molecular and General Genetics MGG, 1986, 202(1): 143-151.
|
50 |
BARKAY T, MILLER S M, SUMMERS A O. Bacterial mercury resistance from atoms to ecosystems[J]. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 2003, 27(2/3): 355-384.
|
51 |
OREMLAND R S, MILLER L G, DOWDLE P, et al. Methylmercury oxidative-degradation potentials in contaminated and pristine sediments of the Carson River, Nevada[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1995, 61(7): 2 745-2 753.
|
52 |
MARVIN-DIPASQUALE M C, OREMLAND R S. Bacterial methylmercury degradation in Florida Everglades peat sediment[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1998, 32(17): 2 556-2 563.
|
53 |
OREMLAND R S, CULBERTSON C W, WINFREY M R. Methylmercury decomposition in sediments and bacterial cultures: involvement of methanogens and sulfate reducers in oxidative demethylation[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1991, 57(1): 130-137.
|
54 |
XIANG Y P, LIU G L, YIN Y G, et al. Periphyton as an important source of methylmercury in Everglades water and food web[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 410: 12 455.1-12 455.7
|
55 |
ZHENG D M, LI X Y, LI H, et al. Changes of mercury and methylmercury content and mercury methylation in suaeda salsa soil under different salinity[J]. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2022, 44(4): 1 399-1 407.
|
56 |
WANG Qichao, LIU Ruhai, Xianguo LÜ, et al. Progress of study on the mercury process in the wetland environment[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2002, 17(6): 881-885.
|
|
王起超, 刘汝海, 吕宪国, 等.湿地汞环境过程研究进展[J].地球科学进展, 2002, 17(6): 881-885.
|
57 |
WU Z Y, LI Z K, SHAO B, et al. Impact of dissolved organic matter and environmental factors on methylmercury concentrations across aquatic ecosystems inferred from a global dataset[J]. Chemosphere, 2022, 294. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2002.133713 .
|
58 |
BRIDOU R, MONPERRUS M, GONZALEZ P R, et al. Simultaneous determination of mercury methylation and demethylation capacities of various sulfate-reducing bacteria using species-specific isotopic tracers[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2011, 30(2): 337-344.
|
59 |
SCHAEFER J K, ROCKS S S, ZHENG W,et al. Active transport,substrate specificity,and methylation of Hg(II)in anaerobic bacteria[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Scienc-es of the United States of America,2011,108(21):8 714-8 719.
|
60 |
HSU-KIM H, KUCHARZYK K H, ZHANG T, et al. Mechanisms regulating mercury bioavailability for methylating microorganisms in the aquatic environment: a critical review[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(6): 2 441-2 456.
|
61 |
GIONFRIDDO C M, TATE M T, WICK R R, et al. Microbial mercury methylation in Antarctic Sea ice[J]. Nature Microbiology, 2016, 1. DOI:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.127 .
|
62 |
ZOU Yan, SI Youbin, YAN Xue, et al. Research on mercury methylation by Geobacter sulfurreducens and its influencing factors[J]. Environmental Science, 2012, 33(9): 3 247-3 252.
|
|
邹嫣, 司友斌, 颜雪, 等. Geobacter sulfurreducens对汞的甲基化及其影响因素研究[J].环境科学, 2012, 33(9): 3 247-3 252.
|
63 |
YU R Q, FLANDERS J R, MACK E E, et al. Contribution of coexisting sulfate and iron reducing bacteria to methylmercury production in freshwater river sediments[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(5): 2 684-2 691.
|
64 |
DUARTE A C, PEREIRA M E, OLIVEIRA J P, et al. Mercury desorption from contaminated sediments[J]. Water Air & Soil Pollution, 1991, 56(1): 77-82.
|
65 |
PAK K R, BARTHA R. Mercury methylation and demethylation in anoxic lake sediments and by strictly anaerobic bacteria[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1998, 64(3): 1 013-1 017.
