基于地面观测的遥感监测蒸散量验证方法研究

doi:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2010.11.1248

地球科学进展 ›› 2010, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (11): 1248 -1260. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2010.11.1248

贾贞贞 ¹，刘绍民 ^1*，毛德发 ²，王志良 ³，徐自为 ¹，张茹 ¹

1. 北京师范大学遥感科学国家重点实验室，地理学与遥感科学学院，北京 100875; 2. 北京市水利水电技术中心，北京 100073;
3. 中国水利部海河水利委员会，天津 300170

收稿日期:2010-09-06 修回日期:2010-09-21 出版日期:2010-11-10
通讯作者: 刘绍民（1967-），男，浙江绍兴人，教授，主要从事大尺度地表通量观测与遥感应用研究.  E-mail:smliu@bnu.edu.cn
基金资助:
公益性行业(气象)科研专项“大尺度水热通量观测系统的研制与应用研究”（编号：GYHY200706046）；国家自然科学基金项目“地表水热通量的时空尺度扩展研究”（编号：40971194）；国家高技术研究发展计划课题“非均匀下垫面条件下区域蒸散量遥感监测与验证的关键技术研究”（编号: 2007AA12Z175）资助.

A Study of the Validation Method of Remotely Sensed Evapotranspiration based on Observation Data

Jia Zhenzhen ¹, Liu Shaomin ¹, Mao Defa ², Wang Zhiliang ³,Xu Ziwei ¹, Zhang Ru ¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, School of Geography, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
2. Beijing Water Technology Center of Beijing Water Authority, Beijing 100073, China;
3. The Haihe River Water Conservancy Commission of the Ministry of Water Resources of the PRC, Tianjin 300170, China

Received:2010-09-06 Revised:2010-09-21 Online:2010-11-10 Published:2010-11-10

下载PDF ( 10799 )

为了保证遥感监测蒸散量的准确性，需建立一套较完整的遥感监测蒸散量地面验证方法对其进行验证。通过由大孔径闪烁仪、涡动相关仪和自动气象站等组成的蒸散量观测系统可以获取不同卫星像元尺度蒸散量的地面观测值。自2002年以来，由海河流域的密云、馆陶、大兴及小汤山等站构建了一个不同卫星像元尺度蒸散量的观测站网，经过严格的观测数据处理与质量控制，获取了一大批卫星像元尺度蒸散量及其配套参数的地面观测值。同时，建立了一套基于地面观测的遥感监测蒸散量验证流程，重点对验证像元的选取以及评价指标的构建等进行探讨。依据上述验证流程，在海河流域的北京地区开展了遥感监测蒸散量的地面验证工作。利用2008年密云站和大兴站的大孔径闪烁仪观测数据，对基于MODIS数据估算的北京地区区域蒸散量进行验证。结果表明：这套基于大孔径闪烁仪观测数据的遥感监测蒸散量验证方法是合理、可行的。其中2008年北京地区遥感监测月、日蒸散量的均方差分别为13.75和0.91 mm，平均相对误差分别为22.79%、18.61%。

关键词: 蒸散量, 地面观测, 验证方法, 像元尺度

A comprehensive validation method of remotely sensed Evapotranspiration (ET) based on observation data was proposed to ensure the accuracy of estimated ET. Thus, an observation system was equipped with a large aperture scintillometer, an eddy covariance system and an automatic weather station, and then an observation network was established at Miyun, Guantao, Daxing and Xiaotangshan sites in Hai river basin, which were set up from 2002 for ET and correlative parameters measurements at different satellite pixel scales. On this basis, rigorous data process and quality control were executed to ensure the high quality of observations. Meanwhile, a validation procedure of remotely sensed ET based on ground measurements was presented, and the method of selecting validation pixels and evaluation index were investigated intensively. According to this method, validation of remote sensing ET was performed in Beijing. Based on the LAS measurements at Miyun and Daxing sites in 2008, regional ET in Beijing area estimated by MODIS data was validated. The results demonstrated that the proposed validation method based on LAS observation data was feasible. The RMSE and MRE of estimated monthly and daily ET were 13.75、0.91 mm and 22.79%、18.61% respectively.

