地球科学进展 ›› 2009, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 571 -576. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2009.06.0571

生态学研究    下一篇

中国主要陆地生态系统服务功能与生态安全
傅伯杰 1,周国逸 2,白永飞 3,宋长春 4,刘纪远 5,张惠远 6,吕一河 1,郑  华 1,谢高地 5   
  1. 1.中国科学院生态环境研究中心城市与区域生态国家重点实验室,北京  100085;2.中国科学院华南植物园,广东  广州  510650;
    3.中国科学院植物研究所,北京  100093;  4. 中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所,吉林  长春  130012;
    5.中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京  100101;   6.国家环境保护部环境规划院,北京  100012
  • 收稿日期:2009-04-28 修回日期:2009-05-11 出版日期:2009-06-10
  • 通讯作者: 傅伯杰 E-mail:bfu@rcees.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划项目“中国主要陆地生态系统服务功能与生态安全”(编号:2009CB421100)资助.

The Main Terrestrial Ecosystem Services and Ecological Security in China

Fu Bojie 1,Zhou Guoyi 2,Bai Yongfei 3,Song Changchun 4,Liu Jiyuan 5,Zhang Huiyuan 6,Lü Yihe 1,Zheng Hua 1,Xie Gaodi 5   

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology,Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing  100085, China;
    2.South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou  510650, China;
    3. Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing  100093, China;
    4. Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun  130012, China;
    5. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing  100101, China;
    6.Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning,Ministry of Environmental Protection,Beijing  100012,China
  • Received:2009-04-28 Revised:2009-05-11 Online:2009-06-10 Published:2009-06-10

      生态系统服务是国际生态学研究的前沿和热点,表现出向生态系统服务机理和区域集成方法两大方向发展的趋势。开展陆地生态系统服务研究,是生态系统恢复、生态功能区划和建立生态补偿机制、保障国家生态安全的重大战略需求。面向国家重大需求和生态系统服务研究的国际前沿,以主要陆地生态系统为对象,“中国主要陆地生态系统服务功能与生态安全”项目拟解决3个科学问题:①生态系统结构—过程—服务功能的相互作用机理;②生态系统服务功能的尺度特征与多尺度关联;③生态系统服务功能评估的指标与模型。通过上述研究,发展生态系统服务研究的理论与方法,为国家的生态建设和环境保护提供科学支撑。
 

       Ecosystem service has become a hot topic in international ecological research with two major trends of advancing ecosystem service mechanism and regional integration methodologies. At the same time, terrestrial ecosystem service research is a great national science and strategic need for ecological restoration, ecological functional regionalization, ecological compensation, and sustaining ecological security. Targeting this necessity and the international research frontiers of ecosystem service, this project takes main terrestrial ecosystems in China as the object of research. There are three scientific themes that will be tackled: ①the interaction between ecosystem structure, process and services; ②spatiotemporal coupling and scale effects of ecosystem service; ③regional ecosystem service assessment and integration modeling. Through the above, it is managed to promote the development of ecosystem service theory and applications to scientifically support national ecological rehabilitation and environmental protection.



中图分类号: 

