地球科学进展 ›› 2026, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 644 -660. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2026.045   cstr: 32269.14.adearth.CN62-1091/P.2026.045

综述与评述 上一篇    下一篇

基于观测数据的闪电预报方法研究进展
姜睿娇1(), 张国平1(), 谢正帅2, 王曙东1, 黄琰1, 薛冰1, 王阔音1, 王慕华1   
  1. 1.中国气象局公共气象服务中心,北京 100081
    2.中国气象局人工影响天气中心,北京 100081
  • 收稿日期:2026-04-22 修回日期:2026-05-22 出版日期:2026-06-10
  • 通讯作者: 张国平 E-mail:jiang_ruijiao@foxmail.com;xhgm100@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(42305160);中国气象局创新发展专项资助

Research Progress in Lightning Forecasting Methods Based on Observational Data

Ruijiao Jiang1(), Guoping Zhang1(), Zhengshuai Xie2, Shudong Wang1, Yan Huang1, Bing Xue1, Kuoyin Wang1, Muhua Wang1   

  1. 1.Public Meteorological Service Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China
    2.Weather Modification Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2026-04-22 Revised:2026-05-22 Online:2026-06-10 Published:2026-09-02
  • Contact: Guoping Zhang E-mail:jiang_ruijiao@foxmail.com;xhgm100@126.com
  • About author:Jiang Ruijiao, research area includes nowcasting methods for lightning. E-mail: jiang_ruijiao@foxmail.com
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China(42305160);The Innovation and Development Project of China Meteorological Administration

闪电是强对流天气中常见的灾害性放电现象,对社会经济和人民生命财产安全构成了严重威胁,高时空分辨率、及时准确的闪电临近预报预警对防灾减灾具有重要意义。系统梳理了依托观测数据开展闪电预报的研究成果。首先从物理机理角度,归纳闪电活动与各类环境气象要素之间的关联特征。在动力环境层面,整理现有研究关于上升气流、对流有效位能、垂直风切变影响电荷分离过程和闪电发生频次的相关结论;在微物理特征层面,汇总已有成果中冰晶与霰粒碰撞起电相关机理研究,以及水成物含量、降水强度表征闪电强弱的相关结论,同时梳理闪电活动在对流系统边缘、热带气旋内部的空间分布规律。其次,分类梳理依托单一观测资料构建闪电临近预报模型的技术方案。针对雷达观测资料,整理传统质心追踪、光流算法与时序网络、生成对抗网络、条件流匹配等深度学习算法在雷达回波外推、闪电反演中的各类应用研究;针对卫星观测资料,总结依托云顶演化特征识别对流初生、预估闪电发生概率的现有研究进展;同时归纳地基闪电定位网、地面大气电场仪在局地超短临预警中的应用成效。在此基础上,进一步整理多源异构观测资料融合数值预报模式、三维语义分割模型、新一代气象大模型的跨模态融合技术研究,结合Pangu-Weather、GraphCast等全球AI气象大模型与闪电高频观测相融合的探索发现,多技术融合方案可弥补单一观测短板,有效延长预报时效、提升精细化概率预报水平。最后,归纳样本失衡、模型区域适配能力弱、物理可解释性不足等难题,并对“将对流有效位能、冰相粒子等物理约束嵌入损失函数或输入通道的‘物理约束+数据驱动’”一体化智能概率预报技术的发展方向进行展望。

Lightning is a high-impact meteorological hazard associated with severe convective weather, posing substantial threats to socioeconomic activities and public safety. Timely and accurate lightning forecasting and warning with high spatiotemporal resolution are therefore of great importance for disaster prevention and mitigation. This paper systematically reviews existing research on observation-based lightning forecasting methods. First, from a physical-mechanisms perspective, it summarizes the characteristic relationships between lightning activity and various meteorological factors. Regarding the dynamical environment, previous findings are reviewed on how updrafts, Convective Available Potential Energy (CAPE), and vertical wind shear affect charge separation processes and modulate lightning frequency. Regarding microphysical characteristics, existing studies on collision-induced charging mechanisms between ice crystals and graupel particles are synthesized, along with conclusions on the roles of hydrometeor content and precipitation intensity in characterizing lightning intensity. The spatial distribution patterns of lightning activity along the margins of convective systems and within tropical cyclones are also discussed. Second, this paper classifies and reviews technical approaches for constructing lightning nowcasting models based on single-source observational data. For radar observations, it summarizes applications of traditional centroid tracking, optical flow algorithms, and deep learning methods—including temporal networks, Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), and conditional flow matching—in radar echo extrapolation and lightning retrieval. For satellite observations, it reviews progress in identifying convective initiation and estimating lightning occurrence probability based on cloud-top evolution features. In addition, it summarizes the effectiveness of ground-based lightning location networks and atmospheric electric field mills in local ultra-short-term warning applications. On this basis, the paper further reviews studies on cross-modal fusion techniques that integrate multi-source heterogeneous observations with Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models, three-dimensional semantic segmentation models, and next-generation meteorological foundation models. Existing findings indicate that multi-source fusion approaches can compensate for the limitations of single-source observations, effectively extend forecast lead time, and improve the capability of refined probabilistic forecasting. Finally, this paper summarizes current challenges in lightning forecasting, including sample imbalance, weak regional adaptability of models, and insufficient physical interpretability. It also provides an outlook on future development directions for integrated intelligent probabilistic forecasting technologies that combine physical constraints with data-driven approaches.

