前陆背景下的两种正断裂现象及其相互作用模式

doi:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2006.06.0633

地球科学进展 ›› 2006, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (6): 633 -640. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2006.06.0633

王海荣 ^1,2,王英民 ¹,刘振湖 ³,黄奇志 ⁴,邓安雄 ^1,2

1．中国石油大学石油天然气成藏机理教育部重点实验室，北京 102249；2．中国石油大学盆地与油藏研究中心，北京 102249；3．广州海洋地质调查局海洋矿产地质调查所，广东广州 510075；4．中国石油天然气勘探开发公司，北京 100083

收稿日期:2005-11-14 修回日期:2006-02-09 出版日期:2006-06-15
通讯作者: 王海荣 E-mail:geomarine@163.com
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划项目“前陆和复合盆地的形成及油气效应”(编号：G200004670502)资助.

Two Types of Normal Faulting and Interplaying Mode between Them within the Context of Foreland

Wang Hairong ^1,2,Wang Yingmin ¹,Liu Zhenhu ³,Huang Qizhi ⁴,Deng Anxiong ^1,2

1.Key Laboratory for Hydrocarbon Accumulation Mechanism of the Ministry of Education,University of Petroleum,Beijing 102249; 2. Basin and Reservoir Research Center, University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249,China; 3. Institute of Guangzhou Marine Geological Survey, Guangzhou 510760,China; 4. China National Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Corporation, Beijing 100083,China

Received:2005-11-14 Revised:2006-02-09 Online:2006-06-15 Published:2006-06-15

下载PDF ( 1564 )

许多前陆盆地同时存在着下部的裂陷正断裂和上部的造山期的挠曲正断裂。作用在均质不分层和非均质分层板块中的挠曲正断裂具有不同的外观形态和形变的空间协调机制，前者断面陡直、贯穿深远；后者则呈坡坪式形态。裂陷正断裂和挠曲正断裂具有3种相互作用方式、差异甚殊的断裂总体形态和中性面分布位置不同的应力体制。Ⅰ类，挠曲正断裂局限在陆缘期或坳陷期层序中；Ⅱ类，裂陷期正断裂断至断陷期层序，且以裂陷正断裂为基础而存在，二者构成完整而独特的断裂组合；Ⅲ类，挠曲正断裂亦断穿至断陷期层序，但和裂陷正断裂并不存在直接关系。这三类关系对孔隙—裂缝网络体具有不同的影响，并和应力体制一道，对流体尤其是烃类的作用过程有差异很大的影响。地层在跨越同生正断裂和挠曲正断裂时所发生的厚度的变化，起因于二者在物源方向上的完全不同。

关键词: 裂陷正断裂, 应力机制, 挠曲响应, 流体过程, 前陆, 挠曲正断裂

Rifting normal faults which commonly constitute the base of the subsequent foreland strata and flexural faults coexist in many foreland basins. Flexural faults acting within the homogeneous and non-stratified plate commonly take on steep, planar fault plane form. Those within the heterogeneous and stratified plate usually present the ramp-flat form. There are three types of interplaying relation and corresponding stress distribution between the rifting normal faults and flexurial normal faults. The flexural faults of Type one confined in continental marginal stratal sequences; Those of Type Two can extend into the rifting strata and acting based on those rifting normal faults; Those of Type Three exist in direct relation with rifting normal faults although its extending similar to the Type Two. These three types exert different influence on porosity-fissure system, act with different stress distribution and influence the flow especially the hydrocarbon furtherly. Eventually the similar thickness changes across the rifting normal faults and flexural faults can attribute to their difference of sources.

Key words: Response of flexing, Foreland., Flexural normal fault, Rift normal fault, Stress mechanism

中图分类号:

[1] Chou Y W, Yu H S. Structural expression of flexural extension in the arc-continent collisional foredeep of western Taiwan[J]. Geological Society of American Special Paper,2002, 358:1-12.

[2] Yu H S, Chou Y W. Characteristics and development of the flexural forebulge and basal unconformity of Western Taiwan Foreland Basin[J]. Tectonophysics,2001,333:277-291.

[3] Yu H S, Hsu S K. Paired and Foreland Basin: Insights on Late Cenozoic Orogeny and Foreland Sedimentation in Taiwan Region[C]∥7th Chinese Geophysical Society Symposium, Programme Preceedings, 1998:439-450.

[4] Petkovic P, Collins C D N, Finlayson D M. A crustal transect between Precambrian Australia and the Timor Trough across the Vulcan Sub-basin[J].Tectonophysics,2000,329:23-38.

[5] Londoňo J, Lorenzo J M. Geodynamics of continental plate collision during late tertiary foreland basin evolution in the Timor Sea:Constraints from foreland sequences, elastic flexure and normal faulting[J]. Tectonophysics, 2004,392:37-54.

[6] Bradley D C, Kidd W S F. Flexural extension of the upper continental crust in collisional foredeeps[J]. Geological Society of American Bulletin,1991,103:1 416-1 438.

[7] Lister G S, Etheridge M A, Symonds P A. Detachment models for the formation of passive continental margins[J]. Tectonics,1991,10:1 038-1 064.

[8] Teng L S. Geotectonic evolution of tertiary continental margin basins of Taiwan[J]. Petroleum Geology of Taiwan, 1992,27:1-19.

[9] Yao Bochu, Zhou Changfan. Structural evolution of the region centered with Taiwan strait during the Cenozoic[J]. Marine Geology and Quaternary Geology,1992,12(4):1-10.[姚伯初,周昌范.台湾海峡地区新生代的构造演化[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,1992,12(4):1-10.]

[10] DeCelles P G, Giles K A. Foreland basin systems[J]. Basin Research, 1996,8:105-123.

[11] Sinclair H D. Tectonostratigraphic model for underfilled peripheral foreland basins: An Alpine perspective[J]. Geological Society of American Bulletin, 1997, 109(3): 324-346.

[12] Crampton S L, Allen P A. Recognition of forebulge unconformities associated with early stage foreland basin development example from the North Alpine foreland basin[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1995,79(10):1 495-1 514.

[1]	李荣西, 毛景文, 赵帮胜, 陈宝赟, 刘淑文. 烃类流体在 MVT型铅锌矿成矿中角色与作用：研究进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2021, 36(4): 335-345.
[2]	吕红华, 周祖翼. 前陆盆地陆源沉积序列的特征与成因机制[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(7): 706-714.
[3]	戴朝成,郑荣才,朱如凯,翟文亮,高红灿. 四川类前陆盆地须家河组震积岩的发现及其研究意义[J]. 地球科学进展, 2009, 24(2): 172-180.
[4]	吴运高,李继亮,樊敬亮. 造山带逆冲推覆构造研究的主要新进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2000, 15(4): 426-433.
[5]	董云鹏，张国伟. 造山带与前陆盆地结构构造及动力学研究思路和进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 1997, 12(1): 1-6.
[6]	刘少峰. 前陆盆地的形成机制和充填演化[J]. 地球科学进展, 1993, 8(4): 30-37.

阅读次数

全文

摘要