储层特低渗透成因分析与评价--以安塞油田沿25区块为例

doi:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2007.11.1129

地球科学进展 ›› 2007, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (11): 1129 -1133. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2007.11.1129

高辉 ¹，宋广寿 ^1,2，孙卫 ¹，任国富 ²，张创 ¹，韩宗元 ¹

1.西北大学大陆动力学国家重点实验室，地质学系，陕西西安 710069；2.中国石油长庆油田公司，陕西西安 710021

收稿日期:2007-07-20 修回日期:2007-10-15 出版日期:2007-11-10
通讯作者: 高辉（1979-），男，陕西渭南人，博士研究生，主要从事油气田地质与开发方面的研究.E-mail：ghtopsun@yahoo.com.cn E-mail:ghtopsun@yahoo.com.cn
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划项目“多种能源矿产共存成藏（矿）机理与富集分布规律”（编号2003CB214600）；长江学者和创新团队发展计划“能源盆地油气地质”（编号IRT0559）资助.

Origin Analysis of Extra Low-Permeability and Evaluation for Example Reservoir in the Yan25 Area of Ansai Oil Field

GAO Hui ¹, SONG Guang-shou ^1,2, SUN Wei ¹, REN Guo-fu ², ZHANG Chuang ¹, HAN Zong-yuan ¹

1. The State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics of Northwest University, Department of Geology, Xi’an 710069, China; 2.Changqing Oilfield Company,PetroChina, Xi’an 710021,China

Received:2007-07-20 Revised:2007-10-15 Online:2007-11-10 Published:2007-11-10

下载PDF ( 981 )

应用测井资料和铸体薄片、扫描电镜、X-衍射、粒度分析、压汞等化验分析资料综合研究了安塞油田沿25区块长6储层的特低渗透成因和影响因素，并评价了储层储集性能。分析表明，该区块储层物性总体较差，发育粒间孔、溶蚀孔，孔隙结构类型属小孔隙、微细喉道型。其特低渗透成因主要受沉积作用和成岩作用的共同影响，具体表现为：不同沉积微相储层的物性差异较大，软组织含量大、粒度细和成分成熟度较低是造成储层特低渗透特征的主要原因。同时成岩压实、胶结作用使得储层的孔隙度、渗透性进一步减小、变差，而溶蚀作用和成岩缝的产生又在很大程度上改善了储层的特低渗透特征。根据物性和孔隙结构参数分析，将研究区储集岩分为3类，水下分流河道与河口坝砂体是主要储层分布相带。

关键词: 特低渗透成因, 成岩作用, 储层评价, 长6储层, 安塞油田

The origin of extra low-permeability and influential factors of Chang6 reservoir in the Yan25 area of Ansai Oil Field are studied synthetically through using the log information, testing and analytical information such as Casting section, scanning electron microscope, X diffraction, grain size analysis and mercury penetration et al. and then, the reservoir is evaluated. The results show that accumulation properties are worse, the reservoir mainly develops intergranular pore and emposieu, and pore structure types are fine pore and microscopic throat. Sedimentation and diagenesis have impacted on the origins of extra low-permeability together, such as accumulation properties are various in the different Sedimentary microfacies. The great content of low-energy component, fine grade and the low compositional maturity are the main reasons that cause the extra low-permeability. Compaction and cementation have decreased the porosity, then the permeability have become worse. However, denudation and fractures have improved the extra low-permeability characteristics to some great extent. According to the analysis of properties and pore structure parameters, the reservoir is classified into 3 classes, subsea river channel and mouth bar sand body are the main distributed facies belt of the reservoir.

Key words: Origin of extra low-permeability, Diagenesis, Reservoir evaluation, Chang 6 reservoir, Ansai oil field.

中图分类号:

