特别重大自然灾害损失统计内容的国际对比——基于《特别重大自然灾害损失统计制度》和PDNA系统的分析

doi:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2017.10.1030

地球科学进展 ›› 2017, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 1030 -1038. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2017.10.1030

周洪建, 王曦

民政部国家减灾中心,北京 100124

收稿日期:2017-05-27 修回日期:2017-08-20 出版日期:2017-10-20
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划全球变化及应对重点专项项目“全球变化人口与经济系统风险形成机制及评估研究(编号:2016YFA0602403)”资助.

International Comparisons of Large-scale Natural Disasters Damage and Loss Assessment: Based on “Statistical System of Large-scale Natural Disasters” and PDNA

Zhou Hongjian, Wang Xi

National Disaster Reduction Center of China, Ministry of Civil Affairs, Beijing 100124, China

Received:2017-05-27 Revised:2017-08-20 Online:2017-10-20 Published:2017-10-20
About author:Zhou Hongjian(1980-), male, Xintai County, Shandong Province, Associate professor. Research areas include natural disaster risk and loss assessment.E-mail:zhouhongjian@ndrcc.gov.cn
Supported by:
Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program—Global Change and Mitigation Project“Global change risk of population and economic system: Mechanism and assessment ”(No.2016YFA0602403).

全文 ( 10 ) 下载PDF ( 834 )

2014年6月民政部、国家减灾委员会办公室发布实施的《特别重大自然灾害损失统计制度》(简称《统计制度》)在规范统计内容与指标的同时,为多次重特大自然灾害灾后恢复重建规划编制提供了基础,但对恢复重建规划的直接指导作用仍有限。以国际主流的灾后需求评估(Post Disaster Needs Assessment,PDNA)系统为主要研究对象,在详细分析PDNA系统内容与特色的基础上,从目标、内容与指标体系、评估方法、评估参数等4个方面与《统计制度》进行了对比分析。未来,应基于《统计制度》拓展增加恢复重建需求评估指标,不断优化完善灾害评估参数库,服务中央—省—地—县等多级用户,编制配套技术标准并优化评估技术规程。研究对于优化完善《统计制度》内容与指标,更好地服务于灾后恢复重现决策,实现与国际接轨有重要的现实意义。

关键词: 特别重大自然灾害, 损失统计, 指标体系, 评估参数, PDNA

In June 2014, the Ministry of Civil Affairs, the National Disaster Reduction Committee Office issued the “Statistical System of Large-scale Natural Disasters Damage and Loss” (SSLNDD&L), in which the standard statistical content and index were explored. Examined by several major natural disasters in recent years, such as Ludian earthquake (Ms 6.5) on 3 August 2014, Nepal earthquake (Ms 8.1) on 25 April 2015, SSLNDD&L provided good basis for post disaster recovery and reconstruction planning, but the direct guidance of reconstruction planning was still limited. Post Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA), the mainstream of the international disaster needs assessment system, was taken as the main research object, and the content and characteristics of PDNA system were analyzed in detail. The comparison analysis was made from the objectives, contents and index system, evaluation methodology, evaluation parameters between the SSLNDD&L and PDNA. In the future, expanding and increasing various industries and local evaluation index focusing on recovery and reconstruction needs, optimizing the disaster assessment parameter database used for the multi-user such as the Central-Province-County scale, supporting the preparation of technical standard optimization evaluation process to form a complete assessment technical specification should be put forward as the future development of the SSLNDD&L. It is of great practical significance to optimize and perfect the content and index of the SSLNDD&L to better serve the decision making of the recovery and reconstruction after large-scale disasters, and to achieve international standards on large-scale disaster damage & loss statistics and assessment in China.

Key words: Large-scale disaster, Damage and loss assessment, Index system, Assessment parameters, PDNA.

中图分类号:

