Application of Nano Ion Microprobe Insitu Analysis in the Evolution of Earth’s Early Life
Received date: 2012-12-11
Revised date: 2013-02-05
Online published: 2013-05-10
When life arose on Earth is an unresolved scientific issue, Therefore, it is of great significance to explore the origin of life on Earth and search for possible extraterrestrial life by identifying early life. Morphological or chemical features of life are the most compelling evidence for biogenic in origin. However, morphology is not sufficient to prove biogenicity, as many inorganic processes can result in similar features. In addition, the earliest life on Earth were extremely small and poorly preserved because they went through various geological destructive processes in the long geological time, so it is very difficult to use conventional analytical methods to study those early life in situ. Fortunately, NanoSIMS has very high spatial resolution. And with Cs+ primary ion source that is used to gain nonmetal elements or isotope information, its spatial resolution can promote to 50 nm, which can effectively solve the problems of early life on Earth we are facing. In this paper, five study examples related to early life are presented, which show the great important role NanoSIMS plays in searching for early life.
By using the liferelated element (like C, N, S) distribution images obtained by NanoSIMS, we can directly observe the distribution of the life-related elements (like C, N, S) in the study area. And after excluding the biogenic processes, the close relationship among C, N, S and other elements indicates a biological origin;
at the mean time, C and S isotope data of the obtained micro in situ area can further help to determine whether the socalled “organism” is a true organism or “biological trails” is truly caused by biological activities.
Key words: Early life on Earth; NanoSIMS; Carbon isotope; Sulfur isotope
Chen Yali , Chu Xuelei , Zhang Xingliang , Zhai Mingguo . Application of Nano Ion Microprobe Insitu Analysis in the Evolution of Earth’s Early Life[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2013 , 28(5) : 588 -596 . DOI: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2013.05.0588
[1]Wacey D, Kilburn M R, Mcloughlin N, et al. Use of NanoSIMS in the search for early life on Earth: Ambient inclusion trails in a c. 3 400 Ma sandstone[J].Journal of the Geological Society, 2008, 165(1): 43-53.
[2]Wacey D, McLoughlin N, Whitehouse M J, et al. Two coexisting sulfur metabolisms in a ca. 3 400 Ma sandstone[J].Geology, 2010, 38(12): 1 115-1 118.
[3]Wacey D. Stromatolites in the ~3400 Ma Strelley Pool Formation, Western Australia: Examining biogenicity from the macro-to the nano-scale[J].Astrobiology, 2010, 10(4): 381-395.
[4]Rasmussen B, Fletcher I R, Brocks J J, et al. Reassessing the first appearance of eukaryotes and cyanobacteria[J].Nature, 2008, 455(7 216): 1 101-1 104.
[5]Nishizawa M, Maruyama S, Urabe T, et al. Micro-scale (1.5 μm) sulphur isotope analysis of contemporary and early Archean pyrite[J].Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, 2010, 24(10): 1 397-1 404.
[6]Wacey D, Kilburn M R, Saunders M, et al. Microfossils of sulphur-metabolizing cells in 3.4-billion-year-old rocks of Western Australia[J].Nature Geoscience, 2011, 4(10): 698-702.
[7]Rasmussen B, Blake T S, Fletcher I R, et al. Evidence for microbial life in synsedimentary cavities from 2.75 Ga terrestrial environments[J].Geology, 2009, 37(5): 423-426.
[8]McLoughlin N, Wacey D, Kruber C, et al. A combined TEM and NanoSIMS study of endolithic microfossils in altered seafloor basalt[J].Chemical Geology, 2011, 289(1): 154-162.
[9]McLoughlin N, Wilson L, Brasier M. Growth of synthetic stromatolites and wrinkle structures in the absence of microbes—Implications for the early fossil record[J].Geobiology, 2008, 6(2): 95-105.
[10]Kung C C, Hayatsu R, Studier M H, et al. Nitrogen isotope fractionations in the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis and in the Miller-Urey reaction[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1979, 46(1): 141-146.
[11]Hayatsu R, Studier M H, Matsuoka S, et al. Origin of organic matter in early solar system-VI. Catalytic synthesis of nitriles, nitrogen bases and porphyrin-like pigments[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1972, 36(5): 555-571.
[12]Kasting J F, Howard M T. Atmospheric composition and climate on the early Earth[J].Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2006, 361(1 474): 1 733-1 742.
[13]Robert F, Selo S, Hillion F, et al. NanoSIMS images of Precambrian fossil cells[C]∥36th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Texas:League City, 2005.
