地球科学进展 ›› 2004, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (4): 658 -663. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2004.04.0658

生态学研究 上一篇    下一篇

基于涡度相关技术估算植被/大气间净CO2交换量中的不确定性
温学发, 于贵瑞,孙晓敏   
  1. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京 100101
  • 收稿日期:2003-05-21 修回日期:2003-11-30 出版日期:2004-08-01
  • 通讯作者: 于贵瑞(1959-),男,辽宁大连人,研究员,主要从事生态系统管理和植物生理生态学研究. E-mail:E-mail: yugr@igsnrr.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:

    中国科学院知识创新工程重大项目“中国陆地和近海生态系统碳收支研究”子课题(编号:KZCX1-SW-01-01A)资助.

UNCERTAINTIES IN LONGTERM STUDIES OF NET ECOSYSTEM CO2 EXCHANGE WITH THE ATMOSPHERE BASED ON EDDY COVARIANCE TECHNIQUE

WEN Xue-fa; YU Gui-rui; SUN Xiao-min   

  1. Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101,China
  • Received:2003-05-21 Revised:2003-11-30 Online:2004-08-01 Published:2004-08-01

近年来,涡度相关技术的进步使陆地生态系统CO2通量的长期和连续观测成为可能。目前,涡度相关技术是全球通量观测网络(FLUXNET)测定植被/大气间CO2通量的主要技术手段,但绝大部分CO2通量观测站点都处于非典型的理想条件下,不能完全满足涡度相关技术的基本假设条件,从而导致基于涡度相关技术估算植被/大气间净生态系统CO2交换量的不确定性。系统介绍了涡度相关技术的基本假设,基本理论公式和误差的类型与特征等理论问题,重点阐述了通量测定中仪器本身的物理限制、二维和三维的气流运动、数据处理的方法和夜间通量的低估等不确定性的主要来源,并据此对通量观测研究中需要优先考虑的问题提出一些建议。研究认为数据质量控制与分析以及误差评价是不同通量站点间的结果比较和全球尺度综合分析的过程中需重点考虑的问题。

Direct and continuous longterm measurements of canopyscale carbon dioxide fluxes have only recently become possible due to the improvement of eddy covariance technique. Now it has been widely used in longterm observation studies of CO2 uptake and release by terrestrial ecosystem. A global network of micrometeorological tower sites (FLUXNET) uses eddy covariance methods to measure the exchanges of CO2 between terrestrial ecosystem and atmosphere, but a majority of the site are not in ideal conditions, which can not fully meet the basic assumption of eddy covariance technique for the CO2 flux measurement, thus resulting in some uncertainties in the flux measurement. Chinese Terrestrial Ecosystem Flux Observational Research Network (ChinaFLUX) has been established, which relies on Chinese Ecosystem Research Network (CERN) and applies eddy covariance of microclimatology as main research method to study fluxes of carbon dioxide between the vegetation and soil of typical ecosystem and atmosphere. The objective of this paper is to introduce the basic assumption of the eddy covariance technique, the basic theoretical equations, the types and characteristics of errors in longterm measurements and to elucidate emphatically the uncertainties in the flux measurement due to physical limitation of instrumentation, two and three dimensional air flow motion effects, methods of data processing, and underestimation of nighttime fluxes, etc. Where possible, this paper makes recommendations concerning methodologies and research priorities. Without some understanding of and ability to compensate for these uncertainties, crosssite comparisons and global scale synthesis are difficult and uncertain at best. Thus, dada quality analysis and control (QA/QC) and errors assessments are necessary for crosssite comparisons and global scale synthesis. 

中图分类号: 