P954

[1] Zou Ming, Yuan Yi, Liao Yongfeng, et al . Integrated Risk Governance: Integrated Natural Disaster Relief System in China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2011:2-10.
[邹铭,袁艺,廖永丰,等. 综合风险防范:中国综合自然灾害救助保障体系[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2011: 2-10.]
[2] Zhou Hongjian, Wang Dandan, Yuan Yi, et al . New advances in statistics of large-scale natural disasters damage and loss: Explanation of “Statistical System of Large-scale Natural Disasters”[J]. Advances in Earth Science , 2015, 30(5):530-538.
[周洪建, 王丹丹, 袁艺, 等. 中国特别重大自然灾害损失统计的最新进展——《特别重大自然灾害损失统计制度》解析[J]. 地球科学进展,2015,30(5):530-538.]
[3] Fan Yida. Process and methodology of damage and losses assessment from Ludian Earthquake in Yunan Province[J]. Disaster Reduction in China , 2012, (9): 56-57.
[范一大. 云南鲁甸地震灾害损失评估过程与方法[J]. 中国减灾,2012,(9):56-57.]
[4] The State Council. The State Overall Planning for Post-Wenchuan Earthquake Restoration and Reconstruction[EB/ OL]. (2008-08-12)[2017-07-20]. http://www.gov.cn/wcdzzhhfcjghzqyjg.pdf.
[国务院. 国家汶川地震灾后恢复重建总体规划[EB/OL]. (2008-08-12)[2017-07-20]. http://www.gov.cn/ wcdzzhhfcjghzqyjg.pdf.]
[5] The State Council. Overall Planning for Post-Lushan Earthquake Restoration and Reconstruction[EB/OL]. (2013-07-15) [2017-07-20]. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-07/15/ content_2445989.htm.
[国务院. 芦山地震灾后恢复重建总体规划[EB/OL]. (2013-07-15)[2017-07-20]. http: ∥www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-07/15/ content_2445989.htm.]
[6] The Government of Bangladesh. Cyclone Sidr in Bangladesh: Damage, Loss, and Needs Assessment for Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction[M]. Economic Relations Division, Ministry of Finance, Govt. of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, 2008.
[7] Zhao Yandong, Zhang Huafeng. Post-disaster needs assessment: Theory, methodology and practice[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters , 2013, 22(5): 24-31.
[赵延东,张化枫. 灾后需求评估——理论、方法与实践[J]. 自然灾害学报,2013,22(5):24-31.]
[8] The Government of Nepal. Nepal Earthquake 2015: Post Disaster Needs Assessment (Executive Summary)[EB/OL].(2015-07-15)[2017-07-20]. http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/PDNA_Executive_Summary_new.pdf.
[9] Ministry of Disaster Management & Ministry of National Policies and Economic Affairs of Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka: Post-Disaster Needs Assessment (May 2016 Floods and Landslides)[EB/OL].(2016-07-10)[2017-07-20]. http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/PDNA_Srilanka.pdf.
[10] The Government of Nepal. Nepal Earthquake 2015: Post Disaster Needs Assessment (Vol. B: Sector Reports)[EB/OL].(2015-08-15)[2017-07-20]. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/-ed_emp/documents/publication/wcms_397970.pdf.
[11] Zhang Weixing, Shi Peijun, Zhou Hongjian. Study on definition and division criteria of large-scale disaster: Analysis of typical disasters in the world in recent years[J]. Journal of Catastrophology , 2013, 28(1): 15-22.
[张卫星,史培军,周洪建. 巨灾定义与划分标准研究——基于近年来全球典型灾害案例的分析[J]. 灾害学,2013,28(1):15-22.]
[12] Shi Peijun, Yuan Yi. Integrated assessment of large-scale natural disasters in China[J]. Progress in Geography , 2014, 33(9): 1 145-1 151.
[史培军,袁艺. 重特大自然灾害综合评估[J]. 地理科学进展,2014,33(9):1 145-1 151.]
[13] Chen Shirong, Ma Haijian, Fan Yida, et al . Road damage assessment from high resolution satellite remote sensing imagery in Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing , 2008, 12(6): 949-955.
[陈世荣,马海建,范一大,等. 基于高分辨率遥感影像的汶川地震道路损毁评估[J]. 遥感学报,2008,12(6):949-955.]
[14] Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). HAZUS, FEMA’s Software for Estimating Potential Losses from Disasters[EB/OL]. (2008-06-01)[2017-07-20]. http://www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/hazus/2008.
[15] China Earthquake Administration. Post-earthquake Field Works Part 3: Code for Field Survey:GB/T 18208.3-2011[S]. Beijing,2011.
[中国地震局. 地震现场工作第3部分:调查规范:GB/T 18208.3-2011[S]. 北京,2011.]
[16] Zhou Hongjian. Top ten disaster damage and loss assessment system in the world (Part I)[J]. Disaster Reduction in China , 2015, (1): 56-59.
[周洪建. 全球十大灾害损失评估系统 (上)[J]. 中国减灾,2015,(1):56-59.]
[17] Sichuan Disaster Reduction Committee. Regulation of Damage and Losses Assessment from Major Disaster in Sichuan Province (for Trial Implementation)[EB/OL]. (2014-12-01)[2017-07-20]. http://www.sjz.gov.cn/tzgg_3485/201412/t20141201_18760.htm.
[四川省减灾委员会. 四川省重大自然灾害主要损失评估管理办法(试行)[EB/OL]. (2014-12-01)[2017-07-20]. http://www.sjz.gov.cn/tzgg_3485/201412/t20141201_18760.htm.]
[18] Kircher C A, Whitman R V, Holmes W T. HAZUS earthquake loss estimation methods[J]. Natural Hazards Review , 2006,7(2): 45-59.
[19] Zhou Hongjian. Hot-topics and prospects of global platform for disaster risk reduction: Based on 2017 global platform for disaster risk reduction in Cancun, Mexico[J]. Advances in Earth Science , 2017, 32(7): 688-695.
[周洪建. 当前全球减轻灾害风险平台的前沿话题与展望——基于2017 年全球减灾平台大会的综述与思考[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(7): 688-695.]
[20] Scawthorn C, Flores P, Blais N, et al . HAZUS-MH flood loss estimation methodology II: Damage and loss assessment[J]. Natural Hazards Review , 2006,(5): 72-81.

[1]	高峰,赵雪雁,宋晓谕,王宝,王鹏龙,牛艺博,王伟军,黄春林. 面向 SDGs的美丽中国内涵与评价指标体系[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(3): 295-305.
[2]	王曦, 周洪建. 重特大自然灾害损失统计与评估进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(9): 914-921.
[3]	邵珂, 陈建平, 任梦依. 西南印度洋中脊多金属硫化物矿产资源评价方法与指标体系[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(7): 812-822.
[4]	周洪建, 王丹丹, 袁艺, 郝明月. 中国特别重大自然灾害损失统计的最新进展——《特别重大自然灾害损失统计制度》解析 ^*[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(5): 530-538.
[5]	马建文,李加洪,高志海. 美国NASA建设地球观测科学数据产品生成与应用服务的量化体系综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2007, 22(5): 521-526.
[6]	毛汉英，余丹林. 区域承载力定量研究方法探讨[J]. 地球科学进展, 2001, 16(4): 549-555.
[7]	贾绍凤,毛汉英. 国外可持续发展度量研究综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 1999, 14(6): 596-601.

阅读次数

全文

摘要