地球科学进展 ›› 2015, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 530 -538. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2015.05.0530

综述与评述 上一篇    下一篇

中国特别重大自然灾害损失统计的最新进展——《特别重大自然灾害损失统计制度》解析 *
周洪建, 王丹丹, 袁艺, 郝明月   
  1. 民政部国家减灾中心,北京 100124
  • 出版日期:2015-05-06
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目“灾害链型巨灾风险评估方法研究”(编号:41201553); 国家“十二五”科技支撑计划项目“重大自然灾害应急救助关键技术研究与应用示范”(编号:2013BAK05B02)资助

New Advances in Statistics of Large-scale Natural Disasters Damage and Loss: Explanation of “Statistical System of Large-scale Natural Disasters”

Zhou Hongjian, Wang Dandan, Yuan Yi, Hao Mingyue   

  1. National Disaster Reduction Center of China, Ministry of Civil Affairs, Beijing 100124, China
  • Online:2015-05-06 Published:2015-05-06

以《特别重大自然灾害损失统计制度》(简称《统计制度》)主要执笔人的视角,详细阐述了制度的主要内容、蕴含的科学问题和未来研究方向。《统计制度》报表和指标设计在与现有国家标准保持一致、历经汶川地震等多次重特大灾害实践检验完善、充分吸收相关行业部门意见和建议、适用于多灾种与灾害链损失统计、实用于灾后恢复重建规划编制等方面均体现出其权威性与最新性,《统计制度》具备科学性、综合性、实用性和动态性等特征。《统计制度》在推进特别重大自然灾害损失综合评估、启发涉灾行业部门开展专项深入研究、引领地方建立相关制度等方面具有极大潜力。

From the perspective of leading authors of “Statistical system of largescale natural disasters damage and loss” (SS-LNDD&L), this article elaborated on the main contents, scientific issues and research fields in the future of the SS-LNDD&L. SS-LNDD&L defined the starting conditions, forms of organization, the statistical scope, main contents and time limit, which had the scientific, comprehensive, practical and dynamic features. There were five new advances in statistics of large-scale natural disaster damage and loss based on the SS-LNDD&L. ①SS-LNDD&L had the coordination with relevant national standards of “Classification and code for natural disaster bearing bodies”, and “Classification and code for national industry” and so on. ②SS-LNDD&L was improved by the several large-scale disasters, such as the Wenchuan Earthquake, Yushu Earthquake, Zhouqu flash flood and landslide, Lushan Earthquake and some tables and indices were added, deleted or revised based on the local households’experiences. ③SS-LNDD&L was established based on many advices and suggestion from more than 30 agencies of National Disaster Reduction Committee and some tables and indices were recommended by the agencies. ④SS-LNDD&L could be applied to many sudden disasters, such as the flood, typhoon, earthquake, landslide, snow, tsunami and so on. Especially, multi-hazards and disaster chain’s damage and loss also could be covered by this statistics system. ⑤SS-LNDD&L was an important and practical support material for post disaster restoration and reconstruction planning; for example, the tables and indices from the SS-LNDD&L were used in the “The State Overall Planning for Post-Wenchuan Earthquake Restoration and Reconstruction” and “Overall Planning for Post-Lushan Earthquake Restoration and Reconstructio”.Otherwise, SS-LNDD&L provided legal basis for carrying out comprehensive assessment of large-scale natural disaster loss and will have great potential to carry out the special in-depth studies of disaster related industry sectors and lead the local relevant departments to establish the correlative statistical systems.

中图分类号: 

