Research Progress of the Generalized Nonlinear Complementary Relationships of Evaporation
Received date: 2020-12-20
Revised date: 2021-04-22
Online published: 2021-09-22
Supported by
the National Natural Science Foundation of China "Mechanisms of advections on wet surface evaporation at different spatial scales"(52079147);"Deciphering changes of river discharge on Tibetan Plateau"(92047301)
The complementary relationship of evaporation was first based on the linear feedbacks of land surface evaporation on the atmospheric evaporative demand. Given that the water availability of the land surface changes with constant available energy， it means that the land surface evaporation and the atmospheric evaporative demand change complementarily with equal amount yet opposite directions. Actual evaporation can be estimated with routinely measured meteorological variables based on the complementary relationship. At present， the complementary relationship is generalized to a constitutive relationship describing the nonlinear interactions between the land surface evaporation and the atmospheric evaporative demand. Three generalized nonlinear complementary relationships were proposed： the sigmoid formulation of Han et al. （2012）， the polynomial formulation of Brutsaert （2015）， and the rescaling approach on the independent variable of the polynomial formulation of Crago and Szilagyi （2016）. The three nonlinear complementary relationships adopt different boundary conditions， and employ different approaches to deal with the influences of the land surface water availability， reflecting different understandings on the interactions between the land surface evaporation and the atmospheric evaporative demand. This review summarizes the historical development of the generalized nonlinear complementary relationships with a specific focus on their controversies， and analyzes the differences of the understandings and research approaches， so as to provide a reference for the development of evaporation research.
Key words： Evaporation; Complementary relationship; Complementary principle
Songjun HAN , Fuqiang TIAN . Research Progress of the Generalized Nonlinear Complementary Relationships of Evaporation[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2021 , 36(8) : 849 -861 . DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2021.058
| 1 | SHUTTLEWORTH W J. Terrestrial hydrometeorology ［M］. Wiley-Blackwell， 2012. |
| 2 | MIRALLES D G， BRUTSAERT W， DOLMAN A J， et al. On the use of the term "evapotranspiration" ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2020， 56（11）. DOI：10.1002/essoar.10503229.1. |
| 3 | BRUTSAERT W. Evaporation into the atmosphere： theory， history and applications ［M］// Reidel-Kluwer H D. Evaporation into the atomsphere. Springer， 1982. |
| 4 | WANG Jingfeng， LIU Yuanbo， ZHANG Ke. The maximum entropy production approach for estimating evapotranspiration：principle and applications ［J］. Advances in Earth Science， 2019， 34（6）： 596-605. |
| 4 | WANG Jingfeng， 刘元波， 张珂. 最大熵增地表蒸散模型：原理及应用综述 ［J］. 地球科学进展， 2019， 34（6）： 596-605. |
| 5 | HAN S， TIAN F. Integration of Penman approach with complementary principle for evaporation research ［J］. Hydrological Processes， 2018， 32（19）： 3 051-3 058. |
| 6 | YANG D， FUBAO S， ZHIYU L， et al. Interpreting the complementary relationship in non-humid environments based on the Budyko and Penman hypotheses ［J］. Geophysical Research Letters， 2006， 33： L18402. |
| 7 | HAN Songjun， ZHANG Baozhong. Advances of evapotranspiration research based on the Penman approach and complementary principle ［J］. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering， 2018， 48（9）： 1 158-1 168. |
| 7 | 韩松俊， 张宝忠. 基于Penman方法和互补原理的蒸散发研究历程与展望 ［J］. 水利学报， 2018， 48（9）： 1 158-1 168. |
| 8 | BOUCHET R. Evapotranspiration réelle et potentielle， signification climatique ［J］. International Association of Hydrological Sciences Publication， 1963， 62： 134-142. |
| 9 | MORTON F I. Operational estimates of areal evapotranspiration and their significance to the science and practice of hydrology ［J］. Journal of Hydrology， 1983， 66： 1-76. |