[1] Daily G C, ed. Nature′s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems\[M\]. Washington DC: Island Press, 1997.
[2] MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). Ecosystem and Human Well-Being[M]. Washington DC: Island Press, 2005.
[3] Ehrlich P R, Ehrlich A H. The value of biodiversity[J].Ambio,1992, 21: 219-226.
[4] Constanza R, d′Arge R, de Groot R,et al. The value of the world′s ecosystem services and natural capital[J].Nature,1997, 387: 253-260.
[5] Le Maitre D C, Milton S J, Jarmain C,et al. Linking ecosystem services and water resources: Landscape-scale hydrology of the Little Karoo[J].Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,2007,5(5): 261-270.
[6] Palmer M A, Morse J, Bernhardt E, et al. Ecology for a crowded planet[J].Science,2004,304:1 251-1 252.
[7] Sutherland W J, Armstrong-Brown S, Armsworth P R, et al.The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,2006,43: 617-627.
[8] Daily G C, Soderqvist T, Aniyar S, et al. Ecology: The value of nature and the nature of value[J].Science,2000, 289:395-396.
[9] Heal G. Nature and the Marketplace: Capturing the Value of Ecosystem Services[M]. Covelo, California: Island Press, 2000.
[10] MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment[M].Washington DC:Island Press, 2003.
[11] Biggs R, Bohensky E, Desanker P V,et al. Nature Supporting People: The South African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment[R].Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria, South Africa,2004.
[12] Kremen C. Managing ecosystem services: What do we need to know about their ecology?[J].Ecology Letters, 2005, 8: 468-479.
[13] Vitousek P M, Mooney H A, Lubchenco J, et al. Human domination of Earth′s ecosystem[J].Science,1997, 277:494-499.
[14] National Research Council. Watershed Management for Potable Water Supply: Assessing the New York City Strategy[M]. Washington DC: National Academy Press,  2000.
[15] Balmford A, Green R E, Jenkins M. Measuring the changing state of nature[J].Trends in Ecology & Evolution,2003, 18:326-330.
[16] Luck G W, Daily G C, Ehrlich P R. Population diversity and ecosystem service[J].Trends in Ecology & Evolution,2003, 18:331-336.
[17] Robertson G P, Swinton S M. Reconciling agricultural productivity and environmental integrity: A grand challenge for agriculture[J].Frontier in Ecology and Environment, 2005, 3:38-46.
[18] Armsworth P R, Chan K M A, Daily G C, et al. Ecosystem-service science and the way forward for conservation[J].Conservation Biology,2007, 21(6):1 383-1 384.
[19] Holmes T P, Bergstrom J C, Huszar E,et al. Contingent valuation, net marginal benefits, and the scale of riparian ecosystem restoration[J].Ecological Economics,2004, 49: 19-30.
[20] Swift M J, Izac A M N, Noordwijk M Van. Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes-are we asking the right questions?[J].Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2004, 104: 113-134.
[21] Yue T X, Liu J Y, Li Z Q, et al. Considerable effects of diversity indices and spatial scales on conclusions relating to ecological diversity[J].Ecological Modelling,2005, 188: 418-431.
[22] Houlahan J E, Findlay C S. Estimating the critical distance at which adjacent land-use degrades wetland water and sediment quality[J].Landscape Ecology,2004, 19:677-690.
[23] Fu Bojie,Lü Yihe,Chen Liding,et al. The latest progress of landscape ecology in the world[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2008,28(2):798-804.[傅伯杰,吕一河,陈利顶,等.国际景观生态学研究新进展[J]. 生态学报, 2008,28(2):798-804.]
[24] Peterson D L, Parker V T. Ecological Scale: Theory and Applications[M]. New York: Columbia University Press,1998:5-16.
[25] Balvanera P, Pfisterer A B, Buchmann N, et al. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services[J].Ecology Letters,2006, 9:1 146-1 156.
[26] Worm B, Barbier E B, Beaumout N, et al. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services[J]. Science,2006, 314(787):787-790.
[27] Mertz O, Ravnborg H M, Lövei G L, et al. Ecosystem services and biodiversity in developing countries[J]. Biodiversity Conservation,2007,16:2 729-2 737.

[1] 范小杉. 国际社会对生态系统服务研究误区的研讨综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(6): 616-624.
[2] 康文敏,蔡芫镔,郑慧祯. 福州城市地表温度时空变化与贡献度研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(1): 88-100.
[3] 王思佳,刘鹄,赵文智,李中恺. 干旱、半干旱区地下水可持续性研究评述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(2): 210-223.
[4] 范小杉, 何萍. 河流生态系统服务研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(8): 852-864.
[5] 何霄嘉, 王敏, 冯相昭. 生态系统服务纳入应对气候变化的可行性与途径探讨[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(5): 560-567.
[6] 戴尔阜, 王晓莉, 朱建佳, 高江波. 生态系统服务权衡/协同研究进展与趋势展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(11): 1250-1259.
[7] 胡云锋,徐芝英,刘越,艳燕. 地理空间数据的尺度转换[J]. 地球科学进展, 2013, 28(3): 297-304.
[8] 陈亚宁,郝兴明,李卫红,陈亚鹏,叶朝霞,赵锐锋. 干旱区内陆河流域的生态安全与生态需水量研究——兼谈塔里木河生态需水量问题[J]. 地球科学进展, 2008, 23(7): 732-738.
[9] 高抒. 潮汐汊道形态动力过程研究综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2008, 23(12): 1237-1248.
[10] 张永民,赵士洞. 全球生态系统服务未来变化的情景[J]. 地球科学进展, 2007, 22(6): 605-611.
[11] 张永民,赵士洞. 全球生态系统服务的状况与趋势[J]. 地球科学进展, 2007, 22(5): 515-520.
[12] 刘鹄,赵文智. 农业水生产力研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2007, 22(1): 58-65.
[13] 岳耀杰,周洪建,王静爱,史培军,吕红峰,何春阳,严平. 生态安全条件下亚洲沙区土地利用结构研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(2): 131-137.
[14] 杨志峰,崔保山,黄国和,白军红,孙涛,李晓文,刘新会. 黄淮海地区湿地水生态过程、水环境效应及生态安全调控[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(11): 1119-1126.
[15] 何大明;吴绍洪;彭华;杨志峰;欧晓昆;崔保山. 纵向岭谷区生态系统变化及西南跨境生态安全研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(3): 338-344.
阅读次数
全文


摘要