大孔径闪烁仪的通量印痕分析与应用

doi:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2010.11.1166

地球科学进展 ›› 2010, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (11): 1166 -1174. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2010.11.1166

大孔径闪烁仪的通量印痕分析与应用

蔡旭晖 ¹，朱明佳 ²，刘绍民 ²，徐自为 ²

1.北京大学环境科学系，北京 100871; 
2.北京师范大学国家遥感科学重点实验室，地理学与遥感科学学院，北京 100875

收稿日期:2010-08-03 修回日期:2010-09-07 出版日期:2010-11-10
通讯作者: 蔡旭晖 E-mail:xhcai@pku.edu.cn
基金资助:
公益性行业(气象)科研专项“大尺度水热通量观测系统的研制与应用研究”(编号:GYHY200706046); 国家高技术研究发展计划项目“区域大气污染源识别与动态源清单技术及应用”(编号:2006AA06A305）和“区域大气复合污染的模拟、预测技术及应用”（编号：2006AA06A306)资助.

Flux Footprint Analysis and Application for the Large Aperture Scintillometer

Cai Xuhui ¹, Zhu Mingjia ², Liu Shaomin ², Xu Ziwei ²

1.Department of Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China;
2.State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, School of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

Received:2010-08-03 Revised:2010-09-07 Online:2010-11-10 Published:2010-11-10

下载PDF ( 1782 )

针对北京密云站的长期通量观测进行大孔径闪烁仪的平均印痕区域分析。首先从2008年全年8 152组湍流观测资料，以整体湍流特征量σ_w/u_*以及其他数据合理性判据进行质量控制，获得6 806组有效数据；然后用一个解析解模型逐时次计算大孔径闪烁仪的二维印痕，并进行统计平均，获得各季平均印痕分布；将当地气象条件根据风向、风速和稳定度分为12类，分别统计各类条件的平均印痕分布。最后，以实测感热通量为例，计算当地实际湍流通量的气候平均印痕区域。结果表明，当地大孔径闪烁仪的平均通量印痕季节变化不大；各类气象条件中，稳定度和风向是影响印痕区域大小和方向的重要因素，风速影响相对较小；以实际湍流通量为权重的气候平均印痕可更准确反映观测结果的空间代表性，其分布与简单平均的印痕分布有所不同。

关键词: 大孔径闪烁仪, 通量观测, 印痕, 气候平均

Mean flux footprints were analyzed for long-term measurements of a large aperture scintillometer (LAS) in Miyun county, Beijing. A set of half-hourly mean, full-year turbulence data in 2008 was used for the analysis. As a quality control, one of the integral turbulent characteristics, σ_w/u_*, was used to exclude that part of data which may violate the Monin-Obukhov similarity, in combining with other reasonability assessments. We yielded a sub-set data of 6 806 available from the total of 8 152 in the year. A footprint model based on an analytical solution was applied to calculate the 2-dimenasional footprints for the LAS measurements. Accordingly, seasonal mean footprints, as well as the mean footprints for 12 types of meteorological conditions at this site, were calculated. Wind direction, wind speed and atmospheric stability were used to determine the meteorological type. Finally, as an example, footprint climatology for sensible heat flux was derived, by averaging the footprints with the real flux measurements as the weight function. Results showed that: the mean footprint at this site varied little seasonally, stability and wind direction influenced the footprint size and location significantly while the wind speed played a relatively weak role in it. Long-term mean turbulent fluxes and their spatial representativeness can be expressed better by the flux-weighted mean footprint, which differed from the simple mean footprint slightly at this site, for the case of sensible heat flux.

Key words: Large aperture scintillometer, Flux measurement, Footprint, Climatology

中图分类号:

