地球科学进展 ›› 2010, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (11): 1228 -1236. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2010.11.1228

观测数据处理与分析 上一篇    下一篇

塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地LAS和EC观测感热通量对比分析
艾力·买买提明,何清,霍文,刘新春   
  1. 1.中国气象局乌鲁木齐沙漠气象研究所,新疆乌鲁木齐 830002;
    2.塔克拉玛干沙漠大气环境观测试验站,新疆塔中 841000
  • 收稿日期:2010-03-16 修回日期:2010-08-22 出版日期:2010-11-10
  • 通讯作者: 艾力·买买提明 E-mail:ali@idm.cn
  • 基金资助:

    公益性行业(气象)科研专项“沙漠及周边地区灾害性天气监测预报警报技术”(编号:GYHY201006012);中国气象局气象新技术推广项目“近地层沙尘通量观测方法应用推广”(编号:CMATG2010M29);国家自然科学基金项目“塔克拉玛干沙漠地气相互作用观测试验研究”(编号:40775019)资助.

Intercomparison of Sensible Heat Fluxes Measured by Large Aperture Scintillometer and Eddy Covariance System in the Hinterland of the Taklimakan Desert 

Ali Mamtimin, He Qing, Huo Wen, Liu Xinchun   

  1. 1.Institute of Desert Meteorology,CMA,Urumqi 830002,China;
    2.The Taklimakan Desert Atmospheric and Environment Observation Station,Tazhong 841000,China
  • Received:2010-03-16 Revised:2010-08-22 Online:2010-11-10 Published:2010-11-10

利用2009年6月20日至7月3日塔克拉玛干沙漠腹地塔中地区地—气相互作用观测试验中的大孔径闪烁仪(LAS)和涡动相关仪(EC)观测资料,对LAS和EC在流动沙漠地区观测的感热通量差异进行了对比分析。结果表明:LAS和EC测得的感热通量变化趋势一致,两者有很好的相关性。总体来看,LAS的感热通量测量值大于EC测得的感热通量值。如果LAS和EC测量的允许差异|△H|≤50 W/m2时,LAS和EC测量结果无显著差异的频率达79%左右。因此,LAS完全适用于流动沙漠地区大尺度的感热通量的观测研究。

 The sensible heat fluxes measured by Large Aperture Scintillometer(LAS) and Eddy Covariance system(EC) were compared. The data were collected at the Taklimakan desert atmospheric and environment OBSERVATION station located in the middle Taklimakan desert during the period of from June 20 to July 3,2009, which was supported by the Taklimakan deset Land-Atmospheric Interactive Experiment (TLAIE) project.  The results show  a similar variance trends and good agreement between sensible heat fluxes by LAS(HLAS) and EC(HEC), but  HLAS tends to be slightly higher than HEC. The probability distribution function of  HLASand HEC can be as high as 79% if the permitted difference  is in the range of -50~50 W/m2. Therefore, we  have reached the conclusion  that the large aperture scintillometer is a reliable system for measuring sensible heat flux of large quicksand area as the Taklimakan desert.

中图分类号: 