| 10 | BRUTSAERT W， STRICKER H. An advection-aridity approach to estimate actual regional evapotranspiration ［J］. Water Resources Research， 1979， 15（2）： 443-450. |
| 11 | KAHLER D M， BRUTSAERT W. Complementary relationship between daily evaporation in the environment and pan evaporation ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2006， 42： W05413. DOI：10.1029/2005WR004541. |
| 12 | BRUTSAERT W， PARLANGE M B. Hydrologic cycle explains the evaporation paradox ［J］. Nature， 1998， 396： 30. |
| 13 | GRANGER R J. A complementary relationship approach for evaporation from nonsaturated surfaces ［J］. Journal of Hydrology， 1989， 111： 31-38. |
| 14 | HAN S， TIAN F. A review of the complementary principle of evaporation： from the original linear relationship to generalized nonlinear functions ［J］. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences， 2020， 24（5）： 2 269-2 285. |
| 15 | HAN S， XU D， WANG S， et al. Similarities and differences of two evapotranspiration models with routinely measured meteorological variables： application to a cropland and grassland in northeast China ［J］. Theoretical and Applied Climatology， 2014， 117（3/4）： 501-510. |
| 16 | HAN S， TIAN F， HU H. Positive or negative correlation between actual and potential evaporation？ evaluating using a nonlinear complementary relationship model ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2014， 50（2）： 1 322-1 336. DOI： 10.1002/2013WR014151. |
| 17 | HAN S， HU H， TIAN F. A nonlinear function approach for the normalized complementary relationship evaporation model ［J］. Hydrological Processes， 2012， 26（26）： 3 973-3 981. |
| 18 | HAN S， HU H， YANG D. A complementary relationship evaporation model referring to the Granger model and the advection-aridity model ［J］. Hydrological Processes， 2011， 25（13）： 2 094-2 101. |
| 19 | HAN S， HU H， TIAN F. Evaluating the advection-aridity model of evaporation using data from field-sized surfaces of HEIFE ［J］. IAHS Publication， 2008， 322（2）： 9-14. |
| 20 | HAN Songjun. Study on complementary relationship of evapotranspiration and its application in Tarim River Basin ［D］. Beijing： Tsinghua University， 2008. |
| 20 | 韩松俊. 蒸散发互补相关理论及其在塔里木河流域应用研究［D］. 北京：清华大学， 2008. |
| 21 | BRUTSAERT W. A generalized complementary principle with physical constraints for land-surface evaporation ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2015， 51（10）： 8 087-8 093. DOI：10.1002/2015WR017720. |
| 22 | CRAGO R， SZILAGYI J， QUALLS R， et al. Rescaling the complementary relationship for land surface evaporation ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2016， 52（11）： 8 461-8 471. |
| 23 | CRAGO R， QUALLS R. Evaluation of the generalized and rescaled complementary evaporation relationships ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2018， 54： 8 086-8 102. |
| 24 | SZILAGYI J， CRAGO R， QUALLS R. A calibration‐free formulation of the complementary relationship of evaporation for continental‐scale hydrology ［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research： Atmospheres， 2017， 122（1）： 264-278. |
| 25 | WANG L， TIAN F， HAN S， et al. Determinants of the asymmetric parameter in the complementary principle of evaporation ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2020， 56： e2019WR026570. |
| 26 | HAN S， TIAN F. Derivation of a sigmoid generalized complementary function for evaporation with physical constraints ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2018， 54（7）： 5 050-5 068. |
| 27 | LIU W， ZHOU H， HAN X， et al. Comment on two papers about the generalized complementary evaporation relationships by Cragoet al. ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2020， 56： e2019WR026292. |
| 28 | CRAGO R， SZILAGYI J， QUALLS R. Reply to "Comment on 'two papers about the generalized complementary evaporation relationships by Cragoet al.'" ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2020， 56： e2019WR026773. |
| 29 | SZILAGYI J， CRAGO R. Comment on "derivation of a sigmoid generalized complementary function for evaporation with physical constraints" by S. Han and F. Tian ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2019， 55： 868-869. |
