地球科学进展 ›› 2012, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 435 -442. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2012.04.0435

综述与评述 上一篇    下一篇

自然灾害脆弱性曲线研究进展
周瑶 1,2,王静爱 1,2,3*   
  1. 1. 北京师范大学地表过程与资源生态国家重点实验室, 北京100875;
    2. 北京师范大学地理学与遥感科学学院, 北京100875;
    3.北京师范大学区域地理研究实验室,北京100875
  • 收稿日期:2011-10-10 修回日期:2012-02-13 出版日期:2012-04-10
  • 通讯作者: 王静爱(1955-),女,河北定州人,教授,博导,主要从事自然灾害风险评价和区域地理研究. E-mail:jwang@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    公益性行业(气象)科研专项“全球变化背景下中国气象灾害风险区划研究”(编号:GYHY200906019);国家自然科学基金项目“区域农业旱灾适应性评价模型及风险防范模式研究”(编号:41171402)资助.

A Review on Development of Vulnerability Curve of Natural Disaster

Zhou Yao 1, 2, Wang Jing′ai 1,2,3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing100875,China;
    2.School of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing100875,China; 
    3.Laboratory of Regional Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing100875,China
  • Received:2011-10-10 Revised:2012-02-13 Online:2012-04-10 Published:2012-04-10

在全球变化与全球化背景下自然灾害风险逐年增大,灾害评估就成为风险防范的重要基础。灾害评估包括灾情估算与风险评估2个方面, 而脆弱性分析是把灾害与风险研究紧密联系起来的重要桥梁。脆弱性曲线作为定量精确评估承灾体脆弱性的方法,近年来在多领域被广泛运用,成为灾情估算、风险定量分析以及风险地图编制的关键环节。从致灾因子角度综述脆弱性曲线的研究进展,重点阐述基于灾情数据、已有曲线、调查和模型的脆弱性曲线构建。研究表明脆弱性曲线构建由单曲线向多曲线库、单一参数向综合参数、单一方法向多领域综合应用发展,具有综合化和精细化的趋势。进一步开展多领域、多方法综合脆弱性曲线研究,对灾损快速评估及风险评价,防灾减灾具有重要意义。

With the trend of global change and globalization in these decades, natural disaster risk is getting much more serious. As the foundation of the disaster risk prevention, disaster assessment is composed of loss estimate and risk analysis. The vulnerability analysis is an important component in disaster assessment, connecting analysis of  hazard and risk. As the quantitative and accurate assessment means of vulnerability, the vulnerability curve has been widely used in disaster estimate, quantitative risk analysis and risk mapping. This paper briefly describes the research development of vulnerability curves of different hazards, emphasizing  the method of building vulnerability curves based on disaster data, existing curve, investigation and model. The research shows that the researches′ focuses switch from the single curve to multi-curve database, from single parameter to synthesized parameters, and from single method  to integrated method. Further development of vulnerability curve based on multi-discipline and multimethod will have the important impact on disaster estimate, risk analysis and disaster reduction.

中图分类号: 

