Articles

AN OVERVIEW OF MARINE BIOGEOCHEMICAL MODELING

  • CHAI Fei ,
  • HONG Hua-sheng1 ,
  • SHANG Shao-ling
Expand
  • 1.Marine Environmental Laboratory of the Ministry of Education of China, Xiamen University,Xiamen 361005,China;2.School of Marine Science, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469, USA

Received date: 2003-04-23

  Revised date: 2003-10-24

  Online published: 2004-08-01

Abstract

The recent development and progress in marine biogoechemical modeling are reviewed and summarized. In general, biogeochemical models can be classified into several different categories according to various physical, biological and chemical processes in the oceans. There are three main types of modeling approaches focusing on physical transport of nutrients, ecosystem dynamics, and temporal variability of biogeochemical processes in the oceans. Ocean current and mixing are dominate processes in supplying nutrients to the euphotic zone. In the upwelling regions, the vertical advection through upwelling is the main mechanism to deliver nutrients. In the central gyre regions, vertical mixing had been thought as a key process to bring nutrients to the surface. Recent field observations and modeling work have suggested that the vertical motion (both upwelling and downwelling) associated with mesoscale eddy activities in the gyre regions can be a potentially important to supply nutrients into the euphotic zone. So far, most models developed for the central gyre regions are onedimensional or coarse resolution threedimensional, and more eddyresolving biogeochemical models are needed. Prior to early 1990’s, most ecosystem models were developed following a general nutrientphytoplanktonzooplanktondetritus (NPDZ) structure. The state variables are single phytoplankton and zooplankton specie, nitrate or phosphate as a limiting nutrient, and a sinking detritus pool. Recently, development of ecosystem model has been advanced with considering multiple limiting nutrients such as iron and silicate, incorporating more phytoplankton and zooplankton functional groups, and separating detritus materials with different sinking velocity. These advances in ecosystem modeling allow us to investigate more complex processes in the oceans, such as nitrogen fixation by cyanobacterium, iron fertilization, and role of remineralization in nutrient and carbon cycle. The ecosystem and biogeochemical processes in responses to climate variability have been main interests in developing and testing models. Prior to 1990’s, most models were focused on reproducing and understanding seasonal cycle and nutrients and phytoplankton dynamics. Recently, lots of progresses have been made in terms of modeling and understanding on how ecosystem dynamics respond to climate variability on longer time scale, such as El Nino and Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). The progresses in biogeochemical modeling have been made rapidly during the past decade, but challenges are still ahead. For example: physical circulation models need to consider mesoscale processes and to resolve eddyinduced nutrient transports; phytoplankton and zooplankton functional groups need to be better incorporated into models based upon both field and laboratory experiments; biogeochemical models need to be linked from global to basin and regional scales, and property exchange at boundaries across these three scales needs more attention; data assimilation technique is also needed to refine parameter values in ecosystem models. In order to build and establish predictive capabilities of biogeochemical models, multidisciplinary observational networks and computing facilities should be developed and supported.

Cite this article

CHAI Fei , HONG Hua-sheng1 , SHANG Shao-ling . AN OVERVIEW OF MARINE BIOGEOCHEMICAL MODELING[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2004 , 19(4) : 621 -629 . DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2004.04.0621