[1]Goulden M L, Munger J W, Fan S-M, et al. Measurements of carbon sequestration by long-term eddy covariance: Methods and a critical evaluation of accuracy[J]. Global Change Biology, 1996,2:169-182.
[2]Baldocchi D D, Hicks B B, Meyers T P. Measuring biosphere-atmosphere exchange of biologically related gases with micrometeorological methods[J]. Ecology, 1988,69:1 331-1 340.
[3]Wofsy S C, Goulden M L, Munger J W,et al. Net exchange of CO2 in a midlatitude forest[J]. Science,1993,260:1 314-1 317.
[4]Berbigier P, Bonnefond J M, Mellmann P. CO2 and water vapor fluxes for 2 years above Euroflux forest site[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2001, 108: 183-197.
[5]Grace J, Lloyd J, Mclntyre J, et al. Carbon dioxide uptake by an undisturbed tropical rain in southwest Amazonia,1992-1993[J]. Science,1995,270:778-780.
[6]Black T A, den Hartog G, Neumann H H, et al. Annual cycles of water vapor and carbon dioxide fluxes in and above a boreal aspen forest[J]. Global Change Biology, 1996,2:219-229.
[7]Goulden M L, Munger J W, Fan S-M, et al. Exchange of carbon dioxide by a deciduous forest: Response to interannual climate variability[J]. Science, 1996,271: 1 576-1 578.
[8]Baldocchi D, Falge E, Gu L H, et al. Fluxnet: A new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities[J].Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2001,82: 2 415-2 434.
[9]Lee X, Hu X Z. Forest-air fluxes of carbon, water and energy over non-flat terrain[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2002,103:277-301.
[10]Lee X.On micrometeorological observation of surface-air exchange over tall vegetation[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1998,91:39-49.
[11]Leuning R, King K M. Comparison of eddy-covariance measurement of CO2 fluxes by open- and closed-path CO2 analysers[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1992,59: 297-311.
[12]Suyker A E, Verma S B. Eddy correlation measurement of CO2 flux using a closed-path sensor: Theory and field test against an open path sensor[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1993,64:391-407.
[13]Paw U K T, Baldocchi D D, Meyers T P, et al. Correction of eddy-covariance measurements incorporating both advective effects and density fluxs[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2000,97:487-511.
[14]Massman W J, Lee X. Eddy covariance flux corrections and uncertainties in long term studies of carbon and energy exchanges[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2002, 113: 121-144.
[15]Foken T , Wichra B. Tools for quality assessment of surface measurement[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1995,78:83-105.
[16]Moncrieff J B, Malhi Y, Leuning R. The propagation of errors in long-term measurement of land-atmosphere fluxes of carbon and water[J]. Global Change Biology,1996,2:231-240.
[17]Businger J A. Evaluation of the accuracy with which dry deposition can be measured with current micrometeorological technique[J]. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 1986,25:1 100-1 124.
[18]Webb E K, Pearman G I, Leuning R. Correction of flux measurement for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer[J]. Quarterly Journal Royal Meteorological  Society, 1980,106:85-100.
[19]Baldcchi D,Finnigan J, Wilson K, et al. On measuring net carbon exchange over tall vegetation on complex terrain[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2000,96:257-291.
[20]Moore C J. Frequency reponse correction for eddy correction systems [J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1986,37:17-30.
[21]Horst T W. A simple formula for attenuation of eddy fluxes measured with firstorderresponse scalar sensors[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1997,82:219-233.
[22]Massman W J. A simple method for estimating frequency response correction for eddy covariance systems[J]. Agricultural Forest and Meteorology, 2000,104:185-198.
[23]Massman W J. Reply to comment by Rannik on “A simple method for estimating frequency response correction for eddy covariance systems”[J]. Agricultural Forest and Meteorology,2001,107:247-251.
[24]Rannik U. A comment on the paper by W.J.Masman “A simple method for estimating frequency response correction for eddy covariance systems”[J]. Agricultural Forest and Meteorology,2001,107:241-245.
[25]Goulden M L, Daube B C, Fan SM, et al. Physiological reponse of a black spruce forest to the weather[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1997,102:28 987-28 996.
[26]Finnigan J. A commnent on the paper by Lee(1998): “On micrometeorological observation of surface-air exchange over tall vegetation”[J]. Agricultural Forest and Meteorology, 1999,97:55-64.
[27]Kaimal J C, Finnigan J J. Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flows-Their Structure and Measurement[M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
[28]Wilczak J M, Oncley S P, Stage S A. Sonic anemometer tilt correction algorithms[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2001,99:127-150.
[29]Weber R O. Remarks on the definition and estimation of friction velocity[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology,1999,93:107-209.
[30]Lecler M Y, Thertell G W. Footprint prediction of scalar using a markovian analysis[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1990,52:247-258.
[31]Schmid H P. Source areas for scalar and scalar flues[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1994,67:293-318.
[32]Lee X, Barr A G. Climatology of gravity waves in a forest[J]. Quarterly Journal Royal Meteorological Society, 1998,124:1 403-1 419.
[33]Fitzjarrald D R, Morre K E. Mechanisms of nocturnal exchange between the rain forest and the atmosphere[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1990,95:16 938-16 850.
[34]Hu X, Lee X, Steven D E, et al. A numerical study of noctural wavelike motion in forest[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 2002,102:199-223.
[35]Wyngaard J, Kosovic B. Similarity of structurefuction parameters in the stratified boundarylayer[J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 1994,71:277-296.
[36]Mahrt L. Momentum balance of gravity flow[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1982,39:2 701-2 711.
[37]Sun J, Desjardins R, Mahrt L, et al. Transport of carbon dioxide, water vapour, and ozone by turbulence and local circulations[J].Journal of Geophysical Reaearch, 1998, 103:25 873-25 885.
[38]Black T A, Chen W J, Barr A G, et al. Increased carbon sequestration by s boreal deciduous forest in years with a warm spring[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2000,27: 1 271-1 274.
[39]Aubinet M, Grelle A, Ibrom A, et al. Estimates of the annual net carbon and water exchange of forest: The EUROFLUX methodology[J]. Advances in Ecological Research, 2000,30:113-175.
[40]Grace J, Malhi Y, Lloyd J, et al.The use of eddy covariance to infer the carbon dioxide uptake of Brazilian rain forest[J]. Global Change Biology, 1996,2:209-217.

[1] 唐文魁,高全洲. 河口二氧化碳水—气交换研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2013, 28(9): 1007-1014.
[2] 薛亮,于卫东,宁春林,王辉武. 海表层二氧化碳分压之时间序列研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2013, 28(8): 859-865.
[3] 曲宝晓, 宋金明, 袁华茂, 李学刚, 李 宁, 段丽琴,马清霞, 陈 鑫. 东海海—气界面二氧化碳通量的季节变化与控制因素研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2013, 28(7): 783-793.
[4] 胡宁科,李新. 历史时期土地利用变化研究方法综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2012, 27(7): 758-768.
[5] 陈泮勤,程邦波,王芳,曲建升. 全球气候变化的几个关键问题辨析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(1): 69-75.
[6] 张雪芹,彭莉莉,林朝晖. 未来不同排放情景下气候变化预估研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2008, 23(2): 174-185.
阅读次数
全文


摘要