地球科学进展 ›› 2005, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (2): 149 -157. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2005.02.0149

研究论文 上一篇    下一篇

植被—侵蚀状态图在典型流域的应用
王兆印 1, 郭彦彪 2, 李昌志 1, 王费新 1   
  1. 1.清华大学水利水电工程系,北京 100084;2. 华南农业大学资源环境学院, 广东 广州 510642
  • 收稿日期:2003-06-23 修回日期:2004-04-02 出版日期:2005-02-25
  • 通讯作者: 王兆印
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目“植被—侵蚀动力学的理论与应用研究”(编号:40371010)资助.

VEGETATION-EROSION CHART AND ITS APPLICATION IN TYPICAL WATERSHED IN CHINA

WANG Zhaoyin 1; GUO Yanbiao 2; LI Changzhi 1; WANG Feixin 1   

  1. 1. Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;2. College of Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
  • Received:2003-06-23 Revised:2004-04-02 Online:2005-02-25 Published:2005-02-25

运用植被—侵蚀动力学耦合方程组,研究了流域植被与侵蚀在人类活动特别是植树造林和工程治理影响下的演变。动力学方程组中的4个参数由实测植被侵蚀资料算出,利用这些参数发展出植被—侵蚀状态图作为分析工具,分析在停止人类干预后植被和土壤侵蚀的发展趋势。流域的植被—侵蚀状态有4种,即向着侵蚀模数增大和植被覆盖度降低方向发展的A区,向着侵蚀模数降低和植被完善方向发展的C区,植被和侵蚀模数都增长的B区,植被和侵蚀模数都减少的D区。将耦合方程组和植被—侵蚀状态图应用于黄土高原王家沟、安家沟流域,云南小江流域和北京西山地区,结果表明动力学方程组准确地模拟了植被和滑动侵蚀模数的演变过程。对植被侵蚀状态图的分析表明,在干旱寒冷的黄土高原增加植被对于减少侵蚀的作用显著,治理应该首先增加植被使其进入D区,再结合控制侵蚀进入C区,治理后仍应加强管理和防止人为破坏;在雨量较丰、气温较高的小江流域,减少侵蚀对改善植被的作用大,治理措施首选控制侵蚀;北京西山地区介于两者之间。

    This paper studies the development of vegetation and erosion of typical watersheds in China employing the vegetation-erosion dynamics:
dV/dt-αV+cE=-Kiδ(t0)+VR
dE/dt-dE+fV=ER
The four parameters a, c, d, f in the couple differential equations are determined by using the data of vegetation-erosion process within the watersheds. The parameters are functions of climatic, topographical and soil conditions and independent of the vegetation and erosion, ecological stresses and human activities. With these parameters we developed the vegetationerosion chart to predict the developing trend of vegetation and erosion. The vegetation of a watershed may exists in four states: vegetation developing and erosion reducing (C zone in the chart), vegetation deteriorating and erosion increasing (A zone), both vegetation and erosion increasing (B zone) and both vegetation and erosion decreasing (D zone).
    The vegetation-erosion chart for a watershed is exclusively given by the parameters a, c, d, fThe parameters are constant and universal for the areas of the same climate, topography, soil and vegetation compositions. If the values of the parameters a and f are large, the system in most cases is in the C-Zone developing toward perfect vegetation. If the values of c and d are large, the system in most cases is in the A-Zone developing toward poor vegetation and high rate of erosion.
    We worked out the vegetation-erosion charts for the Wangjiagou, Anjiagou, Xiaojiang watersheds and Xishan areas with the determined values of a, c, d, f from data. The erosion rate in Xiaojiang watershed is extremely high and the vegetation cover is relatively poor although the area is wetter and warmer than north China. It is still in Zone A and exhibits the development trend toward poor vegetation, which can offset, to a certain extent, the human's effort for improvement of the vegetation. The dashed curve in the figure shows the suggested route for moving the system into the C-zone. First, erosion control must be performed to reduce the erosion rate by 60%-80%, thus the system is moved into Zone B. Then the development trend V'>0 may support human's reforestation project moving the system into Zone C. Erosion control is very important in the area for re-vegetating the hills. Mere planting trees and shrubs do not work well for greening the high erosion land. 
    For the Wangjiagou and Anjiagou Watersheds on the loess plateau, however, there is no Zone B but Zone D, in which V'<0,E'<0. The ecological system in the D-zone is also unstable, because both vegetation and erosion are reducing. If the vegetation reduces faster than erosion the system may enter into the A-zone and if erosion reduces faster than vegetation the system may enter into the C-zone. The C-zone in the charts for the two watersheds is very small and the D-zone is large. The tangent of the line E'=0 is high, implying high effectiveness of which vegetation may control erosion. On the other hand, the line V'=0 is almost horizontal, which suggests that erosion control helps little for vegetation development. Thus, in the loess plateau the most effective way to control erosion is to increase the vegetation cover, so to move the system from the A-zone into the D-zone. Thence the system will automatically move in the direction of erosion reduction but also vegetation reduction. Human can further increase the vegetation cover by planting trees. The dashed curve shows the route of the watershed management and vegetation development. Unfortunately, the C-zone is too small for stable vegetation development. Human effort is always needed to maintain a stable or increasing vegetation cover. For the two small watersheds, although reforestation and erosion control have been continued for more than 30 years, the rate of erosion has been reduced by 90% and the vegetation cover has increased by 8-12 times, the state of the systems is still in the D-Zone. It is quite possible for the system to return to Zone A if the vegetation is not carefully protected. To move the system into the C-Zone, both reforestation and erosion control must be continued.
    In summary, the vegetation-erosion charts demonstrate that on the Yunnan Plateau, the precipitation and temperature are high; vegetation can develop well if erosion is controlled and the vegetation is stable after improvement. On the dry and cold Loess Plateau, vegetation can effectively control erosion but erosion reduction exhibits low effectiveness on vegetation development. Vegetation in the area is not stable and management is always needed to maintain the vegetation. The Xishan area in the outskirts of Beijing is not so wet and dry, not so cold and warm, the vegetation-erosion chart illustrates that the development trend of vegetation is between the two extreme cases. The C-zone is not so big as the Xiaojiang watershed but much larger than the loess plateau, which implies a relatively stable vegetation may be maintained. Reforestation is the most effective measure to control erosion and improve vegetation in the area because the slope of the line E'=0 is very steep in the chart.

