基于卫星高度计的全球大洋潮汐模式的准确度评估

doi:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2010.04.0353

地球科学进展 ›› 2010, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 353 -362. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2010.04.0353

汪一航 ^1,2,3,4,方国洪 ^1,3,4,魏泽勋 ³,王永刚 ³,王新怡 ³

1.中国科学院海洋研究所，山东青岛 266071; 2．宁波大学，浙江宁波 315211; 3.国家海洋局第一海洋研究所,山东青岛 266061; 4.中国科学院研究生院，北京 100039

收稿日期:2009-04-28 修回日期:2010-01-13 出版日期:2010-04-10
通讯作者: 方国洪（1939-），男，浙江瑞安人，研究员，中国工程院院士，主要从事海洋潮汐、海洋环流和海洋数值建模研究. E-mail:fanggh@fio.org.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“中国近海及邻近海区海洋与地球潮汐相互作用研究”(编号：40676009);国家自然科学青年基金项目“印尼海潮波和潮混合的分析和数值研究”(编号：40606006)资助. 

Accuracy Assessment of Global Ocean Tide Models Base on Satellite Altimetry

Wang Yihang ^1,2,3,4,Fang Guohong ^1,3,4, Wei Zexun ³,Wang Yonggang ³,Wang Xinyi ³

1.Institute of Oceanology, CAS,Qingdao 266071, China; 2.Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China;
3.First Institute of Oceanography,SOA,Qingdao 266061,China; 4.Graduate University of CAS,Beijing 100039,China

Received:2009-04-28 Revised:2010-01-13 Online:2010-04-10 Published:2010-04-10

下载PDF ( 2551 )

依据152个深海验潮站与大洋岛屿地面验潮站观测得到的8个主要分潮（M₂、S₂、K₁、O₁、N₂、K₂、P₁及Q₁）调和常数，对现有7个全球大洋潮汐模式的准确度进行了检验，结果显示各模式在深海大洋区域均达到了比较高的准确度：M₂分潮的潮高均方根偏差在1.0~1.3 cm之间|8个分潮的和方根偏差在2.1~2.3 cm之间，与早期的模式相比，准确度又有了进一步提高。还依据中国近海18个岛屿的调和常数对其中的5个大洋潮汐模式的准确度进行了检验，结果表明，M₂分潮均方根偏差在4.4~10 cm，明显高于大洋的均方根偏差。其中日本国家天文台的潮汐模式NAO99在中国近海的结果相对较准确。

关键词: 大洋潮汐模式, 准确度评估, 卫星高度计, 验潮站资料

Tidal harmonics of 8 principal constituents (M₂, S₂, K₁, O₁, N₂, K₂, P₁ and Q₁)derived from ground observations at 152 tidal gauge stations are used to assess the accuracy of 7 global ocean tidal models. It is shown that for the deep ocean area these models have high accuracy. The root-mean-square values of tidal height differences (RMSd) are within the range from 1.0 to1.3 cm for M₂, and the rootsumsquare values of the RMSd of these 8 constituents lie in the range from 2.0 to 2.3 cm. Comparison of the global tidal models to 18 offshore and island tide gauge observations in the seas adjacent to China shows that the accuracy significantly decreases. The RMSd values of constituent M₂ lie in the range of 4.4 to 10 cm, which is significantly greater than that in the deep ocean area. Among these models, the model NAO99 that assimilates T/P altimeter data and tide gauge observations into a hydrodynamic model, developed by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, has the best accuracy for the seas adjacent to China.

Key words: Ocean tidal model, Accuracy assessment, Satellite altimetry, Tide gauge data

中图分类号:

