地球科学进展 ›› 2003, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (6): 884 -890. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2003.06.0884

所属专题: 青藏高原研究——青藏科考虚拟专刊

研究论文 上一篇    下一篇

青藏高原隆起和高山栎组(壳斗科)分布的关系
周浙昆,普春霞,陈文允   
  1. 中国科学院昆明植物研究所,云南 昆明 650204
  • 收稿日期:2003-01-28 修回日期:2003-06-16 出版日期:2003-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 周浙昆 E-mail:zhouzk@public.km.yn.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目“高山栎组分布区的形成发展与横断山抬升的相互关系”(编号:30170077);中国科学院知识创新项目“横断山及其邻近地区生物多样性起源、演化及可持续利用”(编号:KSCX2-1-09)资助.

RELATIONSHIPS RETWEEN THE DISTRIBUTIONS OF QUERCUS SECT HETEROBALANUS(FAGACEAE)AND UPLIFT OF HIMALAYAS

Zhou Zhekun,Pu Chunxia,Chen Wenyun   

  1. Kunming Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650204, China
  • Received:2003-01-28 Revised:2003-06-16 Online:2003-12-20 Published:2003-12-01

高山栎是一类硬叶常绿的栎属植物,集中分布在横断山区,是这一地区群落中的优势种和建群种。高山栎组分布区的形成和喜马拉雅的隆起、横断山的形成有密切关系。讨论了这种相互关系。先清理了高山栎分类学的混乱,将原来的12种高山栎归并为 9种,在此基础上讨论了高山栎的现代分布和系统位置,总结分析了高山栎的地史资料。认为高山栎组植物出现的时间不晚于中新世,在中新世高山栎组已经有了较广的分布,分布在当时的亚热带常绿阔叶林。在上新世,随着喜马拉雅山脉的隆起和抬升,横断山地区的环境发生了巨大的变化,环境变冷、变旱。高山栎组植物由于自身所具有的抗寒耐旱的形态特征,如被较厚的毛被,单位面积气孔数目较少等使之在生物竞争中成为优胜者,而逐步成为横断山地区群落中的优势种和建群种。并以已有地质学、古植物学、形态解剖学、植物地理学和分子生物学的证据论证了这一假说。

Quercus sect. Heterobalanus (Oerst.) Menits. is a group of oaks consisting of 9 species. They are distributed from Chiang Mai in Thailand to southwest China, Burma, India, Bhutan, Nepal and Afghanistan. However, they are mainly concentrated in eastern Himalayan areas, particularly in the Hengduan Mountains. They are dominant elements in vegetation types of Hengduan mountains. Relationships between the distributions of the section and uplift of Himalayas are discussed in the present paper. Taxonomical revision is carried out at first and 12 species of the section are reduced to 9. Based on taxonomical revision, the modern distribution, fossil history and systematic position of the section are discussed. The fossil record of this section extended back to the Miocene. Early fossil oaks of this section were found mixed with other oaks or Fagaceae, which formed evergreen broad-leaf forests in subtropical region of China and east Asia. The younger fossil (the Late Miocene) records showed that oaks of this section had become the dominant element in floras. A hypothesis was proposed that Sect. Heterobalanus had its origins in these subtropical broad-forests. This type of forest was widely distributed in many regions including the Hengduan Mountains. After the Tertiary Indian plate collided with Eurasia it caused the uplifting of Himalayas and the formation of the Hengduan Mountains where the climate became cold and dry. Such an environment was not ideal for most broad-leaf evergreen trees. However, oaks of sect. Heterobalanus, having obvious xerophytic characters such as dense hairs, thick cuticles, lignified epidermal cell walls and cuticles, and low stomatal density, were adapted to such an environment and therefore became dominant elements in the Hengduan Mountain regions. This hypothesis is partly supported by modern distribution, fossil history and AFLP evidences.

中图分类号: 

[1] Camus A. Les chenes monographie du Genre Quercus (et Lithocarpus)[M]. Paris: Academic des Sciences, 1934-1954.158-373

[2] Xu Yongchun, Huang ChengJiu, Ren Xianwei, et al. Fagaceae[A]. In: Zheng WanJun ed. Sylva Sincia(Vol.2)[C]. Beijing: Forestry Publishing House, 1985.2 198-2 357.[徐永椿,黄成就,任宪威,.壳斗科[A].:郑万钧主编.中国树木志(第二卷)[C]. 北京: 林业出版社, 1985.2 198-2 357.]

[3] Zhou Zhekun. Geographical distribution of Quercus from China[J]. Journal of Graduate School Academia Sinica,1993,10(1):95-102.[周浙昆.中国栎属的地理分布[J] .中国科学院研究生院学报,1993,10(1):95-102.]