[1]World Bank. Hazards of Nature, Risk to Development: An IEG Evaluation of World Bank Assistance for Natural Disaster[R].Washington DC:World Bank,2006.
[2]Fang Weihua, Wang Jing′ai, Shi Peijun, et al. Integrated Risk Governance—Database, Risk Map and Web Platform[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2011.[方伟华,王静爱,史培军,等.综合风险防范——数据库、风险地图与网络平台[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011.]
[3]Shi Peijun. Theory and practice on disaster system research in a fourth time[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2005, 14(6): 1-7.[史培军.四论灾害系统研究的理论与实践[J].自然灾害学报, 2005, 14(6): 1-7.]
[4]UN/ISDR. Living with Risk: A Global Review of Disaster Reduction Initiatives 2004 Version[Z].United Nations Publication, 2004.
[5]Shi Peijun. Theory and practice on disaster system research in a third time[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2002, 11(3): 1-9.[史培军.三论灾害研究的理论与实践[J]. 自然灾害学报2002, 11(3): 1-9.]
[6]Shi Peijun. Atlas of Natural Disaster Risk of China[M]. Beijing: Science Press,2010.[史培军. 中国自然灾害风险地图集[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010.]
[7]Smith D I. Flood damage estimation—A review of urban stage-damage curves and loss functions[J]. Water SA Manuscript,1994,20(3): 231-238.
[8]Penning-Rowsell E C, Chatterton J B. The Benefits of Flood Alleviation: A Manual of Assessment Techniques[M]. UK: Gower Technical Press, 1977.
[9]Shi Yong, Xu Shiyuan, Shi Chun, et al. A review on development of vulnerability assessment of floods[J]. Progress in Geography, 2009, 28(1):41-46. [石勇,许世远,石纯,等.洪水灾害脆弱性研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2009, 28(1):41-46.]
[10]Merz B, Kreibich H, Thieken A, et al. Estimation uncertainty of direct monetary flood damage to buildings[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 2004, 4: 153-163.
[11]Gissing A, Blong R. Accounting for variability in commercial flood damage estimation[J]. Australian Geographer, 2004, 35(2):209-222.
[12]Dutta D, Herath S, Musiake K. A mathematical model for flood loss estimation[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2003, 277(1/2):24-49.
[13]Orsini G A. Model for buildings vulnerability assessment using the parameterless scale of seismic intensity (PSI)[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 1999, 15(3): 463-483.
[14] Singhal A,  Kiremidjian A S. Method for probabilistic evaluation of seismic structural damage[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,1996, 122(12):1 459-1 467.
[15] Singhal A,  Kiremidjian A S. Bayesian updating of fragilities with application to RC frames[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,1998, 124(8): 922-929.
[16]Hwang H,  Liu Jingbo. Seismic fragility analysis of reinforced concrete bridges[J].China Civil Engineering Journal, 2004, 37(6): 47-51.[Hwang H, 刘晶波.地震作用下钢筋混凝土桥梁结构易损性分析 [J]. 土木工程学报, 2004, 37(6):47-51.]
[17]Shi B J,  Chang C H. Damage survey of water supply systems and fragility curve of PVC water pipelines in the Chi-Chi Taiwan Earthquake[J]. Natural Hazards, 2006, 37(1/2):71-85.
[18]Colombi M, Borzi B, Crowley H, et al. Deriving vulnerability curves using Italian earthquake damage data[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2008, 6(3): 485-504.
[19]Bell R,  Glade T. Quantitative risk analysis for landslides—Examples from Bildudalur, NW-Iceland[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 2004, 4(1):117-131.
[20]Galli M,  Guzzetti F. Landslide vulnerability criteria: A case study from Umbria, central Italy[J]. Environment Manage, 2007,40(3/4): 649-664.
[21]Fuchs S, Heiss K, Hübl J. Towards an empirical vulnerability function for use in debris flow risk assessment[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 2007, 7(5):495-506.
[22]Fuchs S. Susceptibility versus resilience to mountain hazards in Austria-paradigms of vulnerability revisited[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 2009, 9(2):337-352.
[23]Akbas S O, Blahut J, Sterlacchini S. Critical assessment of existing physical vulnerability estimation approaches for debris flows[C]∥Proceedings of Landslide Processes: From Geomorphologic Mapping to Dynamic Modeling, 2009.
[24]Cappabianca F, Barbolini M, Natale L. Snow avalanche risk and mapping: A new method based on a combination of statistical analysis, avalanche dynamics simulation and empirically based vulnerability relations integrated in a GIS platform[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2008, 54(3):193-205.
[25]Wilhelm C. Quantitative risk analysis for evaluation of avalanche protection projects[C]∥Hestness E ed. Proceedlings of 25 Years of Snow Avalanche Research, 1998.
[26]Jonasson K, Sigurosson S, Arnalds P. Estimation of Avalanche Risk[R]. Vedurstofu Islands n. R99001-ur01, Reykjavik,1999.
[27] Keylock C J, Barbolini M. Snow avalanche impact pressure-vulnerability relations for use in risk assessment[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2001, 38(2):227-238.
[28]Barbolini M, Cappabianca F, Sailer R. Empirical estimate of vulnerability relations for use in snow avalanche risk assessment[C]∥Brebbia C ed. Risk Analysis IV. Southampton: WIT,2004:533-542.
