地球科学进展 ›› 2022, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (10): 1066 -1078. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2022.071

欠发达山区SDG实现路径研究 上一篇    下一篇

特色产业助力欠发达山区 SDGs实现
赵雪雁 1( ), 王鹤霖 1, 高峰 2, 王鹏龙 2, 王宝 2   
  1. 1.西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院,甘肃 兰州 730070
    2.中国科学院西北生态环境研究院 文献情报中心,甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-09 修回日期:2022-09-12 出版日期:2022-10-10
  • 基金资助:
    中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(A类)(XDA19040502);国家自然科学基金项目“多维脱贫干预对贫困山区农户可持续生计的作用机制研究”(41971268)

Realization of Sustainable Development Goals in the Tea Industry: A Case Study of Lincang City, Yunnan Province

Xueyan ZHAO 1( ), Helin WANG 1, Feng GAO 2, Penglong WANG 2, Bao WANG 2   

  1. 1.College of Geography and Environment Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
    2.Lanzhou Information Center, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2022-06-09 Revised:2022-09-12 Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-10-18
  • About author:ZHAO Xueyan (1971-), female, Wudu County, Gansu Province, Professor. Research area includes ecological economy. E-mail: zhaoxy@nwnu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences “Construction of China’s SDGs evaluation index system based on Earth big data”(XDA19040502);The National Natural Science Foundation of China “Research on the mechanism of multidimensional poverty alleviation intervention on the sustainable livelihood of rural households in poor mountainous areas”(41971268)

发展特色产业,不仅是促进乡村振兴的关键手段,更是推动区域经济、社会和环境可持续发展的重要举措。以国家可持续发展议程创新示范区云南省临沧市为例,采用固定效应模型分析茶产业对联合国可持续发展目标(SDGs)的影响,探讨茶产业助力临沧市可持续发展目标的实现路径,旨在为欠发达山区实现可持续发展目标提供决策依据。结果表明:2010—2020年临沧市茶叶种植面积和产量均呈显著增加趋势,但茶叶产量的增长率逐年下降。从空间分布来看,茶叶种植面积总体呈“东高西低”的分布特征,而茶叶产量总体呈“北高南低”的分布特征;茶产业有利于临沧市经济、社会和环境维度部分SDGs的实现,但在社会维度,对区域层面的SDGs[SDG1.4.1(村路公路硬化率)、SDG3.2.1(5岁以下儿童死亡率)、SDG10.1.1(城乡可支配收入比)]影响不显著;茶产业在经济发展低水平地区对SDG1.1.1(农村人均可支配收入)、SDG1.2.1(脱贫率)、SDG2.1.1(农村居民恩格尔系数)和SDG8.5.1(乡村从业人数)的影响显著大于经济发展高水平地区;未来,茶产业可通过构建全产业链、推动茶产业数字化以及建设绿色生态茶园为路径,推动临沧市可持续发展目标的全面实现。

The development of key industries is a crucial strategy to promote rural revitalization and an important measure to promote the economic, social, and environmental sustainability of a region. In this study, Lincang City, representing an innovation demonstration area of the National Sustainable Development Agenda, was used as a case study. We used a fixed effect model to analyze the influence of the tea industry on SDGs and discuss the realization path of SDGs linked to the tea industry. We aimed to provide a decision-making framework for the realization of SDGs in underdeveloped mountainous regions. The results indicated the following: between 2010 and 2020, both the planting area and yield of tea increased significantly, but the annual growth rate and yield decreased. In terms of spatial distribution, the tea planting area was “high in the east and low in the west”, whereas the tea yield was “high in the north and low in the south”; the tea industry is conducive to the achievement of certain SDGs in the economic, social, and environmental dimensions of Lincang City; however, in the social dimension, it has no significant impact on the SDGs at the regional level; in regions with a low level of economic development, the effects of the tea industry on SDG1.1.1, SDG1.2.1, SDG2.1.1, and SDG8.5.1 were significantly greater than those in areas with high levels of economic development; the tea industry could promote the full realization of SDGs by developing an entire industrial chain, promoting the integrated development of tea tourism, and constructing green and ecological tea gardens.