Key words: Evapotranspiration, Observation, Validation method, Satellite pixel scale

中图分类号:

P404
TP701

[1] Xin Xiaozhou, Tian Guoliang, Liu Qinhuo. A review of researches on remote sensing of land surface evapotranspiration[J]. Journal of Remotely Sensing,2003, 7(3): 233-240. [辛晓洲，田国良，柳钦火. 地表蒸散定量遥感的研究进展[J]. 遥感学报，2003，7(3)：233-240.]
[2] Gao Yanchun, Long Di. Progress in models for eevapotranspiration eestimation using remotely sensed data[J]. Journal of Remotely Sensing, 2008, 12(3): 515-528. [高彦春，龙笛. 遥感蒸散发模型研究进展[J]. 遥感学报，2008，12(3)：515-528.]
[3] Li Z L, Tang R L, Wan Z M, et al. A review of current methodologies for regional evapotranspiration estimation from remotely sensed data[J].Sensors, 2009, 9: 3 801-3 853.
[4] Chávez José L, Christopher M U N. Comparing aircraft-based remotely sensed energy balance fluxes with eddy covariance tower data using heat flux source area functions[J].Journal of Hydrometeorology-Special Section, 2005, 6: 923-940.
[5] Allen R G, Tasumi M, Morse A, et al. A landsat-based energy balance and evapotranspiration model in western US water rights regulation and planning[J]. Irrigation and Drainage Systems,2005, 19: 251-268.
[6] Jiang L, Islam S. An intercomparison of regional latent heat flux estimation using remote sensing data[J].International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2003, 24(11): 2 221-2 236.
[7] Watt C J, Chehbcuni A, Rodriguez J C, et al. Comparsion of sensible heat flux estimates using AVHRR with scintillometer measurements over semi-arid grassed in northwest Mexico[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2000, 105: 81-89.
[8] Hemakumara H M, Chandrapala L, Moene A F. Evapotranspiration fluxes over mixed vegetation areas measured from lager aperture scintillometer[J].Agricultural and Water Management, 2003, 58: 109-122.
[9] Jia L, Su Z B, Bart van den H, et al. Estimation of sensible heat flux using the Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) and ATSR measurements [J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2003, 28: 75-88.
[10] Marx A, Kunstmann H, Schuttemeyer D, et al. Uncertainty analysis for satellite derived sensible heat fluxes and scintillometer measurements over savannah environment and comparison to mesoscale meteorological simulation results [J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2008, 148: 656-667.
[11] Tang R, Li Z, Tang B. An application of the Ts VI triangle method with enhanced edges determination for evapotranspiration estimation from MODIS data in arid and semi-arid regions: Implementation and validation[J].Remote Sensing of Environment, 2010, 114: 540-551.
[12] Kalma J D, McVicar T R, McCabe M F. Estimating land surface evaporation: A review of method using remotely sensed surface temperature data [J]. Surveys in Geophysics, 2008, 29: 421-469.
[13] Lu Li, Liu Shaomin, Sun Minzhang, et al. Advances in the study of areal surface fluxes with large aperture scintillometer [J]. Advances in Earth Science,2005, 20(9): 932-938. [卢俐，刘绍民，孙敏章,等. 大孔径闪烁仪研究区域地表通量的进展[J]. 地球科学进展，2005，20(9)：932-938.]
[14] Kleissl J, Hong S H, Hendrickx J M H. New mexico scintillometer network: Support of remote sensing and hydrologic and meteorological models [J].Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society,2009, 90(2): 207-218.
[15] Liu S M, Hu G, Lu L, et al. Estimation of regional evapotranspiration by TM/ETM+ data over heterogeneous surfaces[J]. Photogrammetric Engineering&Remote Sensing, 2007, 73(10): 1 169-1 178.
[16] Wang Jiemin, Wang Weizhen, Ao Yinhuan, et al. Turbulence flux measurements under complicated conditions [J].Advances in Earth Science,2007,22(8): 791-797. [王介民，王维真，奥银焕,等. 复杂条件下湍流通量的观测与分析[J]. 地球科学进展，2007，22(8)：791-797.]
[17] Xu Ziwei, Liu Shaomin, Gong Lijuan, et al. A study on the data processing and quality assessment of the eddy covariance system[J]. Advances in Earth Science,2008,23(4): 357-370. [徐自为，刘绍民，宫丽娟,等. 涡动相关仪观测数据的处理与质量评价研究[J]. 地球科学进展，2008，23(4)：357-370.]