[4] Zhou Zhekun, Willkinson H P, Wu Zhengyi. Taxonomical and evolutionary implications of the leaf anatomy and architecture of Quercus L. Subgenus Quercus from China[J]. Cathaya, 1995,7:1-34

[5] Huang Chengchiu, Chang Yongtian, Hsu Yongchun, et al. Fagaceae[A]. In : Chun Woonyong, Huang Chengchiu eds. Flora of China(Vol. 22)[C]. Beijing: Science Press,1998.213-332.[黄成就,张永田,徐永椿等. 壳斗科[A].: 陈焕镛,黄成就编.中国植物志(22)[C] 北京:科学出版社,1998.213-332.]

[6] Manos P S, Zhou Zhoukun, Cannon C H. Systematics of Fagaceae: phylogenetic tests of reproductive trait evolution[J]. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 2001, 162(6): 1 361-1 379

[7] Jin Zhenzhou. A Mossy Forest appearing the Sclerophyllous Evergreen Broad-Leaf Forest-Quercetum pannosum nimborum[J]. Acta Botanica Yunnanica,1981,3(1): 75-88 [金振洲.硬叶常绿阔叶林的苔藓林——黄背栎、云生兔儿风群丛[J].云南植物研究,1981,3(1): 75-88.]

[8] Jin Zhenzhou. The Sclerophyllous Evergreen Broad-Leaf Forest[A]. In:Wu Zhenyi, Zhu Yancheng eds. Yunnan[C]. Beijing: Science Press, 1987.[金振洲.硬叶常绿阔叶林[A]. : 吴征镒,朱彦丞主编.云南植被[C]. 北京:科学出版社,1987.]

[9] Jin Zhenzhou, Ou Puding. The Sclerophyllous Evergreen Broad-Leaf Forest in China[J]. Journal of Yunnan University,1981, 2:13-20.[金振洲,区普定. 我国的硬叶常绿阔叶林[J]. 云南大学学报,1981, 2:13-20.]

[10] Yang Qinzhou. The characteristics and classification of oak durisilver in the Himalayan region of China[J]. Acta Phytoecologica et Geobotanica Sinica, 1990, 14(3): 197-210.[杨钦周.中国喜马拉雅地区硬叶栎林的特点与分布[J]. 植物生态学与地植物学学报, 1990,14(3): 197-210.]

[11] Zhou Zhoukun. The Fossil History of Quercus[J]. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 1993,15(1): 21-23.[周浙昆.栎属的历史植物地理学研究[J]. 云南植物研究,1993,15(1): 21-23.]

[12] Manos P S, Doyle J J, Nixon K C. Phylogeny, biogeography, and processes of molecular differentiation in Quercus Subgenus Quercus(Fagaceae)[J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1999,12(3) : 333-349

[13] Xu Ren, Tao Junrong, Sun Xiangjun. On the discovery of a Quercus semicarpifolia bed in mount Shiha Pangma and its significance in botany and geology[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica, 1973,15(1): 103-114.[徐仁,陶君容,孙湘君. 希夏邦马峰高山栎化石层的发现及在植物学和地质学上的意义[J].植物学报,1973 ,15(1): 103-114.]

[14] Li Haomin, Guo Shuangxing. The Miocene flora Namling of Xizang[J]. Acta Palaeontological Sinica, 1976 ,15(4): 598-609. [李浩敏,郭双兴. 西藏南木林中新世植物群[J]. 古生物学报,1976 ,15(4): 598-609.]

[15] The writing group of Cenozoic plant in Chinaabbrev.WGCPC.Cenozoic plants from China, Fossil plants of China 3[M]. Beijing: Sciences Press,1978.42-57.[中国新生代植物篇写组.中国植物化石(第三册)——中国新生代植物化石[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1978.42-57.]

[16] Tao Junrong, Kong Zhaochen. The fossil and sporp-pollen assemblage of the Shang-in coal series of Erhyuan, Yunnan[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica,1973,151:120-126.[陶君容,孔昭宸. 云南洱源三营煤系的植物化石和孢粉组合[J].植物学报, 1973,151:120-126.]

[17] Tao Junrong. Tertiary Plant From China[A]. In: Li Yuntong, et al eds. Chinese Stratigraphy 13, Chinese Tertiary[C]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1984.314-317.[陶君容.中国第三纪的植物[A].:李云通等编著.中国地层13中国的第三系[C].北京:地质出版社,1984.314-317.]

[18] Tao Junrong. Neogene flora of Lanping and its significance in middle watershed of Salween-Mekong-yangtze Rivers[A]. In: the Comprehensive Scientific Expedition to the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Scientific Expedition Special Issue of Henghuan Mountains 2[C]. Beijing: Science & Technology Press, 1986.58-65. [陶君容.横断山区中段——兰坪新第三纪植物化石群及意义[A]. :中国科学院青藏高原综合科学考察队,横断山考察专集(二)[C]. 北京:北京科学技术出版社,1986.58-65.]

[19] Zhou Zhoukun. A taxonomical revision of fossil evergreen sclerophyllous oaks from China[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica,1992 ,34(12): 54-961.[周浙昆.硬叶常绿高山栎类化石的分类研究[J].植物学报,1992,34(12): 54-961.]

