Please wait a minute...
img img
地球科学进展  2017, Vol. 32 Issue (12): 1245-1252    DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2017.12.1245
大洋钻探科学目标展望     
洋壳的基本问题与人类的莫霍钻梦想
周怀阳()
同济大学 海洋与地球科学学院, 上海 200092
Fundamental Questions of Ocean Crust and the Dream for Mohole
Huaiyang Zhou()
School of Ocean and Earth Science, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
 全文: PDF(6786 KB)   HTML
摘要:

一般认为,地球物理上的莫霍面是地幔和地壳的分界面。被海水覆盖的洋壳通常只有6~7 km厚,相对于较厚的陆壳来说,洋壳不仅年轻得多,也活跃得多。然而,洋壳的地质结构以及莫霍面的地质意义到底是什么,至今仍是固体地球科学领域最大的悬疑之一。现有的结果表明,依据分布在大陆边缘的蛇绿岩套确定的Penrose模型基本不适用于慢速和超慢速扩张洋中脊的实际洋壳结构,对快速扩张洋中脊的适用性也有一定的疑问。解答洋壳结构及其莫霍面地质意义最有效的手段仍是大洋钻探。20世纪60年代初,试图挺进莫霍面的“莫霍钻”计划揭开了地球科学最伟大的大洋钻探计划的序幕。新世纪以来,随着各种研讨和计划的切实开展,人类真正实现莫霍钻梦想的日子似乎正在来临。

关键词: 洋壳结构莫霍面下洋壳岩浆房蛇绿岩套    
Abstract:

Knowledge of ocean crust is one of bases to understand the deep and the surface of our planet. Since the definition of the Earth crust based on the geophysical discovery of Moho, marvelous efforts have been made to understand the geological significance of the Moho and the structure of the ocean crust. Up to date, it becomes clear that the Penrose model built up on ophiolite is unsuitable for the explanation of the ocean crust structure along slow and ultraslow spreading ridges, and probably also questionable for that of fast spreading ridges. The only effective way to solve the problem is to drill into the geophysical detected Moho and get samples. With the development of modern technology and more logic scientific strategy, that largely improved from the milestone Mohole projects carried out about half a century ago. The time to realize the Mohole dream seams coming.

Key words: Ocean crust    Moho    Lower ocean crust    Magma chamber    Ophiolite.
收稿日期: 2017-10-25 出版日期: 2018-03-06
ZTFLH:  P756.5  
作者简介:

作者简介:周怀阳(1961-),男,江苏常熟人,教授,主要从事海洋地质和地球化学研究.E-mail:zhouhy@tongji.edu.cn

服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
周怀阳

引用本文:

周怀阳. 洋壳的基本问题与人类的莫霍钻梦想[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(12): 1245-1252.

Huaiyang Zhou. Fundamental Questions of Ocean Crust and the Dream for Mohole. Advances in Earth Science, 2017, 32(12): 1245-1252.

链接本文:

http://www.adearth.ac.cn/CN/10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2017.12.1245        http://www.adearth.ac.cn/CN/Y2017/V32/I12/1245