P456

[1] Jia Zhenzhen, Liu Shaomin, Mao Defa, et al. A study of the validation method of remotely sensed evapotranspiration based on observation data[J].Advances in Earth Science,2010,25(11):1 248-1 260.[贾贞贞,刘绍民,毛德发,等.基于地面观测的遥感监测蒸散量验证方法研究[J]. 地球科学进展,2010,25(11):1 248-1 260.]
[2] Kleissl J, Hong S H, Hendrickx J M H. New Mexico scintillometer network-Supporting remote sensing and hydrologic and meteorological models[J].Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society,2009, 9: 207-218.
[3] Timmermans W J, Su Z, Olioso A. Footprint issues in scintillometry over heterogeneous landscapes[J].Hydrology and Earth System Sciences,2009, 13(11): 2 179-2 190.
[4] Schmid H P.Footprint modeling for vegetation atmosphere exchange studies: A review and perspective[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorol, 2002, 113: 159-183.
[5] Vesala T, Kljun N, Rannik U, et al.Flux and concentration footprint modelling: State of the art[J].Environmental Pollution,2008, 152:653-666.
[6] Cai Xuhui. Footprint analysis in micrometeorology and its extended applications[J].Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences,2008,32（1）：123-132.[蔡旭晖.湍流微气象观测的印痕分析方法及其应用拓展[J].大气科学，2008，32(1): 123-132.]
[7] Meijninger W, Hartogensis O, Kohsiek W, et al. Determination of area averaged sensible heat fluxes with a large aperture scintillometer over a heterogeneous surface: Flevoland field experiment[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2002, 105: 63-83.
[8] Horst T W, Weil J C. Footprint estimation for scalar flux measurements in the atmospheric surface-layer[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1992, 59:279-296.
[9] Ezzahar J, Chehbouni A. The use of scintillometry for validating aggregation schemes over heterogeneous grids[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2009, 149(12): 2 098-2 109.
[10] Ezzahar J, Chehbouni A, Hoedjes J, et al.Combining scintillometer measurements and an aggregation scheme to estimate area-averaged latent heat flux during the AMMA experiment[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2009, 375(1/2): 217-226.
[11] Peng Guliang, Cai Xuhui, Liu Shaomin. A flux footprint model for large aperture scintillometer[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis,2007,43(6):822-827.[彭谷亮，蔡旭晖，刘绍民.大孔径闪烁仪湍流通量印痕模型的建立与应用[J].北京大学学报, 2007, 43(6): 822-827.]
[12] Kormann R, Meixner F X. An analytic footprint model for non-neutral stratification[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorololy, 2001, 99: 207-224.
[13] Wang Weizhen, Xu Ziwei, Liu Shaomin, et al. The characteristics of heat and water vapor fluxes over different surfaces in the Heihe river basin[J].Advances in Earth Science,2009,24(7):714-723.[王维真,徐自为,刘绍民,等. 黑河流域不同下垫面水热通量特征分析[J].地球科学进展,2009,24(7): 714-723.]
[14] van Ulden A P. Simple estimates for vertical diffusion from sources near the ground[J].Atmospheric Environment,1978, 12: 2125-2 129.
[15] Gryning S E, Holtslag A A M, Irwin J S, et al.Applied dispersion modelling based on meteorological scaling parameters[J]. Atmospheric Environment,1987,21: 79-89.
[16] Cai X H, Peng G L, Guo X F,et al.Evaluation of backward and forward lagrangian footprint models in the surface layer[J].Theoretical and Applied Climatology,2008, 93: 207-223.
[17] DeBruin H A R, Bink N J, Kroon L J. Fluxes in the surface layer under advective conditions[C]//Schmugge T J, Andre J C,eds. Workshop on Land Surface Evaporation Measurement and Parametrization. New York: Springer, 1991:157-169.
[18] Gockede M, Rebmann C, Foken T. A combination of quality assessment tools for eddy covariance measurements with footprint modelling for the characterisation of complex sites[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2004, 127: 175-188.
[19] Panofsky H A, Tennekes H, Lenschow D H,et al.The characteristics of turbulent velocity components in the surface layer under convective conditions′[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology,1977,11:355-361.
[20] Kaimal J C,Finnigan J. Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows: Their Structure and Measurement[M]. New York:Oxford University Press, 1994:304.
[21] Gu Xiaoxiao.Micrometeorological Characteristics and Surface Parameters over Inhomogeneous Landscape of Haihe River Basin[D]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University, 2010:89.[顾笑筱.海河流域不同下垫面微气象与地表参数特征分析[D].北京:北京师范大学，2010:89.]
[22] Chen B Z, Black T A, Coops N C, et al. Assessing tower flux footprint climatology and scaling between remotely sensed and eddy covariance measurements[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology,2009,130:137-167.

[1]	孙义博,苏德,全占军,商豪律,耿冰,林兴稳,荆平平,包扬,赵艳华,杨巍. 无人机涡动相关通量观测技术研究综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(8): 842-854.
[2]	曹沛雨, 张雷明, 李胜功, 张军辉. 植被物候观测与指标提取方法研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(4): 365-376.
[3]	罗维均, 王世杰, 刘秀明. 喀斯特洞穴系统碳循环的烟囱效应研究现状及展望 ^*[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(12): 1333-1340.
[4]	何洪林,张黎, 黎建辉, 周园春,任小丽,于贵瑞. 中国陆地生态系统碳收支集成研究的e-Science 系统构建[J]. 地球科学进展, 2012, 27(2): 246-254.
[5]	施生锦，黄彬香，刘绍民，杨燕，黄勇彬，徐自为. 大尺度水热通量观测系统的研制[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1128-1138.
[6]	徐自为，黄勇彬，刘绍民. 大孔径闪烁仪观测方法的研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1139-1147.
[7]	郑宁，张劲松，孟平，黄辉，高峻，贾长荣，任迎丰. 基于闪烁仪观测低丘山地人工混交林通量印痕与源区分布[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1175-1186.
[8]	朱治林, 孙晓敏, 贾媛媛, 温学发, 张仁华, 袁国富, 唐新斋. 基于大孔径闪烁仪（LAS）测定农田显热通量的不确定性分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1199-1207.
[9]	王维真，徐自为，李新，王介民，张智慧. 大孔径闪烁仪在黑河流域的应用分析研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1208-1216.
[10]	艾力·买买提明，何清，霍文，刘新春. 塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地LAS和EC观测感热通量对比分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1228-1236.
[11]	李远, 孙睿, 刘绍民, 徐自为, 白洁. 大孔径闪烁仪观测数据在陆面模式验证中的应用初探[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1237-1247.
[12]	刘雅妮，辛晓洲，柳钦火，周春艳. 基于多尺度遥感数据估算地表通量的方法及其验证分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1261-1272.
[13]	白洁，刘绍民，丁晓萍，卢俐. 大孔径闪烁仪观测数据的处理方法研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1148-1165.
[14]	白洁,刘绍民,丁晓萍. 海河流域不同下垫面上大孔径闪烁仪观测显热通量的时空特征分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1187-1198.
[15]	卢俐，刘绍民，徐自为，白洁，王介民. 大孔径闪烁仪和涡动相关仪观测显热通量之间的尺度关系[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1273-1282.

阅读次数

全文

摘要