TE348

[1]Li Daopin. The Development of the Low Permeability Sandstone Oilfield[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1997：329-332 . [李道品.低渗透砂岩油田开发[M].北京：石油工业出版社，1997：329-332.]
[2]Guo Yanqin, Li Wenhou, Chen Quanhong,et al. Oil accumulation factors of Chang6 oil reservoir of Yanchang formation of upper triassic in Ansai oilfield[J]. Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science), 2006，36（4）：639-641.[郭艳琴，李文厚，陈全红,等.安塞油田上三叠统延长组长6油藏储集因素[J].西北大学学报:自然科学版，2006，36（4）：639-641.]
[3]Li Caiyun, Li Zhongxing, Zhou Rongan,et al.Characteristics of Chang6 extra-low permeability reservoir in Ansai oilfield[J]. Journal of Xi’an Petroleum Institute (Natural Science), 2001，16（6）：30-32.[李彩云，李忠兴，周荣安,等.安塞油田长6特低渗储层特征[J].西安石油学院学报：自然科学版，2001，16（6）：30-32.]
[4]Zhao Hong, Dang Ben, Dang Rongchao,et al. Characteristics of Yanchang formation reservoir and its influence factors in Ansai oilfield[J]. Journal of Earth Sciences and Environment, 2005，27（4）：45-48. [赵虹，党犇，党永潮,等.安塞油田延长组储集层特征及物性影响因素分析[J].地球科学与环境学报，2005，27（4）：45-48.]
[5]Gao Jianbo, Pang Xiongqi, Wang Zhixin,et al. Characteristics and master control factors of petroliferous properties of low permeability clastic reservoirs of Yanchang formation in the upper Triassic of Jiyuan area in Ordos basin[J].Journal of China Univcrsity of Petroleum (Natural Science), 2007，31（1）：5-12.[高剑波，庞雄奇，王志欣,等.鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬地区延长组碎屑岩储层低渗特征及含油性主控因素[J]. 中国石油大学学报：自然科学版，2007，31（1）：5-12.]
[6]Zhang Jinliang,Lin Hui, Si Xueqiang,et al. Diagenesis of Chang6 reservoir in Wang yao area of Ansai oilfield[J].Periodical of Ocean University of China, 2004，34（4）：625-635.[张金亮，林辉，司学强,等.鄂尔多斯盆地王窑地区块上三叠统长6油层成岩作用研究[J].中国海洋大学学报，2004，34（4）：625-635.]
[7]Dang Ben, Zhao Hong, Li Wenhou. Characteristics Sedimentary microfacies in Chang6 oil-bearing formation of Yachang formation of Ansai oilfield[J]. Natral Gas Geoscience,2004，15（6）：597-600. [党犇，赵虹，李文厚.安塞油田延长组长6油层组沉积微相特征[J].天然气地球科学，2004，15（6）：597-600.]
[8]Song Ziqi, Wang Jing, Lu Xiangwei,et al. An quantitative assessment method of the Diagenetic reservoir facies in extra-low permeability oil-gas reservoir[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2006，13（2）：21-23.[宋子齐，王静，路向伟,等.特低渗透油气藏成岩储集相的定量评价方法[J].油气地质与采收率，2006，13（2）：21-23.]
[9]Yin Xin, Ying Wenmin. Reservoir evaluation for the low prosity and permeability sandstone of upper Paleozoic in the Daniudi gas field Ordos basin[J]. Journal of Mineral Petrolofy,2005 ，25（2）：104-109. [尹昕，应文敏.鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田上古生界低孔渗砂岩储层评价[J].矿物岩石，2005，25（2）：104-109.]
[10]Houseknecht D W.Assessing the relative importance of compation process sand cementation to reduction of porosity in sand-stones[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1987, 71(6): 633-642.
[11]Zhao Chenglin, Zhu Xiaomin. Sedimentary Petrography[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2005：125-137. [赵澄林，朱筱敏.沉积岩石学[M].北京：石油工业出版社，2005：125-137.]
[12]Beard D C, Weyl P K.Influence of texture on porosity and permeability of unconsolidated sand[J].AAPG Bulletin,1973, 5(2): 349-369.
[13]Li Hong, Liu Yiqun, Liu Linyu. Diagenesis of Chang 8₁reservoir with low permeability in Xifeng oilfield, Ordos basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2006，27（2）:209-217. [李红，柳益群，刘林玉.鄂尔多斯盆地西峰油田延长组长8₁低渗透储层成岩作用[J].石油与天然气地质，2006，27（2）:209-217.] 
[14]Yang Fan, Sun Yushan, Tan Xiucheng,et al. Formation mechanism of Paleogene low permeability reservoir in Dina2 gas field, Tarim Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration & Development,2005，32（2）: 39-42.[杨帆，孙玉善，谭秀成,等.迪那2气田古近系低渗透储集层形成机制分析[J].石油勘探与开发，2005，32（2）: 39-42.]

[1]	冯佳睿, 高志勇, 崔京钢, 周川闽. 库车坳陷迪北侏罗系深部储层孔隙演化特征与有利储层评价——埋藏方式制约下的成岩物理模拟实验研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(3): 305-320.
[2]	王瑞, 余克服, 王英辉, 边立曾. 珊瑚礁的成岩作用[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(3): 221-233.
[3]	郑庆华, 柳益群. 鄂尔多斯盆地华庆地区延长组长4+5致密油层成岩作用及成岩相[J]. 地球科学进展, 2015, 30(1): 78-90.
[4]	张金亮，张鹏辉，谢俊，董紫睿，张明，丁芳，袁勇，李景哲. 碎屑岩储集层成岩作用研究进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2013, 28(9): 957-967.
[5]	赖锦，王贵文，王书南，郑懿琼，吴恒，张永辰. 碎屑岩储层成岩相研究现状及进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2013, 28(1): 39-50.
[6]	胡作维，李云，黄思静，吕杰，朱炳光. 砂岩储层中原生孔隙的破坏与保存机制研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2012, 27(1): 14-25.
[7]	刘喜停，颜佳新. 铁元素对海相沉积物早期成岩作用的影响[J]. 地球科学进展, 2011, 26(5): 482-492.
[8]	朱茂旭，史晓宁，杨桂朋，李铁，吕仁燕. 海洋沉积物中有机质早期成岩矿化路径及其相对贡献[J]. 地球科学进展, 2011, 26(4): 355-364.
[9]	林春明, 张霞, 周健, 徐深谋, 俞昊, 陈召佑. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田下石盒子组储层成岩作用特征[J]. 地球科学进展, 2011, 26(2): 212-223.
[10]	黄思静,龚业超,黄可可,佟宏鹏. 埋藏历史对碳酸盐溶解—沉淀的影响——以四川盆地东北部三叠系飞仙关组和塔里木盆地北部奥陶系为例[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(4): 381-390.
[11]	黄思静,佟宏鹏,黄可可,刘丽红,张雪花. 阴极发光分析在恢复砂岩碎屑长石含量中的应用 ——鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界和川西凹陷三叠系须家河组的研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2008, 23(10): 1013-1019.
[12]	黄思静,Hairuo QING,胡作维,王春梅,郜晓勇,邹明亮,王庆东. 四川盆地东北部三叠系飞仙关组碳酸盐岩成岩作用和白云岩成因的研究现状和存在问题[J]. 地球科学进展, 2007, 22(5): 495-503.
[13]	陈红汉. “第三届国际地质流体大会(Geofluids III)”简介[J]. 地球科学进展, 2001, 16(2): 288-289.
[14]	刘立,于均民,孙晓明,杨庆杰. 热对流成岩作用的基本特征与研究意义[J]. 地球科学进展, 2000, 15(5): 583-585.

阅读次数

全文

摘要