A STUDY OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TRUE SURFACE TEMPERATURE AND RADIOMETRIC SURFACE TEMPERATURE
Received date: 2004-12-27
Revised date: 2005-06-13
Online published: 2005-10-25
The measurements of air temperature and air humidity were utilized to analyze the diurnal variation of atmospheric emissivity over heterogeneous surfaces and to calculate downward atmospheric longwave irradiance, from June 5th to July 6th, 2004, in Xiaotangshan area, Beijing. Moreover, sky radiometric temperature at 37 and land surface radiometric temperature with thermal infrared thermometers were employed to study the differences between surface radiometric temperature over heterogeneous surfaces without being calibrated and calibrated with standard blackbody source and the differences between surface “true” temperature, which were calculated with the downward longwave irradiance and surface emissivity, and surface radiometric temperature, which were calibrated by standard blackbody source. The results may be served as scientific reference to invert land surface temperature with remote sensing and to study land surface energy balance. The results indicated: (1) the differences of surface radiometric temperature between without being calibrated and being calibrated by standard blackbody sources ranged from 0.1 to 1℃;（2）the diurnal variation range of atmospheric emissivity ranged from 0.75 to 0.85; (3) the differences of downward atmospheric longwave irradiance between being calculated by air temperature and air humidity and being measured by pyranometer were small with the average mean error being 3.1%, while those of downward atmospheric longwave irradiance between being calculated by sky radiometric temperature at 37° with thermal infrared thermometer and being measured by pyranometer were larger, with the average mean error being 38.1%; (4) the differences between surface true temperature and surface radiometric temperature calibrated with standard blackbody ranged from 0.2℃ to 1.5℃ over various surfaces under variable sky conditions, and the higher surface radiometric temperature was, the larger the differences were. Therefore, the differences had the diurnal variation rule.
LIU Su-hong , HUANG Miao-fen , ZHU Qi-jiang , LIU Shao-min . A STUDY OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN TRUE SURFACE TEMPERATURE AND RADIOMETRIC SURFACE TEMPERATURE[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2005 , 20(10) : 1075 -1082 . DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2005.10.1075
[1] Zhang R H, Li Z L, Tang X Z, et al. Study of emissity scaling and relativity of homogeneity of surface temperature[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing,2004, 25(1): 245-259.
[2] Lagouarde J P,Kerr Y H , Brunet Y.An experimental study of angular effects on surface temperature for various plant canopies and bare[J]. Agriculture and Forest Meteorology,1995, 77:167-190.
[3] Voogt J A , Oke T R. Radiometric temperature of urban Canyon Walls obtained from vehicle traverses[J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology,1998, 60:199-217.
[4] Chehbouni A, Nouvellon Y, Kerr Y H, et al. Directional effect on radiative surface temperature measurements over a semiarid grassland site[J].Remote Sensing of Environment,2001, 76:360-372.
[5] Li Z L, Zhang R, Sun X, et al. Experimental system for the study of the directional thermal emission of natural surface[J].International Journal of Remote Sensing,2004, 25(1): 195-204.
[6] Zhang Yiping, Li Yourong. A study on the characteristic of temperatures on the different surface of building in the urban area[J].Urban Environment Urban Ecology,1997, 10(1):39-42.[张一平, 李佑荣.城市区域内建筑物表面温度特征[J].城市环境与城市生态, 1997, 10(1):39-42.]
[7] Voogt J A, Oke T R. Complete urban surface temperature [J].Journal of Applied Meteorology,1997, 36:1 117-1 132.
[8] William P Kustas, John M Norman. Evaluation of soil amd vegetation heat flux predictions using a simple two-source model with radiometric temperatures for partial canopy cover[J]. Agriculture and Forest Meteorology,1999, 94:13-29.
[9] Chehbouni A, Nouvellon Y, Lhomme J P, et al. Estimation of surface sensible heat flux dual angle observations of radiative surface temperature[J]. Agriculture and Forest Meteorology,2001, 108:55-65.
[10] Zhan W P kustas, Humes K S. An intercomparison study on models of sensible heat llux over partial canopy surfaces with remotely sensed surface temperature[J]. Remote Sense Environment,1996,58:242-256.
[11] Wang Pengxin, Wan Zhengming, Gong Jianya, et al. Advanced in drought monitoring by using remotely sensed normalized difference vegetation index and land surfce temperature products[J]. Advances in Earth Science,2003, 18(4):527-533. [王鹏新, Wan Zhengming,龚健雅,等.基于植被指数和土地表面温度的干旱监测模型[J].地球科学进展, 2003, 18(4):527-533.]
[12] Norman J M, Kustas W P, Humes K S.Source approach for estimating soil and vegetation energy fluxes in observation of directional radiometric surface temperature[J].Agriculture and Forest Meteorology,1995,77:263-293.
[13] Chehbouni A, Seen D Lo, Njoku E G, et al. Estimation of sensible heat flux over sparsely vegetated surface[J].Journal of Hydrology,1997,(188~189):855-868.
[14] Zhang Renhua.Remotely Sensing Model Based on Experiment and the Basis of Land Surface[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1996. [张仁华. 实验遥感模型及地面基础[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 1996.]
[15] Brutsaert W H. On a derivable formula for long-wave radiation from clear skies[J].Water Resource Research,1975,11:742-744.
[16] Isdo S B. A set of equation for full spectrum, 8~14 μm and 10.5~12.5 μm thermal radiation from cloudless skies[J].Water Resource Research,1981,17:295-304.
[17] Guo Xiaoyin,Cheng Guodong. Advances in the application of remote sensing to evapotranspiration research[J].Advances in Earth Science,2004, 19（1）:107-114.[郭晓寅,程国栋.遥感技术应用于地表面蒸散发的研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2004,19(1):107-114.]
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
甘公网安备62010202000687