中图分类号: 

[1]Wang Zhaoyin, Wang Guangqian, Gao jing. An ecological dynamics model of vegetation evolution in erosion area [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003, 23(1): 99-107.[王兆印,王光谦,高菁.侵蚀地区植被生态动力学模型[J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(1): 99-107.]
[2]Cai Guangrong, Lin Jinbing, Chen Wangzhi. Study on control measures for mudstone slope erosion hazard in southwest Taiwan with vegetable root mechanics[A]. In: Cui Peng, et al, eds. Researches on Moutain Disasters and Environmental Protection across Taiwan Strait[C].
Chengdu: Sichuan Science and Technology Press, 1998. 373-379.[蔡光荣,林金炳,陈旺志.植生根系力学模式应用于台湾西南部泥岩坡面冲蚀灾害之防治研究[A].见:崔鹏等主编.海峡两岸山地灾害与环境保育研究[C].成都:四川科学技术出版社, 1998.373-379.]
[3]Wang Zhaoyin, Wang Guangqian, Li Changzhi, et al. Preliminary exploratory research and application of vegetation-erosion dynamic[J]. Science in China(D),2003,33(10):1 013-1 023.[王兆印,王光谦,李昌志,等.植被—侵蚀动力学的初步探索和应用[J].中国科学D辑,2003,33(10):1 013-1 023.]
[4]Liu Shuhua, Liu Heping. Turbulence spectral structure and dissipation rate above and within the forest canopy[J]. Science in China(D), 1998,28(10): 469-480.[刘树华,刘和平.森林冠层上下湍流谱结构和耗散率[J].中国科学D辑, 1998,28(10): 469-480.]
[5]Zhang Yan, Zhang Qingchun, Liu Baoyuan. Study on vegetation coverage and height variation in northern Loess Plateau [J]. Advances in Earth Science,2002, 17(2): 268-272.[张岩,张清春,刘宝元.降水变化对陕北黄土高原植被覆盖度和高度的影响[J].地球科学进展,2002, 17(2): 268-272.]
[6]Li Zhuo.Effects of forest in controlling gully erosion[J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 1993, (1): 14-21.[李倬.论林木的固沟减蚀作用[J].泥沙研究,1993, (1): 14-21.]
[7]Wang Xiangdong, Wang Zhaoyin.Effect of land use change on runoff and sediment yield[J]. International Journal of Sediment Research, 1999, 14(4):37-44.
[8]Chen Jie, Tan Manzhi, Chen Jingzhong, et al. Soil degradation: A global problem of endangering sustainable development[J]. Advances in Earth Science,2002, 17(5): 720-728.[陈杰,檀满枝,陈晶中,等.严重威胁可持续发展的土壤退化问题[J].地球科学进展,2002, 17(5): 720-728.]
[9]Bussotti F, Ferretti M. Air pollution, forest condition and forest decline in South Europe: An overview [J]. Environmental Pollution, 1998, 101: 49-65.
[10]Monserud R A, Denissenko O V, Tchebakova N M. Comparison of Siberan paleovegetation to current and future vegetation under climate change [J]. Climate Research, 1993, 3:143-159.
[11]Svirezhev, Yuri M. Simplest dynamic model of the global vegetation pattern[J]. Ecological Modeling, 1999, 124: 131-144.
[12]Maley Jean, Brenac Patrice. Vegetation dynamics, palaeoenvironments and climatic changes in the forests of western Cameroon during the last 28000 years BP[J]. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 1998, 99: 157-187.
[13]Thornes J B. Environmental systems-patterns, processes and evolution[A]. In: Gregory K J, Clark J, eds. Horizon in Physical Geography[C]. Macmillan, 1985. 27-46.
[14]Lü Guonian, Qian Yadong, Chen Zhongming. Study on Automated mapping of channel network in hilly Loess Region [J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica,1998,5: 131-137.[闾国年,钱亚东,陈钟明.黄土丘陵沟壑区沟谷网络自动制图技术研究[J].测绘学报,1998,5: 131-137.]
[15]Wang Futang. Change of soil erosion at Wangjiagou watershed before and after the control[A]. In: Application and Research on Geographic Information System and Soil Erosion Management on Loess Plateau in West Shanxi Province [C]. Beijing:Science Press,1992,5: 213-220.[王福堂王家沟流域治理前后土壤侵蚀变化[A].见:晋西黄土高原土壤侵蚀管理与地理信息系统应用研究[C].北京:科学出版社,1992,5: 213-220.]
[16]Fu Wei. A model research on Universal Soil Loss Equation in loess regions [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,1997,3: 58-66.[傅炜.黄土地区通用土壤流失方程模型研究[J].干旱区资源与环境, 1997,3: 58-66.]
[17]Zeng Maolin, Fang Xuemin, Kang Lingling, et al. Relative steadiness of development of the valley-dam system is absolutely feasible[J]. Yellow River, 1995,4: 18-23.[曾茂林,方学敏,康玲玲,等.沟道坝系发展相对稳定是完全可能的[J].人民黄河, 1995,4: 18-23.]
[18]Zhang Zhiguo, Wei Zhengxin, Wang Xiaoping, et al. Analysis of Runoff Yield from terrace system of Wangjiagou Watershed in Western Shanxi [J]. Soil and Water Conseration Science and Techology in Shanxi, 2001,9: 11-12.[张治国,卫正新,王小平,等.晋西王家沟流域梯田系统产流分析[J].山西水土保持科技, 2001,9: 11-12.]
[19]Ran Dachuan, Liu Linwang, Zhao Liyi, et al. Analysis of runoff and sediment reduction by water and soil conservation in the segment from Hekou to Longmen of Yellow River[A]. In:Study on Water and Sediment Change in the Yellow River (Volume II)[C]. Zhengzhou: Yellow River Commission Press, 2002.198-260.[冉大川,柳林旺,赵力仪,等.河龙区间水土保持措施减水减少作用分析[A].见:黄河水沙变化研究(第二卷)[C].郑州:黄河水利出版社, 2002.198-260.]
[20]Huo Yazhen. Beijing Physical Geography[M]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press, 1989.[霍亚贞.北京自然地理[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1989.]