[20] Zhou Zhoukun. Fossil of the Fagaceae and their implication in systematics and biogeography[J]. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica,1999,374: 369-385.[周浙昆.壳斗科的地质历史及其系统学和植物地理学意义[J].植物分类学报,1999 ,374: 369-385.]

[21] Tao Junrong, Zhou Zhekun, Liu Yusheng. The Evolution of the Late Cretaceous-Cenozoic Floras in China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2000.1-205.[陶君容,周浙昆,刘裕生.中国晚白垩世至新生代植物区系发展演变[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2000.1-205.]

[22] He Jinsheng, Chen Weilie. Morphological and anatomical features of Quercus section Suber and its adaptation to the ecological environment[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica,1994,181: 94-97.[贺金生,陈伟烈. 高山栎的形态和解剖特征以及和对生态环境的适应[J]. 植物生态学报, 1994,181: 94-97.]

[23] Menitski L I. Oak of Asia[M]. Leningosd Sciences,1984. 89-97.

[24] Huang ChengJiu, Zhang Yongtian, Bartholomew B. Fagaceae[A]. In: Wu Zhenyi, Raven P H eds. Flora of China (Vol.4)[C]. Beijing: Science Press,1999.370-400

[25] Li Jin, Chen Keyong, Li Posheng. The variation of genetic diversity of Quercus aquifolioides in different elevations [J]. Acta Botanica Sinica,1998,40(8): 761-767.[李进,陈可咏,李勃生. 不同海拔高度川滇高山栎群体遗传多样性变化[J].植物学报,1998,40(8): 761-767.]

[26] Zhang Jihui. Paleophyte[A]. In: Guizhou Branch Atlas(2), Atlas of Paleobiology of SW China[C]. Beijing: Science Press,1978.488-490. [张吉惠.古植物[A].:西南地区古生物图册,贵州分册(二)[C].北京:科学出版社,1978.488-490.]

[27] Pu Chunxia, Zhou Zhekun, Luo Yan. A Cladistic Analysis of Quercus (Fagaceae) in China Based on Leaf Epidermis and Architecture[J]. Acta Botanica Yunnanica,2002,246: 689-698. [普春霞, 周浙昆, 罗艳. 中国栎属(壳斗科)基于叶表皮及叶结构特征的分支分析[J]. 云南植物研究, 2002,246:689-698.]

[28] Li Jianqiang. On the phylogeny of the Fagaceae[J]. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica,1996,346:597-609.[李建强. 论山毛榉科植物的系统发育[J].植物分类学报,1996,346:597-609.]

[29] Axelrod D I. Evolution and Biologeography of Madrean-Tethphyan Sclerophyll vegetation [J]. Annual Missouria Botany Garden, 1973, 63: 280- 334

[30] Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences. The Tertiary System of China[A]. In: Stratigraphy of China(No.1):An outline of the stratigraphy in China[C]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1982. 383-418.[中国地质科学院.中国的第三系[A].:中国地层(一):中国地层概论[C]. 北京: 地质出版社,1982. 383-418.]

[31] The Editorial Committee of Chinese Physical Geography of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Paleography(Vol.1) [A]. In: Chinese Physcial Geography[C]. Beijing: Science Press,1984

.1-197.[中国科学院《中国自然地理》编辑委员会. 古地理(上册)[A].:中国自然地理[C]. 北京: 科学出版社,1984.1-197.]

[1] 王俏懿,马耀明,王宾宾,左洪超. 喜马拉雅南北坡地区地表能量通量及蒸散发量对比分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(8): 810-825.
[2] 白玲,宋博文,李国辉,江勇. 喜马拉雅造山带地震活动及其相关地质灾害[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(6): 629-639.
[3] 王晓先, 张进江, 王佳敏. 喜马拉雅早古生代岩浆事件:以吉隆和聂拉木眼球状片麻岩为例[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(4): 391-402.
[4] 刘新,刘晓汝,马耀明,李伟平. 喜马拉雅北部地区春季大气特征及日变化分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(8): 836-843.
[5] 张新钰,季建清,韩宝福,陈建军,余绍立. 地表剥蚀、下地壳流变与造山作用研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(5): 521-531.
[6] 秦建华;冉敬;沈敢富;杜谷. 喜马拉雅河流Sr同位素异常源岩研究现状及研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(3): 262-268.
[7] E. Vuillermoz,L. Bertolani,C. Smiraglia,GP. Verza,G. Tartari,A. Marinoni. SHARE-Asia自动气象站网络:喜马拉雅山—喀喇昆仑山地区气候研究的一个必要组成部分[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(12): 1244-1253.
[8] 秦建华,冉敬,沈敢富,杜谷. 喜马拉雅河流Sr同位素异常源岩研究现状及研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(03): 262-268.
[9] 任留东;陈炳蔚. 高喜马拉雅变质岩“夕线石带”的地质意义[J]. 地球科学进展, 2004, 19(5): 715-721.
阅读次数
全文


摘要