中图分类号: 

图1 闪电预报技术发展时间线
Fig. 1 Timeline of lightning forecasting technology development
表1 雷达、卫星、闪电定位网与大气电场仪在闪电预报中的应用对比
Table 1 Comparison of the applications of radar, satellite, lightning location system and atmospheric electric field meter in lightning forecasting
[1] Rakov V A, Uman M A. Lightning: physics and effects[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
[2] Geng Y A, Li Q Y, Lin T Y, et al. LightNet: a dual spatiotemporal encoder network model for lightning prediction[C]// Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. Anchorage AK USA: ACM, 2019: 2 439-2 447.
[3] Wang J, Sheng Z, Zhou B H, et al. Lightning potential forecast over Nanjing with denoised sounding-derived indices based on SSA and CS-BP neural network[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2014, 137: 245-256.
[4] Zhou K H, Zheng Y G, Dong W S, et al. A deep learning network for cloud-to-ground lightning nowcasting with multisource data[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2020, 37(5): 927-942.
[5] Wang Haoliang, Liu Yubao, Zhao Tianliang, et al. Progress in lightning forecast by using numerical weather models and model outputs[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2017, 32(1): 44-55.
王昊亮, 刘玉宝, 赵天良, 等. 基于数值天气模式及其模式输出的闪电预报研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(1): 44-55.
[6] Takahashi T. Riming electrification as a charge generation mechanism in thunderstorms[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1978, 35(8): 1 536-1 548.
[7] Lang T J, Rutledge S A. Relationships between convective storm kinematics, precipitation, and lightning[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2002, 130(10): 2 492-2 506.
[8] Baker M B, Christian H J, Latham J. A computational study of the relationships linking lightning frequency and other thundercloud parameters[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1995, 121(527): 1 525-1 548.
[9] Wang C X, Zheng D, Zhang Y J, et al. Relationship between lightning activity and vertical airflow characteristics in thunderstorms[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2017, 191: 12-19.
[10] Williams E R. Large-scale charge separation in thunderclouds[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1985, 90(D4): 6 013-6 025.
[11] Dye J E, Jones J J, Weinheimer A J, et al. Observations within two regions of charge during initial thunderstorm electrification[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1988, 114(483): 1 271-1 290.
[12] Price C, Rind D. A simple lightning parameterization for calculating global lightning distributions[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 1992, 97(D9): 9 919-9 933.
[13] Kuhlman K M, Ziegler C L, Mansell E R, et al. Numerically simulated electrification and lightning of the 29 June 2000 STEPS supercell storm[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2006, 134(10): 2 734-2 757.
[14] Wiens K C, Rutledge S A, Tessendorf S A. The 29 June 2000 supercell observed during STEPS. part II: lightning and charge structure[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 2005, 62(12): 4 151-4 177.
[15] Palucki J L, Biggerstaff M I, MacGorman D R, et al. Comparison between low-flash and non-lightning-producing convective areas within a mature mesoscale convective system[J]. Weather and Forecasting, 2011, 26(4): 468-486.
[16] Clark S K, Ward D S, Mahowald N M. Parameterization-based uncertainty in future lightning flash density[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2017, 44(6): 2 893-2 901.
[17] Solomon R, Baker M. Electrification of new Mexico thunderstorms[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 1994, 122(8): 1 878-1 886.