[1] 李芦頔,吴冰,李鑫璐,杨洁,林良国. 土壤侵蚀中的片蚀研究综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(7): 712-726.
[2] 马芊红, 张科利. 西南喀斯特地区土壤侵蚀研究进展与展望 *[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(11): 1130-1141.
[3] 张琪琳, 王占礼, 王栋栋, 刘俊娥. 黄土高原草地植被对土壤侵蚀影响研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(10): 1093-1101.
[4] 史忠林, 文安邦, 严冬春, 龙翼, 周萍. 7Be法估算土壤侵蚀速率若干问题的探讨[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(9): 885-893.
[5] 刘希林,张大林,贾瑶瑶. 崩岗地貌发育的土体物理性质及其土壤侵蚀意义——以广东五华县莲塘岗崩岗为例[J]. 地球科学进展, 2013, 28(7): 802-811.
[6] 戴海伦, 金复鑫, 张科利. 国内外风蚀监测方法回顾与评述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2011, 26(4): 401-408.
[7] 马乐宽,李天宏,刘国彬. 基于水土保持的流域生态环境需水研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2008, 23(10): 1102-1110.
[8] 杨勤科,李锐,曹明明. 区域土壤侵蚀定量研究的国内外进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(8): 849-856.
[9] 张风宝;杨明义;赵晓光;刘普灵. 磁性示踪在土壤侵蚀研究中的应用进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(7): 751-756.
[10] 李立青;杨明义;刘普灵;王晓燕;田均良. 137 Cs示踪农耕地土壤侵蚀速率模型的比较研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2004, 19(1): 32-037.
[11] 张岩,张清春,刘宝元. 降水变化对陕北黄土高原植被覆盖度和高度的影响[J]. 地球科学进展, 2002, 17(2): 268-272.
[12] 谢云,刘宝元,伍永秋. 切沟中土壤水分的空间变化特征[J]. 地球科学进展, 2002, 17(2): 278-282.
[13] 符素华,刘宝元. 土壤侵蚀量预报模型研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2002, 17(1): 78-84.
[14] 唐翔宇,杨浩,李仁英,赵其国. 7Be在土壤侵蚀示踪中的应用研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2001, 16(4): 520-525.
[15] 唐翔宇,杨 浩,赵其国,李仁英,朱振华,濮励杰. 137Cs示踪技术在土壤侵蚀估算中的应用研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2000, 15(5): 576-582.
阅读次数
全文


摘要