[29]Garcia R R,Weiss B E, Murphy A A. Relationships between crop damage and hail fall parameters on the high plains[J]. Atmospheric Research, 1990,25(6):559-582.
[30]Leigh R, Kuhnel I. Hailstorm loss modelling and risk assessment in the Sydney region, Australia [J]. Natural Hazards, 2001,24(2): 171-185.
[31]Hohl R, Schiesser H, Aller D. Hailfall: The relationship between radar-derived hail kinetic energy and hail damage to buildings[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2002,63(1/2): 177-207.
[32]Hohl R, Schiesser H, Knepper I. The use of weather radars to estimate hail damage to automobiles: An exploratory study in Switzerland[J]. Atmospheric Research,2002, 61(3): 215-238.
[33]Xue Changying, Huo Zhiguo, Li Shikui, et al. Risk assessment of drought and yield losses of winter wheat in the northern part of North China[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2003,12(1):131-139.[薛昌颖, 霍治国, 李世奎, 等. 华北北部冬小麦干旱和产量灾损的风险评估[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2003, 12(1):131-139.]
[34]Liu Ronghua. Analysis and Assessment Technology Research of Drought Risk of Winter Wheat in Henan [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Information Engineering, 2008.[刘荣花. 河南省冬小麦干旱风险分析与评估技术研究[D].南京: 南京信息工程大学,2008.]
[35]Yamoaha C F, Walters D T, Shapiro C A, et al. Standardized precipitation index and nitrogen rate effects on crop yields and risk distribution in maize[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2000, 80(1): 113-120.
[36]Pan Yaozhong. A research on temporal-spatial characteristics of drought in China during 1949~1990[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Natural Science), 1996, 32(1): 138-142.[潘耀忠. 中国近40年旱灾时空格局分析[J]. 北京师范大学学报:自然科学版, 1996,32(1): 138-142.]
[37]Wang Zhiqiang. The Drought Disaster Risk Research of Wheat Based on the Assessment of Physical Vulnerability[D]. Beijing:Beijing Normal University, 2008.[王志强.基于自然脆弱性评价的中国小麦旱灾风险研究[D].北京: 北京师范大学, 2008.]
[38]He Fei. Regional Agricultural Drought Disaster System Research—Case Study of Drought Disaster of Rice[D]. Beijing:Beijing Normal University, 2010.[何飞. 区域农业旱灾系统研究——以湖南蒸水流域水稻旱灾为例[D].北京: 北京师范大学, 2010.]
[39]Jia Huicong, Wang Jing′ai, Pan Donghua, et al. Maize drought disaster risk assessment based on EPIC Model: A case study of maize region in northern China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(5): 643-652.[贾慧聪, 王静爱, 潘东华, 等. 基于EPIC模型的黄淮海夏玉米旱灾风险评价[J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(5): 643-652.]
[40]Wang Zhiqiang, Fang Weihua, Shi Peijun,et al. Development and applications of the EPIC model: A review[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University(Natural Science),2008, 44(5):533-538.[王志强, 方伟华, 史培军, 等. EPIC 农作物生长模型应用研究进展[J]. 北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2008, 44(5): 533-538.]
[41]Lee K H,  Rosowsky D V. Fragile assessment for roof sheathing failure in high wind regions[J]. Engineering Structures, 2005, 27:857-868.
[42]Khanduri A C,  Morrow G C. Vulnerability of buildings to windstorms and insurance loss estimation[J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics,2003, 91(4): 455-467.
[43]Heneka P,  Hofherr T. Probabilistic winter storm risk assessment for residential buildings in Germany[J]. Natural Hazards, 2011, 56(3): 815-831.
[44]Eidsvig U M, Medina-Cetina Z, Kveldsvik V, et al. Risk assessment of a tsunamigenic rockslide at Aknes[J]. Natural Hazards, 2011, 56(2):529-545.
[45] Leone F, Lavigne F, Paris R, et al. A spatial analysis of the December 26th, 2004 tsunami-induced damages: Lessons learned for a better risk assessment integrating buildings vulnerability[J]. Applied Geography, 2011, 31(1):363-375.
[46] Moel H de, Aerts J C J H. Effect of uncertainty in land use, damage models and inundation depth on flood damage estimates[J]. Natural Hazards, 2010, 58(1):407-425.
[47]Papathoma-Khle M, Kappes M, Keiler M, et al. Physical vulnerability assessment for alpine hazards: State of the art and future needs[J]. Natural Hazards, 2011, 58(2):645-680.
[48]Lotto P D,  Testa G. Risk assessment: A simplified approach of flood damage evaluation with the use of GIS[C]∥Interpraevent 2000-Villach/Osterreich, Italy,2000.
[49]Shi Yong. The Vulnerability Assessment Research of the City Based on the Disaster Scenario—Case Study of Shanghai[D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University,2010.[石勇.灾害情景下城市脆弱性评估研究——以上海市为例[D].上海:华东师范大学,2010.]
[50]Clausen L K. Potential Dam Failure: Estimation of Consequences and Implications for Planning [M]. Middlesex: Middlesex Polytechnic, 1989.
[51]Huang Chongfu. Risk Assessment of Natural Disaster: Theory & Practice[M].Beijing: Science Press,2005.[黄崇福. 自然灾害风险评价理论与实践[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2005.]
[52]Wang Baohua, Fu Qiang, Feng Yan, et al. Mixed fuzzy nerve net model for fast evaluation on economic loss of flood[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2008,39(6): 47-51.[王宝华,付强,冯艳,等.洪灾经济损失快速评估的混合式模糊神经网络模型[J].东北农业大学学报,2008, 39(6):47-51.][53]Yuan Yi. Advances in the assessment of natural disaster situation[J].Advances in Earth Science,2010, 25(1):22-32.[袁艺.自然灾害灾情评估研究与实践进展[J].地球科学进展,2010, 25(1):22-32.]