[18] Qie X S, Toumi R, Zhou Y J. Lightning activity on the central Tibetan Plateau and its response to convective available potential energy[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2003, 48(3): 296-299.
[19] Zheng Dong, Zhang Yijun, Weitao Lü, et al. Atmospheric instability parameters and forecasting of lightning activity[J]. Plateau Meteorology, 2005, 24(2): 196-203.
郑栋, 张义军, 吕伟涛, 等. 大气不稳定度参数与闪电活动的预报[J]. 高原气象, 2005, 24(2): 196-203.
[20] Sun Ling, Zhou Yunjun, Gou Zaihua. Forecast research on cloud-to-ground lightning activity during thunderstorms in Hunan[C]// Annual Meeting of the Chinese Meteorological Society. Hangzhou, 2009.
孙凌, 周筠珺, 郭在华. 湖南雷暴天气中地闪活动的预报研究[C]// 中国气象学会年会. 杭州, 2009.
[21] Galanaki E, Kotroni V, Lagouvardos K, et al. A ten-year analysis of cloud-to-ground lightning activity over the Eastern Mediterranean region[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2015, 166: 213-222.
[22] Pawar S D, Lal D M, Murugavel P. Lightning characteristics over central India during Indian summer monsoon[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2012, 106: 44-49.
[23] Mazarakis N, Kotroni V, Lagouvardos K, et al. Storms and lightning activity in Greece during the warm periods of 2003-06[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 2008, 47(12): 3 089-3 098.
[24] Sá J A S, Almeida A C, Rocha B, et al. Lightning forecast using data mining techniques on hourly evolution of the convective available potential energy [C]// Proceedings of the Brazilian conference on intelligent systems (CBIC 2011. Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil, 2011.
[25] Romps D M, Charn A B, Holzworth R H, et al. CAPE times P explains lightning over land but not the land-ocean contrast[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2018, 45(22): 12 623-12 630.
[26] Stolz D C, Rutledge S A, Pierce J R, et al. A global lightning parameterization based on statistical relationships among environmental factors, aerosols, and convective clouds in the TRMM climatology[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2017, 122(14): 7 461-7 492.
[27] Rotunno R, Klemp J B, Weisman M L. A theory for strong,long-lived squall lines [J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1988, 45(3): 463-485.
[28] Etten-Bohm M, Yang J, Schumacher C, et al. Evaluating the relationship between lightning and the large-scale environment and its use for lightning prediction in global climate models[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2021, 126(5): e2020JD033990.
[29] Seroka G N, Orville R E, Schumacher C. Radar nowcasting of total lightning over the Kennedy space center[J]. Weather and Forecasting, 2012, 27(1): 189-204.
[30] Neumann C J. Thunderstorm forecasting at Cape Kennedy, Florida, utilizing multiple regression techniques [R]. NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS SOS-8, 1971.
[31] Carey L D, Rutledge S A. The relationship between precipitation and lightning in tropical island convection: a C-band polarimetric radar study[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2000, 128(8): 2 687-2 710.
[32] Sherwood S C, Phillips V T J, Wettlaufer J S. Small ice crystals and the climatology of lightning[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2006, 33(5). DOI:10.1029/2005GL025242 .
[33] Wang Fei, Dong Wansheng, Zhang Yijun, et al. Case study of big particles effect on lightning initiation in clouds using model[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 2009, 20(5): 564-570.
王飞, 董万胜, 张义军, 等. 云内大粒子对闪电活动影响的个例模拟[J]. 应用气象学报, 2009, 20(5): 564-570.
[34] Jiang Tao. Numerical simulation of effect of ice crystals concentration in thunderstorm cloud microphysical and charging process[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, 2015.
江涛. 冰晶浓度对雷暴云微物理和起电过程的影响的数值模拟[D]. 南京: 南京信息工程大学, 2015.
[35] Zhao Pengguo, Zhou Yunjun, Deng Dewen, et al. Numerical simulation of the effect of microphysical process of thunderstorm on electrical activity [J]. Plateau Meteorology, 2013, 32(3): 884-893.
赵鹏国, 周筠珺, 邓德文, 等. 雷暴微物理过程对电活动影响的数值模拟研究 [J]. 高原气象, 2013, 32(3): 884-893.
