基于条件价值法评估罗源湾海洋生物多样性维持服务价值

doi:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2010.08.0886

地球科学进展 ›› 2010, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (8): 886 -892. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2010.08.0886

可持续发展研究上一篇

基于条件价值法评估罗源湾海洋生物多样性维持服务价值

王丽 ¹，陈尚 ^1*，任大川 ²，柯淑云 ³，李京梅 ²，王栋 ⁴

1.国家海洋局第一海洋研究所生态中心，山东青岛 266061；
2.中国海洋大学经济学院，山东青岛 266071；3.福建海洋与渔业厅，福建福州 350003；4.中国海洋大学海洋环境学院,山东青岛 266100

收稿日期:2010-04-06 修回日期:2010-05-31 出版日期:2010-08-10
通讯作者: 陈尚(1972-)，男，贵州盘县人，研究员，主要从事海洋生态系统综合评价研究. E-mail:qdcs@163.com
基金资助:
国家海洋局“海洋生态系统服务功能及其价值评估”专题项目（编号：908-02-04-03）；福建海洋与渔业厅“福建海湾生态资本评估”(编号：FJ908-02-02-07);山东海洋与渔业厅“山东近海生态资产评估”专题项目(编号：SD-908-02-10)；山东省科技厅“不同海水养殖模式对海湾生态系统服务的影响与养殖优化技术开发”项目(编号：2007GG10005012)资助

Valuation of Species Diversity Maintenance Service in Luoyuan Bay Based on Contingent Valuation Method

Wang Li ¹, Chen Shang ¹, Ren Dachuan ², Ke Shuyun ³, Li Jingmei ², Wang Dong ⁴

1. Research Center for Marine Ecology，First Institute of Oceanography, SOA, Qingdao 266061, China;
2.School of Economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266071,China;
3. Department of Ocean and Fisheries of Fujian Province, Fuzhou 350003,China;
4.College of Physical and Environmental Oceanography, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China

Received:2010-04-06 Revised:2010-05-31 Online:2010-08-10 Published:2010-08-10

下载PDF ( 1737 )

海洋生物多样性维持服务指海洋中不仅生活着丰富的生物种群，还为其提供了重要的产卵场、越冬场、索饵场、避难所、栖息地等场所。基于条件价值法,于2009年8月对福建罗源湾周边城镇居民进行问卷调查，掌握当地居民对保护罗源湾生物多样性的支付意愿，进而评估罗源湾生物多样性维持服务价值。结果显示，2009年罗源湾4种珍稀生物的支付意愿为618.8元/户。2004—2008年罗源湾生物多样性维持服务价值分别为747.17万元、1 912.52万元、2 565.08万元、3 821.92万元、5 272.00万元。分析表明：家庭年收入、对保护生物的了解程度和环保意识是影响生物多样性维持服务价值的主要因素。对于保护海洋生物多样性来说，经济发展政策和环保政策都是必要的，如何做好这2个政策的平衡是政府应该关注的。

关键词: 罗源湾, 生物多样性维持服务, 条件价值法, 支付意愿, 价值评估

Marine species diversity maintenance service means that there are abundant living organisms in the sea, and moreover the sea provides important habitats, e.g. spawning grounds, overwintering grounds, feeding grounds and the shelters. Based on Contingent Valuation Method, a questionnaire survey on willingness-to-pay of local residents for the protection of marine species diversity was conducted in the towns around Luoyuan Bay in August, 2009, and thereby, marine species diversity maintenance service in Luoyuan Bay ecosystem was valuated. The average willingness-to-pay for 4 kinds of species was 618.8 yuan RMB per household in 2009. Marine species diversity maintenance service value of Luoyuan Bay was 7.47 million yuan RMB, 19.12 million yuan RMB, 25.65 million yuan RMB, 38.2192million yuan RMB, 52.7200 million yuan RMB from 2004 to 2008 rspectively. The annual household income, level of understanding of marine species diversity and environment awareness are the major factors in affecting marine species diversity maintenance service. For better protection of marine species diversity, both economic and environmental policies are necessary. The local government should pay more attention to how to balance and coordinate these two policies.