图1  基于Oman蛇绿岩剖面岩石地层学的Penrose模型与地震数据比较
图2  平行轴向横穿慢速扩张洋中脊的洋壳剖面简化图[7] 洋脊段末端之下的浅莫霍标注在图中,反映沿着大西洋洋中脊北部内高角之下的地震观察
图3  2种洋壳增生的端元模型(a)“ 冰川”模型,塑性熔体是从洋壳轴部岩浆房下沉并扩张向外,形成下洋壳;(b)“席状”模型,在洋壳中有不同深度的多个熔融体,除了浅层岩浆房岩体之外,深部熔体通过水力破碎传输,结合基底岩床塑性流动;红色箭头代表热液活动范围与方向
图4  洋中脊剖面的理想结构图解(未按比例)(据参考文献[26]修改) 列举了可能影响贯穿过洋脊剖面热液循环的强度和类型因素,比如断层,海山, 基底地形和不透水沉积物以及可能的生命;箭头表示热(红色)和流体(蓝色)流动
图5  太平洋莫霍钻3个候选海区[26] A:科克斯板块区;B:近南部和下加利福尼亚;C:夏威夷外区
[1] Penrose Conference Participants.Penrose field conference on ophiolites[J]. Geotimes, 1972, 17:24-25.
[2] Dick H J B, Lin J, Schouten H. An ultraslow-spreading class of ocean ridge[J].Nature, 2003, 426(6 965):405-412.
doi: 10.1038/nature02128 pmid: 14647373
[3] Zhou H, Dick H J.Thin crust as evidence for depleted mantle supporting the Marion Rise[J].Nature, 2013, 494(7 436):195-200.
doi: 10.1038/nature11842 pmid: 23389441
[4] Cann J R.A model for oceanic crystal structure developed[J].Geophysical Journal International, 1974, 39(1):169-187.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1974.tb05446.x
[5] Detrick R S, Buhl P, Vera E,et al. Multi-channel seismic imaging of a crustal magma chamber along the East Pacific Rise[J]. Nature, 1987, 326(6 108):35-41.
doi: 10.1038/326035a0
[6] Sinton J, Bergmanis E, Rubin K,et al. Volcanic eruptions on mid-ocean ridges: New evidence from the superfast spreading East Pacific Rise. Volcanic eruptions on mid-ocean ridges: New evidence from the superfast spreading East Pacific Rise, 17°-19°S[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 2002, 107(B6): ECV 3-1-ECV 3-20.
[7] Cannat M.How thick is the magmatic crust at slow spreading oceanic ridges?[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth,1996, 101(B2):2 847-2 858.
doi: 10.1029/95JB03116
[8] Sinha M C, Navin D A, Macgregor L M, et al. Evidence for accumulated melt beneath the slow-spreading Mid-Atlantic Ridge[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society A (Mathematical Physical & Engineering Sciences), 1997, 355(1 723):233-253.
doi: 10.1098/rsta.1997.0008
[9] Singh S, Crawford W, Carton H, et al. Discovery of axial magma chamber reflections beneath the Lucky Strike Hydrothermal vents and volcano and its relationship with median Valley Faults[C]∥AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. AGU Fall Meeting, 2005.
[10] Dunn R A, Leki? V, Detrick R S, et al. Three-dimensional seismic structure of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (35°N): Evidence for focused melt supply and lower crustal dike injection[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth, 2005, 110(B9):B09101.
doi: 10.1029/2004JB003473
[11] Li J, Jian H, Chen Y J, et al. Seismic observation of an extremely magmatic accretion at the ultraslow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2015, 42(8):2 656-2 663.
doi: 10.1002/2014GL062521
[12] Jian H, Singh S C, Chen Y J,et al. Evidence of an axial magma chamber beneath the ultraslow-spreading Southwest Indian Ridge[J]. Geology, 2017, 45(2):143-146.
doi: 10.1130/G38356.1
[13] Toomey D R, Solomon S C, Purdy G M.Microearthquakes beneath Median Valley of Mid-Atlantic Ridge near 23°N: Tomography and tectonics[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 1988, 93(B8):9 093-9 112.
doi: 10.1029/JB093iB08p09093
[14] Schwartz J J, John B E, Cheadle M J, et al. Dating the growth of oceanic crust at a slow-spreading ridge[J]. Science, 2005, 310(5 748):654.
doi: 10.1126/science.1116349 pmid: 16254183
[15] Kelemen P B, Koga K, Shimizu N.Geochemistry of gabbro sills in the crust-mantle transition zone of the Oman ophiolite: Implications for the origin of the oceanic lower crust[J]. Earth & Planetary Science Letters, 1997, 146(3/4):475-488.