[36] Feng Guili, Xiushu Qie, Yuan Tie, et al. Study on lightning activity characteristics and precipitation structure of hail storms[J]. Science in China (Series D), 2007, 37(1): 123-132.
冯桂力, 郄秀书, 袁铁, 等. 雹暴的闪电活动特征与降水结构研究[J]. 中国科学: D辑, 2007, 37(1): 123-132.
[37] Yuan Tie, Xiushu Qie. TRMM-based study of lightning activity and its relationship with precipitation structure of a squall line in South China[J]. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 2010, 34(1): 58-70.
袁铁, 郄秀书. 基于TRMM卫星对一次华南飑线的闪电活动及其与降水结构的关系研究[J]. 大气科学, 2010, 34(1): 58-70.
[38] Dewan A, Ongee E T, Rafiuddin M, et al. Lightning activity associated with precipitation and CAPE over Bangladesh[J]. International Journal of Climatology, 2018, 38(4): 1 649-1 660.
[39] Mostajabi A, Finney D L, Rubinstein M, et al. Nowcasting lightning occurrence from commonly available meteorological parameters using machine learning techniques[J]. npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 2019, 2: 41.
[40] Deierling W, Latham J, Petersen W A, et al. On the relationship of thunderstorm ice hydrometeor characteristics and total lightning measurements[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2005, 76(1/2/3/4): 114-126.
[41] Tinmaker M I R, Aslam M Y, Chate D M. Lightning activity and its association with rainfall and convective available potential energy over Maharashtra, India[J]. Natural Hazards, 2015, 77(1): 293-304.
[42] Zhao P G, Xiao H, Liu C, et al. Evaluating a simple proxy for climatic cloud-to-ground lightning in Sichuan Province with complex terrain, Southwest China[J]. International Journal of Climatology, 2022, 42(7): 3 909-3 927.
[43] Dye J E, Knight C A, Johnson P. Observations of the development of precipitation-sized ice particles in northeast Colorado thunderstorms [C]// International conference on cloud physics. Boulder, Colorado, USA, 1976.
[44] Rust W D, Taylor W L, MacGorman D R, et al. Research on electrical properties of severe thunderstorms in the Great Plains[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1981, 62(9): 1 286-1 293.
[45] Krehbiel P. Corona electrification: a possible mechanism for enhancing and sustaining the electrification of thunderstorms[C]// Proceedings of the international conference on atmospheric electricity, 7th. Albany, New York, USA, 1984 .
[46] Xu W X, Zipser E J, Liu C T. Rainfall characteristics and convective properties of Mei-yu precipitation systems over South China, Taiwan, and the South China Sea. part I: TRMM observations[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2009, 137(12): 4 261-4 275.
[47] Liu D X, Qie X S, Pan L X, et al. Some characteristics of lightning activity and radiation source distribution in a squall line over North China[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2013, 132/133: 423-433.
[48] Stevenson S N, Corbosiero K L, DeMaria M, et al. A 10-year survey of tropical cyclone inner-core lightning bursts and their relationship to intensity change[J]. Weather and Forecasting, 2018, 33(1): 23-36.
[49] Pan L X, Qie X S, Wang D F. Lightning activity and its relation to the intensity of typhoons over the northwest Pacific Ocean[J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2014, 31(3): 581-592.
[50] Zhang W J, Zhang Y J, Zheng D, et al. Lightning distribution and eyewall outbreaks in tropical cyclones during landfall[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2012, 140(11): 3 573-3 586.
[51] Austin G L, Bellon A. Very-short-range forecasting of precipitation by the objective extrapolation of radar and satellite data [M]// Browning K A. Nowcasting. London: Academic Press, 1982.
[52] Rinehart R E, Garvey E T. Three-dimensional storm motion detection by conventional weather radar[J]. Nature, 1978, 273(5 660): 287-289.
[53] Li L, Schmid W, Joss J. Nowcasting of motion and growth of precipitation with radar over a complex orography[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 1995, 34(6): 1 286-1 300.
[54] Zhang Y P, Cheng M H, Xia W M, et al. Estimation of weather radar echo motion field and its application to precipitation nowcasting [C]// Proceedings of the Sino-U.S. Workshop on quantitative precipitation monitoring and forecasting, Wuhan, Hubei, China. 2005.
[55] Dixon M, Wiener G. TITAN: thunderstorm identification, tracking, analysis, and nowcasting—a radar-based methodology[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 1993, 10(6): 785-797.