References

[1]Riley G A, Stommel H, Bumpus D F . Quantitative ecology of the plankton of the Western North Atlantic[J]. Bulletin Bingham Oceanography Collection, 1949,12:1-169.
[2]Xu Yongfu(徐永福). On the study of the biogeochemical cycle of carbon dioxide[J]. Advance in Earth Sciences(地球科学进展),1995,10(4):367-372(in Chinese).
[3]Gao Huiwang(高会旺), Feng Shizuo(冯士笮), Guan Yuping(管玉平). Progress in marine planktonic ecosystem modelling[J]. Limnology Oceanography(海洋与湖沼),2000,31(3) :341-348(in Chinese).
[4]Emerson S, Quay P, Karl D, et al. Experimental determination of the organic carbon flux from open-ocean surface waters[J]. Nature, 1997,389:951-954.
[5]Doney S C, Glover D M, Najjar R G. A new coupled, one-dimensional biological-physical model for the upper ocean:Applications to the JGOFS Bermuda Atlantic Time Series(BATS)site[J]. Deep-Sea Research II,1996,43:591-624.
[6]Haigh S P, Denman K L, Hsich W W. Simulation of the planktonic ecosystem response to pre-and post-1976 forcing in an isopycnic model of the North Pacific[J]. Canadian Journal of Fishery Aquatic Science, 2001,58:703-722.
[7]McGillicuddy D J, Jr Robinson A R. Eddy-induced nutrient supply and new production[J]. Deep-Sea Research Ⅰ,1997,44:1 427-1 450.
[8]Oschlies A, Garcon V. Eddy-induced enhancement of primary production in a model of the North Atlantic Ocean[J]. Nature, 1998,394:266-269.
[9]Spall S A, Richards K J. A numerical model of mesoscale frontal instabilities and plankton dynamics.I.Model formulation and initial experiments[J]. Deep-Sea Reseach II,2000,47:1 261-1 301.
[10]Gao S, Jia J J. Modeling suspended sediment distribution in continental shelf upwelling/downwelling systems[J]. [WT6BX]GeoMarine Letters,2003,22:218-226.
[11]Fasham M J R, Ducklow H W, Mckelvie S M. A nitrogen based model of plankton dynamics in the oceanic mixed layer[J]. Journal of Marine Research,1990,48:591-639.
[12]Sarmiento J L, Orr J C. Threedimensional simulations of the impact of southern ocean nutrient depletion on atmospheric CO2 and ocean chemistry[J]. Limnology Oceanography,1991,36(8):1 928-1 950.
[13]Hurtt G C, Armstrong R A. A pelagic ecosystem model calibrated with BATS data[J]. Deep-Sea Research, 1996, 43:653684.
[14]Bissett W P, Walsh J J, Dieterle D A, et al. Carbon cycling in the upper waters of the Sargasso Sea. I. Numerical simulation of differential carbon and nitrogen fluxes[J]. Deep-Sea Research, 1999a,46:205-269.
[15]Bissett W P, Carder K L, Walsh J J, et al. Carbon cycling in the upper waters of the Sargasso Sea.Ⅱ. Numerical simulation of apparent and inherent optical properties[J]. Deep-Sea Research, 1999b,46:271-317.
[16]Dadou I,Lamy F Modéle. Unidimensionnel intégré en mode forcé: Application au site oligotrophe d`EUMELI[A]. In: Repport JGOFS-France[C]. 1996,22:34.
[17]Joos F, Siegenthaler J L. Estimates of the effect of southern ocean iron fertilization on atmospheric CO2 concentrations[J]. Nature, 1991,349:772-775.
[18]Kurz K D, MaierReimer E. Iron fertilization of the austral ocean-the Hamburg model assessment[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 1993,7(1):229-244.
[19]Price N M, Andersen L F, Morel F M M. The equatorial Pacific Ocean:Grazer controlled phytoplankton populations in an iron-limited system[J]. Deep-Sea Research, 1991,38:1 361-1 378.
[20]Miller C B, Frost B W, Wheeler P A, et al. Ecological dynamics in the subarctic Pacific, a possibly iron-limited ecosystem[J]. Limnology Oceanography, 1991,36:1 600-1 615.
[21]Chai F, Lindley S T, Barber R T. Origin and maintenance of a high nitrate condition in the equatorial Pacific[J]. Deep-Sea Research II, 1996,43:1 031-1 064.
[22]Armstrong R A. An optimization-based model of iron-light-ammonium colimition of nitrate uptake and phytoplankton growth[J]. Limnology Oceanography, 1999a,44:1 436-1 446.