|
66 |
KELLY C A, RUDD J W M, HOLOKA M H. Effect of pH on mercury uptake by an aquatic bacterium: implications for Hg cycling[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2003, 37(13): 2 941-2 946.
|
67 |
GUNDA T, SCANLON T M. Topographical influences on the spatial distribution of soil mercury at the catchment scale[J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2013, 224(4): 1-13.
|
68 |
ZHOU J, WANG Z W, ZHANG X S, et al. Distribution and elevated soil pools of mercury in an acidic subtropical forest of southwestern China[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2015, 202: 187-195.
|
69 |
BOYD E S, YU R Q, BARKAY T, et al. Effect of salinity on mercury methylating benthic microbes and their activities in Great Salt Lake, Utah[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 581/582: 495-506.
|
70 |
ACHÁ D, HINTELMANN H, YEE J. Importance of sulfate reducing bacteria in mercury methylation and demethylation in periphyton from Bolivian Amazon region[J]. Chemosphere, 2011, 82(6): 911-916.
|
71 |
CESÁRIO R, MONTEIRO C E, NOGUEIRA M, et al. Mercury and methylmercury dynamics in sediments on a protected area of Tagus Estuary (Portugal)[J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2016, 227(12): 1-17.
|
72 |
FENG S L, AI Z J, ZHENG S M, et al. Effects of dryout and inflow water quality on mercury methylation in a constructed wetland[J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2014, 225(4): 1-11.
|
73 |
GILMOUR C C, HENRY E A. Mercury methylation in aquatic systems affected by acid deposition[J]. Environmental Pollution, 1991, 71(2/3/4): 131-169.
|
74 |
OREM W, GILMOUR C, AXELRAD D, et al. Sulfur in the south Florida ecosystem: distribution, sources, biogeochemistry, impacts, and management for restoration[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2011, 41(): 249-288.
|
75 |
POULIN B A, RYAN J N, TATE M T, et al. Geochemical factors controlling dissolved elemental mercury and methylmercury formation in Alaskan wetlands of varying trophic status[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(11): 6 203-6 213.
|
76 |
TJERNGREN I, KARLSSON T, BJÖRN E, et al. Potential Hg methylation and MeHg demethylation rates related to the nutrient status of different boreal wetlands[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2012, 108(1/2/3): 335-350.
|
77 |
DROTT A, LAMBERTSSON L, BJÖRN E, et al. Do potential methylation rates reflect accumulated methyl mercury in contaminated sediments?[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(1): 153-158.
|
78 |
WINDHAM-MYERS L, MARVIN-DIPASQUALE M, KRABBENHOFT D P, et al. Experimental removal of wetland emergent vegetation leads to decreased methylmercury production in surface sediment[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 2009, 114(G2). DOI:10.1029/2008JG000815 .
|
79 |
GRAHAM A M, AIKEN G R, GILMOUR C C. Dissolved organic matter enhances microbial mercury methylation under sulfidic conditions[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(5): 2 715-2 723.
|
80 |
SCHAEFER J K, MOREL F M M. High methylation rates of mercury bound to cysteine by Geobacter sulfurreducens[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2009, 2(2): 123-126.
|
81 |
BOUCHET S, GOÑI-URRIZA M, MONPERRUS M, et al. Linking microbial activities and low-molecular-weight thiols to Hg methylation in biofilms and periphyton from high-altitude tropical lakes in the Bolivian Altiplano[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2018, 52(17): 9 758-9 767.
|
82 |
KORTHALS E T, WINFREY M R. Seasonal and spatial variations in mercury methylation and demethylation in an oligotrophic lake[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1987, 53(10): 2 397-2 404.
|
83 |
ULLRICH S M, TANTON T W, ABDRASHITOVA S A. Mercury in the aquatic environment: a review of factors affecting methylation[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2001, 31(3): 241-293.
