地球科学进展 ›› 2002, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (1): 5 -11. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2002.01.0005

学科发展与研究 上一篇    下一篇

复杂区域科学:21世纪的区域科学
杨开忠,薛领   
  1. 北京大学城市与环境学系,北京 100871
  • 收稿日期:2001-04-29 修回日期:2001-07-05 出版日期:2002-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 杨开忠(1962-),男,湖南常德人,教授,主要从事区域发展及空间演化研究.E-mail:paulsnow@263.net E-mail:paulsnow@263.net
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目“区域复杂空间格局演化规律的研究”(编号:49971027)资助.

SPATIAL COMPLEXITY:REGIONAL SCIENCE IN 21th CENTURY

YANG Kaizhong,XUE Ling   

  1. Department of Urban and Environment Sciences,Peking University,Beijing 100871,China
  • Received:2001-04-29 Revised:2001-07-05 Online:2002-12-20 Published:2002-02-01

简要回顾了区域科学的发展里程并着重指出,今天越来越多的学者逐渐放弃传统的理念,将区域作为一个开放、复杂的非线性系统对待。区域科学的研究趋势逐渐由静态的、均衡的范式向动态演化的范式转变,开始应用复杂科学(scienc esofcomplexity)的理论和方法来研究和分析区域问题及其时空演化的内在规律,从而形成复杂区域科学研究阶段。介绍了有关复杂性及复杂科学的一些内容,并在此基础上进一步探讨了复杂区域科学研究的主要问题和可能的研究方法。

This paper basically reviews the development of regional science and emphasizes the fact that today more and more researchers gradually give up the traditional ideas, begin to treat region as an open, evolutionary, non-linear complex system. The research tendency of regional science has changed from static, equilibrium paradigm to dynamic, evolutionary paradigm, which makes use of sciences of complexity to study and analyze the regional problems and its rules of spatialtemporal evolution. The existence of a vast literature to a certain extent suggests that regional growth as well as its spatial evolution is more complicated than what we had thought. It is indeed the complexity inherent in the regional process that deserves further study. Urban and regional spatial structure can be seen as a cumulative on temporal dimension and agglomeration on spatial dimension which results from numerous interaction and locally decision of adaptive agents (households, enterprises, government and other organizations). Therefore the basic force driving the evolution of spatial structure is inherently microscopic. Our research on spatial complexity should focus on the microscopic mechanism of macroscopic emergence and its simulation. Moreover, this paper also discusses the other primary issues of spatial complexity and potential ways of approaching these problems such as multi-agent model based on the theory of complex adaptive systems.

中图分类号: 

