地球科学进展 ›› 2016, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (8): 811 -819. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2016.08.0811.

综述与评述 上一篇    下一篇

海底地理实体命名对大陆架划界的影响——以日本为例
黄文星, 朱本铎, 刘丽强, 张金鹏   
  1. 国土资源部海底矿产资源重点实验室,广州海洋地质调查局,广东 广州 510760
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-12 修回日期:2016-07-27 出版日期:2016-08-20
  • 基金资助:
    中国大洋矿产资源研究开发协会前沿性课题“大洋海底地理实体命名关键问题研究”(编号:DY125-22-QY-09)资助

The Influence of Undersea Feature Naming on Delimitation of Continental Shelf: A Case Study of Japan

Huang Wenxing, Zhu Benduo, Liu Liqiang, Zhang Jinpeng   

  1. Key Laboratory of Marine Mineral Resource, Ministry of Land and Resource, Guangzhou Marine Geological Survey, Guangzhou 510760,China
  • Received:2016-06-12 Revised:2016-07-27 Online:2016-08-20 Published:2016-08-20
  • Supported by:
    Project supported by the Frontiers Research Project of China Ocean Mineral Resources Research and Development Association “Research on the key issues of naming undersea feature name”(No.DY125-22-QY-09)
对日本大陆架划界案相关海域的海底地理实体命名进行动态跟踪,结果显示日本在大陆架划界案提交前后,命名了坂东海盆(Bando Basin),删除了半月海槽(Hangetsu Trough)新月海穴(Shingetsu Hole)和冲大东海槽(Oki-Daito Trough),修改了小笠原海底高原(Ogasawara Plateau)和冲大东海脊(Oki-Daito Ridge)附近的命名方案,这些命名和更名动作违背了一般的命名更名规则,其目的是扩展其大陆架边界。建议加强海底地理实体命名与海洋权益相关关系的研究工作,为维护国家海洋权益提供技术支撑。
Base on the tracing study on the Japanese undersea feature naming activity, this study shows that, Japan has named Bando Basin, removed Hangetsu Trough, Shingetsu Hole and Oki-Daito Trough, and altered some features names near Ogasawara Plateau and Oki-Daito Ridge, before and after the submission for Delimitation in outer limits of continental shelves. Contrary to the general undersea feature naming rule, these actions aim to extend its continental shelf boundaries. It is suggested that the study of relationships between naming undersea feature and marine right and interest should be enhanced.

中图分类号: 

[1] Wang Qi, Luo Tingting. Disputes and legal effect of undersea feature naming[J]. Ocean Development and Management ,2012,29(9):10-15.
. 海洋开发与管理, 2012,29(9):10-15.]
[2] Zhang Dongqi, Ai Wanzhu. The position androle of a trench or trough in continental shelf delimitation[J]. Marine Science Bulletin ,1994,13(5):84-89.
. 海洋通报, 1994,13(5):84-89.]
[3] Li Mingbi, Li Jiabiao, Fang Yinxia, et al . Geological Features of the Continental Margin and the Delimitation of the Outer Continental Shelf beyond 200 Nautical Miles[M]. Beijing: China Ocean Press, 2015. [黎明碧,李家彪,方银霞,等.大陆边缘地质特征与200海里以外大陆架界限确定[M].北京:海洋出版社,2015.]
[4] Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf[EB/OL].[2016-06-20].http:∥www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/jpn08/jpn_execsummary.pdf.
[5] Advanced and Unedited Reporting Material[EB/OL].[2016-06-20].http:∥www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_files/jpn08/com_sumrec_jpn_fin.pdf.
[6] IHO-IOC. Standardization of Undersea Feature Name(B-6) [M]. Monaco: Bathymetric Publication,2013.
[7] Li Sihai,Li Yanwen, Fan Miao, et al . Research on the classification system for the generic names of undersea feature[J] .Marine Science Bulletin ,2013,32(2):160-163.
.海洋通报,2013,32(2):160-163.]
[8] Zhou Chenghu, Cheng Weiming, Qian Jinkai. Digital Geomorphological Interpretation and Mapping from Remote Sensing [M]. Beijing:Science Press,2009. [周成虎,程维明,钱金凯.数字地貌遥感解译与制图[M].北京:科学出版社,2009.]
[9] Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission(of UNESCO).Fourteenth Meeting of the GEBCO Sub-Committee on Undersea Feature Names (SCUFN)-Summary Report[R]. Tokyo, Japan: Sub-Committee on Undersea Feature Names (SCUFN), 2001.
[10] Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission(of UNESCO).Nineteenth Meeting of the GEBCO Sub-Committee on Undersea Feature Names (SCUFN)-Summary Report[R].Bremerhaven, Germany: Sub-Committee on Undersea Feature Names (SCUFN),2006.
[11] Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission(of UNESCO).Twentieth Meeting of the GEBCO Sub-Committee on Undersea Feature Names (SCUFN)-Summary Report[R].Monaco: Sub-Committee on Undersea Feature Names (SCUFN), 2007.
[12] Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission(of UNESCO).Twenty Third Meeting of the GEBCO Sub-Committee on Undersea Feature Names (SCUFN)-Summary Report[R].Lima, Peru: Sub-Committee on Undersea Feature Names (SCUFN), 2010.
[13] Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission(of UNESCO).Fifteenth Meeting of the GEBCO Sub-Committee on Undersea Feature Names (SCUFN)-Summary Report[R]. Monaco: Sub-Committee on Undersea Feature Names (SCUFN),2002.
[14] Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission(of UNESCO).Twenty Fourth Meeting of the GEBCO Sub-Committee on Undersea Feature Names (SCUFN)-Summary Report[R].Beijing, China: Sub-Committee on Undersea Feature Names (SCUFN),2011.
[15] Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission(of UNESCO).Undersea Feature Name Proposal[EB/OL].[2016-06-20].http:∥www.iho.int/mtg_docs/com_wg/SCUFN/SCUFN24/SCUFN_proposals/Japan/28_Shingetsu_Hole_to_be_removed.pdf.
[16] Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission(of UNESCO).Twenty Fifth Meeting of the GEBCO Sub-Committee on Undersea Feature Names (SCUFN)-Summary Report[R].Wellington, New Zealand: Sub-Committee on Undersea Feature Names (SCUFN),2012.
[17] Huang Wenxing, Zhu Benduo, Liu Liqiang, et al . A case study of naming disputes of undersea features[J]. Advances in Earth Science , 2016,31(1):78-85.
. 地球科学进展, 2016,31(1):78-85.]
[1] 孙湫词, 方银霞, 李家彪. 大陆架划界科学技术及其在海上丝路合作中的应用前景分析 *[J]. 地球科学进展, 2018, 33(12): 1215-1222.
[2] 黄文星, 朱本铎, 刘丽强, 张金鹏. 国际海底命名争端案例研究及其启示[J]. 地球科学进展, 2016, 31(1): 78-85.
阅读次数
全文


摘要