[18] Xu Ziwei, Liu Shaomin, Xu Tongren, et al. Comparison of the gap filling methods of evapotranspiration measured by eddy covariance system[J].Advances in Earth Science,2009,29(4): 372-382.[徐自为，刘绍民，徐同仁,等. 涡动相关仪观测蒸散量的插补方法研究[J]. 地球科学进展，2009，29(4)：372-382.]
[19] Twine T E, Kustas W P, Normal J M, et al. Correcting eddy-covariance flux underestimates over a grassland[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2000, 103: 279-300.
[20] Yang K, Wang J M. A temperature prediction-correction method for estimating surface soil heat flux from soil temperature and moisture data[J].Science in China (Series D),2008, 51: 721-729.
[21] Foken T, Göckede M, Mauder M, et al. Post-field data quality control[C]//Handbook of Micrometeorology: A Guide for Surface Flux Measurement and Analysis. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers,2004.
[22] Lu Li, Liu Shaomin, Xu Ziwei, et al. Results from measurements of large aperture scintillometer over different surfaces [J]. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science,2009, 20(2): 171-178. [卢俐，刘绍民，徐自为,等. 不同下垫面上大孔径闪烁仪观测数据的处理与分析[J]. 应用气象学报，2009，20(2)：171-178.]
[23] Bai Jie, Liu Shaomin, Ding Xiaoping, et al. A Study of the processing method of large aperture scintillometer observation data[J].Advances in Earth Science,2010,25(11):1 148-1 165.[白洁，刘绍民，丁晓萍,等. 大孔径闪烁仪观测数据的处理方法研究[J]. 地球科学进展，2010，25(11):1 148-1 165.]
[24] De Bruin H A R, Kohsiek W, Van Den Hurk B J J M. A verification of some methods to determine the fluxes of momentum, sensible heat, and water vapor using standard deviation and structure parameter of scalar meteorological quantities [J]. Boundary-Layer Meteorology,1993, 63: 231-257.
[25] Andreas E L. Estimating C²_nover snow and sea ice from meteorological data [J].Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1988, 5: 481-495.
[26] Kormann R, Meixner F X. An analytic footprint model for neutral stratification[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology,2001, 99: 207-224.
[27] Gong Lijuan, Liu Shaomin, Shuang Xi, et al. Investigation of spatial representativeness for surface flux measurements with eddy covariance system and large aperture scintillometer[J].Plateau Meteorology,2009, 28(2): 246-257. [宫丽娟，刘绍民，双喜，等. 涡动相关仪和大孔径闪烁仪观测通量的空间代表性[J]. 高原气象，2009，28(2)：246-257.]
[28] Peng Guliang, Cai Xuhui, Liu Shaomin. A flux footprint model for large aperture scintillometer[J].Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis,2007, 43(6): 822-827. [彭谷亮，蔡旭晖，刘绍民. 大孔径闪烁仪湍流通量印痕模型的建立与应用[J]. 北京大学学报，2007，43(6)：822-827.]
[29] Shuang Xi, Liu Shaomin, Xu Ziwei, et al. Investigation of spatial representativeness for surface flux measurements in the Heihe river basin[J].Advances in Earth Science,2009, 24(7): 724-733.[双喜，刘绍民，徐自为，等. 黑河流域观测通量的空间代表性研究[J].地球科学进展，2009，24(7)：724-733.]
[30] Cai Xuhui, Zhu Mingjia, Liu Shaomin, et al. Flux footprint analysis and application for the large aperture scintillometer[J]. Advances in Earth Science,2010,25(11):1 166-1 174.[蔡旭辉，朱明佳，刘绍民,等. 大孔径闪烁仪的通量印痕分析与应用[J]. 地球科学进展，2010，25(11):1 166-1 174.]
[31] Kohsiek W, Liebethal C, Foken T,et al. The energy balance experiment EBEX-2000. Part Ⅲ: Bahaviour and quality of radiation measurements[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology,2007, 13: 55-75.
[32] Mauder M,Liebethal C, Göckede M, et al. Processing and quality control of flux data during LITFASS-2003[J].Boundary-Layer Meteorology,2006, 121: 67-88.
[33] Mauder M, Foken T P, Clement R, et al. Quality control of carboEurope flux data-art2: Inter-comparison of eddy-covariance software [J].Biogeosciences, 2008, 5: 451-462.

[1]	张强，张之贤，问晓梅，王胜. 陆面蒸散量观测方法比较分析及其影响因素研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2011, 26(5): 538-547.
[2]	鱼腾飞，冯起，司建华，席海洋，陈丽娟. 遥感结合地面观测估算陆地生态系统蒸散发研究综述[J]. 地球科学进展, 2011, 26(12): 1260-1268.
[3]	刘雅妮，辛晓洲，柳钦火，周春艳. 基于多尺度遥感数据估算地表通量的方法及其验证分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(11): 1261-1272.
[4]	徐自为,刘绍民,徐同仁,王介民. 涡动相关涡动相关仪观测蒸散量的插补方法比较[J]. 地球科学进展, 2009, 24(4): 372-382.
[5]	李林,张国胜,汪青春,时兴合. 黄河上游流域蒸散量及其影响因子研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2000, 15(3): 256-259.

阅读次数

全文

摘要