中图分类号: 

图1 特色产业助推乡村可持续发展的理论框架
Fig. 1 Theoretical framework for characteristic industries to promote sustainable rural development
图2 临沧市概况图
Fig. 2 The study area of Lincang
表1 变量的描述性统计
Table 1 Descriptive statistics of each variable
维度 指标 变量(地方化指标) 均值 标准差
经济 SDG1.1.1(生活在国际贫困线以下的人口比例) SDG1.1.1(农村人均可支配收入)/元 7 751.075 3 094.612
SDG2.3.1(按农业/畜牧/林业规模分类的每个 劳动单位的生产力) SDG2.3.1(农业总产值)/万元 202 644.862 140 145.724
SDG8.4.1(物质足迹、人均物质足迹和单位国内生产总值的物质足迹) SDG8.4.1(GDP)/万元 63.456 35.822
社会 SDG1.2.1(国家贫穷线以下人口的比例) SDG1.2.1(脱贫率)/% 42.292 34.512
SDG1.4.1(其家庭可获得基本服务的人口比例) SDG1.4.1(村路公路硬化率)/% 70.862 20.065
SDG2.1.1(营养不足发生率) SDG2.1.1(农村居民恩格尔系数) 0.455 0.163
SDG3.2.1(5岁以下儿童死亡率) SDG3.2.1(5岁以下儿童死亡率)/% 2.596 1.580
SDG8.5.1(雇员平均每小时收入) SDG8.5.1(乡村从业人数)/人 155 682.941 61 081.736
SDG10.1.1(最底层40%人口和总人口的家庭 支出或人均收入增长率) SDG10.1.1(城乡可支配收入比)/% 3.036 0.832
环境 SDG15.1.1(森林面积占陆地总面积的比例) SDG15.1.1(森林面积占陆地总面积的比例)/% 65.560 6.424
SDG15.4.1(保护区内山区生物多样性的重要 场地的覆盖情况) SDG15.4.2(植被覆盖度NDVI) 0.684 0.052
茶产业 茶叶产量/t 132 124.948 85 712.029
茶叶产值/万元 30 594.455 61 272.047
茶叶种植面积/hm2 11 650.501 4 871.442
自然资源禀赋 人均林地面积/hm2 0.277 0.347
公共服务水平 每千人医疗卫生机构床位数/个 4.283 3.489
经济结构 第一产业占GDP比重/% 0.500 0.134
劳动力素质 乡村劳动力数量/个 157 309.394 60 400.086
高中少数民族在校学生比例/% 46.064 19.499
图3 临沧市茶叶种植面积和产量
Fig. 3 Cultivation area and yield of tea in Lincang City
图4 临沧市茶叶种植面积的空间分布
Fig. 4 Spatial distribution of tea planting area in Lincang City
图5 临沧市茶叶产量的空间分布
Fig. 5 Spatial distribution of tea yield in Lincang City
表2 面板固定效应模型估计结果
Table 2 Estimation results of panel fixed effect model
表3 稳健性检验回归结果
Table 3 Stability test regression results
表4 混合 OLS模型检验结果
Table 4 Test results of mixed OLS model
表5 分样本回归结果
Table 5 Subsample regression results
图6 茶产业助推SDGs的实现路径
Fig. 6 Realization path of SDGs boosted by tea industry
1 WU Dafang, HU Yue, LIU Yanyan, et al. Empirical study on the coupling coordination between development intensity and resources-and-environment carrying capacity of core cities in Pearl River Delta[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2020, 35(1): 82-94.
吴大放, 胡悦, 刘艳艳, 等. 城市开发强度与资源环境承载力协调分析: 以珠三角为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(1): 82-94.
2 World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). Our common future[R]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.
3 The General Assembly of the United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development[R]. United Nations, 2015.
4 WANG Muxin, PANG Deliang. Research on the impact of industrial policy on total factor productivity of enterprises[J]. Economic Review Journal, 2019(12): 116-123.
王睦欣, 庞德良. 乡村经济多元化发展及其推进路径研究[J]. 经济纵横, 2019(12): 116-123.
5 WANG Penglong, GAO Feng, HUANG Chunlin, et al. Progress on sustainable city assessment index system for SDGs[J]. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 2018, 33(5): 784-792.
王鹏龙, 高峰, 黄春林, 等. 面向SDGs的城市可持续发展评价指标体系进展研究[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2018, 33(5): 784-792.
6 SHAO Chaofeng, CHEN Sihan, GAO Junli, et al. Design of China’s sustainable development evaluation index system based on the SDGs[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2021, 31(4): 1-12.
邵超峰, 陈思含, 高俊丽, 等. 基于SDGs的中国可持续发展评价指标体系设计[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2021, 31(4): 1-12.
7 WANG Hongshuai, LI Shantong. Analysis of relationship types among Sustainable Development Goals[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2021, 31(9): 154-160.
王红帅, 李善同. 可持续发展目标间关系类型分析[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2021, 31(9): 154-160.
8 WU X, FU B, WANG S, et al. Decoupling of SDGs followed by re-coupling as sustainable development progresses[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2022, 5: 452-459.
9 LU Shanlong, JIA Li, JIANG Yunzhong, et al. Progress and prospect on monitoring and evaluation of united nations SDG 6 (clean water and sanitation) target[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2021, 36(8): 904-913.
卢善龙, 贾立, 蒋云钟, 等. 联合国可持续发展目标6(清洁饮水与卫生设施)监测评估:进展与展望[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2021, 36(8): 904-913.
