地球科学进展 ›› 2006, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (9): 982 -988. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2006.09.0982

可持续发展研究 上一篇    

甘肃生态经济系统的能值分析及其可持续性评估
杜鹏 1,徐中民 2   
  1. 1.西北师范大学地理与环境科学学院,甘肃 兰州 730070;2.中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所寒旱区流域水文及应用生态研究室,甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2006-03-30 修回日期:2006-07-18 出版日期:2006-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 杜鹏 E-mail:pengkong829@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金重点项目“环境变化条件下干旱区内陆河流域水资源可持续利用研究”(编号:40235053) ;国家自然科学基金项目“基于环境经济帐户的可持续发展评价——以张掖地区为例”(编号:40201019) 资助.

Emergy Analysis and Sustainability Assessment of Ecological-economics System in Gansu Province

Du Peng 1,Xu Zhongmin 2   

  1. 1.Geography and Environment Science College of North-West Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China;2.State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soil Engineering, CAREERI, CAS, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2006-03-30 Revised:2006-07-18 Online:2006-09-15 Published:2006-09-15

比较生态足迹指数、环境可持续性指数(ESI)、自然资本指数(NCI)等作为衡量生态经济系统可持续性指标的不足后,选择能值分析及其指标作为定量评价区域可持续发展状态的方法和指标。通过对甘肃1994—2004年的净能值产出率(NEYR)、能值投入率(RIR)、环境负载率(ELR)和可持续发展能值指数(ESI)等7项指标的计算及趋势分析,并与其他国家和地区比较得出:甘肃经济还处于较低水平,开放程度依然有限,能值消费和利用结构也是低层次的,近年工业化步伐虽然加快,但要实现甘肃的可持续发展,仍需重视经济发展的作用,通过进口低能值、高能量的产品而输出高能值的产品和服务,达到自组织最优化状态(能源利用高效率)和系统对外最大功(强势竞争力);甘肃可持续发展指数(ESI)的波动下降与甘肃经济的快速增长不无关系。重视经济增长和控制其对环境系统的压力,保持可持续发展指数的平缓降低尤为重要。

Sustainability assessment indices as a hot topic in the Sustainable Development Research. Emergy analysis methods and relevant assessment indices have primary advantages at sustainability evaluation process, it can calculate the whole eco-economic system's each kind of contents into a single index as Solar Emergy to analysis its' sustainable conditions. In this paper we choose some Emergy indices such as Net Emergy Yield Ratio(NEYR), Emergy Investment Ratio(EIR), Environmental Loading Radio(ELR), Emergy Dollar Ratio(EDR), Emergy Density(ED), Fraction of Emergy Used form Electricity(FEE) and Emergy-Based Sustainability Index(ESI) to assess the Eco-economics System sustainable development situation of Gansu province. By the change tendency of Gansu'NEYR , ELR, EIR and ESI indices from 1994 to 2004 and the comparisons between other countries and regions, it could be concluded that: the change tendency of NEYR and EIR from 1994 to 2004 reflects the economic development stage of Gansu is at lower level in China, Emergy consumes and yields structure are also at the similarly lower level, compared with other countries and regions. The emergy consumption and utilization structure also at a lower level. To realize the objectives of the sustainable development, that is to say the maximum of the whole system yields power as well as the minimum of environment negative effects; the system should adjust its economic structure to optimize the self-organized situation. The change tendency of ESI has a close relation with the economic growth of Gansu. To keep the sustainable development index steady decrease, the government of Gansu Province should takes a peer efforts to focus on economic growth and control eco-system's press on environment.

中图分类号: 

[1] Zhang Zhiqiang, Cheng Guodong, Xu Zhongmin. Review of indicators and methodologies for measuring sustainable development and their applications [J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2002, 24(4):354-357. [张志强,程国栋,徐中民.可持续发展评估指标、方法及应用研究[J].冰川冻土,2002,24(4):354-357.]