| 30 | HAN S， TIAN F. Reply to comment by J. Szilagyi and R. Crago on "derivation of a sigmoid generalized complementary function for evaporation with physical constraints"［J］. Water Resources Research， 2019， 55（2）： 1 734-1 736. |
| 31 | MA N， ZHANG Y. Comment on "rescaling the complementary relationship for land surface evaporation" by R. Cragoet al. ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2017， 53（7）： 6 340-6 342. |
| 32 | HOBBINS M T， RAMI′REZ J A， BROWN T C， et al. The complementary relationship in estimation of regional evapotranspiration： the CRAE and Advection-aridity models ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2001， 37（5）： 1 367-1 388. |
| 33 | MCNAUGHTON K G， SPRIGGS T W. An evaluation of the Priestley and Taylor equation and the complementary relationship using results from a mixed layer model of the convective boundary layer［M］// Estimation of areal evapotranspiration.Wallingford， UK： IAHS Press， 1989. |
| 34 | RAMIREZ J A， HOBBINS M T， BROWN T C. Observational evidence of the complementary relationship in regional evaporation lends strong support for Bouchet's hypothesis ［J］. Geophysical Research Letters， 2005， 32： L15401. DOI：10.1029/2005GL023549. |
| 35 | LEDREW E F. A diagnostic examination of a complementary relationship between actual and potential evapotranspiration ［J］. Journal of Applied Meteorology， 1979， 18： 495-501. |
| 36 | LINTNER B， GENTINE P， FINDELL K， et al. The Budyko and complementary relationships in an idealized model of large-scale land-atmosphere coupling ［J］. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences， 2015， 19（5）： 2 119-2 131. |
| 37 | MA N， ZHANG Y， SZILAGYI J， et al. Evaluating the complementary relationship of evapotranspiration in the alpine steppe of the Tibetan Plateau ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2015， 51（2）： 1 069-1 083. |
| 38 | SZILAGYI J， JOZSA J. New findings about the complementary relationship—based evaporation estimation methods ［J］. Journal of Hydrology， 2008， 354（1/4）： 171-186. |
| 39 | SZILAGYI J. Complementary-relationship-based 30 year normals （1981-2010） of monthly latent heat fluxes across the contiguous United States ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2015， 51（11）： 9 367-9 377. |
| 40 | SPOSITO G. Understanding the Budyko Equation ［J］. Water， 2017， 9（4）. DOI：103390/w9040236. |
| 41 | LHOMME J P， GUILIONI L. Comments on some articles about the complementary relationship ［J］. Journal of Hydrology， 2006， 323： 1-3. |
| 42 | PENMAN H L. Natural evaporation from open water， bare soil and grass ［J］. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London， Series A， Mathematical and Physical Sciences， 1948， 193： 120-145. |
| 43 | PRIESTLEY C H， TAYLOR R J. On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters ［J］. Monthly Weather Review， 1972， 100： 81-92. |
| 44 | MORTON F I. Climatological estimates of evapotranspiration ［J］. Journal of the Hydraulics Division， 1976， 3（3）： 275-291. |
| 45 | ZENG Yan， QIU Xinfa， LIU Changming. Distributed modeling of evapotranspiration in the Yellow River Basin ［J］. Advances in Water Science， 2014， 25（5）： 632-640. |
| 45 | 曾燕， 邱新法， 刘昌明. 黄河流域蒸散量分布式模拟 ［J］. 水科学进展， 2014， 25（5）： 632-640. |
| 46 | MO Xingguo. An advection-aridity evaporation model for wheat field evapotranspiration and advection ［J］. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology， 1995， 16（6）： 1-4. |
| 46 | 莫兴国. 用平流—干旱模型估算麦田潜热及平流 ［J］. 中国农业气象， 1995， 16（6）： 1-4. |
| 47 | SZILAGYI J. Temperature corrections in the Priestley-Taylor equation of evaporation ［J］. Journal of Hydrology， 2014， 519： 455-464. |
| 48 | ASSOULINE S， LI D， TYLER S， et al. On the variability of the Priestley-Taylor coefficient over water bodies ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2016， 52（1）： 150-163. |
| 49 | HAN S， XU D， WANG S. Decreasing potential evaporation trends in China from 1956 to 2005： accelerated in regions with significant agricultural influence？［J］. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology， 2012， 154： 44-54. |
| 50 | YAO Tianci，LU Hongwei，YU Qing，et al. Potential evapotranspiration characteristic and its abrupt change across the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and its surrounding areas in the last 50 years［J］. Advances in Earth Science，2020，35（5）： 534-546. |