[14]Kilburn M R, Wacey D. Elemental and isotopic analysis by NanoSIMS: Insights for the study of stromatolites and early life on Earth[M]∥Stromatolites: Interaction of Microbes with Sediments. Netherlands:Springer,2011,118: 463-493.
[15]Shen Y, Buick R, Canfield D E. Isotopic evidence for microbial sulphate reduction in the early Archaean era[J].Nature, 2001, 410(6 824): 77-81.
[16]Shen Y, Farquhar J, Masterson A, et al. Evaluating the role of microbial sulfate reduction in the early Archean using quadruple isotope systematics[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2009, 279(3): 383-391.
[17]Ueno Y, Ono S, Rumble D, et al. Quadruple sulfur isotope analysis of ca. 3.5 Ga Dresser Formation: New evidence for microbial sulfate reduction in the early Archean[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2008, 72(23): 5 675-5 691.
[18]Philippot P, Van Zuilen M, Lepot K, et al. Early Archaean microorganisms preferred elemental sulfur, not sulfate[J].Science, 2007, 317(5 844): 1 534-1 537.
[19]Canfield D E, Teske A. Late Proterozoic rise in atmospheric oxygen concentration inferred from phylogenetic and sulphur-isotope studies[J].Nature, 1996, 382(6 587): 127.
[20]Habicht K S, Canfield D E. Sulfur isotope fractionation during bacterial sulfate reduction in organic-rich sediments[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1997, 61(24): 5 351-5 361.
[21]Canfield D E, Thamdrup B. The production of 34S-depleted sulfide during bacterial disproportionation of elemental sulfur[J].Science, 1994, 266: 1 973.
[22]Schidlowski M. Carbon isotopes as biogeochemical recorders of life over 3.8 Ga of Earth history: Evolution of a concept[J].Precambrian Research, 2001, 106(1): 117-134.
[23]Farquhar J, Bao H, Thiemens M. Atmospheric influence of Earth’s earliest sulfur cycle[J].Science, 2000, 289(5 480): 756.
[24]Farquhar J, Savarino J, Airieau S, et al. Observation of wavelength-sensitive mass-independent sulfur isotope effects during SO2 photolysis: Implications for the early atmosphere[J].Journal of Geophysical Research, 2001, 106(E12): 32 829-32 839.
[25]Pavlov A A, Kasting J F. Mass-independent fractionation of sulfur isotopes in Archean sediments: Strong evidence for an anoxic Archean atmosphere[J].Astrobiology, 2002, 2(1): 27-41.
[26]Johnston D T, Wing B A, Farquhar J, et al. Active microbial sulfur disproportionation in the Mesoproterozoic[J].Science, 2005, 310(5 753): 1 477-1 479.
[JP2][27]Wacey D, Saunders M, Brasier M D, et al. Earliest microbially mediated pyrite oxidation in ~3.4 billion-year-old sediments[J].Earth and Planetary Science Letters,2011,301(1):393-402.[ZK)][JP]
[28]Brocks J J, Logan G A, Buick R, et al. Archean molecular fossils and the early rise of eukaryotes[J].Science, 1999, 285(5 430): 1 033-1 036.
[29]Brocks J J, Buick R, Summons R E, et al. A reconstruction of Archean biological diversity based on molecular fossils from the 2.78 to 2.45 billion-year-old Mount Bruce Supergroup, Hamersley Basin, Western Australia[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2003, 67(22): 4 321-4 335.
[30]Hofmann H. Precambrian microflora, Belcher Islands, Canada: Significance and systematics[J].Journal of Paleontology, 1976: 1 040-1 073.
[31]Javaux E J, Knoll A H, Walter M R. TEM evidence for eukaryotic diversity in mid-Proterozoic oceans[J].Geobiology, 2004, 2(3): 121-132.
[32]Schopf J W. Fossil evidence of Archaean life[J].Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2006, 361(1 470): 869-885.
[33]Horodyski R J, Knauth L P. Life on land in the precambrian[J].Science, 1994, 263(5 146): 494.
[34]Tyler S A, Barghoorn E S. Ambient pyrite grains in Precambrian cherts[J].American Journal of Science, 1963, 261(5): 424-432.
[35]Knoll A H, Barghoorn E S. Ambient pyrite in Precambrian chert: New evidence and a theory[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1974, 71(6): 2 329-2 331.
[36]Kilburn M R, Wacey D. NanoSIMS analysis of Archean fossils and biomarkers[J].Applied Surface Science, 2008, 255(4): 1 465-1 467.
/
〈 |
|
〉 |