地球科学进展 ›› 2010, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (11): 1187 -1198. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2010.11.1187

观测数据处理与分析 上一篇    下一篇

海河流域不同下垫面上大孔径闪烁仪观测显热通量的时空特征分析
白洁,刘绍民*,丁晓萍   
  1. 北京师范大学遥感科学国家重点实验室,地理学与遥感科学学院,北京 100875
  • 收稿日期:2010-08-03 修回日期:2010-09-15 出版日期:2010-11-10
  • 通讯作者: 刘绍民(1967-),男,浙江绍兴人,教授,主要从事陆面过程观测与遥感应用研究. E-mail:smliu@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    公益性行业(气象)科研专项“大尺度水热通量观测系统的研制与应用研究”(编号:GYHY200706046);国家自然科学基金项目“地表水热通量的时空尺度扩展研究”(编号:40971194);中德合作项目“基于遥感和数据同化方法的海河流域水文通量预测研究—SP2:不同尺度蒸散量和土壤水分的观测研究”(编号:30911130504)资助.

Temporal-spatial Characteristics Analysis of Area-averaged Sensible Heat Fluxes by Large Aperture Scintillometer over Hai River Basin

Bai Jie, Liu Shaomin, Ding Xiaoping   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, School of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
  • Received:2010-08-03 Revised:2010-09-15 Online:2010-11-10 Published:2010-11-10

基于海河流域密云站、馆陶站和大兴站2008—2009年大孔径闪烁仪的观测数据,结合涡动相关仪和自动气象站的同步观测,经过数据筛选、质量评价、数据处理及插补等步骤,得到了3个站点不同时间尺度的显热通量和蒸散量。首先分析了3个站点1月、4月、7月、10月不稳定状态下大孔径闪烁仪通量观测的空间代表性及源区内不同下垫面的通量贡献率,并结合下垫面作物生长状况比较分析了3个站点不同季节大孔径闪烁仪观测显热通量与净辐射的月平均日变化趋势,不同下垫面上两者变化趋势一致,且馆陶站的显热通量在各月中都为最低,1月、7月密云站的显热通量与大兴站较为接近。同时3个站点2008—2009年9:00~15:00显热通量日平均值的季节变化趋势表明,相对于密云站单峰状的季节变化,源区内下垫面的植被类型和植被生长状况导致馆陶站和大兴站的显热通量都表现出明显的三峰变[JP2]化。最后,以馆陶站大孔径闪烁仪和涡动相关仪观测的30 min显热通量数据为例,结合涡动相关仪的能量闭合率,大孔径闪烁仪和涡动相关仪通量足迹源区的重叠程度和非重叠部分的地面非均一性,对不同尺度显热通量观测的差异原因进行了讨论。

Combined with the measurements of Eddy Covariance (EC) system and Automatic Weather Station (AWS) and  after a series steps including data screening, quality assessment, data processing and gap filling, the sensible heat fluxes of Large Aperture Scintillometer (LAS) HLAS and evapotranspiration (ET)  were  calculated based on the LAS measurements in Miyun, Guantao and Daxing sites over Hai River Basin during 2008-2009. The spatial representation and flux contribution of different land use under unstable conditions  were  analyzed in January and July over Miyun, Guantao and Daxing sites. Combined with the footprint and the crop phenological phase, the seasonal variation of Hlas over the three sites were  compared with Rn in the same period, where Guantao site had  the lowest value each month, Hlas in Miyun and Daxing were closed in January and July. Meanwhile, daily Hlas between 9:00 and 15:00 were  discussed over the three sites from 2008-2009. Compared to the single peak variation of Miyun site,  both  Guantao and Daxing sites both had three peak values because of  the  alternation of crops. Finally, according to the energy closure ratio of EC measurement, the different footprint overlapping ratio between LAS and EC measurements, as well as surface heterogeneity of their non-overlap source area, the difference between Hlas and Hec in Guantao site  was  discussed.

