地球科学进展 doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2026.059   cstr: 32269.14.adearth.CN62-1091/P.2026.059

   

江苏省气象干旱向农业干旱的传播特征及机制解析
吴晓汇1,2,张蕾3*,冯兆忠1,2   
  1. (1. 气候系统预测与变化应对全国重点实验室,江苏 南京 210044;2. 南京信息工程大学生态与应用气象学院,江苏 南京 210044;3. 国家气象中心,北京 100081)
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省科技厅碳达峰碳中和专项(编号:BE2023400)资助.

Characteristics and Mechanisms of Meteorological-to-Agricultural Drought Propagation in Jiangsu Province

Wu Xiaohui1, 2, Zhang Lei3*, Feng Zhaozhong1, 2   

  1. (1. State Key Laboratory of Climate System Prediction and Risk Management, Nanjing 210044, China; 2. Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China; 3. National Meteorological Centre, Beijing 100081, China)
  • About author:Wu Xiaohui, research areas include agrometeorological disasters. E-mail: 202412080168@nuist.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Project supported by Jiangsu Provincial Department of Science and Technology (Grant No. BE2023400).
气象干旱向农业干旱的传播是降水亏缺转化为土壤水分亏缺的关键过程,在很大程度上影响干旱的实际严重程度,并进一步影响作物产量与农业经济效益。基于标准化降水指数和标准化土壤湿度指数,联合游程理论、最大皮尔逊相关系数法、Copula 函数和地理探测器,系统解析了1990 年以来江苏省气象干旱向农业干旱的传播过程及其驱动机制。结果表明,农业干旱事件频次低于气象干旱,而平均历时和平均强度均高于气象干旱。气象干旱向农业干旱的传播时间集中于3~5 个月;从空间分布来看,传播时间以3 个月为主,呈现南部传播较快、北部较慢的格局。随着气象干旱等级的提升,农业干旱发生概率增加,轻度、中度、重度和极端气象干旱条件下农业干旱平均发生概率分别为0.51、0.65、0.75 和0.83;不同等级农业干旱对应的传播阈值差异明显,高等级农业干旱需要更强的气象水分亏缺才能触发。降水是传播时间空间分异的主导因子,土壤湿度和温度亦具有重要贡献;各因子交互作用均增强了对传播时间空间差异的解释能力,其中降水与土壤湿度的交互作用最强。研究结果可为区域农业干旱监测预警及水资源管理提供科学依据,同时为 降低干旱对农业生产的负面影响提供理论参考。
Abstract:The propagation from meteorological drought to agricultural drought is a key process through which precipitation deficit translates into soil moisture deficit, which largely determines the actual severity of drought impacts and further affects crop yield and agricultural economic benefits. Using the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and Standardized Soil Moisture Index (SSI), drought propagation and its driving factors in Jiangsu Province since 1990 were systematically investigated by integrating run theory, the maximum Pearson correlation coefficient method, copula functions, and the geographical detector. Agricultural drought events occurred less frequently than meteorological drought events but had longer mean durations and greater mean intensities. Propagation times were concentrated between 3 and 5 months. Spatially, a 3-month propagation time predominated, with faster propagation in southern Jiangsu and slower propagation in northern Jiangsu. The probability of agricultural drought increased with meteorological drought severity. Under mild, moderate, severe, and extreme meteorological drought, the mean probabilities of agricultural drought occurrence were 0.51, 0.65, 0.75, and 0.83, respectively. Propagation thresholds differed markedly among agricultural drought severity levels, with more severe agricultural drought requiring a greater meteorological water deficit to be triggered. Precipitation was the dominant factor controlling spatial variation in propagation time, while soil moisture and mean air temperature also made important contributions. Interactions among all pairs of factors enhanced their explanatory power for spatial differences in propagation time, and the interaction between precipitation and soil moisture was the strongest. These findings provide a scientific basis for regional agricultural drought monitoring, early warning, and water resources management, and offer theoretical support for reducing the adverse impacts of drought on agricultural production.

中图分类号: 

[1] 陈仁升. 雪面雨洪水基本特点、研究进展及展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2025, 40(6): 551-558.
[2] 郭灵辉, 闫静静, 罗媛媛, 徐紫萌, 高江波, 吴绍洪, 冯千凤. 华北地区冬小麦生育期中短尺度气象干旱演变特征及影响因素解析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2025, 40(4): 374-387.
[3] 袁星, 周诗玙, 马凤, 王钰淼, 郝奕, 梁妙玲, 陈李楠. 气候和下垫面变化下骤旱形成演变机制研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2024, 39(9): 877-888.
[4] 徐宗学, 叶陈雷, 廖如婷. 城市洪涝灾害协同治理:研究进展与应用案例[J]. 地球科学进展, 2023, 38(11): 1107-1120.
[5] 张翔, 黄舒哲, 管宇航. 干旱传播的研究进展、挑战与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2023, 38(6): 563-579.
[6] 张翔, 孙雯. 2015—2017年南非西开普省干旱事件的时空特征分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2023, 38(5): 493-504.
[7] 唐明秀, 孙劭, 朱秀芳, 张世喆, 徐昆, 郭春华. 基于CMIP6的中国未来暴雨危险性变化评估[J]. 地球科学进展, 2022, 37(5): 519-534.
[8] 李耀辉, 孟宪红, 张宏升, 李忆平, 王闪闪, 沙莎, 莫绍青. 青藏高原—沙漠的陆—气耦合及对干旱影响的进展及其关键科学问题[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(3): 265-275.
[9] 陈仁升, 沈永平, 毛炜峄, 张世强, 吕海深, 刘永强, 刘章文, 房世峰, 张伟, 陈春艳, 韩春坛, 刘俊峰, 赵求东, 郝晓华, 李如琦, 秦艳, 黄维东, 赵成先, 王书峰. 西北干旱区融雪洪水灾害预报预警技术:进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(3): 233-244.
[10] 王鹏,邓红卫. 基于GIS和Logistic回归模型的洪涝灾害区划研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(10): 1064-1072.
[11] 张强, 马芳, 王莺, 宋连春, 马鹏里. 浅论气候容量及其对气候安全风险管理的作用[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(6): 709-714.
[12] 方建, 杜鹃, 徐伟, 史培军, 孔锋. 气候变化对洪水灾害影响研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(9): 1085-1093.
[13] 张强, 韩兰英, 张立阳, 王劲松. 论气候变暖背景下干旱和干旱灾害风险特征与管理策略[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(1): 80-91.
[14] 王文,徐红. Palmer干旱指数在淮河流域的修正及应用[J]. 地球科学进展, 2012, 27(1): 60-67.
[15] 姚正兰,王君军. 遵义市2009/2010年秋冬春连旱事实及形成原因初析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2011, 26(10): 1109-1115.
阅读次数
全文


摘要