[1] Zou Ming, Yuan Yi, Liao Yongfeng, et al. Integrated Risk Governance: Integrated Natural Disaster Relief System in China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2011:2-10.[邹铭,袁艺,廖永丰,等. 综合风险防范:中国综合自然灾害救助保障体系[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2011:2-10.]
[2] Zhang Weixing, Shi Peijun, Zhou Hongjian. Study on definition and division criteria of a large-scale disaster: Analysis of typical disasters in the world in recent years[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2013, 28(1): 15-22.[张卫星,史培军,周洪建. 巨灾定义与划分标准研究:基于近年来全球典型灾害案例的分析[J]. 灾害学,2013,28(1):15-22.]
[3] Zhang Weixing, Zhou Hongjian. Conceptual model of disaster chain risk assessment: Taking Wenchuan Earthquake on 12 May 2008 as a case[J]. Progress in Geography, 2013, 32(1): 130-138.[张卫星,周洪建. 灾害链风险评估的概念模型:以汶川5·12特大地震为例[J]. 地理科学进展,2013,32(1):130-138.]
[4] EMA (Emergency Management Australia). Australia Emergency Manuals Series, Part III: Emergency Management Practice, Disaster Loss Assessment Guidelines[C]. Canberra: Lllycfoft Pty Ltd, Brisbane and PenUltimate, 2002.
[5] ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean). Handbook for Estimating the Socio-economic and Environmental Effects of Disasters[R].Mexico, 2003.
[6] Consultative Group on Indonesia (CCI). Preliminary Damage and Loss Assessment: Yogyakarta and Central Java Natural Disaster[EB/OL]. The 15th Meeting of the Consultative Group on Indonesia, Jakarta. (2006-06-14)[2014-09-10].http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTINDONESIA/Resources/226271-11501965 84718/PackageJune13_HIRES_FINAL.pdf.
[7] WMO & GWP. Flood Loss Assessment Tool[EB/OL]. (2007-10-20)[2014-09-10].http://www.gwptoolbox.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=26&Itemid=25.
[8] FEMA. HAZUS, FEMA’s Software for Estimating Potential Losses from Disasters[EB/OL].Federal Emergency Management Agency.(2008-07-15)[2014-08-20].http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/hazus/.
[9] APEC (Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation). Guidelines and Best Practices for Post-disaster Damage and Loss Assessment[R].Yogyakarta, 2009.
[10] PAGER (Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquakes for Response)[EB/OL].(2010-04-20)[2014-08-21].http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/pager.
[11] WAPMERR (World Agency of Planetary Monitoring Earthquake Risk Reduction)[EB/OL].[2010-11-11].http://www.wapmerr.org.
[12] SUPREME (former name SIGNAL)[EB/OL].[2010-11-11].http://www.tokyo-gas.co.jp/signal.
[13] NERIES (Network of Research Infrastructures for European Seismology)[EB/OL].[2010-10-21].http://www.neries-eu.org.
[14] Yuan Yi. Advances in the assessment of natural disaster situation[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2010,25(1): 22-32.[袁艺. 自然灾害灾情评估研究与实践进展[J]. 地球科学进展,2010,25(1):22-32.]
[15] Yuan Yi, Zhang Lei. Present statistics situation on natural disaster and its future in China[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2006, 21(4): 89-93.[袁艺,张磊. 中国自然灾害灾情统计现状及展望[J]. 灾害学,2006,21(4):89-93.]
[16] Wu Guoxiong, Lin Hai, Zou Xiaolei, et al. Research on global climate change and scientific data[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2014, 29(1): 15-22.[吴国雄,林海,邹晓蕾,等. 全球气候变化研究与科学数据[J]. 地球科学进展,2014,29(1):15-22.]
[17] Shi Peijun, Kong Feng, Ye Qian, et al. Disaster risk science development and disaster risk reduction using science and technology[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2014, 29(11): 1 205-1 211.[史培军,孔峰,叶谦,等. 灾害风险科学发展与科技减灾[J]. 地球科学进展,2014,29(11):1 205-1 211.]
[18] Ministry of Civil Affairs, the National Bureau of Statistics. Statistical System of the Large- scale Natural Disaster Loss[EB/OL].(2014-05-09)[2014-10-21].http://xxgk.mca.gov.cn/n1360/n51127.files/n51128.pdf.[民政部、国家统计局. 特别重大自然灾害损失统计制度[EB/OL].(2014-05-09)[2014-10-21].http://xxgk.mca.gov.cn/n1360/n51127.files/n51128.pdf.]
[19] Shi Peijun, Yuan Yi. Integrated assessment of large-scale natural disasters in China[J]. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(9): 1 145-1 151.[史培军,袁艺. 重特大自然灾害综合评估体系构建[J]. 地理科学进展,2014,33(9):1 145-1 151.]
[20] NCDR (National Disaster Reduction Committee), (EGER-MST) Expert Group for Earthquake Relief of The Ministry of Science & Technology. Comprehensive Analysis and Assessment for Wenchuan Earthquake[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2008.[国家减灾委,科技部抗震救灾专家组.汶川地震灾害综合分析与评估[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.]
[21] The Sate Council. The State Overall Planning for Post-Wenchuan Earthquake Restoration and Reconstruction[EB/OL].(2008-08-12)[2014-11-01].http://www.gov.cn/wcdzzhhfcjghzqyjg.pdf.[国务院. 国家汶川地震灾后恢复重建总体规划[EB/OL].(2008-08-12)[2014-11-01].http://www.gov.cn/wcdzzhhfcjghzqyjg.pdf.]
[22] The Sate Council. Overall Planning for Post-Lushan Earthquake Restoration and Reconstruction[EB/OL].(2013-07-15)[2014-11-01].http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-07/15/content_2445989.htm.[国务院. 芦山地震灾后恢复重建总体规划[EB/OL].(2013-07-15)[2014-11-01].http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-07/15/content_2445989.htm.]
[23] Yuan Yi. Comprehensive damage and loss assessment system of catastrophic natural disaster[J]. Disaster Reduction in China, 2014, (1): 34-37.[袁艺. 特别重大自然灾害损失综合评估回顾与展望[J]. 中国减灾,2014,(1):34-37.]
[24] Li Quanmao, Zhou Hongjian. Three acquisition from the travel to Thailand[J]. Disaster Reduction in China, 2012, (15): 58-59.[李全茂,周洪建. 访泰三得[J]. 中国减灾,2012,(15):58-59.]

[1] 高峰,赵雪雁,宋晓谕,王宝,王鹏龙,牛艺博,王伟军,黄春林. 面向 SDGs的美丽中国内涵与评价指标体系[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(3): 295-305.
[2] 王曦, 周洪建. 重特大自然灾害损失统计与评估进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(9): 914-921.
[3] 周洪建, 王曦. 特别重大自然灾害损失统计内容的国际对比——基于《特别重大自然灾害损失统计制度》和PDNA系统的分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(10): 1030-1038.
[4] 邵珂, 陈建平, 任梦依. 西南印度洋中脊多金属硫化物矿产资源评价方法与指标体系[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(7): 812-822.
[5] 杜祥琬. 应对气候变化的两个基本问题#br# ——应对气候变化战略的科学性及对中国发展的意义[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(4): 438-442.
[6] 马建文,李加洪,高志海. 美国NASA建设地球观测科学数据产品生成与应用服务的量化体系综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2007, 22(5): 521-526.
[7] 毛汉英,余丹林. 区域承载力定量研究方法探讨[J]. 地球科学进展, 2001, 16(4): 549-555.
[8] 贾绍凤,毛汉英. 国外可持续发展度量研究综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 1999, 14(6): 596-601.
阅读次数
全文


摘要