中图分类号: 

[1] De Bruin H A R, Van Den Hurk B J J M, Koshiek W. The scintillation method tested over a dry vineyard area[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology,1995,76: 25-40.
[2] McAneney K J, Green A E, Astill M S. Large-aperture scintillometry: The homogeneous case[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1995,76:149-162.
[3] Anandakumar K. Sensible heat flux over a wheat canopy: Optical scintillometer measurements and surface renewal analysis estimations[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,1999,96: 145-156.
[4] Cain J D, Rosier P T W, Meijninger W, et al. Spatially averaged sensible heat fluxes measured over barley[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2001,107: 307-322.
[5] Hoedjes J C B, Zuurbier R M, Watt C J. Large aperture scintillometer used over a homogeneous irrigated area, partly affected by regional advection[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology,2002,105: 99-117.
[6] Xu Z W, Liu S M, Wang W Z, et al. Evapotranspiration measurements over different surfaces in the Heihe river basin, China[C]//Biohydrology of Farmland under Desertification. Japan: SPA & Water Press, 2010: 86-106.
[7] Meijninger W M L, Hartogensis O K, Kohsiek W. Determination of area-averaged sensible heat fluxes with a large aperture scintillometer over a heterogeneous surface-Flevoland field experiment[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology,2002, 105: 37-62.
[8] Chebouni A, Watts C, Lagouarde J P. Estimation of heat and momentum fluxes over complex terrain using a large aperture scintillometer[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2000, 105: 215-226.
[9] Ezzahar J, Chehbouni A, Er-raki S, et al. Combining a large aperture scintillometer and estimates of available energy to derive evapotranspiration over several agricultural fields in a semi-arid region[J].Plant Biosystems,2009,143(1):209-221.
[10] Kanda M, Moriwaki R, Roth M, et al. Area-averaged sensible heat flux and a new method to determine zero-plane displacement length over an urban surface using scintillometry[J].Boundary Layer Meteorology,2002, 105: 177-193.
[11] Roth M, Salmond J A, Satyanarayana A N V. Methodological consideration regarding the measurement of turbulent fluxes in the urban roughness sublayer: The role of scintillometry[J].Boundary Layer Meteorology,2006, 121: 351-375.
[12] Lagouarde J P, Irvine M, Bonnefond J M, et al. Mornitoring the sensible heat flux over urban areas using large aperture scintillometry: Case study of Marseille city during the ESCOMPTE experiment[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology,2006, 118: 449-476.
[13] Moene A F, De Bruin H A R. Sensible heat flux data derived from the scintillometers[C]//Su Z, Jacobs C, eds. BCRS Report, Advanced Earth Observation Land Surface Climate. Final Report, 01-02, 2001:85-90.
[14] Beyrich F, De Bruin H A R, Meijninger W M L, et al. Results from one year continuous operation of a large aperture scintillometer over a heterogeneous land surface[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2002, 105: 85-97.
[15] Schüttmeyer D, Moene A F, Holtslag A A M, et al. Surface fluxes and characteristics of drying semi-arid terrain in west Africa[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology,2006, 118:583-612.
[16] Lagouarde J P, Jacob F, Gu X F, et al. Spatialization of sensible heat flux over a hetegeneous landscape[J].Agronomie,2003, 22: 627-633.
[17] Kleissl J, Hong S H, Hendrickx J M H. New Mexico scintillometer network in supporting remote sensing and hydrologic and meteorological models[J].Bulletin American Meteorological Society,2009, 90(2):207.
[18] Lu Li, Liu Shaomin, Xu Ziwei, et al. Results from measurements of large aperture scintillometer over different surfaces[J].Journal of Applied Meteorological Science,2009, 20(2): 171-178.[卢俐, 刘绍民, 徐自为,等.不同下垫面大孔径闪烁仪观测数据处理与分析[J]. 应用气象学报, 20(2): 171-178.]
[19] Bai Jie, Liu Shaomin, Ding Xiaoping,et al. A study of the processing method of large aperture scintillometer observation data[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2010,25(11):1 148-1 165.[白洁, 刘绍民,丁晓萍,等.大孔径闪烁仪观测数据的处理方法研究[J].地球科学进展, 2010,25(11):1 148-1 165.]
[20] Ochs G R, Wilson J J. A second-generation large aperture scintillometer[Z]. NOAA Tech. Memor. ERL ETL-232, NOAA Environmental Research Laboratories, Boulder, CO, USA, 1993:24.
[21] Liu Shaomin, Lu L, Mao D, et al. Evaluating parameterizations of aerodynamic resistance to heat transfer using field measurements[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,2007, 11(2): 769-783.
[22] Brutaeart W. Evaporation into the Atmosphere, Theory, History, and Applications[M]. Reidel D Publishing Company, 1982.
[23] Yang K, Koike T, Yang D. Surface flux parameterization in the Tibetan plateau[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology,2003, 116: 245-262.
[24] Xu Ziwei, Liu Shaomin, Gong Lijuan, et al. A study of the data processing and quality assessment of the eddy covariance system[J].Advances in Earth Science,2008, 23(4): 357-370.[徐自为,刘绍民,宫丽娟,等.涡动相关仪观测数据的处理与质量评价研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2008,23(4): 357-370.]
[25] Qin Zhihao, Zhang Minghua,Arnon Karnieli, et al. Mono-window algorithm for retrieving land surface temperature from Landsat TM6 data[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2001,56(4): 456-466.[覃志豪,Zhang Minghua,Arnon Karnieli,等. 用陆地卫星TM6数据演算地表温度德单窗算法[J].地理学报, 2001, 56(4): 456-466.]
[26] Peng Guliang, Cai Xuhui, Liu Shaomin. A flux footprint model for large aperture scintillometer[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis,2007, 43(6):822-827.[彭谷亮,蔡旭晖,刘绍民. 大孔径闪烁仪湍流通量印痕模型的建立与应用[J].北京大学学报, 2007, 43(6): 822-827.]
[27] Shuang Xi. Investigation on Spatial Representativeness of Surface Flux Measurements: Taking Eddy Covariance system and Large Aperture Scintillometer for Example[D]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University, 2009.[双喜. 通量空间代表性的研究——以涡动相关仪和大孔径闪烁仪为例[D].北京:北京师范大学,2009.]
[28] Kormann R, Meixner F X. An analytic footprint model for neutral stratification[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology,2001, 99: 207-224.