[56] Johnson J T, MacKeen P L, Witt A, et al. The storm cell identification and tracking algorithm: an enhanced WSR-88D algorithm[J]. Weather and Forecasting, 1998, 13(2): 263-276.
[57] Bechini R, Chandrasekar V. An enhanced optical flow technique for radar nowcasting of precipitation and winds[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2017, 34(12): 2 637-2 658.
[58] Marzban C, Sandgathe S, Lyons H, et al. Three spatial verification techniques: cluster analysis, variogram, and optical flow[J]. Weather and Forecasting, 2009, 24(6): 1 457-1 471.
[59] Shi X J, Chen Z R, Wang H, et al. Convolutional LSTM network: a machine learning approach for precipitation nowcasting [PP/OL]. (2015-06-13)[2026-03-12]. .
[60] Shi X J, Gao Z, Lausen L, et al. Deep learning for precipitation nowcasting: a benchmark and a new model [PP/OL]. arXiv preprint (2017-06-12)[2026-03-12]. .
[61] Wang Y, Long M, Wang J, et al. PredRNN: recurrent neural networks for predictive learning using spatiotemporal LSTMs [Z]. Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017.
[62] Le Guen V, Thome N. Disentangling physical dynamics from unknown factors for unsupervised video prediction[C]// 2020 IEEE/CVF conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Seattle, WA, USA: IEEE, 2020: 11 471-11 481.
[63] Sønderby C K, Espeholt L, Heek J, et al. MetNet: a neural weather model for precipitation forecasting[PP/OL]. V2. arXiv (2020-03-30)[2026-03-10]. .
[64] Espeholt L, Agrawal S, Sønderby C K, et al. Skillful twelve hour precipitation forecasts using large context neural networks [PP/OL]. arXiv preprint (2021-11-14)[2026-03-12]. .
[65] Ravuri S, Lenc K, Willson M, et al. Skilful precipitation nowcasting using deep generative models of radar[J]. Nature, 2021, 597(7 878): 672-677.
[66] Zhang Y C, Long M S, Chen K Y, et al. Skilful nowcasting of extreme precipitation with NowcastNet[J]. Nature, 2023, 619(7 970): 526-532.
[67] Chen H, Han W, Sun H, et al. Nowcast3D: reliable precipitation nowcasting via gray-box learning [PP/OL]. ArXiv (2025-11-06) [2026-03-12]. .
[68] Ribeiro B P, Pucer J F. FlowCast: advancing precipitation nowcasting with conditional flow matching [PP/OL]. ArXiv (2025-11-12)[2026-03-02]. .
[69] Sheng Jie, Jin Ronghua, Zhang Xiaowen, et al. Verification and case evaluation of the “Fenglei” V1 meteorological nowcasting model[J]. Meteorological Monthly, 2025, 51(4): 389-399.
盛杰, 金荣花, 张小雯, 等. 临近气象预报大模型“风雷”V1版本检验及个例评估[J]. 气象, 2025,51(4): 389-399.
[70] Rombeek N, Leinonen J, Hamann U. Exploiting radar polarimetry for nowcasting thunderstorm hazards using deep learning[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2024, 24(1): 133-144.
[71] Smith S. How soon can a thunderstorm be identified?A comparison of satellite-observed cloud-top cooling and the onset of cloud-to-ground lightning[C]// Proceedings of the 18th conference on severe local storms. San Francisco, 1996 .
[72] Baker M B, Blyth A M, Christian H J, et al. Relationships between lightning activity and various thundercloud parameters: satellite and modelling studies[J]. Atmospheric Research, 1999, 51(3/4): 221-236.
[73] Zhang Chunlong, Xiao Wenan, Wang Zhenhui. Lightning forecasting indicators based on meteorological satellite observation data [C]// The 28th annual meeting of the Chinese meteorological Society. Xiamen, 2011.
张春龙, 肖稳安, 王振会. 基于气象卫星观测资料的雷电预报指标研究[C]//2011年第二十八届中国气象学会年会. 厦门, 2011.
[74] Bai Huiqing, Fang Zongyi, Wu Rongzhang, et al. Identification about four kinds of cloud systems in GMS images based on neural network[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 1998(4): 402-409.
白慧卿, 方宗义, 吴蓉璋, 等. 基于人工神经网络的GMS云图四类云系的识别[J]. 应用气象学报, 1998(4): 402-409.