[1] 覃荣高,邱仁敏,黎明,曹广祝,王金生,仵彦卿. 包气带—含水层地下水污染风险评估研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(2): 111-123.
[2] 黄存瑞, 王琼. 气候变化健康风险评估、早期信号捕捉及应对策略研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(11): 1105-1111.
[3] 周洪建, 王曦. 特别重大自然灾害损失统计内容的国际对比——基于《特别重大自然灾害损失统计制度》和PDNA系统的分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(10): 1030-1038.
[4] 史培军, 王爱慧, 孙福宝, 李宁, 叶涛, 徐伟, 王静爱, 杨建平, 周洪建. 全球变化人口与经济系统风险形成机制及评估研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(8): 775-781.
[5] 周洪建, 王丹丹, 袁艺, 郝明月. 中国特别重大自然灾害损失统计的最新进展——《特别重大自然灾害损失统计制度》解析 *[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(5): 530-538.
[6] 彭建, 刘焱序, 潘雅婧, 赵志强, 宋治清, 王仰麟. 基于景观格局—过程的城市自然灾害生态风险研究:回顾与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(10): 1186-1196.
[7] 张强, 韩兰英, 张立阳, 王劲松. 论气候变暖背景下干旱和干旱灾害风险特征与管理策略[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(1): 80-91.
[8] 石先武,谭骏,国志兴,刘钦政. 风暴潮灾害风险评估研究综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2013, 28(8): 866-874.
[9] 方伟华,石先武. 面向灾害风险评估的热带气旋路径及强度随机模拟综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2012, 27(8): 866-875.
[10] 袁艺. 自然灾害灾情评估研究与实践进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(1): 22-32.
[11] 周创兵,李典庆. 暴雨诱发滑坡致灾机理与减灾方法研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2009, 24(5): 477-487.
[12] 刘婧,史培军,葛怡,王静爱,吕红峰. 灾害恢复力研究进展综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(2): 211-218.
[13] 史培军,杜鹃,冀萌新,刘婧,王静爱. 中国城市主要自然灾害风险评价研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(2): 170-177.
[14] 赵生才. 活动构造、环境与自然灾害———香山科学会议第 167次学术讨论会观点摘要[J]. 地球科学进展, 2002, 17(4): 620-623.
[15] 任鲁川. 区域自然灾害风险分析研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 1999, 14(3): 242-246.
阅读次数
全文


摘要