地球科学进展 doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2012.10.1126

环境地球化学 上一篇    下一篇

成都经济区不同地貌景观区土壤有机碳分布特征及储量估算
阚泽忠 1,金立新 1,李忠惠 1,杨振鸿 2,张 华 1,包雨函 1   
  1. 1.四川省地质调查院,四川 成都 610081;2.重庆市地勘局川东南地质大队,重庆 400038
  • 收稿日期:2012-07-24 修回日期:2012-08-28 出版日期:2012-10-10

Distribution Characteristics and Reserves Estimation of Soil Organic Carbon of Different Physiognomy in Chengdu Economic Zone

Kan Zezhong 1,Jin Lixin 1,Li Zhonghui 1,Yang Zhenhong 2,Zhang Hua 1 ,Bao Yuhan 1   

  1. 1. Sichuan Province Geological Survey Institute, Chengdu 610081, China; 2. Southeast Sichuan Geological Team of Chongqing Bureau of Geology and Minerals Exploration,Chongqing 400038, China
  • Received:2012-07-24 Revised:2012-08-28 Online:2012-10-10 Published:2012-10-10

利用四川省成都经济区多目标区域地球化学调查获得的土壤有机碳含量数据,探讨了成都经济区不同地貌景观区土壤有机碳的分布特征。山区表层土壤有机碳含量(SOC)最高(22 g/kg左右),较平原区、丘陵区高一倍以上,丘陵区最低(9.49 g/kg)。成都平原区和东部丘陵区深层土壤碳含量相差不大,且均低于研究区深层土壤碳含量均值(6.99 g/kg)。利用指数模型对单位土壤平均碳量(USCATOC)、有机碳储量(USCATOC,h)、有机碳丰度指数(R)进行了估算。结果表明:各地貌单元土壤碳含量、单位土壤平均碳量、有机碳储量、有机碳丰度指数(R)分布具有山区高于平原区、丘陵区最低的一致性特征。龙门山区、西南山区面积约占全区的42%,土壤有机碳储量约占全区的59%;成都平原区、丘陵区面积占58%,土壤有机碳储量约占全区的41%。单位土壤平均碳量、有机碳储量在不同地貌单元中分布的差异主要与不同地貌单元的土壤有机碳含量有关,此外还可能与成土母质、植被发育情况、土地利用方式有关。

In this paper, we investigate the distribution characteristics of soil organic carbon between different landscape areas in Chengdu Economic Zone with soil organic carbon (SOC) data from multitarget regional geochemical survey. The SOC contents of surface soil in mountain area is the highest, nearly 22g/kg, twice more than the plain area or hilly area which contribute the lowest carbon contents (about 9.49g/kg). There are the similar carbon contents in deep soil between Chengdu plain area and Eastern hilly area, which were lower than the average value (6.99g/kg) of SOC in deep soil of the study area. The unit soil carbon average storage (USCATOC), Organic carbon storage(USCATOC.h) and the abundance index of soil organic carbon (R) with the index model are estimated. The results show that the SOC, USCATOC, USCATOC.h and R in different geomorphic unit have the same features, i.e. the dates in mountain area are high than those in Chengdu plain area, and the hilly area is the lowest. The region of Longmenshan area and southwestern mountainous area which occupy 42% of the measured area contributed to 59% of USCATOC.h and the region of the plain area and the hilly area which occupy 58% of the measured area contributed to 41% of USCATOC.h. The reason resulting to the distribution content differences of USCATOC and USCATOC,h in the different landscape units is mainly because that the various soil organic carbon contents in different landscape units. In addition, it is related to the differences of the parent material, the vegetation development situation, and the land use types.

中图分类号: 

[1]Zhang Guosheng, Huang Gaobao, Yin Chan. Soil organic carbon sequestration potential in crop land[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2005,25(2):351-357.[张国盛,黄高宝, Yin Chan. 农田土壤有机碳固定潜力研究进展[J].生态学报,2005, 25(2):351-357.]

[2]Li Yuning, Wang Guanyu, Li Wei. Soil respiration and carbon cycle[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2002,9(2): 351-357.[李玉宁,王关玉, 李伟.土壤呼吸作用和全球碳循环[J].地学前缘,2002,9(2):351-357.]

[3]Li Changsheng. Loss of soil carbon threatens Chinese agriculture: A comparison on agroeco system carbon pool in China and U.S[J].Quaternary Sciences, 2000,20(4):345-350.[李长生.土壤碳储量减少:中国农业之隐患——中美农业生态系统碳循环对比研究[J] . 第四纪研究, 2000, 20(4): 345-350.]

[4]Xi Xiaohuan, Zhang Jianxin, Liao Qilin, et al. Multi-purpose regional geochemical survey andsoil carbon reserves problem: Examples ofjiangsu,Henan,Sichuan,Jilin provinces and Inner Mongolia[J].Quatennary Sciences,2008,28(1):49-67.[奚小环,张建新,廖启林,等.多目标区域地球化学调查与土壤碳储量问题———以江苏、湖南、四川、吉林、内蒙古为例[J].第四纪研究,2008,28(1):49-67.]

[5]Xi Xiaohuan,Yang Zhongfang, Xia Xueqi, et al. Based on multi-objective regional geochemical survey of Chinese soil carbon reserves calculation method research[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2009,16(1):194-205.[奚小环,杨忠芳,夏学齐,等.基于多目标区域地球化学调查的中国土壤碳储量计算方法研究[J].地学前缘,2009,16(1):194-205.]

[6]Pan Genxing, Li Lianqing, Zheng Jufeng, et al. Soil carbon cycle research and Chinese paddy soil carbon sequestration research progress and problems[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica,2008,45 (5) :901-914.[潘根兴,李恋卿,郑聚锋,等.土壤碳循环研究及中国稻田土壤固碳研究的进展与问题[J].土壤学报, 2008,45 (5):901-914.]

[7]Chen Qingqiang,Shen Chengde,Yi Weixi. Soil carbon cycle research progress[J].Earth Science Progress,1998, 13(6): 555-563.[陈庆强,沈承德,易惟熙.土壤碳循环研究进展[J].地球科学进展, 1998, 13(6): 555-563.]

[8]Huang Xuexia, Ni Jiupai.Stimating soil organic carbon pool of Chongqing area and its spatial distribution[J].Jarnal of Soil and Nater Conserration, 2005, 19(1):54-58.[黄雪夏,倪九派. 重庆市土壤有机碳库的估算及其空间分布特征[J].水土保持学报,2005, 19(1):54-58.]

[9]Liang Aizhen, Yang Xueming,  ZhangXiaoping. Soil organic carbon changes in particle-size fractions following cultivation of Black soils in China[J].Soil & Tillage Research,2009,105:21-26.

[10]Yuri L Zinn, Rattan Lal, Dimas V S Resck. Changes in soil organic carbon stocks under agriculture in Brazil[J].Soil & Tillage Research,2005,84:28-40.

[1] 李启权,王昌全,岳天祥,张文江,余勇. 基于神经网络模型的中国表层土壤有机质空间分布模拟方法[J]. 地球科学进展, 2012, 27(2): 175-184.
阅读次数
全文


摘要