[23]Taylor A H, Harbour D S, Harris R P, et al. Seasonal succession in the pelagic ecosystem of the North Atlantic and the utilization of nitrogen[J]. Journal Plankton Research,1993,15:875-891.
[24]Dugdale R C, Wilkerson F P, Minas H J. The role of a silicate pump in driving new production[J]. Deep-Sea Research, 1995,42:697-719.
[25]Dugdale R C, Wilkerson F P. Silicate regulation of new production in the equatorial Pacific upwelling[J]. Nature, 1998, 391:270-273.
[26]Hutchins D A, Bruland K W. Iron-limited diatom growth and Si: N uptake ratios in a coastal upwelling regime[J]. Nature,1998,393:561-564.  
[27]Takeda S. Influence of iron availability on nutrient consumption ratio of diatoms in oceanic waters[J]. Nature, 1998,393:774-777.
[28]Chai F, Dugdale R C, Peng T H, et al. One-dimensional ecosystem model of the equatorial Pacific Upwelling system. Part I: Model development and silicon and nitrogen cycle[J]. Deep-Sea Research II,2002, 49:2 713-2 743. 
[29]Dugdale R C, Barber R, Chai F, et al. One-dimensional ecosystem model of the equatorial Pacific upwelling system.Part II:sensitivity analysis and comparison with JGOFS EqPac data[J]. Deep-Sea Research II,2002,49:2 747-2 768.
[30]Gnanadesikan A. A global model of silicon cycling: Sensitivity to eddy parameterization and dissolution[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles,1999,13:199-220.
[31]Karl D, Letelier R, Tupas L, et al. The role of nitrogen fixation in biogechemical cycling in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean[J]. Nature, 1997,388: 533-538.
[32]Gruber N, Keeling C D, Stocker T F. Carbon-13 constraints on the seasonal inorganic carbon budget at the BATS site in the northwestern Sargasso Sea[J]. Deep-Sea Research,1998,45:673-717.
[33]Hood R R, Bates N R, Capone D G, et al. Modeling the effect of nitrogen fixation on carbon and nitrogen fluxes at BATS[J]. Deep-Sea Research II, 2001,48:1 609-1 648.
[34]Stoens A, Menkès C, Radenac MH, et al. The coupled physical-new production system in the equatorial Pacific during the 1992-1995 El Niño[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research,1999,104:3 323-3 339.
[35]Chavez F P, Strutton P G, Frienderich G E, et al. Biological and chemical response of the equatorial Pacific ocean to the 1997-98 EI Niño[J]. Science, 1999,286:2 126-2 131.
[36]Leonard C L, McClain C R, Murtugudde R, et al. An iron-based ecosystem model of the central equatorial Pacific[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1999,104:1 325-1 341.
[37]Friedrichs M A M, Hofmann E E. Physical control of biological processes in the central equatorial Pacific Ocean[J]. Deep-Sea Research, 2001,48:1 023-1 069.
[38]McClain C R, Arrigo K. Observations and simulations of physical and biological processes at Ocean Weather Station P,1951-1980[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research,1996,101:3 697-3 713.
[39]Wong C S, Whitney F Aa, Matear R J, et al. Enhancement of new production in the northeast subarctic Pacific Ocean during negative North Pacific index events[J].Limnology Oceanography,1998,43:1 418-1 426. 
[40]Venrick E L, McGowan J A, Cayan D R, et al. Climate and chlorophyll a: Long-term trends in the central north Pacific Ocean[J]. Science, 1987,238:70-72.
[41]Chai F, Jiang M S, Barber R T, et al. Interdecadal variation of the transition zone Chlorophyll front: A physical-biological model simulation between 1960 and 1990[J]. Journal of Oceanography,2003, 59: 461-475.
[42]Archer D, Maier-Reimer E. Effect of deep-sea sedimentary calcite preservation on atmospheric CO2 concentration[J]. Nature, 1994,367: 260-264.
[43]Doney S C. Major challenges confronting marine biogeochemical modeling[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles,1999,13:705-714.
[44]Hofmann E E, Friedrichs M A M. Predictive modeling for marine ecosystems[A].In: Robinson A R, McCarthy J J, Rothschild B J,eds. The Sea[C]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2002. 537-561.

Outlines

/