| 50 | 姚天次， 卢宏玮， 于庆， 等. 近50年来青藏高原及其周边地区潜在蒸散发变化特征及其突变检验 ［J］. 地球科学进展， 2020， 35（5）： 534-546. |
| 51 | QUALLS R J， GULTEKIN H. Influence of components of the advection-aridity approach on evapotranspiration estimation ［J］. Journal of Hydrology， 1997， 199： 3-12. |
| 52 | HOBBINS M T， RAMIREZ J A， BROWN T C. The complementary relationship in estimation of regional evapotranspiration： an enhanced advection‐aridity model ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2001， 37（5）： 1 389-1 403. |
| 53 | HOBBINS M T， RAMíREZ J A， BROWN T C. The complementary relationship in estimation of regional evapotranspiration： an enhanced Advection-aridity model ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2001， 37（5）： 1 389-1 404. |
| 54 | LHOMME J P. An examination of the Priestley-Taylor equation using a convective boundary layer model ［J］. Water Resources Research， 1997， 33： 2 571-2 578. |
| 55 | TIAN F， HU H， LEI Z. Thermodynamic watershed hydrological model： constitutive relationship ［J］. Science in China （Series E）， 2008， 51（9）： 1 353-1 369. |
| 56 | KATERJI N， PERRIER A. Modelisation de l'evapotranspiration reelle d'une parcelle de luzerne： role d'un coefficient cultural ［J］. Agronomie， 1983， 3（6）： 513-521. |
| 57 | HAN Songjun， HU Heping， TIAN Fuqiang. Evaluation of applicability of three evapotranspiration models using meteorological data ［J］. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering， 2009， 40（1）： 75-81. |
| 57 | 韩松俊， 胡和平， 田富强. 三种通过常规气象变量估算实际蒸散量模型的适用性比较 ［J］. 水利学报， 2009， 40（1）： 75-81. |
| 58 | THOM A S. Momentum， mass and heat exchange of plant communities［M］// MONTEITH J L. Vegetation and the atmosphere. New York： Academic Press， 1975： 57-109. |
| 59 | ZHANG L， HICKEL K， DAWES W R， et al. A rational function approach for estimating mean annual evapotranspiration ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2004， 40： W02502. DOI：10.1029/2003WR002710. |
| 60 | YANG H， YANG D， LEI Z， et al. New analytical derivation of the mean annual water-energy balance equation ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2008， 44（7）： W03410. |
| 61 | FU Baopu. On the calculation of the evaporation from land surface ［J］. Acta Meteorologica Sinica， 1981， 39（2）： 226-236. |
| 61 | 傅抱璞. 土壤蒸发的计算 ［J］. 气象学报， 1981， 39（2）： 226-236. |
| 62 | FU Baopu. On the calculation of evaporation from soil ［J］. Scientia Atmospherica Sinica， 1981， 5（1）： 23-31. |
| 62 | 傅抱璞. 论陆面蒸发的计算 ［J］. 大气科学， 1981， 5（1）： 23-31. |
| 63 | TJ?RVE E. Shapes and functions of species-area curves： a review of possible models ［J］. Journal of Biogeography， 2003，30（6）： 827-835. |
| 64 | GOUTELLE S， MAURIN M F， BARBAUT X， et al. The Hill equation： a review of its capabilities in pharmacological modelling ［J］. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology， 2008， 22（6）： 633-648. |
| 65 | GIORDANO F R， WEIR M D， FOX W P. A first course in mathematical modeling ［M］. Richard Stratton， 2013. |
| 66 | MA N， ZHANG Y， XU C Y， et al. Modeling actual evapotranspiration with routine meteorological variables in the data-scarce region of the Tibetan Plateau： comparisons and implications ［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research： Biogeosciences， 2015， 120. DOI：10.1002/2015JG003006. |
| 67 | ZHOU H X， HAN S J， LIU W Z. Evaluation of two generalized complementary functions for annual evaporation estimation on the Loess Plateau， China ［J］. Journal of Hydrology， 2020. DOI：10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124980. |
| 68 | GAO B， XU X. Derivation of an exponential complementary function with physical constraints for land surface evaporation estimation ［J］. Journal of Hydrology， 2020，5931117.DOI：10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125623. |
| 69 | BRUTSAERT W， LI W， TAKAHASHI A， et al. Nonlinear advection‐aridity method for landscape evaporation and its application during the growing season in the southern Loess Plateau of the Yellow River basin ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2017，53： 270-282. |
| 70 | AI Z， WANG Q， YANG Y， et al. Estimation of land-surface evaporation at four forest sites across Japan with the new nonlinear complementary method ［J］. Scientific Reports， 2017， 7（1）： 17793. |