|
84 |
LÁZARO W L, GUIMARÃES J R D, IGNÁCIO A R A, et al. Cyanobacteria enhance methylmercury production: a hypothesis tested in the periphyton of two lakes in the Pantanal floodplain, Brazil[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2013, 456/457: 231-238
|
85 |
LECLERC M, PLANAS D, AMYOT M. Relationship between extracellular low-molecular-weight thiols and mercury species in natural lake periphytic biofilms[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(13): 7 709-7 716.
|
86 |
BRAVO A G, BOUCHET S, TOLU J, et al. Molecular composition of organic matter controls methylmercury formation in boreal lakes[J]. Nature Communications, 2017, 8. DOI:10.1038/ncomms14255 .
|
87 |
LINDQVIST O, JOHANSSON K, AASTRUP M, et al. Mercury in the Swedish environment—recent research on causes, consequences and corrective methods[J]. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 1991, 55(1/2): xi-xiii.
|
88 |
CLECKNER L B, GILMOUR C C, HURLEY J P, et al. Mercury methylation in periphyton of the Florida Everglades[J]. Limnology and Oceanography, 1999, 44(7): 1 815-1 825.
|
89 |
SHEN Ge, XU Bin, JIN Yunxiang, et al. Advances in studies of wetlands in zoige plateau[J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2016, 32(4): 76-82, 89.
|
|
申格, 徐斌, 金云翔, 等.若尔盖高原湿地研究进展[J].地理与地理信息科学, 2016, 32(4): 76-82, 89.
|
90 |
ROTH S, POULIN B A, BAUMANN Z, et al. Nutrient inputs stimulate mercury methylation by syntrophs in a subarctic peatland[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2021, 12. DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2021.741523 .
|
91 |
ZHANG L J, PHILBEN M, TAS N, et al. Unravelling biogeochemical drivers of methylmercury production in an Arctic Fen soil and a bog soil[J]. Environmental Pollution (Barking, Essex: 1987), 2022, 299. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118878 .
|
92 |
BILODEAU F, SCHETAGNE R, THERRIEN J, et al. Absence of noticeable mercury effects on fish populations in boreal reservoirs despite threefold to sevenfold increases in mercury concentrations[J]. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2016, 73(7): 1 104-1 125.
|
93 |
SILVERTHORN V M, BISHOP C A, JARDINE T, et al. Impact of flow diversion by run-of-river Dams on American dipper diet and mercury exposure[J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 2018, 37(2): 411-426.
|
94 |
LECLERC M, HARRISON M C, STORCK V, et al. Microbial diversity and mercury methylation activity in periphytic biofilms at a Run-of-river hydroelectric dam and constructed wetlands[J]. mSphere, 2021, 6(2). DOI:10.1128/mSphere.00021-21 .
|
95 |
FENG P Y, XIANG Y P, CAO D, et al. Occurrence of methylmercury in aerobic environments: evidence of mercury bacterial methylation based on simulation experiments[J]. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.4093950 .
|
96 |
WANG Y M, YIN D L, XIANG Y P, et al. A review of studies on the biogeochemical behaviors of mercury in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China[J]. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2019, 102(5): 686-694.
|
97 |
ZHAO J Y, YE Z H, ZHONG H. Rice root exudates affect microbial methylmercury production in paddy soils[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2018, 242: 1 921-1 929.
|
98 |
GONG Y, NUNES L M, GREENFIELD B K, et al. Bioaccessibility-corrected risk assessment of urban dietary methylmercury exposure via fish and rice consumption in China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 630: 222-230.
|
99 |
ZHANG H, FENG X B, LARSSEN T, et al. In inland China, rice, rather than fish, is the major pathway for methylmercury exposure[J]. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2010, 118(9): 1 183-1 188.
|
100 |
WANG X, YE Z H, LI B, et al. Growing rice aerobically markedly decreases mercury accumulation by reducing both Hg bioavailability and the production of MeHg[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(3): 1 878-1 885.
|
101 |
TANG W L, SU Y, GAO Y X, et al. Effects of farming activities on the biogeochemistry of mercury in rice-paddy soil systems[J]. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2019, 102(5): 635-642.