[16] Kelemen P B, Aharonov E.Periodic formation of magma fractures and generation of layered gabbros in the lower crust beneath oceanic spreading ridges[M]∥Buck W R, Delaney P T, Karson J A, et al,eds. Faulting and Magmatism at Mid-Ocean Ridges. Washington DC: American Geophysical Union, 1998:267-289.
[17] Mutter J C, Carbotte S M, Su W, et al. Seismic images of active magma systems beneath the east pacific rise between 17°05' and 17°35'S[J]. Science, 1995, 268(5 209):391-395.
doi: 10.1126/science.268.5209.391
[18] Cannat M.Emplacement of mantle rocks in the seafloor at mid-ocean ridges[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 1993, 98(B3):4 163-4 172.
doi: 10.1029/92JB02221
[19] Mainprice D.Modelling the anisotropic seismic properties of partially molten rocks found at mid-ocean ridges[J]. Tectonophysics, 1997, 279(1):161-179.
doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(97)00122-4
[20] Dunn R A, Toomey D R, Solomon S C,et al. Three-dimensional seismic structure and physical properties of the crust and shallow mantle beneath the East Pacific Rise at 9°30'N[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 2000, 105(B10):23 537-23 556.
doi: 10.1029/2000JB900210
[21] Crawford W C, Webb S C.Variations in the distribution of magma in the lower crust and at the Moho beneath the East Pacific Rise at 9°~10°N[J].Earth & Planetary Science Letters, 2002, 203(1):117-130.
doi: 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00831-2
[22] Hess H H.The evolution of ocean basins[M]∥Hill M N, Goldberg E, Munk W, et al,eds. The Sea, Ideas and Observations.New York: Interscience Publishers, 1960.
[23] Hess H H.History of ocean basins[M]∥Engel A E J,ed. Petrological Studies: A Volume in Honor of A.F. Buddington. Boulder, CO:Geological Society of America, 1962:599-620.
[24] Muller M R, Minshull T A, White R S.Crustal structure of the Southwest Indian Ridge at the Atlantis II Fracture Zone[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2000, 105(B11):25 809-25 828.
doi: 10.1029/2000JB900262
[25] Gillis K, Snow J E, Klaus A.Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Expedition 345 Preliminary Report, Exploring the Plutonic Crust at A Fast-Spreading Ridge: New Drilling at Hess Deep[R]. Washington DC:Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Management International, Inc., 2013, doi:10.2172/1248306.
[26] Ildefonse B, Natsue Abe, Blackman D K, et al. The MoHole: A crustal journey and mantle quest, workshop in Kanazawa, Japan, 3-5 June 2010[J]. Scientific Drilling, 2010, 141(10):238-244.
doi: 10.2204/iodp.sd.10.07.2010
[27] Ildefonse B, Christie D M.Mission Moho workshop: Drilling through the oceanic crust to the mantle[J].Scientific Drilling, 2007, 4, doi:10.2204 / iodp.sd.4.02.2007.
doi: 10.5194/sd-4-11-2007
[28] Pablo Canales, Henry Dick, Robert Dunn,et al. Workshop Report for Scientific Drilling in the Indian Ocean Crust and Mantle[R].US-China International Discovery Program Workshop, 2015.
[1] 汪品先. 未雨绸缪——迎接大洋钻探学术新计划的制定[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(12): 1229-1235.
[2] 翦知湣, 党皓文. 解读过去、预告未来:IODP气候与海洋变化钻探研究进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(12): 1267-1276.
[3] 王汝建, 肖文申, 章陶亮, 聂森艳. 极地地质钻探研究进展与展望[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(12): 1236-1244.
[4] 林间, 徐敏, 周志远, 王月. 全球俯冲带大洋钻探进展与启示[J]. 地球科学进展, 2017, 32(12): 1253-1266.
[5] 李春峰, 汪品先, Dieter Franke, 李家彪, Randell Stephenson, 许树坤,Peter Michael, 周祖翼,等. 南海张裂过程及其对晚中生代以来东南亚构造的启示-IODP建议书735-Full介绍[J]. 地球科学进展, 2009, 24(12): 1339-1351.
[6] 刘志飞,拓守廷. IODP计划的新进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2009, 24(12): 1318-1324.
[7] IODP-China通讯员. 2013年后的大洋钻探——从INVEST会议看学科前沿[J]. 地球科学进展, 2009, 24(12): 1325-1329.
[8] 刘新月;王清;周祖翼. 日本的综合大洋钻探计划(IODP)[J]. 地球科学进展, 2004, 19(4): 552-557.
[9] 徐斐,周祖翼. 洋底高原:了解地球内部的窗口[J]. 地球科学进展, 2003, 18(5): 745-752.