| 71 | ZHOU H X， LI Z， LIU W. Connotation analysis of parameters in the generalized nonlinear advection aridity model ［J］. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology， 2021， 301/302（11）：108343. |
| 72 | LIU X， LIU C， BRUTSAERT W. Regional evaporation estimates in the eastern monsoon region of China： assessment of a nonlinear formulation of the complementary principle ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2016， 52： 9 511-9 521. |
| 73 | BRUTSAERT W， CHENG L， ZHANG L. Spatial distribution of global landscape evaporation in the early twenty first century by means of a generalized complementary approach ［J］. Journal of Hydrometeorology， 2020， 21： 287-298. |
| 74 | SZILAGYI J， CRAGO R， MA N. Dynamic scaling of the Generalized Complementary Relationship （GCR） improves long-term tendency estimates in land evaporation ［J］. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences， 2020， 37（9）： 975-986. |
| 75 | KOVáCS G. Estimation of average areal evapotranspiration— proposal to modify Morton's model based on the complementary character of actual and potential evapotranspiration ［J］. Journal of Hydrology， 1987， 95（3）： 227-240. |
| 76 | CRAGO R， SZILAGYI J， QUALLS R， et al. Rescaling the complementary relationship for land surface evaporation ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2016， 52（11）： 8 461-8 471. |
| 77 | CRAGO R D， SZILAGYI J， QUALLS R. Comment on： a review of the complementary principle of evaporation： from the original linear relationship to generalized nonlinear functions by S. Han and F. Tian ［J］. Hydrology & Earth System Sciences， 2021， 25（1）： 63-68. |
| 78 | MA N， SZILAGYI J. The CR of evaporation： a calibration‐free diagnostic and benchmarking tool for large‐scale terrestrial evapotranspiration Modeling ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2019， 55（8）： 7 246-7 274. |
| 79 | HAN S， TIAN F. Comment on "a calibration-free formulation of the complementary relationship of evaporation for continental-scale hydrology" by J. Szilagyiet al. ［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research： Atmospheres， 2021， 126： e2020JD033403. |
| 80 | WANG L， HAN S， TIAN F. At which time scale does the complementary principle perform best on evaporation estimation？［J］. Hydrology and Earth System Science， 2021， 25（1）： 375-386. |
| 81 | LIU X， LIU C， BRUTSAERT W. Investigation of a generalized nonlinear form of the complementary principle for evaporation estimation ［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research： Atmospheres， 2018， 123（8）： 3 933-3 942. |
| 82 | WANG L， HAN S， TIAN F. Comparison of formulating apparent potential evaporation with pan measurements and Penman methods ［J］. Journal of Hydrology， 2021， 592： 125816. |
| 83 | ZHANG L， CHENG L， BRUTSAERT W. Estimation of land surface evaporation using a generalized nonlinear complementary relationship ［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research： Atmospheres， 2017， 122（3）： 1 475-1 487. |
| 84 | YANG Y， CHEN R S， Song Y X， et al. Evaluation of five complementary relationship models for estimating actual evapotranspiration during soil freeze-thaw cycles ［J］. Hydrology Research， 2021， 52（2）： 431-449. |
| 85 | MA N， SZILAGYI J， JOZSA J. Benchmarking large-scale evapotranspiration estimates： a perspective from a calibration-free complementary relationship approach and FLUXCOM ［J］. Journal of Hydrology， 2020， 590. DOI：10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125221. |
| 86 | MA N， SZILAGYI J， ZHANG Y， et al. Complementary‐relationship‐based modeling of terrestrial evapotranspiration across China during 1982-2012： validations and spatiotemporal analyses ［J］. Journal of Geophysical Research： Atmospheres， 2019， 124（8）： 4 326-4 351. |
| 87 | QUALLS R J， CRAGO R D. Graphical interpretation of wet surface evaporation equations ［J］. Water Resources Research， 2020， 56： e2019WR026766. |
| 88 | SZILAGYI J. On the thermodynamic foundations of the complementary relationship of evaporation ［J］. Journal of Hydrology， 2021， 593. DOI：10.10161j.jhydrol.2020.125916. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
甘公网安备62010202000687