[1] Peng Guliang, Cai Xuhui, Liu Shaomin, et al. A flux footprint model for large aperture scintillometer[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis,2007, 43(6):822-827.[彭谷亮, 蔡旭晖, 刘绍民, 等. 大孔径闪烁仪的湍流通量印痕模型的建立与应用[J]. 北京大学校报:自然科学版, 2007,43(6):822-827.]
[2] Lu Li, Liu Shaomin, Sun Minzhang, et al. Advances in the study of area surface fluxes with large aperture scintillometer[J]. Advances in Earth Science,2005,20(9):932-938.[卢俐,刘绍民,孙敏章,等.大孔径闪烁仪研究区域地表通量的进展[J].地球科学进展,2005,20(9):932-938.]
[3] Zeweldi D A, Gebremichael Mekonnen, Wang Junming, et al. Inter comparison of sensible heat flux from large aperture scintillometer and eddy covariance methods:Field experiment over a homogeneous semi-arid region[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology,2009,doi 10.1007/s10546-009-9460-9.
[4] Kleissl J, Watts C J, Rodriguez J C, et al. Scintillometer inter comparison study-continued[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology,2009,doi 10.1007/s10546-009-9352-z.
[5] Watts C J,Chebbouni A, Rodriguez J C, et al. Comparison of sensible heat flux estimates using AVHRR with scintillometer measurement over semi-arid grassland in northwest Mexico[J].Agriculture and Forest Meteorology,2000,105:81-89.
[6] McAneney K J,Green A E, Astill M S. Large aperture scintillometry: The homogeneous case[J].Agriculture and Forest  Meteorology,1995,76:149-162.
[7] De Bruin H A R, Van den Hurk B J J M, Kohsiek W. The scintillation method tested over a dry vineyard area[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology,1995,76:25-40.
[8] Meijninger W M L, Hartogensis O K, Kohsiek W. Determination of area averaged sensible heat fluxes with a large aperture scintillometer over a heterogeneous surface-flevoland field experiment[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology,2002,105:37-62.
[9] Lu Li, Liu Shaomin, Xu Ziwei, et al. Results from measurements of large aperture scintillometer over different surfaces[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 2009,20(2):171-178.[卢俐,刘绍民,徐自为,等.不同下垫面大孔径闪烁仪观测数据处理与分析[J].应用气象学报,2009,20(2):171-178.]
[10] Peng  Guliang,Liu Shaomin, Cai Xuhui, et al. Footprint analysis of turbulent flux measurement over heterogeneous surface[J].Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Science,2008,32(5):1 064-1 070.[彭谷亮,刘绍民,蔡旭辉,等.非均匀下垫面湍流通量观测的印痕分析[J].大气科学,2008,32(5):1 064-1 070.]
[11] Shuang Xi, Liu Shaomin, Xu Ziwei, et al. Investigation of spatial representativeness for surface flux measurements in the Heihe river basin[J].Advances in Earth Science,2009,24(7):724-733.[双喜 ,刘绍民,徐自为 ,等.黑河流域观测通量的空间代表性研究[J].地球科学进展,2009,24(7):724-733.]
[12] Gong Lijuan, Liu Shaomin, Shuang Xi,et al. Investigation of spatial representativeness for surface flux measurements with eddy covariance system and large aperture scintillometer[J].Plateau  Meteorology,2009,28(2):246-257.[宫丽娟,刘绍民,双喜,等.涡动相关仪和大孔径闪烁仪观测通量的空间代表性[J].高原气象,2009,28(2):246-257]
[13] Wang Weizhen, Xu Ziwei, Liu Shaomin, et al. The characteristics of heat and water vapor fluxes over different surfaces in the Heihe  river basin[J]. Advances in Earth Science,2009,24(7):714-723.[王维真 ,徐自为 ,刘绍民,等. 黑河流域不同下垫面水热通量特征分析[J].地球科学进展,2009,24(7):714-723.]
[14] Zhi Keguang, Tu Gang, Lian Yi, et al. Measuring sensible heat fluxes over saline-alkali land area in Qian′an district[J].Acta Meteorologica Sinica,2002, 60 (6) : 780-785.[支克广,涂钢,廉毅,等.乾安地区盐碱地显热通量的测量[J]. 气象学报,2002, 60(6): 780-785.]
[15] Hu Liqin, Wu Rongzhang, Fang Zongyi.Large aperture scintillometer and its application to surface energy balance monitoring[J].Journal of Applied Meteorological Science,2003,14(2):197-205.[胡丽琴,吴蓉璋,方宗义.大孔径闪烁仪及其在地表能量平衡监测中的应用[J].应用气象学报,2003, 4(2):197-205.]
[16] Huang Miaofen, Liu Shaomin, Zhu Qijiang. Analysis of the factors impacting sensible heat fluxes with large aperture scintillometers[J].Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2004,18(4):133-138.[黄妙芬,刘绍民,朱启疆. LAS测定显热通量的影响因子分析[J].干旱区资源与环境, 2004, 18(4):133-138.]
[17] Wang T, Ochs G R , Clifford S F. A saturation resistant optical scintillometer to measure C2n[J]. Journal of Optical Society of America, 1978, 68(3): 334-338.
[18] Kipp&zonen.Large Aperture Scintillometer Instruction Manual[M/CD].Holland:Kipp&Zonen,2007:41-50.
[19] Yu Guirui, Sun Xiaomin. Principles of Flux Measurement in Terrestrial Ecosystems[M].Beijing: Higher Education Press,2006:165-238.[于贵瑞,孙晓敏.陆地生态系统通量观测的原理与方法[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006:165-238.]
[20] Ochs G R , Wilson J J.A second-generation large aperture scintillometer[Z]. NOAA Tech Memor, ERL ETL-232, NOAA Environmental Research Laboratories , Boulder , CO, USA ,1993.
[21] Hoedjes J C B, Chehbouni A, Ezzahar J, et al. Comparison of large aperture scintillometer and eddy covariance measurements: Can thermal infrared data be used to capture footprint-induced differences?[J].Journal of Hydro Meteorology, 2007,8:144-159.