[2] Xu Zhongmin, Zhang Zhiqiang, Cheng Guodong. Ecological Economics-theory, Method and Application[M]. Zhengzhou:Yellow River Water Conservancy Press, 2003:78-79.[徐中民,张志强,程国栋.生态经济学理论方法与应用[M].郑州:黄河水利出版社, 2003:78-79.]

[3] Odum H T. Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1996:1-14;19-24;370-379.

[4] Ulgiati S, Odum H T, Bastinanoni S. Emergy use, environmental loading and sustainability: An emergy analysis of Italy [J]. Ecological Modeling, 1994, 73: 215-268.

[5] Brown M T, McClanahan T. Emergy analysis persepectives of Thailand and Mekong river dam proposals[J]. Ecological Modeling, 1996, 91: 105-130.

[6] Yan Maochao. Introduction to New Ecological Economics[M]. Beijing: China Zhigong Press, 2001:72-74. [严茂超.生态经济学新论[M].北京:中国致公出版社,2001:72-74.]

[7] Lan Shengfang, Qin Pei. Emergy analysis of ecosystems [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2001, (1): 129-131. [蓝盛芳,钦佩.生态系统的能值分析[J].应用生态学报, 2001,(1):129-131.]

[8] Li Haitao, Liao Yingchun, Yan Maochao, et al. Emergy evaluation and assessment of sustainability on the eco-economic system of Xinjiang [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2003, 58(5):766-769.[李海涛,廖迎春,严茂超,.新疆生态经济系统的能值分析及其可持续性评估[J].地理学报,2003,58(5):766-769.]

[9] Statistical Bureau of Gansu Province. Gansu Yearbook 1995-2005[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press,2005.[甘肃省统计局编.甘肃年鉴1995—2005[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2005.]

[10] Environment Protection Bureau of Gansu Povince. Environment Protection Journal of Gansu Povince No.73[J/OL].2004.[甘肃省环保期刊第73. http://www.gsep.gansu.gov.cn/qkdk/hjdk/20041019102300.htm]

[11] Li Haitao, Liao Yingchun, Yan Maochao. Emergy analysis on the ecological-economic system of Jiangxi province [J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis,2003,25(1):96-98. [李海涛,廖迎春,严茂超.江西生态经济系统的能值分析[J].江西农业大学学报,2003, 25(1):96-98.]

[12] Li Jialin, Zhang Zhenglong, Zeng Zhaopeng. Study on emergy analysis and sustainable development of Jiangsu environmental-economic system [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2003, 13(2):74-76. [李加林,张正龙,曾昭鹏.江苏环境经济系统的能值分析与可持续发展对策研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2003,13(2) :74-76.]

[1] 邓振镛,张 强,王润元,赵 鸿,徐金芳,刘明春,赵红岩,姚玉璧. 农作物主要病虫害对甘肃气候暖干化的响应及应对技术的研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2012, 27(11): 1281-1287.
[2] 许彦平,姚晓红,乔艳君. 甘肃小陇山林区甘肃鼢鼠危害面积的气象预测预报技术研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2011, 26(8): 881-886.
[3] 郭毅,赵景波. 1368—1948年陇中地区干旱灾害时间序列分形特征研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2010, 25(6): 630-637.
[4] 邓振镛,张强,徐金芳,黄蕾诺,文小航,王润元,王小燕,奚立宗. 全球气候增暖对甘肃农作物生长影响的研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2008, 23(10): 1070-1078.
[5] 杨小利;杨兴国;马鹏里;王若升;董彦雄. PDSI在甘肃中东部地区的修正和应用[J]. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(9): 1022-1028.
[6] 孙秉强;张强;董安祥;陈少勇. 甘肃黄土高原土壤水分气候特征[J]. 地球科学进展, 2005, 20(9): 1041-1046.
[7] 胡兴林. 甘肃省主要河流径流时空分布规律及演变趋势分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2000, 15(5): 516-521.
[8] 孙晓猛,张旗,钱青. 甘肃肃南白泉门地区蛇绿混杂岩地质特征[J]. 地球科学进展, 1997, 12(4): 340-350.
阅读次数
全文


摘要