|
102 |
PENG X Y, LIU F J, WANG W X, et al. Reducing total mercury and methylmercury accumulation in rice grains through water management and deliberate selection of rice cultivars[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2012, 162: 202-208.
|
103 |
ROTHENBERG S E, ANDERS M, AJAMI N J, et al. Water management impacts rice methylmercury and the soil microbiome[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 572: 608-617.
|
104 |
XING Y, WANG J X, KINDER C E S, et al. Rice hull biochar enhances the mobilization and methylation of mercury in a soil under changing redox conditions: implication for Hg risks management in paddy fields[J]. Environment International, 2022, 168. DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2022.107484 .
|
105 |
ZHU H K, ZHONG H, WU J L. Incorporating rice residues into paddy soils affects methylmercury accumulation in rice[J]. Chemosphere, 2016, 152: 259-264.
|
106 |
ACHÁ D, IÑIGUEZ V, ROULET M, et al. Sulfate-reducing bacteria in floating macrophyte rhizospheres from an Amazonian floodplain lake in Bolivia and their association with Hg methylation[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2005, 71: 7 531-7 535.
|
107 |
POULAIN A J, BARKAY T. Cracking the mercury methylation code[J]. Science, 2013, 339: 1 280-1 281.
|
108 |
SCHAEFER J K, KRONBERG R M, MOREL F M M, et al. Detection of a key Hg methylation gene, hgcA, in wetland soils[J]. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 2014, 6(5): 441-447.
|
109 |
JONES D S, JOHNSON N W, MITCHELL C P J, et al. Diverse communities of hgcAB (+) microorganisms methylate mercury in freshwater sediments subjected to experimental sulfate loading[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2020. DOI:10.1021/acs.est.0c02513 .
|
110 |
STRICKMAN R J S, FULTHORPE R R, COLEMAN WASIK J K, et al. Experimental sulfate amendment alters peatland bacterial community structure[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 566/567: 1 289-1 296.
|
111 |
GRAHAM E B, GABOR R S, SCHOOLER S, et al. Oligotrophic wetland sediments susceptible to shifts in microbiomes and mercury cycling with dissolved organic matter addition[J]. PeerJ, 2018, 6. DOI:10.7717/peerj.4575 .
|
112 |
YU R Q, REINFELDER J R, HINES M E, et al. Syntrophic pathways for microbial mercury methylation[J]. ISME Journal, 2018, 12(7): 1 826-1 835.
|
113 |
BAE H S, DIERBERG F E, OGRAM A. Periphyton and flocculent materials are important ecological compartments supporting abundant and diverse mercury methylator assemblages in the Florida Everglades[J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2019, 85(13): e00156-e00119.
|
114 |
LIU Na. Characterization and identification of SRB and its control method[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2012.
|
|
刘娜. 硫酸盐还原菌的分类鉴定及抑制规律研究[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2012.
|
115 |
CHEN Jie, CHU Yin, SI Youbin. Dissimilatory Fe(Ⅲ) reduction by Shewanclla oneidensis MR-1 and impact factors[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2011, 38(4):554-558.
|
|
陈洁, 储茵, 司友斌. 奥奈达希瓦氏菌MR-1的Fe(Ⅲ)还原特性及其影响因素[J].安徽农业大学学报, 2011, 38(4):554-558.
|
116 |
ZHU W, SONG Y, ADEDIRAN G A, et al. Mercury transformations in resuspended contaminated sediment controlled by redox conditions, chemical speciation and sources of organic matter[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta,2018, 220: 158-179.
|
117 |
ZHANG H X, HUO S, YEAGER K M, et al. A historical sedimentary record of mercury in a shallow eutrophic lake: impacts of human activities and climate change[J]. Engineering, 2019, 52: 296-304.
|
118 |
FRANCO M W, MENDES L A, WINDMÖLLER C C, et al. Mercury methylation capacity and removal of Hg species from aqueous medium by cyanobacteria[J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2018, 229(4): 1-12.