[1] 罗维均, 王世杰, 刘秀明. 喀斯特洞穴系统碳循环的烟囱效应研究现状及展望 *[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(12): 1333-1340.
[2] 朱明佳, 赵谦益, 刘绍民, 徐同仁. 农田下垫面观测通量的变化特征及其气候学足迹分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2013, 28(12): 1313-1325.
[3] 刘倩, 高辰晶, 赵元杰, 夏训诚. 塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘红柳沙包落叶阳离子含量及气候环境变化[J]. 地球科学进展, 2013, 28(12): 1326-1334.
[4] 徐自为,黄勇彬,刘绍民. 大孔径闪烁仪观测方法的研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1139-1147.
[5] 蔡旭晖,朱明佳,刘绍民,徐自为. 大孔径闪烁仪的通量印痕分析与应用[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1166-1174.
[6] 郑宁,张劲松,孟平,黄辉,高峻,贾长荣,任迎丰. 基于闪烁仪观测低丘山地人工混交林通量印痕与源区分布[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1175-1186.
[7] 朱治林, 孙晓敏, 贾媛媛, 温学发, 张仁华, 袁国富, 唐新斋. 基于大孔径闪烁仪(LAS)测定农田显热通量的不确定性分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1199-1207.
[8] 王维真,徐自为,李新,王介民,张智慧. 大孔径闪烁仪在黑河流域的应用分析研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1208-1216.
[9] 李远, 孙睿, 刘绍民, 徐自为, 白洁. 大孔径闪烁仪观测数据在陆面模式验证中的应用初探[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1237-1247.
[10] 刘雅妮,辛晓洲,柳钦火,周春艳. 基于多尺度遥感数据估算地表通量的方法及其验证分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1261-1272.
[11] 白洁,刘绍民,丁晓萍,卢俐. 大孔径闪烁仪观测数据的处理方法研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1148-1165.
[12] 白洁,刘绍民,丁晓萍. 海河流域不同下垫面上大孔径闪烁仪观测显热通量的时空特征分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1187-1198.
[13] 卢俐,刘绍民,徐自为,白洁,王介民. 大孔径闪烁仪和涡动相关仪观测显热通量之间的尺度关系[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1273-1282.
[14] 张劲松,孟平,郑宁,黄辉,高峻. 大孔径闪烁仪法测算低丘山地人工混交林显热通量的可行性分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1283-1290.
[15] 涂钢,支克广,支平,付光极,王建平. 大气折射指数的结构参数与北方5~9月降雨的强相关现象[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1291-1295.
阅读次数
全文


摘要