[1] 罗维均, 王世杰, 刘秀明. 喀斯特洞穴系统碳循环的烟囱效应研究现状及展望 *[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(12): 1333-1340.
[2] 朱忠礼,林柳莺,徐同仁. 海河流域不同下垫面土壤水分动态模拟研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2012, 27(7): 778-787.
[3] 夏军,邱冰,潘兴瑶,翁建武,傅国斌,欧阳如林. 气候变化影响下水资源脆弱性评估方法及其应用[J]. 地球科学进展, 2012, 27(4): 443-451.
[4] 田苗,王鹏新,孙威. 基于地表温度与植被指数特征空间反演地表参数的研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(7): 698-705.
[5] 徐自为,黄勇彬,刘绍民. 大孔径闪烁仪观测方法的研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1139-1147.
[6] 蔡旭晖,朱明佳,刘绍民,徐自为. 大孔径闪烁仪的通量印痕分析与应用[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1166-1174.
[7] 郑宁,张劲松,孟平,黄辉,高峻,贾长荣,任迎丰. 基于闪烁仪观测低丘山地人工混交林通量印痕与源区分布[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1175-1186.
[8] 朱治林, 孙晓敏, 贾媛媛, 温学发, 张仁华, 袁国富, 唐新斋. 基于大孔径闪烁仪(LAS)测定农田显热通量的不确定性分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1199-1207.
[9] 王维真,徐自为,李新,王介民,张智慧. 大孔径闪烁仪在黑河流域的应用分析研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1208-1216.
[10] 王建林,温学发 ,孙晓敏,王秋凤,王辉民,刘允芬. 涡动相关系统和小孔径闪烁仪观测的森林显热通量的异同研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1217-1227.
[11] 艾力·买买提明,何清,霍文,刘新春. 塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地LAS和EC观测感热通量对比分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1228-1236.
[12] 李远, 孙睿, 刘绍民, 徐自为, 白洁. 大孔径闪烁仪观测数据在陆面模式验证中的应用初探[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1237-1247.
[13] 刘雅妮,辛晓洲,柳钦火,周春艳. 基于多尺度遥感数据估算地表通量的方法及其验证分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1261-1272.
[14] 白洁,刘绍民,丁晓萍,卢俐. 大孔径闪烁仪观测数据的处理方法研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1148-1165.
[15] 卢俐,刘绍民,徐自为,白洁,王介民. 大孔径闪烁仪和涡动相关仪观测显热通量之间的尺度关系[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1273-1282.
阅读次数
全文


摘要