10 LIU X X, ZHAO W W, LIU Y X, et al. Contributions of ecological programs to sustainable development goals in Linzhi, over the Tibetan Plateau: a mental map perspective[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2022, 176: 106532.
11 WOOD S L R, JONES S K, JOHNSON J A, et al. Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the Sustainable Development Goals[J]. Ecosystem Services, 2018, 29: 70-82.
12 CHENG Qingping, ZHONG Fanglei, ZUO Xiaoan, et al. Evaluation of water resources carrying capacity of Heihe River Basin combining beautiful China with SDGs[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(1): 204-214.
程清平, 钟方雷, 左小安, 等. 美丽中国与联合国可持续发展目标(SDGs)结合的黑河流域水资源承载力评价[J]. 中国沙漠, 2020, 40(1): 204-214.
13 CRISTÓBAL J, EHRENSTEIN M, DOMÍNGUEZ-RAMOS A, et al. Unraveling the links between public spending and Sustainable Development Goals: insights from data envelopment analysis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 786(2): 147459.
14 HILSON G, MACONACHIE R. Artisanal and small-scale mining and the Sustainable Development Goals: opportunities and new directions for sub-Saharan Africa[J]. Geoforum, 2020, 111: 125-141.
15 YIN C C, ZHAO W W, PEREIRA P. Soil conservation service underpins Sustainable Development Goals[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2022, 33: e01974.
16 OFOSU G, SARPONG D. Mineral exhaustion, livelihoods and persistence of vulnerabilities in ASM settings[J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2022, 92: 154-163.
17 YANG Yadong, LUO Qiyou, Runqi LUN, et al. Research on the development dynamic mechanism of rural advantageous characteristic industry from the perspective of system analysis[J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2020, 41(12): 61-73.
杨亚东, 罗其友, 伦闰琪, 等. 乡村优势特色产业发展动力机制研究: 基于系统分析的视角[J]. 农业经济问题, 2020, 41(12): 61-73.
18 ZHENG Zhilai. Development path innovation of targeted poverty alleviation with industry with ethnic features in minority nationality areas under the perspective of “Internet +”[J]. Contemporary Economic Management, 2018, 40(7): 35-39.
郑志来. “互联网+”视角下民族地区特色产业精准扶贫发展路径创新[J]. 当代经济管理, 2018, 40(7): 35-39.
19 WU Nalin, LI Li, LI Erling, et al. The spatial continuity of specialized plantation: a case study of raspberry farm in Fengqiu County, Henan Province[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018, 38(3): 428-436.
吴娜琳, 李立, 李二玲, 等. 特色种植的空间持续性及其影响因素研究: 以河南省封丘县树莓产业为例[J]. 地理科学, 2018, 38(3): 428-436.
20 MA Caihong, YUAN Qianying, WEN Qi, et al. Impact of agriculture industrial development on farmers’ livelihood: based on the research of four migrant villages in Hongsibu District, Ningxia[J]. Progress in Geography, 2021, 40(5): 784-797.
马彩虹, 袁倩颖, 文琦, 等. 乡村产业发展对农户生计的影响研究: 以宁夏红寺堡区为例[J]. 地理科学进展, 2021, 40(5): 784-797.
21 SANTIKA T, WILSON K A, LAW E A, et al. Impact of palm oil sustainability certification on village well-being and poverty in Indonesia[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2021, 4: 109-119.
22 ZADA M, SHAH S, CAO Y K, et al. Impact of small-to-medium size forest enterprises on rural livelihood: evidence from khyber-pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan[J]. Sustainability, 2019, 11(10): 2989.
23 KHANAL U, WILSON C, RAHMAN S, et al. Smallholder farmers’ adaptation to climate change and its potential contribution to UN’s Sustainable Development Goals of zero hunger and no poverty[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 281: 124999.
24 JAHAN H, RAHMAN M W, ISLAM M S, et al. Adoption of agroforestry practices in Bangladesh as a climate change mitigation option: investment, drivers, and SWOT analysis perspectives[J]. Environmental Challenges, 2022, 7: 100509.
25 KNICKEL K, MARÉCHAL A. Stimulating the social and environmental benefits of agriculture and forestry: an EU-based comparative analysis[J]. Land Use Policy, 2018, 73: 320-330.
26 AHIRWAL J, SAHOO U K, THANGJAM U, et al. Oil palm agroforestry enhances crop yield and ecosystem carbon stock in northeast India: implications for the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals[J]. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2022, 30: 478-487.
