关于意愿调查价值评估法在我国环境领域应用的可行性探讨——以北京市居民支付意愿研究为例

doi:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2002.03.0420

地球科学进展 ›› 2002, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (3): 420 -425. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2002.03.0420

杨开忠，白墨，李莹，薛领，王学军

北京大学城市与环境学系，北京 100871

收稿日期:2001-04-16 修回日期:2001-09-17 出版日期:2002-12-20
通讯作者: 杨开忠（1962-），男，湖南常德人，教授，主要从事区域科学与可持续发展研究.E-mail:paulsnou@263.net E-mail:paulsnou@263.net
基金资助:
北京市环保局项目“北京环境污染损失评估研究”资助.

THE FEASIBILITY OF CONTINGENT VALUATION METHOD IN ECONOMIC VALUATION OF ENVIRONMENT IN CHINA: A CASE STUDY OF THE RESIDENTS’WILLINGNESS TO PAY IN BEIJING

YANG Kai-zhong，BAI Mo，LI Ying，XUE Ling，WANG Xue-jun

Department of Urban and Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

Received:2001-04-16 Revised:2001-09-17 Online:2002-12-20 Published:2002-06-01

从意愿调查价值评估法的优越性和局限性出发，以在北京市进行的关于市民为改善大气环境质量的支付意愿的调查研究为例，详细分析了调查方法和结果。通过对结果的评价，探讨了意愿调查价值评估法在我国进行环境物品价值评估实践中的可行性，得出了这一方法在我国具有推广前景的结论。最后对意愿调查价值评估法今后在我国实践中的应用提出了几点建议。

关键词: 意愿调查价值评估法, 支付意愿, 环境经济评估

This paper started from the basic concepts and advantages of the contingent valuation method (CVM)，and briefly analyzed the limitations of this method when used in developing country. Based on summarizing the previous research results in China, we analyzed the method and result of a survey, which aimed at finding out the residents’ willingness to pay (WTP) for improving air quality in Beijing by using CVM. The result indicated that the residents’ mean WTP for a 50% reduction of the current concentration of pollution substances in the air was 143 Yuan per household and per year, and the total WTP of the residents in the research area was 336 million Yuan per year. According to statistical average income level of the sample household, WTP was about 0.7%~0.8% of annual income of one family. The amount of accepted questionnaires was 91.4% and among them 70.3% respondents showed that they completely or almost completely understand the questionnaire. This demonstrated that the survey was successful. The feasibility of CVM in economic valuation of environment in China was discussed. It is concluded that the potential application prospect of this method in China is optimistic. CVM can be reliably used to estimate the value of improved environmental quality in big cities of China by carefully designing the survey. This study also indicates that based on the increased income and improved environmental awareness, people are willing to pay for the improved environmental quality. WTP measures are important for policy makes when deciding about public investments and policy instrument in order to control environmental pollution. Some suggestions for the application of CVM in the future were pointed out at the end of the paper.

Key words: Contingent valuation method(CVM), Willingness to pay(WTP), Economic valuation of environment.

中图分类号:

［1］ Mitchell R C, Carson R T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method［M］. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 1989. 
［2］ Richard C B, Patricia A C, Daniel J M. Contingent Valuation［A］. In: Daniel W Bromley. The Handbook of Environmental Economics［C］. US: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 1995. 629-654.
［3］ Ma Zhong, ed. Introduction to Economics of Environment and Natural Resources［M］. Beijing:Higher Education Press, 1999. 130-131［马中主编. 环境与资源经济学概论［M］. 北京：高等教育出版社，1999. 130-131.］
［4］ Xu Songling. An economic estimation for environmental damage losses in China: its purpose, methods, results and suggestions on research (Ⅰ) ［J］. China Soft Sciences, 1997, (11): 115-127.［徐嵩龄. 中国环境破坏的经济损失的计量研究：它的意义、方法、成果及研究建议（Ⅰ）［J］. 中国软科学，1997,（11）：115-127.］
［5］ Jin Leshan. Research on Techniques of Valuation Method for Environmental Quality (doctoral dissertation) ［D］. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 1997.［靳乐山. 环境质量价值若干评估技术研究（博士论文）［D］. 北京：中国农业大学，1997.］
［6］ Xue Dayuan, Clem Tisdell. Economic valuation method for environmental: contingent valuation method［J］. Rural Eco-Environment, 1999, 15(3): 39-43.［薛达元，Clem Tisdell. 环境物品的经济价值评估方法：条件价值法［J］. 农村生态环境，1999，15（3）:39-43.］
［7］ Wang Jinnan. Environmental Economics: Theory, Method, Policy［M］. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 1994. ［王金南. 环境经济学：理论、方法、政策［M］. 北京：清华大学出版社，1994.］
［8］ Jin Leshan. Environmental valuation in China: theory and practice［J］. Environmental Science Trends, 1997,(4): 1-4. ［靳乐山.中国的环境价值评估：理论与实践［J］. 环境科学动态，1997,(4): 1-4.］
［9］ Day B, Mourato S. Willingness to pay for water quality improvements in Chinese rivers: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey in the Beijing Area［A］. In: United Nations CSERGE Working Paper 98-01,Center for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment［C］. 1998.
［10］ Swanson T, Day B. Valuing water quality in China: purpose, approach and policy［J］. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1999, 11 (3): 309-316.
［11］ Arrow K,Solow R, Leamer E, et al. Report of NOAA Panel on contingent valuations［A］. In: US Federal Register［C］. 1993, 10: 4 601-4 614.
［12］ Carlsson F,Johansson-Stenman O. Willingness to pay for improved air quality in Sweden［J］. Applied Economics, 2000, 32 (6): 661-669.
［13］ Beijing Statistical Bureau,eds. Beijing Statistical Yearbook, 2000［M］. Beijing: Chinese Statistical Press, 2000.［北京市统计局编. 北京统计年鉴，2000［M］. 北京：中国统计出版社，2000.］

[1]	王丽，陈尚，任大川，柯淑云，李京梅，王栋. 基于条件价值法评估罗源湾海洋生物多样性维持服务价值[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(8): 886-892.
[2]	李金平,王志石. 澳门噪音污染损害价值的条件估值研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(6): 599-604.
[3]	张志强,徐中民,程国栋. 条件价值评估法的发展与应用[J]. 地球科学进展, 2003, 18(3): 454-463.

阅读次数

全文

摘要