[75] Tebbi M A, Haddad B. Artificial intelligence systems for rainy areas detection and convective cells’ delineation for the south shore of Mediterranean Sea during day and nighttime using MSG satellite images[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2016, 178: 380-392.
[76] Kim M, Im J, Park H, et al. Detection of tropical overshooting cloud tops using Himawari-8 imagery[J]. Remote Sensing, 2017, 9(7): 685.
[77] Zheng Yiqin, Yang Xiaofeng, Li Ziwei. Detection of severe convective cloud over sea surface from geostationary meteorological satellite images based on deep learning[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2020, 24(1): 97-106.
郑益勤, 杨晓峰, 李紫薇. 深度学习的静止卫星图像海上强对流云团识别[J]. 遥感学报, 2020, 24(1): 97-106.
[78] Mecikalski J R, Bedka K M. Forecasting convective initiation by monitoring the evolution of moving cumulus in daytime GOES imagery[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2006, 134(1): 49-78.
[79] Mecikalski J R, Li X L, Carey L D, et al. Regional comparison of GOES cloud-top properties and radar characteristics in advance of first-flash lightning initiation[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2013, 141(1): 55-74.
[80] Han H, Lee S, Im J, et al. Detection of convective initiation using meteorological imager onboard communication, ocean, and meteorological satellite based on machine learning approaches[J]. Remote Sensing, 2015, 7(7): 9 184-9 204.
[81] Lee S, Han H, Im J, et al. Detection of deterministic and probabilistic convection initiation using Himawari-8 Advanced Himawari Imager data[J]. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2017, 10(5): 1 859-1 874.
[82] Liu Y J, Xiong A Y, Liu N, et al. A dataset for machine learning model to convective initiation detection and nowcasting over southeastern China[J]. Scientific Data, 2026, 13: 557.
[83] Mecikalski J, Jewett C, Carey L, et al. An integrated 0-1 hour first-flash lightning nowcasting, lightning amount and lightning jump warning capability[C]// Proceedings of the conference on the meteorological applications of lightning data. Phoenix, Arizona, USA, 2015.
[84] Mansouri E, Mostajabi A, Tong C, et al. Lightning nowcasting using solely lightning data[J]. Atmosphere, 2023, 14(12): 1713.
[85] Li F Q, Li J, Gu S Q, et al. Nowcasting of cloud-to-ground lightning location and frequency based on a deep learning technique[J]. Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters, 2026, 19(3): 100607.
[86] Cintineo J L, Pavolonis M J, Sieglaff J M. ProbSevere LightningCast: a deep-learning model for satellite-based lightning nowcasting[J]. Weather and Forecasting, 2022, 37(7): 1 239-1 257.
[87] Song G, Li S W, Xing J. Lightning nowcasting with aerosol-informed machine learning and satellite-enriched dataset[J]. npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 2023, 6: 126.
[88] Leinonen J, Hamann U, Sideris I V, et al. Thunderstorm nowcasting with deep learning: a multi-hazard data fusion model[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2023, 50(8): e2022GL101626.
[89] Hou Rongtao, Zhu Bin, Feng Minxue, et al. Prediction model for lightning nowcasting based on DBSCAN[J]. Journal of Computer Applications, 2012(3): 847-851.
侯荣涛, 朱斌, 冯民学, 等. 基于DBSCAN聚类算法的闪电临近预报模型[J]. 计算机应用, 2012(3): 847-851.
[90] Zhou Kanghui, Zheng Yongguang, Lan Yu. Flash cell identification, tracking and nowcasting with lightning data[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 2016, 27(2): 173-181.
周康辉, 郑永光, 蓝渝. 基于闪电数据的雷暴识别、追踪与外推方法[J]. 应用气象学报, 2016, 27(2): 173-181.
[91] Liu Y, Wang J L, Song Y, et al. Lightning nowcasting based on high-density area and extrapolation utilizing long-range lightning location data[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2025, 321: 108070.
[92] Lu M Y, Jin C W, Yu M Z, et al. MCGLN: a multimodal ConvLSTM-GAN framework for lightning nowcasting utilizing multi-source spatiotemporal data[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2024, 297: 107093.
[93] Ren Zhaohuan, Lin Rui, Zhou Hao, et al. Lightning strike location prediction using a deep learning model[J]. Journal of Tropical Meteorology, 2024, 40(5): 758-766.