[1] Isard W. Methods of Regional Analysis: An Introduction to Regional Science[M].Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1960.
[2] Iserman A M.  The history, status and future of regional science: An American perspective[J]. International Science Review, 1995, 17: 249-296.
[3] Krugman P. The Self organizing Economy[M].New York: Blackwell Oxford, 1996.
[4] Zhu Jinfeng. A discussion about basic characteristics of global city[J]. Human Geography, 1996, 2: 33-37.[褚劲风. 试论全球城市的基本特征[J]. 人文地理, 1996, 2: 33-37.]
[5] Yang Wuyang, Liang Jinshe. Advanced Economic Geography[M]. Beijing: Peking University Press, 1997.[杨吾扬, 梁进社. 高等经济地理学[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 1997.]
[6] Zhang Jingxiang. Combination of Urban Group Space[M]. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2000. [张京祥. 城镇群体空间组合[M]. 南京:东南大学出版社,2000.]
[7] Garreau. Edge City: Life on the Frontier[M]. New York: Doubleday, 1988.
[8] Gordon P, Richardson H W. Employment decentralization in US metropolitan areas: Is Los Angeles an outlier or the norm?[J]. Environment and Planning A, 1996, 28: 1 727-1 743.
[9] Wu F.An Experiment on the generic polycentricity of urban growth in a cellular automatic city[J]. Environment and Planning B, 1998, 25: 731-752.
[10] Batty M. New ways of looking at cities[J]. Nature, 1995, 377:574.
[11] Allen P M, Sanglier M. A dynamic model of a central place system[J]. Geographical Analysis,1981, 13: 149-165.
[12] Allen P M, Sanglier M. Urban revolution, self organization and decision making[J]. Environment and Planning A, 1981, 13: 169-183.
[13] Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables A J. The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade[M].Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1999.
[14] Clarke M, Wilson A G. The dynamics of urban spatial structure: Progress and problem[J]. Journal of Regional Science, 1983, 23: 1-18.
[15] Bak P, Tang C, Weisenfeld K. Self organized criticality[J]. Physical Review A, 1988, 38: 364-374.
[16] Anselin L, Rey S J. Introduction to the special issue on spatial econometrics[J]. International Regional Science Review, 1997, 20: 1-7.
[17] Krugman P. Urban concentration: The role of increasing returns and transport Costs[J]. International Regional Science Review, 1996, 19: 5-30.
[18] Cowan G A,Pines D,Meltzer D, eds. Complexity: Metaphors, Models and Reality[M]. New York: Addison Wesley, 1994.
[19] Casti J L. Complexification: Explaining a Paradoxical World through the Science of Surprise[M]. HarperColllins Publishers Inc, 1994.
[20] Harris B, Wilson A G. Equilibrium values and dynamics of attractiveness terms in production constrained spatial interaction models[J]. Environment and Planning A, 1978, 10: 371-388.
[21] Haag G, Weidlich W. A stochastic theory of interregional migration[J]. Geographical Analysis, 1984, 16: 331-357.
[22] Fujita M, Mori T. Structural stability and evolution of the urban system[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 1997, 27: 399-422.
[23] Krugman P. On the number and location of cities[J]. European Economic Review, 1993, 37: 293-298.
[24] Batty M, Xie Y. From cells to cities[J]. Environment and Planning B, 1997, 21: 531-548.
[25] Couclelis H. Cellular worlds: a framework for modeling micro-macro dynamics[J]. Environment and Planning A, 1985, 17: 585-596.
[26] Couclelis H. Of mice and men: what rodent populations can teach us about complex spatial dynamics[J]. Environment and Planning A, 1988, 20: 99-109.
[27] Couclelis H. From cellular automata to urban models: new principles for model development and implementation[J]. Environment and Planning B, 1997, 24: 165-174.
[28] Portugali J, Benenson I. Artificial planning experience by means of a heuristic cell space model: simulating international migration in the urban process[J]. Environment and Planning A, 1995, 27: 1 647-1 665.
[29] White R, Engelen G. Cellular automata and fractal urban form: a cellular modeling approach to the evolution of urban land use patterns[J]. Environment and Planning A, 1993, 25: 1 175-1 189.
[30] White R, Engelen G. Cellular automata as the basis of integrated dynamic regional modeling[J]. Environment and Planning B, 1997, 24: 235-246.
[31] Carroll G R. National citysize distribution[J]. Progress in Human Geography, 1982, 6: 1-43.
[32] Mandelbrot B B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature[M]. San Francisco: Freeman, 1982.
[33] Holland J H. Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity[M]. Massachusetts:Addison Wesley, 1995.
[34] Holland J H. Complex Adaptive System[M]. Boston: Winter, 1992.
[35] Basu N, Pryor R J, Quint T, Arnold T. ASPEN: A Microsimulation Model of the Economy[R]. Sandia National Laboratories: SANDIA Report, SAND96-2459,1996.

[1] 沈体雁. CGE与GIS集成的中国城市增长情景模拟框架研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(11): 1153-1163.
[2] 陈彦光,刘继生. 城市人口分布空间自相关的功率谱分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2006, 21(1): 1-9.
阅读次数
全文


摘要