地球科学进展 ›› 2005, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (12): 1300 -1305. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2005.12.1300

研究论文 上一篇    下一篇

额济纳绿洲近20年来土地覆被变化
张小由 1,龚家栋 1,赵 雪 2,周茅先 1    
  1. 1.中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所,甘肃 兰州 730000;2.烟台师范学院,山东 烟台 264025
  • 收稿日期:2004-12-09 修回日期:2005-08-01 出版日期:2005-12-25
  • 通讯作者: 张小由
  • 基金资助:

    中国科学院“引进杰出人才”项目“内陆河流域水热动力与生态环境空间演化”(编号:2003401);中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目“黑河流域水—经济—生态环境综合治理试验示范”(编号:KZCX3-SW-329)资助.

THE CHANGE OF LAND COVER/LAND USE IN EJINA OASIS OVER 20 YEARS

ZHANG Xiaoyou 1,GONG Jiadong 1,ZHAO Xue 2,ZHOU Maoxian 1   

  1. 1.Cold and Arid Region Environmental and Engineering Research Institute,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Lanzhou  730000,China;2.Yantai Nornal University,Yantai  264025,China 
  • Received:2004-12-09 Revised:2005-08-01 Online:2005-12-25 Published:2005-12-25

土地利用/土地覆被变化研究是近年来全球环境变化研究的焦点之一。根据黑河下游额济纳绿洲土地生态分类,利用1982年与2000年2期TM遥感数据对比和野外实地调查,采用景观生态空间分布格局分析方法,分为河岸乔木林、河岸灌草林、荒漠稀疏灌丛、荒漠稀疏草地、河道与水域、盐碱化土地、城镇、戈壁、流动沙丘和剥蚀地山丘陵, 从各类土地分布面积变化和类型转移趋向与幅度两个方面,分析了额济纳绿洲20年来土地覆被变化。结果表明:①土地覆被类型结构发生了较大变化,河岸乔木林面积萎缩了0.97%、斑块数减小了376,而河岸灌草林增加了0.92%,数量减小1 316;而%LAND指数荒漠稀疏灌丛由4.49%增加到5.65%,由于中游来水量的锐减,河道和水域的斑块数由40个减少到6个,%LAND指数减小了0.15%。与此同时流动沙丘%LAND指数增加了0.42%。②近20年来以胡杨为主的河岸乔木林和荒漠稀疏草地减小了45.02%和14.55%,相应地以柽柳为主的河岸稀疏灌草地和荒漠稀疏灌丛增加了35.03%和25.88%;河岸乔灌林向河岸灌草林景观转移概率为45.95%,向荒漠稀疏灌丛和稀疏草地转移了0.78%和3.01%,向戈壁转移了10.87%;河岸灌草林景观类型向河岸乔灌林转移8.06%,向稀疏灌丛和稀疏草地转移10.95%和19.64%,向戈壁转移11.88%;③额济纳绿洲具有从河岸乔木→河岸灌草地→荒漠稀疏灌丛快速演化的趋势。

Land use and land cover change have been of great concern in global change study in recent years. Base on comparison with the remote sensing data in 1982 and 2000 and field investigation, the results of land cover and land use change were obtained by the method of landscape analysis. Ten types of land use were identified: riparian woods, riparian shrubbery, desert shrubbery, desert grassland, river-way and water area, salinised land, town, Gobi, shift sand dune, denudative upland. The results show that, (1) there were obvious changes in land cover structure. The area of riparian woods decreased 0.97% and the number of patch decreased 376; the area of riparian shrubbery decreased 0.92% and the number of patch decreased 1316. Meanwhile, the index of %LAND of desert shrubbery increased from 4.49% to 5.65%; Because of decrease of water quantity of discharge from middle reach. The patch of riverway and water area decreased from 40 to 6. the index of %LAND decreased 0.15%. At the same time, the index of %LAND of shift sand dune increase 0.42%. (2) the areas of riparian woods dominated by Populus euphratica and desert grassland decrease to 45.02% and 14.55%. However, the areas of riparian shrubbery dominated by Tamarix Spp and desert shrubbery increase to 35.03% and 25.88%. The transition probability is 45.95% from riparian woods to riparian shrubbery. At the same time, they are 0.78% and 3.01% from riparian woods to desert shrubbery and desert grassland. The succession trend of ecosystem was obtained: riparian woods→ riparian shrubbery and grassland→desert grassland. Meanwhile, the succession velocity becomes higher and higher.

中图分类号: 

[1] Tuner ⅡB L .Two types of global environmental change: Definitional and spatial issues in their human dimensions [J].Global Environmental Chang,1990,1(1):14-22.
[2] Meyer W B , Tuner ⅡB L .Change Use and Land Cover:A Global Perspective[M].London :Cambridge University Press ,1994.
[3] Jorgenson M T,Roth J E,Raynolds M K, et al.An Ecological Land Survey for Fort Wainwright ,Alaska .CRREL Report -9[R].Alaska :US Army Corps of Engineers,1999.
[4] Wang Genxu,Qian Ju,Cheng Guodong. Eco-environmental degradation and causal analysis in the source region of the Yellow river[J].Environmental Geology,2001,40(7):884-890. 
[5] Li Xiubin. A review of the international researches on land use/land cover change[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,1996,51(6):553-558. [李秀彬. 全球环境变化研究的核心领域——土地利用/土地覆被变化的国际研究动向[J].地理学报, 1996, 51(6): 553-558.]
[6] Shi Peijun, Gong Peng, Li Xiaobing, et al. Study Method and Practice on Landuse Cover Change[M]. Beijing:Science Press,2000.[史培军, 宫鹏, 李晓兵,等.土地利用/覆盖变化研究方法与实践[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2000.]
[7] Li Xiaobing,Chen Yunfeng,Yu Feng. Global and regional cover mapping form remote sensing data: Status quo, strategies and trends[J].Advances in Earth Science,2004,19(1):71-78.[李晓兵,陈云峰,喻峰. 基于遥感数据的全球及区域土地覆盖制图——现状、战略和趋势[J]. 地球科学进展,2004,19(1): 71-78.]
[8] Li Xiaobing. International research on environmental consequence of land use/cover change[J].Advances in Earth Science,1999,14(4):395-400.[李晓兵. 国际土地利用—土地覆盖变化的环境影响研究地[J]. 地球科学进展,1999,14(4): 395-400.]

[1] 魏学琼, 叶瑜, 崔玉娟, 李蓓蓓, 袁存, 方修琦. 中国历史土地覆被变化重建研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2014, 29(9): 1037-1045.
阅读次数
全文


摘要