27 GERLITZ J Y, MACCHI M, BROOKS N, et al. The Multidimensional Livelihood Vulnerability Index—an instrument to measure livelihood vulnerability to change in the Hindu Kush Himalayas[J]. Climate and Development, 2017, 9(2): 124-140.
28 DING Jianjun, WANG Zhang, YU Fangwei, et al. Targeted poverty alleviation drives the process and mechanism of rural reconstruction: a case study of Shibadong Village[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2021, 76(10): 2 568-2 584.
丁建军, 王璋, 余方薇, 等. 精准扶贫驱动贫困乡村重构的过程与机制: 以十八洞村为例[J]. 地理学报, 2021, 76(10): 2 568-2 584.
29 DING Jianjun, LENG Zhiming. Regional poverty analysis in a view of geography science[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018, 73(2): 232-247.
丁建军, 冷志明. 区域贫困的地理学分析[J]. 地理学报, 2018, 73(2): 232-247.
30 YANG Zhiliang, JIANG Anyin. Inclusive connection and its path of small farmers and industries with rural characteristics[J]. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management, 2021, 20(2): 249-255.
杨志良, 姜安印. 小农户与乡村特色产业的包容性衔接及其路径研究[J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2021, 20(2): 249-255.
31 YANG Jin, XU Chen, ZHU Hong. Placeness reconstruction under the influence of local industry: a cultural economic geographical study of the jadeware industry in Yangmei Village[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2020, 40(3): 374-382.
杨槿, 徐辰, 朱竑. 本土产业发展视角下的乡村地方性重构: 基于阳美玉器产业的文化经济地理分析[J]. 地理科学, 2020, 40(3): 374-382.
32 ZHONG Yiping, TANG Linren, HU Pingbo. The mechanism and empirical analysis of the integration of agriculture and tourism to promote the optimization and upgrading of rural industrial structure: a case study of national demonstration counties of leisure agriculture and rural tourism[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2020(7): 80-98.
钟漪萍, 唐林仁, 胡平波. 农旅融合促进农村产业结构优化升级的机理与实证分析: 以全国休闲农业与乡村旅游示范县为例[J]. 中国农村经济, 2020(7): 80-98.
33 ZHU Qizhen. The village industry in the background of rural revitalization—a sociological explanation of industrial prosperity[J]. China Agricultural University Journal of Social Sciences Edition, 2018, 35(3): 89-95.
朱启臻. 乡村振兴背景下的乡村产业: 产业兴旺的一种社会学解释[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 35(3): 89-95.
34 WANG Ruifeng, LI Shuang. Influencing factors and formation mechanism of high-quality development of rural industries—a case study based on‘top ten models’ of high-quality development of rural industries in China[J]. Agricultural Economics and Management, 2022(2): 24-36.
王瑞峰, 李爽. 乡村产业高质量发展的影响因素及形成机理: 基于全国乡村产业高质量发展“十大典型”案例研究[J]. 农业经济与管理, 2022(2): 24-36.
35 BAXTER R E, CALVERT K E. Estimating available abandoned cropland in the United States: possibilities for energy crop production[J]. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 2017, 107(5): 1 162-1 178.
36 BUKOMEKO H, JASSOGNE L, TUMWEBAZE S B, et al. Integrating local knowledge with tree diversity analyses to optimize on-farm tree species composition for ecosystem service delivery in coffee agroforestry systems of Uganda[J]. Agroforestry Systems, 2019, 93(2): 755-770.
37 YIN Duo, ZHU Hong. The mechanism and comprehensive effect of poverty alleviation with characteristic agriculture in typical mountainous rural areas of Yunnan Province: a case study on the production of special cash crops[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2022, 77(4): 888-899.
尹铎, 朱竑. 云南典型山地乡村农业扶贫的机制与效应研究: 以特色经济作物种植为例[J]. 地理学报, 2022, 77(4): 888-899.
[1] 王鹏龙, 王宝, 徐冰鑫, 黄悦悦, 高峰, 赵雪雁, 黄春林, 宋晓谕, 周亮. 欠发达山区可持续发展目标研究进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2022, 37(9): 937-948.
[2] 苗俊霞, 宋晓谕, 冯人和, 权学烽, 高峰, 黄春林, 赵雪雁, 钟方雷, 程清平, 魏彦强. 欠发达山区可持续发展目标相互作用研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2022, 37(9): 949-962.
[3] 袁子峰, 周亮, 黄春林, 高峰, 王宝, 王鹏龙, 李晓恩. 欠发达山地城市人居环境适宜性综合评价[J]. 地球科学进展, 2022, 37(10): 1079-1087.
[4] 宋晓谕, 高峻, 李新, 李巍岳, 张中浩, 王亮绪, 付晶, 黄春林, 高峰. 遥感与网络数据支撑的城市可持续性评价:进展与前瞻[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(10): 1075-1083.
[5] 魏彦强, 李新, 高峰, 黄春林, 宋晓谕, 王宝, 马瀚青, 王鹏龙. 联合国2030年可持续发展目标框架及中国应对策略[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(10): 1084-1093.
阅读次数
全文


摘要