|
119 |
NOH S, KIM C K, KIM Y, et al. Assessing correlations between monomethylmercury accumulation in fish and trophic states of artificial temperate reservoirs[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 580: 912-919.
|
120 |
SOERENSEN A L, SCHARTUP A T, GUSTAFSSON E, et al. Eutrophication increases phytoplankton methylmercury concentrations in a coastal sea—a Baltic Sea case study[J].Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(21): 11 787-11 796.
|
121 |
ZHAO Q X, WANG J T, OUYANG S Y, et al. The exacerbation of mercury methylation by Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA in a freshwater algae-bacteria symbiotic system throughout the lifetime of algae[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021, 415: 125 691.1-125 691.9.
|
122 |
LEI P, NUNES L M, LIU Y R, et al. Mechanisms of algal biomass input enhanced microbial Hg methylation in lake sediments[J]. Environment International, 2019, 126: 279-288.
|
123 |
GARCIA-CALLEJA J, COSSART T, PEDRERO Z, et al. Determination of the intracellular complexation of inorganic and methylmercury in Cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55(20): 13 971-13 979.
|
124 |
LEI P, ZHANG J, ZHU J J, et al. Algal organic matter drives methanogen-mediated methylmercury production in water from eutrophic shallow lakes[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2021, 55(15): 10 811-10 820.
|
125 |
ALANOCA L, AMOUROUX D, MONPERRUS M, et al. Diurnal variability and biogeochemical reactivity of mercury species in an extreme high-altitude lake ecosystem of the Bolivian Altiplano[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, 23(7): 6 919-6 933.
|
126 |
GAISER E E, MCCORMICK P V, HAGERTHEY S E, et al. Landscape patterns of periphyton in the Florida Everglades[J]. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2011, 41(): 92-120.
|
127 |
SANLI K, BENGTSSON-PALME J, NILSSON R H, et al. Metagenomic sequencing of marine periphyton: taxonomic and functional insights into biofilm communities[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2015,6. DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01192 .
|
128 |
RAMANAN R, KIM B H, CHO D H, et al. Algae-bacteria interactions: evolution, ecology and emerging applications[J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2016, 34(1): 14-29.
|
129 |
OLSEN T A, BRANDT C C, BROOKS S C. Periphyton biofilms influence net methylmercury production in an industrially contaminated system[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(20): 10 843-10 850.
|
130 |
LÁZARO W L, DÍEZ S, da SILVA C J, et al. Seasonal changes in peryphytic microbial metabolism determining mercury methylation in a tropical wetland[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 627: 1 345-1 352.
|
131 |
CARRELL A A, SCHWARTZ G E, CREGGER M A, et al. Nutrient exposure alters microbial composition, structure, and mercury methylating activity in periphyton in a contaminated watershed[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology,2021,12. DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2021.647861 .
|
132 |
MANGAL V, PHUNG T, NGUYEN T Q, et al. Molecular characterization of mercury binding ligands released by freshwater algae grown at three photoperiods[J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2019,6. DOI:10.3389/fenvs.2018.00155 .
|
133 |
BRANFIREUN B A, COSIO C, POULAIN A J, et al. Mercury cycling in freshwater systems—an updated conceptual model[J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 745. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140906 .
|
134 |
SIEBER J R, MCINERNEY M J, GUNSALUS R P. Genomic insights into syntrophy: the paradigm for anaerobic metabolic cooperation [M]. Paloalto:Annual Reviews, 2012.
|
135 |
GROSSKOPF T, ZENOBI S, ALSTON M, et al. A stable genetic polymorphism underpinning microbial syntrophy[J]. ISME Journal, 2016, 10(12): 2 844-2 853.
|
136 |
LIU Y R, DONG J X, ZHANG Q G, et al. Longitudinal occurrence of methylmercury in terrestrial ecosystems of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2016, 218: 1 342-1 349.
|
137 |
MA M, DU H X, WANG D Y, et al. Biotically mediated mercury methylation in the soils and sediments of Nam Co Lake, Tibetan Plateau[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2017, 227: 243-251.
|