Key words: Luoyuan Bay, Species diversity maintenance service, Contingent valuation method, Willingness-to-pay, Valuation

中图分类号:

X24
X196

[1] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis[R].Washington DC: Island Press,2005.[2] Chen Shang,Zhang Zhaohui,Ma Yan,et al.Program for service evaluation of marine ecosystems in China waters[J].Advances in Earth Science,2006,21(11):1 127-1 133.[陈尚,张朝晖,马艳,等.我国海洋生态系统服务功能及其价值评估研究计划[J].地球科学进展,2006,21(11):1 127-1 133.]
[3] Jakobsson K M,Dragun A K.The economics of endangered species[C]//Working-paper of Swedish University Agriculture Sciences Presented at the 7th Annual Conference of the EAERE.Uppsala(Sweden),1996.
[4] Denise L Stanley.Local perception of public goods:Recent assessments of willingness-to-pay for endangered species[J].Contemporary Economic Policy,2005,23(2):165-179.
[5] Green D, Jacowitz K E, Kahneman D, et al. Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods[J].Resources and Energy Economics,1998,20(2):85-116.
[6] Paulo A L D Nunes, Jeroen C J M, Van Den Bergh. Economic valuation of biodiversity: Sense or nonsense[J].Ecological Economics,2001,39(2):203-222.
[7] Xue Dayuan,Bao Haosheng,Li Wenhua.A study on tourism value of biodiversity in Changbaishan mountain biosphere reserve (CMBR) in northeast China[J].Journal of natural resources,1999,14(2):140-145.[薛达元,包浩生,李文华.长白山自然保护区生物多样性旅游价值评估研究[J].自然资源学报,1999,14(2):140-145.]
[8] Qiu Xingchun,Tu Yulin.Economic value valuation on biodiversity of the Chishui alsophina spinulosa nature reserve[J].Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Natural Sciences),2005,23(1):23-27.[邱兴春,屠玉麟.赤水桫椤保护区生物多样性的经济价值评估[J].贵州师范大学学报:自然科学版,2005,23(1):23-27.]
[9] Bu Yuexian,Zeng Guangming,Zhao Weihua,et al.Economic value assessment of biodiversity in Hunan[J].Ecologic Science,2006,25(1):82-86.[卜跃先,曾光明,赵卫华,等.湖南省生物多样性经济价值评估分析[J].生态科学,2006,25(1):82-86.]
[10] Wang Yonghua,Hu Yujia.Contingent valuation of restoring ecosystem services of Xincun bay in Hainan province[J].Journal of Yangtze University(Natcual Sciences Edit),2005,2(2):83-88.[汪永华,胡玉佳.海南新村海湾生态系统服务恢复的条件价值评估[J].长江大学学报:自然版,2005,2(2):83-88.]
[11] Chen Shang,Li Tao,Liu Jian,et al.Ecological Impact Assessment of Reclamation Planning in the Bays of Fujian Province[M].Beijing:Science Press,2008.[陈尚,李涛,刘键,等.福建省海湾围填海规划生态影响评价[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.]
[12] Loomis J, Ekstrand E. Economic benefits of critical habitat for the mexican spotted owl:A scope test using a multiple-bounded contingent valuation survey[J].Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics,1997,22:356-366.
[13] Loomis J, Kent P, Strange L, et al. Measuring the total economics value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: Results from a contingent valuation servey[J].Ecological Economics,2000,33(1):103-117.

[1]	张翼飞,赵敏. 意愿价值法评估生态服务价值的有效性与可靠性及实例设计研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2007, 22(11): 1134-1140.
[2]	李金平,王志石. 澳门噪音污染损害价值的条件估值研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(6): 599-604.
[3]	金建君,王志石. 条件价值法在澳门固体废弃物管理经济价值评估中的比较研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(6): 605-609.
[4]	张志强,徐中民,程国栋. 条件价值评估法的发展与应用[J]. 地球科学进展, 2003, 18(3): 454-463.
[5]	杨开忠，白墨，李莹，薛领，王学军. 关于意愿调查价值评估法在我国环境领域应用的可行性探讨——以北京市居民支付意愿研究为例[J]. 地球科学进展, 2002, 17(3): 420-425.

阅读次数

全文

摘要