任照环, 林锐, 周浩, 等. 基于深度学习模型的雷电落区预报[J]. 热带气象学报, 2024, 40(5): 758-766.
[94] Lu Bingyuan. The research on the application of the data of atmospheric electric field in lightning warning[D]. Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2012.
卢炳源. 大气电场数据在雷电预警中的应用研究[D]. 成都: 电子科技大学, 2012.
[95] Da Silva F M A, Yamasaki J, Matos P D R, et al. Lightning risk warnings based on atmospheric electric field measurements in Brazil[J]. Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management, 2011, 3(3): 301-310.
[96] Tian Hao, Zhang Han, Feng Wanxing, et al. CG lightning prediction method of based on BP neural network and atmospheric electric field characteristics[J]. Insulators and Surge Arresters, 2018(6): 27-33.
田浩, 章涵, 冯万兴, 等. 基于BP神经网络和大气电场特征的地闪雷电预测方法[J]. 电瓷避雷器, 2018(6): 27-33.
[97] Zhang Y, Li H, Wang Z H, et al. A preliminary study on time series forecast of fair-weather atmospheric electric field with WT-LSSVM method[J]. Journal of Electrostatics, 2015, 75: 85-89.
[98] Xing H Y, Yang X, Zhang J Y. Thunderstorm cloud localization algorithm and performance analysis of a three-dimensional atmospheric electric field apparatus[J]. Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, 2019, 14(6): 2 487-2 495.
[99] Bao R Y, Zhang Y P, Ma B J, et al. An artificial neural network for lightning prediction based on atmospheric electric field observations[J]. Remote Sensing, 2022, 14(17): 4131.
[100] Luo Zhiyong, Yin Qiyuan, Li Xiang. Research on lightning risk early warning technology based on characteristics of atmospheric electric field signals[J]. Meteorological Monthly, 2025, 51(2): 239-248.
罗志勇, 殷启元, 李翔. 基于大气电场信号特征的雷电风险预警技术研究[J]. 气象, 2025, 51(2): 239-248.
[101] López J, Pérez E, Herrera J, et al. Thunderstorm warning alarms methodology using electric field mills and lightning location networks in mountainous regions[C]// 2012 International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP). Vienna, Austria: IEEE, 2012: 1-6.
[102] He W, Liu H J, Xu B L, et al. Application of ground electric field information in lightning forecast[M]// Future intelligent information systems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2011: 577-583.
[103] Zeng Q F, Wang Z H, Guo F X, et al. The application of lightning forecasting based on surface electrostatic field observations and radar data[J]. Journal of Electrostatics, 2013, 71(1): 6-13.
[104] Yair Y, Lynn B, Price C, et al. Predicting the potential for lightning activity in Mediterranean storms based on the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model dynamic and microphysical fields[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2010, 115(D4): 2008JD010868.
[105] McCaul E W, Goodman S J, LaCasse K M, et al. Forecasting lightning threat using cloud-resolving model simulations[J]. Weather and Forecasting, 2009, 24(3): 709-729.
[106] Tippett M K, Koshak W J. A baseline for the predictability of U.S. cloud-to-ground lightning[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2018, 45(19):10 719-10 728.
[107] Bothwell P D. Prediction of cloud-to-ground lightning in the western United States [D]. Norman, Oklahoma, USA: The University of Oklahoma, 2002.
[108] Wang F, Zhang Y J, Dong W S. A lightning activity forecast scheme developed for summer thunderstorms in South China[J]. Journal of Meteorological Research, 2010, 24(5): 631-640.
[109] Lynn B H, Yair Y, Price C, et al. Predicting cloud-to-ground and intracloud lightning in weather forecast models[J]. Weather and Forecasting, 2012, 27(6): 1 470-1 488.
[110] Fierro A O, Mansell E R, MacGorman D R, et al. The implementation of an explicit charging and discharge lightning scheme within the WRF-ARW model: benchmark simulations of a continental squall line, a tropical cyclone, and a winter storm[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2013, 141(7): 2 390-2 415.
[111] Altaratz O, Reisin T, Levin Z. Simulation of the electrification of winter thunderclouds using the three-dimensional Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS) model: single cloud simulations[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2005, 110(D20): 2004JD005616.
[112] Zhou C H, Fan L, Neri F. A spatio-temporal fusion deep learning network with application to lightning nowcasting[J]. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 2024, 31(3): 233-247.