P731.23

[1] Munk W. The evolution of physical oceanography in the last hundred years[J].Oceanography,2002, 15: 135-141.
[2] Schwiderski E W. On charting global ocean tides[J].Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics,1980,18:243-268.
[3] Cartwright D E, Ray R D. Oceanic tides from Geosat altimetry[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1990, 95: 3 069-3 090.
[4] Kantha L. Barotropic tide in the global ocean from a nonlinear tidal model assimilating altimetry tides, I, Model description and result[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1995, 100: 25 283-25 308.
[5] Tapley B D, Chambers D P, Shum C K, et al. Accuracy assessment of the large-scale dynamic ocean topography from TOPEX/POSEIDON altimetry[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1994, 99(C12): 24 605-24 619.
[6] He Yijun, Chen Ge, Guo Peifang, et al. Ocean Remote Sensing of Altimeter Research and Application[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2002.[何宜军，陈戈，郭佩芳,等.高度计海洋遥感研究与应用 [M].北京：科学出版社，2002.]
[7] Andersen O B, Woodworth P L, Flather R A, et al. Intercomparison of recent ocean tide model[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1995, 100:25 261-25 282.
[8] Shum C K, Woodworth P L, Andersen O B, et al. Accuracy assessment of recent ocean tide models [J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1997, 102: 25 173-25 194.
[9] Yu Nanhua. Ocean tide models′ performance in coastal regions[J].Annals of Shanghai Observatory Academia Sinica,2006, 27: 17-25.
[10] Zahran K H, Jentzsch G, Seeber G. Accuracy assessment of ocean tide loading computations for precise geodetic observations[J].Journal of Geodynamics,2006，42: 159-174.
[11] Ma X C, Shum C K, Eanes R J, et al. Determination of Ocean Tides from the first year TOPEX/POSEIDON altimeter measurements[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research,1994, 99: 24 809-24 820.
[12] Eanes R, Bettadpur S. The CSR3.0 global ocean tide model: Diurnal and semi-diurnal ocean tides from TOPEX/POSEIDON altimetry[R]. Technical Report CRS-TM-96-05, Centre for Space Research, Texas: University of Texas,1996.
[13] Schrama E J O, Ray R D. A preliminary tidal analysis of TOPEX/POSEIDON altimetry[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1994, 99: 24 799-24 808.
[14] Ray R D. A global ocean tide model from TOPEX/POSEIDON altimetry: GOT99[R]. Technical Report NASA Technical Mem. 209478, Goddard Space Flight Centre, Greenbelt, MD, USA, 1999.
[15] Desai S D,Wahr J M. Empirical ocean tide models estimated from TOPEX/POSEIDON altimetry[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1995, 100: 25 205-25 228.
[16] Smith A J E, Ambrosius B A C, Wakker K F. Ocean tides from T/P, ERS-1, and GEOSAT altimetry[J].Journal of Geodesy,2000, 74: 399-413.
[17] Le Provost C, Genco M L, Lyard F, et al. Spectroscopy of the ocean tides from a finite element hydrodynamic model[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1994, 99: 24 777-24 797.
[18] Ray R D, Eanes R J, Chao B F. Detection of tidal dissipation in the solid Earth by satellite tracking and altimetry[J].Nature,1996, 381: 595-597.
[19] Tierney C C, Born G H, Kantha L H, et al. Shallow and deep water global ocean tides from altimetry and numerical modeling[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,2000, 105:11 259-11 278.
[20] Egbert G D, Erofeeva S Y. Efficient inverse modeling of barotropic ocean tides[J].Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology,2002, 19: 183-204.
[21] Egbert G D, Bennett A, Foreman M. TOPEX/POSEIDON tides estimated using a global inverse model[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1994, 99:24 821-24 852.
[22] Matsumoto K, Takanezawa T, Ooe M. Ocean tide models developed by assimilating TOPEX/POSEIDON altimeter data into hydrodynamical model: A global model and a regional model around Japan[J].Journal of Oceanography,2000, 56:567-581.
[23] Lefevre F, Lyard F H, Le Provost C. FES98: A new global tide finite element solution independent of altimetry[J].Geophysical Research Letters,2000,27:2 717-2 720.
[24] Lefevre F, Lyard F H, Le Provost C, et al. FES99: A global tide finite element solution assimilating tide gauge and altimetric information[J].Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology,2002, 19:1 345-1 356.
[25] Lyard F, Lefevre F, Letellier T, et al. Modelling the global ocean tides: modern insights from FES2004[J].Ocean Dynamics,2006, 56：394-415.
[26] Smithson M J. Pelagic Tidal Constants-3[M]. IAPSO Publication Scientifique No.35. International Association for the Physical Sciences of the Ocean (IAPSO) of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics,1992:191.
[27] Ponchaut F, Lyard F, Le Provost C. An analysis of the tidal signal in the WOCE Sea level dataset[J].Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology,2001，18: 77-91.
[28] Fang Guohong, Wang Yonggang, Wei Zexun, et al. Empirical cotidal charts of the Bohai, Yellow and East China Seas from 10 years of TOPEX/Poseidon altimetry[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,2004, 109, doi:10.1029/2004JC002484.

[1]	王萌,张艳伟,刘志飞,吴家望. 南海北部中尺度涡的时空分布特征：基于卫星高度计资料的统计分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2019, 34(10): 1069-1080.

阅读次数

全文

摘要