[113] Wilson J, Xu M. Experiments in blending radar echo extrapolation and NWP for nowcasting convective storms[C]// Fourth European conference on radar in meteorology and hydrology. Barcelona, Spain, 2006.
[114] Yeung L H Y, Wong W K, Chan P K Y, et al. Applications of the Hong Kong observatory nowcasting system Swirls-2 in support of the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games[M]// Environmental science, engineering. Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2009.
[115] Lin T Y, Li Q Y, Geng Y L, et al. Attention-based dual-source spatiotemporal neural network for lightning forecast[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 158 296-158 307.
[116] Leinonen J, Hamann U, Germann U, et al. Nowcasting thunderstorm hazards using machine learning: the impact of data sources on performance[J]. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2022, 22(2): 577-597.
[117] Fan L, Zhou C H. Cloud-to-ground and intra-cloud nowcasting lightning using a semantic segmentation deep learning network[J]. Remote Sensing, 2023, 15(20): 4981.
[118] Bi K, Xie L, Zhang H, et al. Accurate medium-range global weather forecasting with 3D neural networks [J]. Nature, 2023, 619(7 970): 533-538.
[119] Lam R, Sanchez-Gonzalez A, Willson M, et al. Learning skillful medium-range global weather forecasting [J]. Science, 2023, 382(6 677): 1 416-1 421.
[120] Li Yiran, Li Qingyong, Zheng Dong, et al. Lightning prediction method based on gated spatio-temporal fusion network based on meteorological large model[J]. Science China: Earth Sciences, 2025, 55(9): 3 086-3 103.
李怡然, 李清勇, 郑栋, 等. 基于气象大模型的门控时空融合网络闪电预报方法[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2025, 55(9): 3 086-3 103.
[121] Raissi M, Perdikaris P, Karniadakis G E. Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations[J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2019, 378: 686-707.
[122] Willard J, Jia X W, Xu S M, et al. Integrating scientific knowledge with machine learning for engineering and environmental systems[J]. ACM Computing Surveys, 2023, 55(4): 1-37.
[123] Brecht R, Bihlo A. M-ENIAC: a physics-informed machine learning recreation of the first successful numerical weather forecasts [J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2024, 51(10): e2023GL107718.
[124] Verma Y, Heinonen M, Garg V. ClimODE: climate and weather forecasting with physics-informed neural ODEs[C]// Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2024. Vienna, Austria, 2024.
[125] Luo Y T, Fang S, Wu B, et al. Physics-guided learning of meteorological dynamics for weather downscaling and forecasting[C]// Proceedings of the 31st ACM SIGKDD conference on knowledge discovery and data mining V.2. ACM. New York, NY, USA, 2025: 2010-2020.
[1] 房宸蔚, 史月琴, 谭超, 沈淑婧, 李扬. 基于深度学习的云特性短临预报研究与应用进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2026, 41(5): 482-499.
[2] 李璐, 黄彦铭, 张锦昌. 基于YOLOv8的海底磁异常条带自动识别方法研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2026, 41(4): 441-454.
[3] 潘林林, 靳双龙, 宋宗朋, 丁煌, 胡睿, 肖子牛, 杜杰, 杨静, 包庆, 王勃. 风能和太阳能短中期气象预报技术及其最新进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2026, 41(1): 73-86.
[4] 邓乃尔, 徐浩, 周文, 唐小川, 陈雨露, 刘永旸, 刘绍军, 张益, 蒋柯, 刘瑞崟, 宋威国. 基于深度学习的页岩黄铁矿扫描电镜图像分割及环境指示意义:以四川盆地泸州Ι区为例[J]. 地球科学进展, 2024, 39(5): 476-488.
[5] 黄春林, 侯金亮, 李维德, 顾娟, 张莹, 韩伟孝, 王维真, 温小虎, 朱高峰. 深度学习融合遥感大数据的陆地水文数据同化:进展与关键科学问题[J]. 地球科学进展, 2023, 38(5): 441-452.
[6] 黄亦鹏,李万彪,赵玉春,白兰强. 基于雷达与卫星的对流触发观测研究和临近预报技术进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(12): 1273-1287.
[7] 王昊亮, 刘玉宝, 赵天良, 郭凤霞, 冯双磊, 王勃. 基于数值天气模式及其模式输出的闪电预报研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(1): 44-55.
阅读次数
全文


摘要